Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The need of animal rights
Why animals deserve rights
Why animals deserve rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The need of animal rights
Have you ever wondered how the world would be if animals had a voice? Some have great intelligence already but imagine with the ability to speak they will evolve into a new species. Animals have many similarities with humans. For example they think, feel, and live exactly like people. The only difference that there maybe is speech. Animals can only do so much when they are trying to communicate. For example, they whimper, growl, or bark when they are in pain. Animals cannot tell a person if they are in pain or if they are unhappy. That is why humans have to be the voice for animals. While exploring these things, I agree with Tom Regan that animals should have rights.
I agree with John Stuart Mills when he states that we have first find the
…show more content…
have in common with each other is animals. It is more like humans depend on animals rather than the other way around. If people take animals for granted, sooner or later there may be no animals to depend on. According to Adaptt “More than 150 billion animals are slaughtered every year” (No author). The question is why? Why are innocent animals being killed? The reason is selfishness and the thought of being superior. Some people may believe that humans are superior to animals. That since they are superior, animals do not have a right in anything. Even though animals also feel emotions, thoughts are going through their head, and they live a life. Animals do not like being caged up, poked by needles, or being abused emotionally and physically. Human babies do not know how to talk yet, they don’t think of consequences yet, and they are helpless during the first year. However, no one has ever thought on experimenting on babies or no one has ever put a babies in a cage to amuse other people. Even though babies do not have a voice yet, they have their parents be their voice for them. If experimenting or abusing babies is seen as inhumanly then experimenting or abusing animals should also be seen as
In the article you published called “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin states “Many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined.”. I agree and believe society should be more involved into the way we do things that involves animals. We need to be more aware about the animals and that they have feelings and emotions too and we should not be taking advantage of that. Rifkin stated a lot of good points and arguments. I honestly do not agree we should end all animals deaths, but I do believe there should be an awareness against animal cruelty.
We brutally inflict pain upon the animals, not exclusively in the final moments as they are being slaughtered, but for the most part, during their entire life. Many animals know nothing other than a life in a dark, crowded barn or factory treated as meat before they are even killed. These terrible conditions blatantly show that we do not care about these animals and we simply rear and kill them in order to satisfy our trivial interests. The cruelty imposed upon these helpless animals is shocking and it is not rare for people to turn a blind eye to the brutality. Another commonplace would be for a meat consumer to say that humans are “ends in themselves, while everything other than a person can only have value for a person” (C. Vlastos). People believe that animals are on this earth simply for human consumption, which can be easily
We can see the idea that we killing each other for food and/or survival makes us animals rather than human in the memoir Night by Elie Weisel wher the men were fighting all they could to get a crumb of bread and Elie touring through bodies to breath, current and historical events when Richard Parker killed his crew mate and the RUF group eating human corpses to intimidate their enemies, and personal observation and experiences where in Battle Royal and The Hunger Games where people were put in an isolated area to fight to the death. When we kill each other, it shows inhumanity towards ourselves when we as humans should work together and not cause conflict and fight or even kill one another.
Animals are used today for many sources of protection, food, clothing, transportation, sports, entertainment, and labor, but millions of these animals die each year from abuse. “Most of the reasons that people give for denying animals rights are: animals do not have souls, god gave humans dominion over the animals, humans are intellectually superior to animals, humans are intellectually superior to animals, animals do not reason, think, or feel pain like humans do, animals are a natural resource to used as humans see fit, and animals kill each other” (Evans). It all started in the nineteenth century, when people began abusing animals by beating them, feeding them poorly, providing them with no shelter or poor shelter, left to die if they were sick or old, or by cruel sports. Most of the organized efforts to improve human treatment of animals all started in England. Around the 1800s, there was signs of rising concern for animal welfare in the United States.
feelings as well as humans. We do not kill humans if they kill or eat
In conclusion, I agree with Tom Regan’s perspective of the rights view, as it explores the concept of equality, and the concept of rightful treatment of animals and humans. If a being is capable of living, and experiencing life, then they are more than likely capable of feeling pleasure and pain, except in a few instances. If humans are still treated in a respectable and right way even if some cannot vote, or think for themselves, then it is only fair that animals who also lack in some of these abilities be treated as equals. As Regan puts it, “pain is pain, wherever it occurs” (1989).
The debate of whether animal rights are more important than human rights is one that people have argued mercilessly. Some people think all animals are equal. To understand this, humans must be considered animals. Humans are far more civilized than any animal, they have the power, along with understanding to control many types of sickness and disease. This understanding that humans have, keeps them at the top of the food chain.
Those without a voice are the people’s responsibility to protect. Animals provide us with food, clothes, companionship, and beauty. One of the endangered species has been killed for their ivory. Asian and African elephants have been slaughtered for nothing but their tusks.... ...
Our case is that if we don’t test on animals then progress in scientific fields would be halted. As first speaker for the negative I will speak about the benefits of animal testing in general and then I’ll talk in detail about animal testing in medicine. My second speaker will talk about the opinions on testing and the food chain and my third speaker will summarise our points and rebut.
Animals are so often forgotten when it comes to the many different levels of basic rights. No, they can’t talk, or get a job, nor can they contribute to society the way humans can. Yet they hold a special place in their owners’ hearts, they can without a doubt feel, show their different emotions, and they can most definitely love. In recent years there has been a massive increase in animal rights awareness, leading to a better understanding and knowledge in the subject of the humane treatment of animals. Where do humans draw the line between the concern of equality, and simple survival?
The truth is that animals have right and humans cannot ignore their rights ever they cannot express their mind through speaking. According to the article” Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing,” animals’ right are violated when the sciences are doing the research and there are many similar ways between humans and animals, such as feel and behave. Even though animals cannot express their opinion, they still
However, it is the purpose of this essay to convince the reader otherwise. The question at hand is: do animals deserve rights? It must certainly be true. Humans deserve rights and this claim is made on numerous appeals. Of one of the pertinent pleas is made on the claim that humans can feel emotions. More importantly, that humans are capable of suffering, and that to inflict such pain is unethical. Those who observe the tortures of the Nazi Concentration Camp are instilled with a humane creed held for all humans. But if there is no significant gulf between humans, that is to say there is no gulf based on skin color, creed, or gender that will make one human more or less valuable than any other, then by what right can a gulf be drawn out between humans and our fellow creatures? The suffering of humans is why we sympathize with each other. Since animals suffer, they deserve our sympathy.
The biocentric worldview, which is life centered, focuses on the importance of all living things and considers all living things to have intrinsic value. I will be using Peter Singer’s ideas as the main focus explaining that animals share equal moral status with human beings and that therefore is unethical for people to kill and eat them. In “All Animals are Equal” by Peter Singer recognizes that there are differences between humans and other species. As he ...
Should animals have the same rights as humans? The answer is simply an opinion, but before someone decides whether or not animals have rights they must first take into consideration a few things. First, one must decide what the term “rights” is referring to: moral rights or legal rights. Secondly, one must determine what the term animal is referring to: are humans considered animals? Thirdly, one must ask are animals’ sentient beings: Can animals feel pain and suffer? The next element is to take into consideration is all of the beneficial and atrocious aspects of animal testing, and then decide if the beneficial aspects outweigh the atrocious aspects or vice-versa. The final step is to decide if there is a middle ground to the argument: Can animals have rights
Throughout the history of the world, there have been subjects of heated debates; there are a few facts that are undisputed. One of the undisputed facts is that animals existed and inhabited the planet before humans did and humans have been dependent on animals for thousands of years. Animals have played a very vital part in our history and one wonders whys should they be treated with much cruelty. While animals have been a great resource, a steady supply of food and clothing and even security, our treatment towards them has become nothing short of appalling. Since humans are dependent on animals for their well being, their comfort and at times their religion, there should be a moral obligation to treat animals.