Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal rights vs human rights
Do animals have rights
The use of animals in medical research is a necessary evil
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Animal rights vs human rights
Nicole Fontaine
Delgado
W131: Sec. 33399
September 18, 2015
Animal Rights
The right to life, liberty and freedom, the pursuit of happiness, and the right to be free from slavery are just some of the basic human rights. Although animals’ rights aren’t completely alike, they do exist and are similar to some human rights. Some common misconceptions are that if we don’t use animals, we would have to use humans to test drugs and that hunting is necessary for controlling animal populations. Animal rights are rights believed to belong to animals to live free from use in medical research, hunting, and other services to humans.
Animal rights organization PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) further explains animal rights as “recognizing
animals are not ours to use—for food, clothing, entertainment, or experimentation”. All animals have the capacity to feel pain, loneliness, love, fear, and frustration. An easier way to explain animal rights, though, is through a historical timeline of animal rights movements. One of the first major events occurred in 1966 when the Animal Welfare Act was signed (Favre). This law regulates the treatment of animals in research, exhibition, transport, and by dealers. In her article, “Historical Timeline of the Animal Rights Movement,” animal rights attorney Doris Lin states that in 1987 California high school student Jennifer Graham made national headlines when she refused to dissect a frog and a few years later, in 1989, Avon, an international manufacturer, stopped testing their products on animals. Following that, “in 1990, Revlon also stopped testing their products on animals” (Lin). In the years following, acts and laws were passed in order to protect animals and their rights. Lin states that in 1992 the Animal Enterprise Protection Act was passed. Later, in 2001, Compassion Over Killing, a nonprofit animal advocacy organization, conducted an open rescue at a battery hen facility, documented abuses, and rescued eight hens. In 2004, popular clothing chain Forever 21 promised to stop selling fur. Also, in 2009, the European Union banned cosmetics testing and the sale or import of seal products. As you can see by the historical timeline of events, the animal rights movement has been taking place for a long time and will continue for years to come until animals are treated with the same respect as humans. Some examples of animal rights are killing animals for fur or food, using animals for testing cosmetic products, hunting, and enclosing wild animals in a zoo or aquarium. A recent issue was brought up about the use of Ovis 21 lamb fur in Patagonia clothing products. When people found out that workers would pick up lambs while fully conscious, tie their legs together, and start skinning them for their fur, many complaints were filed against Patagonia’s use of their fur. On August 17, 2015, following PETA’s expose, Patagonia announced that it was dropping Ovis 21 as a supplier and would not buy wool from the company again until they insured “humane treatment of animals.” This is just one way people nowadays are still fighting for the humane treatment of animals and this type of pro-humane treatment of animals will likely continue throughout the years.
Animal rights can defined as the idea that some, or all non-human animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and that their most basic interests should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings. Animal rights can help protect the animals who experience research and testing that could be fatal towards them. The idea of animal rights protects too the use of dogs for fighting and baiting. Finally, animal rights affects the farms across america, limiting what animals can be slaughtered. The bottom line is, there is too much being done to these animals that most do not know about.
After reading “Do Animals Have Rights?” by Carl Cohen, the central argument of the article is that rights entail obligations. Cohen examines the syllogism that all trees are plants but does not follow the same that all plants are trees. Cohen explains the syllogism through the example of hosts in a restaurant. They have obligation to be cordial to their guests, but the guest has not the right to demand cordiality. Cohen explains using animals, for example his dog has no right to daily exercise and veterinary care, but he does have the obligation to provide those things for her. Cohen states that animals cannot be the bearers of rights because the concept of rights is essentially human; it is rooted in, and has force within, a human moral world. Humans must deal with rats-all too frequently in some parts of the world-and must be moral in their dealing with them; but a rat can no more be said to have rights than a table can be said to have ambition.
PETA is arguably the largest animals’ rights organization in the world with more than 5 million members and supporters. They go further to say they are against the use of animals in food, clothing, research, and entertainment industries and claim to spread their message through public education, cruelty investigations, research, animal rescue, legislation, special events, celebrity involvement, and protest campaigns. This is all according to their website of course; however, a deeper look reveals another meaning filled with hypocrisy, deceit, terror, and greed.
4. What is Animal Rights? Animal Rights is the thought of letting animals get the basic rights. They don’t want animals to be caused pain, or be exploited/killed by humans. It does not mean equality between humans and animals.
In his Meditations, Rene Descartes argues that animals are purely physical entities, having no mental or spiritual substance. Thus, Descartes concludes, animals can’t reason, think, feel pain or suffer. Animals, are mere machines with no consciousness. Use the Internet to explore the issue of animal rights. Investigate the legacy left by Rene Descartes concerning the moral status of animals.
Many countries around the world agree on two basic rights, the right to liberty and the right to ones own life. Outside of these most basic human and civil rights, what do we deserve, and do these rights apply to animals as well? Human rights worldwide need to be increased and an effort made to improve lives. We must also acknowledge that “just as one wants happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not die, so do other creatures” (Dalai Lama). Animals are just as capable of suffering as we are, and an effort should be made to increase their rights. Governments around the world should establish special rights that ensure the advancement and end of suffering of all sentient creatures, both human and non-human. Everyone and everything should be given the same chance to flourish and live.
As an advocate of animal rights, Tom Regan presents us with the idea that animals deserve to be treated with equal respect to humans. Commonly, we view our household pets and select exotic animals in different regard as oppose to the animals we perceive as merely a food source which, is a notion that animal rights activists
the same rights as humans do. Like us, animals can feel pain and fear, but also
In the 1970s the question of animal rights became a major social issue that more people started to take notice and action in. This discovery of the cruelty these animals go through, lead animal cruelty to become a serious issue in our world today. To understand how animals could be treated so unjustly one would need to know that many believed that animals could not feel pain. However, animals can feel pain just like humans can and using them for experimentation causes them extreme pain. “Each year, more than 100 million animals are killed in the U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics” (Peta 1). With countries having inadequate regulations to protect animal’s rights the chances of that number dropping are slim to none.
"The Case For Animal Rights" written by Tom Regan, promotes the equal treatment of humans and non-humans. I agree with Regan's view, as he suggests that humans and animals alike, share the experience of life, and thus share equal, inherent value.
Animals will have rights when they have the means to enforce them. They don't have the ability to reason as humans do. The human race has such a vast understanding of the necessities for all of the different species of animals to exist. Humans are far superior to any other animal because they are so advanced in technology. One advantage of advanced technology is, humans can store information as reference material. With all of this reference material humans can look back at previous mistakes so they don't do the same thing again. With this knowledge, humans can see and predict outcomes before a choice is made. Humans have the knowledge to enforce their rights, something no other animal has.
... concept. An animal cannot follow our rules of morality, “Perhaps most crucially, what other species can be held morally accontable” (Scully 44). As a race humans must be humane to those that cannot grasp the concept. Animals do not posess human rights but they posess the right to welfare and proper treatment by their handlers.
It is the notion of our time that non-human animals exist for the advancement of the human species. In whatever field -- cookery, fashion, blood-sports -- it is held that we can only be concerned with animals as far as human interests exist. There may be some sympathy for those animals, as to limit practices which cause excruciating suffering, but those may only be limited if they are brought to public light, and if legislators receive enough pressure from the public to change.
Animals have their own rights as do to humans and we should respect that and give them the same respect we give each other. Animals deserve to be given those same basic rights as humans. All humans are considered equal and ethical principles and legal statutes should protect the rights of animals to live according to their own nature and remain free from exploitation. This paper is going to argue that animals deserve to have the same rights as humans and therefore, we don’t have the right to kill or harm them in any way. The premises are the following: animals are living things thus they are valuable sentient beings, animals have feeling just like humans, and animals feel pain therefore animal suffering is wrong. 2 sources I will be using for my research are “The Fight for Animal Rights” by Jamie Aronson, an article that presents an argument in favour of animal rights. It also discusses the counter argument – opponents of animal rights argue that animals have less value than humans, and as a result, are undeserving of rights. Also I will be using “Animal Liberation” by Peter Singer. This book shows many aspects; that all animals are equal is the first argument or why the ethical principle on which human equality rests requires us to extend equal consideration to animals too.
Animal rights are the privileges for all animals to live freely from any harm. There were