Animal Farm Rhetorical Analysis

593 Words2 Pages

“Don’t let totalitarianism take over your society because, once it does, you are screwed.” - George Orwell. Orwell’s Animal Farm serves as a moral allegory that sheds light on the corrupt nature of human behavior. It is initially shown through the dynamic between Mr. Jones and the animals, but as the story unfolds, we see the pigs begin to take on the same traits that led to the rebellion against the humans in the first place. Eventually, readers come to realize that the desire for power was the main factor in the division between the animals. This ties into Orwell’s overall message that power corrupts power and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Throughout the storyline of Animal Farm, the main idea presented is “four legs good, two legs bad.” However, the irony behind this objective is shown through the pigs’ continuous transformation into their so-called enemies, the humans. For example, the passage says, “‘You have heard then comrades,’ he said, ‘that we pigs now sleep in the beds of the farmhouse? And why not? You did not suppose, surely, that there was ever a ruling against beds? A bed merely means …show more content…

Napoleon is presented as the worst aspect of human behavior. His abuse of said power and desire to be in total control is what ultimately led to the ruin of unity between the animals as a whole. Any sign of opposition to his demands became an issue and resulted in dreadful outcomes, ultimately affecting the entire farm. We see a prime illustration of this in chapter 7 which says, “Napoleon acted swiftly and ruthlessly”. He ordered the hens’ rations to be stopped, and decreed that any animal giving so much as a grain of corn to a hen should be punished by death.” The animals’ initial dreams of freedom and equality were shattered by one of their own. This very thing went against Old Major’s statement, “Remember, comrades, your resolution must never

Open Document