When someone betrays us, our first response as humans is anger. But anger only gives you a split second of power and fuels bad decisions. It forces you into a corner and makes you easily angry. Instead of turning to anger, we can learn to understand other’s perspective before taking actions we will regret later on. Anger promotes the need to fill emptiness to conceal feelings. Zits finally returns to his own body with two guns in his jacket pocket, deciding whether to shoot or not. He looks at a little boy standing next to his mother and thinks :“I hate him for being loved so well. I want to be him.” Zits misses motherly love and is always searching to fill the emptiness in his heart. To a certain degree, Zits acts out because of the memory of his father, a drunk. He feels that if he behaves likes his father, it will bring him closer to him. Zits plans to shoot everyone in the bank because he believes that it will bring his mother back. He wants the boy’s perfect life with no suffering. But after all the transformations, he realizes that there is no such thing as completeness and no …show more content…
suffering. Notably, Zits he sees Jimmy as a man who is loved by everyone, yet in the end, he loses everyone that he loves. Everyone suffers in a different way and are “ all in this together.” In the end, there is no point in acting with anger because everyone is the same. They all live imperfect lives just like Zits. Further, anger only gives you illusions of strength.
Zits is always angry because he feels betrayed by his family and blames them for all the pain they have caused. Once he meets Justice, he learns how to feel powerful and take revenge. Justice gives Zits two fake guns to practice shooting at random strangers without any hesitation. Gradually, Zits is able to shoot people without regret because his anger blinds him from seeing the damage he is causing. Anger prohibits us from realizing that someone has more than one characteristic than our first impressions of them. There is only instantaneous jolt of power. That feeling tells you that someone has wronged you and you have the authority to do whatever you want until there is reconciliation. Anger is a result of fear and lack of self confidence when dealing with betrayal. However, that anger doesn’t signify strength, only
blindness. In like manner, forgiving and understanding someone doesn’t mean forgetting, but helps to cope with betrayal. Zits gets the opportunity to transform into his father’s body and understand why he left Zits, blaming his father for all the grief and emptiness in his life. His father doesn’t want to think back to that painful moment or feel the regret of leaving his own son. Through his memories, Zits sees the reminiscence of the hospital in which he was born in. In that instant, he feels pain in his father’s chest. Zits’ father remembers being eight years old, ready to go to sleep after going shooting earlier that day. His father (Zit’s grandfather) found out that he didn’t shoot anything and was told that he was worth nothing. He (Zit’s father) repeated it over and over again and believed it. Zits understood that his “father, [was] whipped and bloodied by this memory.” He knows that his father ran away not because he didn’t love him, but because he loved him too much and was scared to ruin Zits’ life like his own father did. Until that moment, Zits was convinced his father didn’t want him or love him and was angry at him. Once he stopped chasing for an answer to his betrayal, he was able to let go of anger. The key antidote to betrayal is overcoming fear and understanding the other’s perspective of the situation. Once you know both sides of the story, patience and forgiveness will conquer anger.
When times get tough, many people turn away from everyone and everything. It must be part of human nature to adopt an independent attitude when faced with troubles. It is understandable because most people do not want to trouble their loved ones when they are going through problems, so it is easier to turn away than stick together. Maybe their family is going through a rough patch and they reason they would be better off on their own. This path of independence and solitude may not always be the best option for them or their family, though. Often times it is more beneficial for everyone to work through the problem together. It is not always the easiest or most desirable option, but most times it is the most efficient and it will get results in the long run. In The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck makes this point very clear through several characters. Many characters throughout
Holiness, sin, and life are repeatedly questioned throughout John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath, particularly by the former preacher, Jim Casey. As a preacher, Casey only preaches what the bible states and he resigns from his occupation after he feels the urge to pursue life's true meaning and values of the individual - basically to make sense of the world he resides in. Casey closely resembles the character and motives of Jesus Christ, as he is enthused to uncover the answers to his wonders and doubts and begins to hold new beliefs of sacrificing the self to sustain the rights of society.
Steinbeck's intercalary chapters in The Grapes of Wrath have nothing to do with the Joads or other characters of the novel, but help describe the story in different terms. They are similar to poems, offering different viewpoints of the migration, and clarifying parts of the story that the reader might not understand. An excellent example of this use can be seen in chapter 21, where an examination of the attitudes of migrant Okies and the residents of California reveals the changing nature of land ownership among the changing population of California and gives greater meaning to the fierce hostility that the Joads meet in California.
A popular literary technique that can be found in a number of literary works is the biblical allusion. John Steinbeck perfects this technique in his novel The Grapes of Wrath by introducing a character who is symbolic of Jesus Christ. This character, Jim Casy, not only shares initials with this biblical figure, but he also grows thoughout the novel as a speaker, a mediator, an organizer, and, most remarkably, a martyr.
Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath is a realistic novel that mimics life and offers social commentary too. It offers many windows on real life in midwest America in the 1930s. But it also offers a powerful social commentary, directly in the intercalary chapters and indirectly in the places and people it portrays. Typical of very many, the Joads are driven off the land by far away banks and set out on a journey to California to find a better life. However the journey breaks up the family, their dreams are not realized and their fortunes disappear. What promised to be the land of milk and honey turns to sour grapes. The hopes and dreams of a generation turned to wrath. Steinbeck opens up this catastrophe for public scrutiny.
Steinbeck's relationship to the transcendentalists [Emerson, Thoreau, and Whitman] was pointed out soon after The Grapes of Wrath appeared by Frederick I. Carpenter, and as the thirties fade into history, Jim Casy with his idea of the holiness of all men and the unreality of sin seems less a product of his own narrowly doctrinaire age than a latter-day wanderer from the green village of Concord to the dry plains of the West.
The differences between selfishness and selflessness are strong throughout The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. Everywhere the Joad family goes there is always someone to either push them into the dirt or give them a hand out of the dirt. This happened far and wide, people can be greedy, selfish, and rapacious. It’s in our nature, but even in desperate times when people have a right to be selfish, some will find the will in their heart to aid those who can’t help themselves.
In the novel The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck the author uses excessive profanity, religion, and migrants to show the hard times family’s had to go through in the 1930’s. Most people believe that Steinbeck novel is too inappropriate for high school students because of its content. This novel should be banned from the high school curriculum.
A betrayal by someone who you trust emotionally impacts you in a variety of ways. Sinclair Ross’ short story The Painted Door prominently shows the reasons of why a person would choose to betray their partner. The story is set in an isolated farmhouse in the prairies where a married couple, named Ann and John lives. After John’s trip to his father’s house he arrives back home and sees that Ann has been unfaithful. Although people know the effects of betrayal they still carry out this act. The main reason that people betray loved ones is due to the fact humans yearn for companionship, crave the thrill of new experiences and desire change to keep them fulfilled.
Big Brother expecting you to work, make sustainable income, provide for a family, and pay taxes all while making nearly minimum wage. Today's issues are that “irrelevant” jobs don’t make enough to live off of. This was the conflict in the novel, The Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck. This realistic fiction book takes place during The Dust Bowl in the 1930’s. This goes to show how even after all those years, income concerns still haven't changed. There are many current similarities that go hand in hand in with the novel. Some examples of the similarities are: low salary, characters compared to modern protesters, and plot parallels to real world occurrences.
People are angry or furious but when the time passes they do not even remember their anger. Should they be angry at the moment or should they accept it as Martha C. Nussbaum says in the “Anger and Forgiveness” book? In the Middle Realm, anger is the “domain of life” (p. 138) and how we spend our life. Nussbaum says that we deal with people who we meet temporary: at work, at the store or in the street on a regular basis. In addition, she points out that in this realm we do not get into a deep relationship with these people, and this is a short term situation. Furthermore, Nussbaum says that she find it easy to transition herself to a non-anger situation with people who she loves. On the other hand, she finds it harder to transition from this
The worst part about betrayal is that most people never even find out that they have been betrayed. A man could go on vacation, cheat on his wife, return home, and she would never find out. Cheaters and other traitors often tend to have the mindset of “I never lied, you just didn’t ask.” Another popular phrase is “It’s not illegal if you don’t get
Thesis: Betrayal is a form of deception and disloyalty that breaks people’s trust, creates conflicts, jeopardizes relationships, impacts people in a negative manner and leads people to their demise.
Anger is a signal …. It may be a message that we are being hurt, that our rights are being violated; that our needs or wants are not being adequately met or simply that something is not right ( 1).
Anger can help or hurt out relationships whether it be with coworkers, friends, boyfriends or family members. When we have a conflict