Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial profiling and its effects on society
Rodney king trial paper
Civil disobedience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial profiling and its effects on society
In today’s society, the excessive use and abuse of force is still an existing controversy. In this project the main adjective was to look at two incidents that have occurred in past years and pinpoint if there was any indication of abuse of authority. One which was the controversial Rodney King case that caused uproar in the civil rights activist community and a case that many are not so familiar with such as the Andrew Meyer case. In both cases, it appeared that there was evidence of abuse of authority. In both videos, it showed people of different ethnicity, settings and predicaments that set the tone for each video. Each video can be argued; “Well they should not have resisted”; while others can argue “it was just too excessive for there …show more content…
In this video, Meyer’s was attending a forum held by senator Kerry in which he asked a few questions and made a few statements. Yes, Meyer’s began to get a little irate and problematic; which in return they cut his mic. Some could argue “he should have taken that as a que to walk away and not to continue his rant” this is very true; but it still gave the officers no right to handled him so roughly as if he was a crazed murder, or if he had made some sort of death threat to senator Kerry. In the video two officers approached Andrew in a very ambushing way, which would make one come to a defense mode right away. As Mr. Meyer was carried away you can hear him yelling “Why am I being arrested”; confusion, fear and anger can instantly be felt by Andrews remarks. As he was thrown to the ground the audience can hear him say “please don’t tase me”; in the audience, someone yells “he has the taser on his chest”. One can only imagine the fearful thoughts that could have passed through Andrew’s mind. In the video, suddenly a zap is heard and Andrew’s yell echoed through the auditorium. In this case abuse of authority was shown when they took away Mr. Meyer’s amendment of freedom of speech. In no instance did Andrew make a threat to the senator or any of the audience; in this case, no police should have been involved if there was no indication of endangerment to himself or others. Also, right away they put their
You would think Andre Rand would have come to his senses after being sentenced to 25 years to life in prison. However, that was not the case. Rand cast himself as a “scapegoat victim” of a “corrupt” legal system, according to a series of letters he wrote and sent to a newspaper dating back to 1994.(Donnelly) In 1969, Andre Rand convicted his first act as a suspected serial killer, and convicted murderer. This must have set off a trigger in his mind that told him mentally to forever be a kidnapper, killer, and pedophile. Rand did not stop his ways after his 1969 act of crime.
Street was arrested after burning the flag and yelling “we don’t need no damn flag” into the crowd. Instead of focusing on the burning of the flag and deciding whether or not it is protected under the First Amendment they focused on Street’s oral remarks (“Timeline of
The beating of Rodney King from the Los Angeles Police Department on March 3, 1991 and the Los Angeles riots resulting from the verdict of the police officers on April 29 through May 5, 1992 are events that will never be forgotten. They both evolve around one incident, but there are two sides of ethical deviance: the LAPD and the citizens involved in the L.A. riots. The incident on March 3, 1991 is an event, which the public across the nation has never witnessed. If it weren’t for the random videotaping of the beating that night, society would never know what truly happened to Rodney King. What was even more disturbing is the mentality the LAPD displayed to the public and the details of how this mentality of policing led up to this particular incident. This type of ethical deviance is something the public has not seen since the civil rights era. Little did Chief Gates, the Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, and the LAPD know what the consequences of their actions would lead to. Moving forward in time to the verdict of those police officers being acquitted of the charges, the public sentiment spiraled into an outrage. The disbelief and shock of the citizens of Los Angeles sparked a mammoth rioting that lasted for six days. The riots led to 53 deaths and the destruction of many building. This is a true but disturbing story uncovering the ethical deviance from the LAPD and the L.A. riots. The two perspectives are from the Rodney King incident are the LAPD and the L.A. riots.
In the book, the author inform how effective is the lawsuit or criminal prosecution to help resolve police brutality. As a failure, it has been explained about how it wo...
Over the years, this country has witnessed many cases of police brutality. It has become a controversial topic among communities that have seen police brutality take place in front of their homes. Officers are faced with many threatening situations everyday forcing them to make split second decisions and to expect the worst and hope for the best. Police officers are given the power to take any citizens rights away and even their lives. With that kind of power comes responsibility, that’s one major concern with the amount of discretion officers have is when to use force or when to use lethal force. The use of excessive force may or not be a large predicament but should be viewed by both the police and the community.
Police brutality is a very real problem that many Americans face today. The police carry an enormous burden each day. Police work is very stressful and involves many violent and dangerous situations. In many confrontations the police are put in a position in which they may have to use force to control the situation. There are different levels of force and the situation dictates the level use most of the time. The police have very strict rules about police use force and the manner in which they use it. In this paper I will try to explain the many different reason the police cross the line, and the many different people that this type of behavior effects. There are thousands of reports each year of assaults and ill treatment against officers who use excessive force and violate the human rights of their victims. In some cases the police have injured and even killed people through the use of excessive force and brutal treatment. The use of excessive force is a criminal act and I will try and explore the many different factors involved in these situations.
Skolnick, J., Fyfe, J. (1993) Above the law: Police and the Excessive use of force. United States: The Free Press
Background and Audience Relevance: According to the Human Rights Watch 2012 report on Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States; police brutality has become one the most serious human rights violation. As citizens of the United States it is our duty to make sure that those with authority don 't take advantage of their power.
This year there's been a lot of brutalities. In fact, there have been at least 500 people killed by the police officers this year. In this article, we are going to be talking about police brutality against African Americans. We are also going to talk about the differences and similarities of different cases that have been in the news this year. For example, the Sandra bland, Eric Garner, Michael Brown, and the Walter Scott cases. Also, we're going to talk about how these cases have affected the African American community.
Just how much force is appropriate under various circumstances can be debatable. When an officer uses excessive force, he or she violates the law. Most brutality is directed against minority groups or otherwise powerless populations. Officers who engage in brutality rationalize their use of extralegal force, they claim they are punishing those groups that threaten to disrupt the social order. The importance of understanding racism in the context of police brutality cannot be underestimated. Many police officials automatically regard racial minority group members as potentially dangerous regardless of their particular activities, gestures, or attire. This perception of racial minority citizens as “trouble” sometimes translates into racially discriminatory police behavior. Most police officers expect citizens to always surrender to police authority. When citizens challenge it instead, some officers view such behavior as the unofficial crime of disobeying a police officer and use physical force to gain compliance. So what can be done to help prevent police brutality around our
This issue being addressed and investigated is the police use of deadly force and the contents that lead up to the use of deadly force. Looking at police policies and the statistics of officer involved shootings of unarmed victims just simply doesn’t add up. The use of deadly force has continued to increase as decades past and determining the issues behind it is crucial for helping maintain a positive image from the public of police officers. Incidents such as Michael Brown and Ferguson are the cases that provide the evidence needed to prove deadly force is not always the option and can be overused by police officials at times but is also sometimes necessary depending on the circumstances. The primary cause of this issue is
Of late, more public protests and riots regarding police brutality have emerged. I can speculate that the number of police brutality has most likely not increased, but the public awareness of this crime is on high alert. The “change of patterns of political opportunities and constraints and the use of strategic repertoire of collective action” are the reason for this sudden mobilization. As this social movement received national attention, the asymmetrical power between the states and social movement became more balances. Law makers are now being personally requested by their African American constituents to comply with greater consequences for police brutality. In addition, with national recognition, local states governments can no longer cover up or pay off the victims’ families; therefore, political constraints or the “repressive factors of the protest and the authorities’ capacity to present a solid front to insurgent and discourage contention” is failing. With this in mind, Michael Lipsky would say that with this opportunity and national attention, the recent police brutality cases provide a collective incentive to mobilize and challenge the
Police brutality is an act that often goes unnoticed by the vast majority of white Americans. This is the intentional use of “excessive force by an authority figure, which oftentimes ends with bruises, broken bones, bloodshed, and sometimes even death” (Harmon). While law-abiding citizens worry about protecting themselves from criminals, it has now been revealed that they must also keep an eye on those who are supposed to protect and serve.
Although they are very closely related, power and authority are two different concepts. Power is needed in order to establish authority, yet it is also completely distinct from authority (Week 9 Study Notes).
Cases in which police, prison guards and other law enforcement authorities used extreme force to violate victims’ civil right. It increased from fiscal years 1960’s, according to the Time Magazine. The composer’s primary audience is a prisoner. It made me think so because police brutality has been around since the police have been around. Although most people generally think of the highly publicized riots in the 1960s, police brutality occurred well earlier that and still happens currently. This form of police misconduct occurs when a police officer using their power, and physical rather than verbal. There are unfortunately many examples of police brutality that have happened over the past decades. The author’s secondary audiences might be prison guards. The writer addresses the audience the right to prosecute prison guards. The right to sue prison guards for any brutality is mandatory to prisoners. Other issues contain access to proper medical care and liberty from harm from other inmates. The author tries to create with the audience the immoral relationship between a police and prisoners. Police brutality is a form of police misconduct that happens all around the world nowadays. It has come to light more in recent years, after the attacks in the United States. The author of Time Magazine says, “To attack the basic prison problem-isolation from society”. It is hard to prosecute police attitudes because of the laws protecting police