Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary essay murder on the orient express
Literary analysis and then there were none
Analysis of agatha christie's female characters
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Summary essay murder on the orient express
And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie and the movie, Murder on the Orient Express, Show that it is wrong to take justice into your own hands. And Then There Were None is actually a perfect example that shows that “Now look here, my dear girl, you just listen--” And then he sprang. Quick as a panther--as any other feline creature… Automatically Vera pressed the trigger... “ (264). This quote is perfect because it takes place when Vera shoots Lombard thinking that he is the murderer, so she took justice into her own hands by shooting who she thought he was, I thought that she should've not have killed him because they trusted each other, so seeing Vera shooting Lombard is really a shocking part of the novel, and I don’t think it was really necessary for her to shoot …show more content…
Another quote that follows the last one is, “We are good civilized people and then evil got over the wall, and we looked to the law for justice, and the law let us down.” (1:10:23). Poirot is telling that it is against the law to take justice into your own hands and unfortunately the woman that said the second quote was trying to explain that the law let them down by saying the evil got over the wall. Poirot later then explains that by murdering someone makes them savages, as Poirot described, the woman getting beat by a rock in the middle of the streets, and these kinds of people deserve to be punished and go through severe consequences. But the group of 12 still try to defend the subject by saying that she was only 5 years old and that Ratchet still deserves to be dead. They should have told Poirot first so that by the end when they get out of the train they could've had reported to Poirot and Poirot could of have told police like this the professionals could have had killed or given the consequences that Ratchet
have performed evil action on others will never get away with their misconducts. In the book,
“I say I say, God is dead!” This quote was stated by John Proctor, a character from The Crucible, when he was accused of witchcraft by Mary Warren. John Proctor is a hardworking person, but he is a sinner too, he had an affair, he does not go to church because he hates Reverend Parris. John and I have a few personality traits in common, in that we are both hardworking men, we sinned a few times, but at the end we are honest.
In this paper, I’m going to talk about these two intriguing movies. The movies that I will be elaborating on is “And Then There Were None”, and “Clue”. In my paper, I will be examining the similarities and differences the plot of the two murder mysteries were different and similar. I will also try to find the similarity between the plot of these two movies. In my paper, I will be discussing the difference between the two movies murder scenes. I hope you think my Compare and Contrast paper is intriguing.
John Proctor is, at first, willing to offer up a false confession that his life may be spared. Inevitably, John Proctor possesses that fateful attribute known to fall fatal to many human beings - pride. While he has, indeed, been ashamed of his many sins throughout his life, Proctor's soul still clings to his pride and his good name, however soiled it may have become. On the morning scheduled for his execution, Proctor wrestles with the realization that one more sin so heaped upon the rest in his life will make precious little difference in the end; "I cannot mount the gibbet like a saint. It is a fraud. I am not that man.... My honesty is broke... I am no good man. Nothing's spoiled by giving them this lie." (126) He attempts to calm his pride by telling himself that the other accused witches who will not give false testimony to save themselves from the gallows have every right to do so; they led lives free of blame. He, however, he tells himself, did no such thing; what right has he to hang among the righteous? "Let them that never lied die now to keep their souls. It is pretense for me, a vanity that will nor blind God nor keep my children out of the wind." (126) Thus the conviction first reached by John Proctor is to save his life rather than to throw it away in mock martyrdom.
Both Cates, in Inherit the Wind by Lee and Lawrence, and Procter, in The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, are both subjected to unjust laws. Both demonstrated that , "if the law is of such a nature that it requires one to be an agent of injustice toward another, then I say break the law," as stated by Henry David Thoreau. When a law is put into effect that will convict a person who is a free thinker then it is a unjust law. One might as well break it because if no one stands up for the principle then than law will stay in effect until adverted again.
The pardoner telling a story about greed and saying that if you don’t repent you will get what’s coming to you. A great example of this is in line 289-290, “Thus these murders receive...
In lieu of the fact that Rignall could not give them much information, the Police were unable to be of much help. In fact even wh...
“I did not intend to pay, before the gods,/for breaking these laws/because of my fear of one man and his principles.”
To conclude, The Crucible, all began from simple accusations against a hand full of girls and later developed into great hysterias that are still known today. The author conveys that not all people who claim to be motivated by principles are, most are motivated by greed or
“Whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”
For sure, there are criminals who have no conscience to guide them as they walk these streets. For sure, there are sick people in the world who rather molest a child before one of their age, which neither is justified. And for sure, they are people who would act as God and take ones life away because they feel like it. It is the reality of society, however, we must not incarcerate people for the small things, instead we must help them as citizens. Works Cited: Linklater, Veronica.
The plot of “Witness for the Prosecution” takes the viewer on a rollercoaster ride as the mystery of Emily French’s, a wealthy widow, murder unfolds in the courtroom. Leonard Vole visits the office of Sir Wilfrid for legal advice because he suspects that he will be arrested and charged with Mrs. French’s murder. Consequently, Vole’s suspicion came to fruition when he was arrested minutes are voicing his concerns. Sir Wilfrid accepted Vole’s case after he consults with a fellow barrister (attorney). Christine Helm, Vole’s wife and a former actress, graces Sir Wilfrid’s office with her presence to corroborate Vole’s story confirming his alibi. During the trial, Christine is not called as a witness for the defense; however, she is called as a witness for the prosecution. The mysterious death of Emily French resulted ...
...solve the crimes. Poirot is ordinary person not the police, so he has no rights to arrest twelve juries. Last, police are not smarter than Poirot, so the sleuth knows they want to hear the simple answer.
‘Acts of whatever kind, which, without justifiable cause, do harm to others, may be, and in the more important cases absolutely require to be, controlled by the unfavorable sentiments, and, when needful, by the active interference of mankind. The liberty of the individual must be thus far limited; he must not make himself a nuisance to other people.’
An example of this is the incident where Maya was raped by Mr. Freeman. Maya was placed before court because of this incident with Mr. Freeman and she lies to the court to defend her innocence as a sinful young girl. In later chapters, the book states that Mr. Freeman was murdered and Maya reacts to that by thinking “He was gone, and a man was dead because I lied. Where was the balance in that? One lie surely wouldn’t be worth a man’s life” (Angelou 86).