Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Themes of books by Agatha Christie
Christianity beliefs on justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Themes of books by Agatha Christie
Maddie Paule Mrs. Reasons ELA 8-5 23 Oct. 2017 And Then There Were None and Wolf Rider: Pursuing Justice In March of 1984, Jeff Doucet exited his plane and was shot in the head by Gary Plauce because Doucet had been accused of kidnapping Plauce’s son. This is just one real-life incidence of someone taking something into their own hands. In the mystery novel And Then There Were None by Agatha Cristie, a retired judge named Justice Wargrave feels the system has failed to punish people who have committed or been linked to the murder of an individual. Justice had already received a terminal diagnosis and decided to invite those guilty individuals to an island and commit a mass murder. In Wolf Rider by Avi, a teenager, Andy, receives a phone call …show more content…
from a man calling himself Zeke claiming to have killed a girl named Nina. Andy becomes far too obsessed with finding out who Zeke really is; this puts him in danger and results in Andy being sent by his father to live with his aunt. A theme that develops throughout the two novels is taking things into one’s own hands seldom yields positive results. Said theme is present all throughout the first half of And Then There Were None.
Macarthur had been reflecting on the gramophone’s accusation that he’d committed murder: “Yes, he’d sent Richmond to his death and he wasn’t sorry.” (Christie 83). He had deliberately sent a family friend to his death for having an affair with his wife. Macarthur was shown as being in the wrong for this all throughout the novel, even though he showed no remorse. However, Macarthur was one of the individuals Wargrave chose to kill because he felt that Macarthur had done wrong, this obviously isn’t a positive result and definitely was not what Macarthur had hoped would happen. Likewise, In the latter half of Cristie’s novel, the theme continues to present itself. In Wargrave’s manuscript, he leaves a detailed explanation for his crimes: “I considered a type dangerous and unfit to live.” (Christie 289). He took it upon himself to gather and murder people he had deemed unworthy of life. He collected a bunch of names of those who he believed hadn’t been adequately punished, and invited them to an island under a pseudonym in order to kill them. There aren’t any positive outcomes from his mass murder. Several lives are lost, including Wargrave’s, because he eventually kills himself after his final victim has …show more content…
died. In Avi’s Wolf Rider, this theme is shown in the first portion of the novel.
Andy and his father were arguing about Andy’s obsession with Nina and the true identity Zeke. His father was begging him to stop pursuing the case: “It’s all in your head!” (Avi 83). He is trying to convince Andy that he’s making far too big of a deal out of the entire incident that could actually still just be a practical joke at this point. Andy doesn’t listen to his father’s pleas, and continues to pursue the phone call. His desired result is finding out who Zeke is and protecting Nina. However, he gets unhealthily obsessed and constantly feels responsible for Nina and her
safety. In the final half of Avi’s novel, the theme remains there. Andy, his father, and his father’s girlfriend go to the park. Andy breaks from the group to call Zeke. He feels guilty and almost as if he’d betrayed his father: “He was worried if he stopped something would happen to Nina.” (Avi 151). Andy is recognizing his obsession. He acknowledges that he needs to stop before he gets even more involved than he already is but he just cannot stop himself. Andy had gotten too involved with the case, he couldn’t stop thinking about it. In conclusion, it rarely turns out well when one takes things into their own hands is a theme that resonates throughout the two novels. The books both have characters that take things into their own hands, and receive consequences from that choice. Andy chooses to pursue Zeke, and is sent away from his father. Wargrave kills people he’s decided don’t deserve live, but it results in his own suicide. This can be connected to the real-life case involving Jeff Doucet and Gary Plauce from the earlier statements. Plauce was seeking justice for his son, and while he may have gotten it, he was sent to prison for his actions.
The Shotgun stalker is a serial killer who terrorized the Washington, D.C area for two months in 1993. He would do random drive-by shootings using a 12-gauge shotgun. His name is James Swann Jr., was African American he was born in 1964. James was a New Jersey native. He moved to Oxon Hill with his sister a few years prior to the shootings. He worked as a security guard; however, Swann was fired because he insisted on walking backward while patrolling the aisles of a drugstore. In the 1980’s mental illness began to show in James. He did not try to find professional help for his mental disorders. In 1993, James Swann Jr., attempted to kill 14 people, and murdered 4 on Washington, D.C.
Andy goes to psychologist, Dr. Carrothers, to discuss his depression about Rob's death. He does not think he needs to be there because he is fine in school and he is fine at home. Andy talks about why the accident is his fault. He realizes he needs help with his depression and wants to come back for another visit to discuss what is going...
When one thinks of serial killers, the first thoughts that come to that person are usually of cold blooded adults. Two young, carefree teenagers almost never come to mind, and most would never even consider the idea. Charles Starkweather and Caril Fugate may just change the way people think of serial killers. The young couple rampaged across the state of Nebraska in early 1958, murdering ten people along the way. Most wonder what could cause such young people to turn into murderers with what seemed to be no conscience at all. Did Starkweather have a bad childhood? Bullying could have played a part in causing Charles to turn out the way he was. Caril Fugate became involved with Starkweather at the age of 13 and many questioned if it was possible for someone so young to have played a part in something as awful as murder. As the duo traveled, fear was struck into the public. No one knew why the victims were chosen. Did Starkweather or Fugate have a grudge against them? Were they trying to stop the two, or was it just sheer bad luck? Like most criminals, the pair was caught. They each had very different verdicts. Charles Starkweather and Caril Fugate changed the history of Nebraska drastically in just a short amount of time.
Case one was in August of 1906 when John asked Polly Hutchison’s parents for permission to ask for Polly’s hand in marriage. They were all very excited about this “and a bit relieved after Jack’s dramatic announcement, that if he wasn’t allowed to marry Polly, he would blow his brains out” (8). People who have a stable mental state do not threaten to commit suicide, especially when it is hardly necessary. In another instance, Simmie mentions Jessie having to hide John’s guns; “she had hidden his service revolver more than once when he threatened to kill himself,” (110). A new wife having to hide her husband’s service revolver to prevent him from committing suicide is not normal and is just another reason Sergeant John Wilson is insane. As well, while John is fantasizing about a life with Jessie he considers how great his life could be if Polly “conveniently died”(56). Luckily for Polly, John decides not to proceed in that direction right away because many people in Regina know Polly, but he never once states murder would be wrong. John having thoughts of harming him or others for personal benefits is not a healthy mentality to
Michael Kirk and Peter J. Boyer. (2000, January 18). The killer at Thurston High. May 5, 2010, by FrontLine: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kinkel/etc/script.html
There are many ways to decide what makes a man guilty. In an ethical sense, there is more to guilt than just committing the crime. In Charles Brockden Browns’ Wieland, the reader is presented with a moral dilemma: is Theodore Wieland guilty of murdering his wife and children, even though he claims that the command came from God, or is Carwin guilty because of his history of using persuasive voices, even though his role in the Wieland family’s murder is questionable? To answer these questions, one must consider what determines guilt, such as responsibility, motives, consequences, and the act itself. No matter which view is taken on what determines a man’s guilt, it can be concluded that Wieland bears the fault in the murder of Catharine Wieland and her children.
In 2012, there were an estimated 14,827 murders and non-negligent manslaughter crimes reported by all agencies in the United States according to the Uniform Crime Report at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter are defined “as the willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another.” A 1.1 percent increase occurred from 2011 to 2012. But it should be noted, this is a 9.9 percent drop from the figure for 2008 and a 10.3 percent decrease from the number of murders recorded in 2003. Of the murders that occurred in 2012, it is estimated that 43.6 percent were reported in the south, 21.0 percent were from the Midwest, 21.0 percent were accounted from the west, and 14.2 percent were from the northeast
Both Truman, and the U.S. Joint Chief’s of Staff (a collection of high ranking officers from all of the armed forces) disapproved of MacArthur’s actions, but were reluctant to do anything about it because of his tremendous popularity. In Tokyo, MacArthur met with diplomats from Spain and Portugal, and made it clear he wanted war with China. The diplomats related this to their home governments in telegrams that were intercepted by the NSA (National Security Agency). This was reported to Truman and he knew that MacArthur needed to be fired. The problem was that Truman could not report that the US had been listening in on other countries secret communications. So Truman was forced to wait until there was another reason to let MacArthur go, one that could be published and not embarrass the US.
In my opinion, I don’t think Andy Kaufman hid himself from the show business, there proof out there that the girlfriend he was with, had saw him died on the hospital bed when he had lung cancer. I also think that the reason that his brother is saying he got a letter from him and that he faked his death, might be because he really misses his brother and wants to get the idea that he is still alive and just away in a trip with his family. The supposed daughter that came out of nowhere might just want attention and make other people think Andy is alive so she can get money out of it. Well we did get a big joke of Andy, a joke that no one really knows if he is still alive or dead, but a for sure fact that I know is that people do or say anything just to get money out of it or get attention as well.
Wargrave lead the characters to have both internal and external conflicts. For example external conflicts “ They felt now like the people just awaking from a nightmare. There was danger, yes, but it was danger in daylight. That paralyzing atmosphere of fear that had wrapped them round like a blanket yesterday while the wind howled outside was gone” (Christie 243). These people are so terrified they are not getting sleep, barely eating, and hardly talking. They are living they worst nightmare. Not only that Wargrave is killing people but he is also scaring the people that is alive more and more which is causing them to have internal conflicts. For example Vera Claythorne ,the protagonist went through the deepest internal conflict “What was that-hung from the hook in the ceiling? A rope with a noose ...
Know the consequences- Wargrave knew he would be killing the ten people ahead of time and strongly believed that he was giving them what they deserved.
First and foremost, is the case of Peter Reilly. Peter Reilly was convicted of manslaughter at the age of nineteen in 1974 (Lender, 2011). Reilly had found his mother dead in their home (Lender, 2011). Peter Reilly was interrogated without legal council for over an entire day’s t...
Not all murders involve guns. According to data from the United States Department of Justice, in the year 2008, 5,340,000 violent crimes were committed in the United States. However, only eight percent, or 436,000 of these crimes were committed by criminals that were armed with any kind of firearm (Agresti). Even with laws that ban guns from being purchased, a killer could easily obtain a gun by stealing it. In 2010, there were approximately 300 million guns known to be owned by American citizens (Agresti). On the topic of suicide, if somebody has a strong intent on ending their life, and they cannot access a gun, they will find another way to accomplish the task, without using a gun (Lunger, 77). The presence of guns in the hands of the general public is a key element to prevent crime. Steve Agresti has ...
With the typical mystery novel falling between the common outline of victims and an unknown criminal that is painted in a dull and consistent palette of predictability, every single character in this storyline is a criminal but also a victim of their own guilt. Rather than exploring the mere surface of leveled justice, a deeper meaning of the concept is reached as death is doled out in an order of increasing guilt; those who are less guilty die towards the beginning of the purge to evade the anxiety and panic that haunts one as they continue their trek and witness their fate. Evading the governmental justice system before, the characters are emotionally tortured as they succumb to their thoughts and mortality, but because humans are innately imperfect, the justice system is also flawed.
Mitchell, Heather, and Michael G. Aamodt. "The incidence of child abuse in serial killers." Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 20.1 (2005): 40-47.