Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ancient river societies
Compare ancient civilizations
River civilizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ancient River Civilizations: Similar yet Distinct and Unique
The four Ancient River Civilizations share similar core features within their societies; however, their cultures are still distinct and unique. In the Ancient World (±3500 BCE – ±500 BCE) there were four major river civilizations: Mesopotamia (±5000 BCE - ±33 BCE), the Indus Valley (±2100 BCE - ±1750 BCE), Egypt (±3100 BCE - ±323 BCE), and China (±2100 BCE - ±1368 CE). All four river civilizations’ core features are similar in their social structure, leadership, and agriculture. The differences between the river civilizations began in the geography of their placement, whether it is the rivers or the trade made possible through the geography. The river civilizations were distinct and
…show more content…
unique within their cultures, each having a different language, religion, construction projects, and trade. The Ancient River Civilizations shared core features within their social structure.
Social structures were formed into pyramid social structures with the king on top. Following the king would be the nobles then priests and so on, with slaves being at the bottom of the social hierarchy. Slavery made up a great deal of the societal hierarchy. One was not always a slave but with the conquest of land came slaves until they gained citizenship under the new ruler, as was the case in Mesopotamia. Another key element of the social structures was gender. The ancient river civilizations abandoned the matrilineal lineage of prehistory and adopted a patrilineal society. Husbands owned their wives and children, able to sell them into slavery and have control over them; which, in some cases, meant women were seen as second-class citizens. Each river civilization had a social contract that allowed them to form their societies. Furthermore, the core features of social structures were similar in all of the Ancient River …show more content…
Civilizations. The basis of leadership in the Ancient River Civilizations remained uniform throughout the each of the four civilizations: having a powerful army and divine influence. Time periods were broken up into dynasties that followed familial lines, such as the Qin dynasty (±221 BCE - ±206 BCE) of China. Although the basis of leadership was similar, the titles and divinity of the rulers varied between the river civilizations. Mesopotamian leaders were called king and were either divinely influenced or partially divine. Unlike Mesopotamia, Egyptian leaders were one hundred percent divine and were called pharaoh. Chinese rulers were the least divine, only being divinely influenced, requiring the Mandate of Heaven to rule, and were called emperor. Furthermore, the similarity between the Ancient River Civilizations and their basis for leadership is undeniable. Agriculture was vastly important for sustaining the growing population and was similar throughout the Ancient River Civilizations. By developing their civilizations between or near rivers, the earth was fertile and able to sustain immense amounts of crops, although not unlimited, to feed the population. All of the river civilizations improved upon and used similar agricultural structures, such as the irrigation systems used to water the crops. Furthermore, agriculture was a core similarity between the Ancient River Civilizations. While the society of the Ancient River Civilizations was similar, the geography began to depict the difference between them. All four river civilizations are located near or between one or more river; however, each river civilization is near a different river. Mesopotamia was located between the Tigris and Euphrates River and experienced unpredictable and inconsistent flooding, while Egypt was located along the Nile River which experienced predictable, annual flooding. For Egypt this meant an expected crop yield if there was not a drought, in retrospect, this meant Mesopotamia has an irregular crop yield due to the unknown factor of flooding. The rivers were not the only distinct geographic feature between the river civilizations. Depending on the geography of the land, some of the river civilizations differed in that their culture did not change due to being closed off, as is the case with Egypt. Egypt’s isolation led to a static culture where ideas did not change. On the other hand, both Mesopotamia and China had distinctly dynamic cultures due to the open geography of the land. This brought new ideas into the culture, allowing it to flourish. The open geography also promoted more trade due to accessibility. Furthermore, the geography of the Ancient River Civilizations shows that they are distinctly unique from one another. The culture of the Ancient River Civilizations was distinct and unique from one another. For the ancient river civilizations, religion was a fundamental component of everyday life: it formed the peoples’ cosmology. The four major river valley civilizations believed in divine influence. When something strange occurred, such as a drought, the gods were considered the cause as a way to inform the population that the King was no longer fit to rule. They believed in polytheism and a pantheon for them; however, the religions of the four river civilizations remained distinct from one another despite core similarities. Mesopotamia’s religion was constantly changing due to the subsequent conquest of the region, causing new and old religion to amalgamate. Mesopotamia believed in anthropomorphic gods, unlike Egypt whose gods were zoomorphic. Mesopotamia did not always change its religion due to a new ruling empire, as was the case with the Persians, who brought Zoroastrianism, the core of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, to Mesopotamia but did not require the worship of it from the Mesopotamian people. Unlike the Persians, who allowed the Mesopotamians to keep their polytheistic religion, the Egyptian Pharaoh Amunhotep (±1350 BCE), later Akhenaton, converted Egypt to a monotheistic religion, Atenism, following the sun god, Aton; however, Tutankhamun brought back polytheism. China was the only river civilization that had no uniform religion, but rather, core components of religion. The Chinese believed in magic and spells, practicing herbalism on the sick. The religion of China was described as animistic and shamanistic, with the Taoism and Confucianism being ways of thinking about the world. The Mesopotamians did not hold any significance in the dead, unlike China and Egypt. Egypt, in particular, stressed the importance of afterlife and developed extensive preparations for it. They practiced mummification and buried their pharaohs and their families in tombs with their belongings to go with them to the afterlife where they would join the gods. China held similar importance to the dead but did not hold extreme faith in the afterlife. The Chinese believed in ancestral power, demanding the respect of one’s ancestors to gain favor and guidance. Furthermore, while each Ancient River Civilization had a religion, they were dissimilar from one another. Each ancient river civilization had a form of writing; however, they each used a different writing system and language. Mesopotamia’s writing system was cuneiform, sharp like a nail in appearance, while Egypt used hieroglyphics, a pictographic language. China pioneered writing with the invention of the printing press during the Tang dynasty (±618 CE - ±907 CE). Mesopotamia, Egypt and China all had remaining texts of their civilizations; however, each text was different. The Egyptians’ Book of the Dead illustrated the process of mummification, while Mesopotamia’s Hammurabi’s Code pertaining to laws of conduct in Mesopotamia and consequences of actions. Furthermore, while each Ancient River Civilization had a writing system, their writing system and language are distinct to each civilization. Large scale construction projects prevailed throughout the Ancient River Civilizations; however, each one built different types of structures.
In the case of Mesopotamia and Egypt, they both built pyramid-like structures but Mesopotamia built rough pyramid structures, called ziggurats, while Egypt built smooth pyramids. Mesopotamia’s ziggurats were temples of worship, whereas Egypt’s pyramids were tombs for their deceased pharaohs. Similar to Mesopotamia and Egypt’s building-like structures, China built the Forbidden City, which could house 10,000 people. Not all of the civilizations built large scale buildings, for instance, China also built the Great Wall, one of its largest projects. The Indus Valley’s large scale construction project was the great bath at the center of the city. Furthermore, despite each Ancient River Civilization partaking in large scale construction, each had a distinctly unique structure
built. While the Ancient River Civilizations share similar core features within their societies and various core features within parts of their cultures, they are still distinct and unique. Overall, the societies of the river civilizations were similar, but the geography differed past core features and their cultures diverged from each other. Furthermore, the ancient river civilizations are both similar and distinct from one another.
The ancient cultures of Mesopotamia and Egypt developed into successful civilizations. One civilization the Egyptians developed was in the Nile River valley. Based off the "Mesopotamia and Egypt DBQ" packet, "Ancient Egypt was an advanced civilization in many areas including religion, architecture, transportation, and trade. Ancient Mesopotamia was one of the first civilizations that developed a form of government as well as organized people in political states." Based on the documents, Egypt and Mesopotamia developed into successful and advanced civilizations by effectively using the resources that surrounded them to solve problems and live happily.
In 3000 BCE, the creation of the first early river civilization of Mesopotamia sparked the creation of other advanced civilizations around the world. These civilizations had developed in modern-day Egypt, China, and the Middle Eastern Region. The civilization of the Shang came to in 1750 BCE and could be located in modern-day China. The Indus River valley civilization, however, developed as early as 2500 BCE in present-day North-Western India. Similarities and differences between the two progressions were common in their political systems, religious ideas, and artworks. Although not closely located, the Shang and Indus River civilizations shared more similarities than differences in some aspects due to them both facing the same issues that
The first civilization to rise was the Mesopotamia, located in present day Iraq, between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, and Egypt, along the Nile River. It’s split in two ecological zones. In the south Babylonia (irrigation is vital) and north Assyria (agriculture is possible with rainfall and wells). By 4000 B.C.E., people had settled in large numbers in the river-watered lowlands of Mesopotamia and Egypt. Archaeologists have shown that large-scale irrigation appeared only long after urban civilization had already developed, meaning major waterworks were a consequence of urbanism (population). Mesopotamia cities were made of people called the Summerians in the land of Sumer located on the south of Babylonia. The Summerian city was one of
During the years of 3500 BC to 2500 BC, the geography of a land often impacted a civilizations development in great measures. Depending on the resources available or the detriments present due to certain topographical characteristics like rivers or deserts, a civilization could flourish or collapse. By studying the geographic features of growing societies like the Nile, Euphrates, and Tigris Rivers as well as the Mediterranean Sea of Egypt and Mesopotamia, the link between developing cultures and geography will be examined through sources, including Egypt: Ancient Culture, Modern Land edited by Jaromir Malek and Babylon: Mesopotamia and the Birth of Civilization by Paul Kriwaczek. To determine the extent of its influence, this investigation will attempt to compare and contrast the role of geography in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, focusing on the civilizations’ various periods of development and settlement.
Mesopotamian society was stratified into classes and social differences. It was composed of nobles, free clients of the nobility, commoners and slaves. Slave women participated in the textile industry. Free women did exist, however, men dominated the women in Mesopotamia. The nobles consisted of the king, his family, the chief priests, and high palace officials. The king was a war leader elected by the citizens. He established an army and led it into battle. Kingship was hereditary. Commoners were free citizens.
Water is one of the most important elements needed to sustain life. Some ancient civilizations struggled to maintain a steady supply of usable water, while others gained consistent access, and those that did, thrived. Nonetheless, these civilizations, whether they failed or succeeded, depended on water to drink and irritate their crops; without it, they suffered food shortages and famine. Ancient civilizations such as China, Egypt, Mesopotamia and Rome were among those whose advancement benefited from the successful cultivation of water. Even though man started out as hunters and gatherers, once knowledge about growing their own food and the domestication of plants occurred, civilizations are believed to have formed, and thus became dependent on agriculture and water. Water was the driving force of growth in ancient civilizations. A reliable source of water impacted the development of economies, drove religious views, shaped political and legal discussions and influenced the advancement of technologies in diverse civilizations that shared a common bond, the need for water to sustain life.
Both civilizations relied heavily on farmers being the life of the civilization and providers of food and other useful materials. Though farmers were essential for each of the civilizations, in both, they were at the bottom of the social ladder. However, in Egyptian society farmers can have their children learn a different skill, such as to become merchants and craftsman, and eventually, with a slight slim chance, get into the ruling class. This was not the case in the Aryan civilization as each person was born into a caste and could not move up or change their level in the caste system – the order being Brahmins (the priests and king), Kshatriyas (the warriors and aristocrats, the ruling class), Vaishyas (the cultivators, artisans, and merchants, and the Shudras (the peasants and surfs). Another major differentiation is that women did not have many rights in the Indian civilization, only men could own land and receive an education. Women were solely responsible for bearing children and maintaining the household. On the other hand, Egyptian women enjoyed a much higher status and greater independence then women elsewhere in the ancient world. As Ramses II declared “The foot of an Egyptian woman may walk where it pleases her and no one may deny her.” In comparison to the women of the Indus River Valley, Egyptian women lived the high life, as Egyptian law allowed for women to inherit property, enter
The ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt began to develop circa 3,000 B.C. Located near rivers, the lands offered fertile soil and an excess of crops that drew in many people. As more people arrived, the small settlements flourished into large, thriving civilizations. Many aspects of Mesopotamia and Egypt, such as their cities, their strongly organized government, and their religion, greatly contributed to the success of these two civilizations.
A consistent characteristic among the first civilizations was social stratification. In most of the first civilizations, social hierarchies included kings, the elites, the working class, and slaves. Social stratification was evident in the Mesopotamian and Egyptian societies based off of the documents from the Babylonian Empire, The Law Code of Hammurabi, and the Egyptian student text, Be a Scribe. In the document The Law Code of Hammurabi, soldiers, farmers, salves, and other jobs are mentioned (96-97). In the document Be a Scribe, farmers, cobblers, soldiers, and various other jobs are mentioned (100-101). It is significant that these jobs are mentioned in both documents because it illustrates the similarities in these civilization’s social hierarchies. But, the similarities in their social structures do not end there. Special treatment based off of social standing was a consistent factor in both of these civilizations as well. This is clearly exemplified in Mesopotamia with the harshness of punishments for crimes being dependent on class (97). In Egypt, evidence of special treatment based off of social stratification is insinuated in the document Be a Scribe. This document delves into the negatives of having low class jobs and encourages people to become educated to grow in class rank (101). Despite these similarities, these two civilizations still held vastly different values and
Mesopotamia arose before Egypt and influenced it in many ways, but the most influential was religion. Much like Mesopotamia, Egypt was polytheistic, however, they didn’t believe in gods. Instead, they believed in spiritual beings and that if they preserved their body (with their heart intact) that they would be all set to be sent into the afterlife. Polytheistic means they believed in more than one thing and in their cases, this meant either 3,600+ gods or 2,000 spiritual beings. Egypt and Mesopotamia both used temples, but Mesopotamia called them ziggurats. Ziggurats were large temples dedicated to the god of the city. The temple on top served as the god’s home and was beautifully decorated. Inside was a room for offerings of food and goods. They also believed kings and queens were descended from the city gods but were not actual gods. The kings and priests acted as interpreters as they told the people what the gods wanted them to do. In Egypt, the only people allowed in temples were priests and
These Early River Civilizations can be compared and contrasted in many different ways. The three ways I am choosing to juxtapose these civilizations are their government, their religion, and their ways of trying to control nature. Although the differences are prominent these civilizations can also be seen as very homogeneous.
No civilization would be a civilization without some sort of social structure, if nothing was in place, it would most likely be a madhouse. A social structure allows for people to hold different positions and places in society. It is what separates the high, middle, and low. This is something we have seen from the beginning with Kings and Pharaohs. Not everyone in society will be equal in regards to economic or educational status, this is a method of dividing the
Leonardo da Vinci once said, “Water is the driving force of all nature.” Water has been the most essential and sought out resource of all time, giving birth to infinite civilizations and establishments that we see today. From the beginning of man, water has allowed the settlement, growth, and expansion of humankind to become possible. Mesopotamia began at the cradle of civilization at the Fertile Crescent and only became a true civilization through irrigation. The Assyrians (12th to 7th century BC) changed the locations of their capital cities multiple times as conquest became more common but were able to do so due to their canal systems from nearby rivers and mountain ranges (Bagg 2000). These all served as blueprints for future civilizations
Approximately 5500 years ago four of the worlds' most prestigious ancient river civilizations had emerged. Our world has been left in astonishment and awe wondering how these civilizations were developed. Egypt and Mesopotamia were the first ancient river civilizations to create cities and their own ways of living. Society, geography, and religion played an enormous role in the development of the ancient cities. Although there is evidence of early Sumerian contact with the Egyptians, Egypt's civilization was largely self-generated and its history and cultural patterns differed from Mesopotamia.
Ziggurat’s building period took more extensive time than Egypt’s pyramids. From the third millennium to 600 BC, Mesopotamia’s tradition remained longer because they represent their Gods and were a symbolic trademark for the Mesopotamian