Ancient Egypt vs. Nubia
A debate has been raging recently regarding whether Nubia was equal in strength, power, and was as successful as Ancient Egypt. Many people believe that the Nubians were just as powerful as Ancient Egypt but in my opinion from the information I have read Egypt was the dominate culture. Egypt had many great natural resources that gave it an advantage over nearby areas such as gold, copper and stone for building monuments and temples. Next, Egypt had an army that was stronger in force and also had more modern tools and weapons for their use. Finally the Ancient Egyptians proved they were a successful empire due to the length of time they remained in control. We will look at both cultures closely and compare strengths
…show more content…
and weaknesses to decide whether Nubia rises to the same level as Egypt and see if my opinion is right. Egypt had a great wealth in its natural resources and weapons. With the Nile River running through Egypt, it provided many resources that the Egyptians used on a daily basis. Yearly flooding made the land fertile for growing crops. They were able to grow crops they could barter with. The river also helped with trading goods. Ancient Egypt had many natural metals that it mined such as gold, iron and copper. They used these metals for building as well as for weapons. Their weapons were far more advanced than other smaller empires. The size of the Egyptian army was also huge in comparison to other empires. This helped the Egyptian army and caused them to be a great force to be reckoned with.This massive army helped keep Egypt in control for centuries. All of these combined made Ancient Egypt strong, powerful and successful. The Nubians too also had valuable resources and a fierce army.
They had gold, ivory and other precious metals that were used for making various goods. Since Nubia was a major corridor to central Africa and point for trade, it made it a valuable territory. Egypt invaded Nubia and secured the corridor and most of their natural resources. According to an excerpt from ““Nubia – Its Glory and its people”, The Ancient Egyptians also captured 7000 Nubians and took them back to Egypt and used them as laborers on building projects. The took Nubian treasures and made them part of their wealth. While the Nubians had an army, it was not as large as the Egyptian army. Their weapons were not as advanced as they were made from reeds and stones. Only later when Nubia had a strong King would it rule Egypt. This of course was only for a short period of time though.
Both Ancient Egypt and Nubia were strong and powerful. Both had valuable resources and both had fierce armies. But when you compare the facts, Ancient Egypt was the stronger of the two. Egypt took control of Nubia, captured their people, claimed their resources and added it to Egypt's wealth. The Ancient Egyptian army was way more powerful than the Nubian army. The weapons used by each vary greatly as Egyptians used weapons made of metal and Nubia used primitive ones made from wood and stone. Ancient Egyptians ruled for many centuries while Nubia only ruled for a
century. While Nubia was strong, powerful and successful in a number of ways it was not as grand as Ancient Egypt. After reviewing the facts, I believe I have proven my opinion. Ancient Egypt was the most dominate of the two great empires. Ancient Egypt was the stronger, more powerful and was the most successful empire.
Was it a gift or a curse? The Nile is the world's longest river at 4,160 miles. Of that total, approximately 660 to 700 miles of the Nile are actually in Egypt. It is one of the four most important river civilizations in the world. Land in Egypt was called Black Land (representing life) and Red Land (representing danger). For Egyptians, the Nile meant the difference between life and death. Today, we know that the Nile influenced ancient Egypt in many areas of life such as providing food, shelter and faith to the people. Specific areas dealing with settlement location, agricultural cycle, jobs, trade, transportation and spiritual beliefs will prove the case.
The Ancient Egypt and Ancient Mesopotamia grew up to be successful civilizations. The surroundings of where they are located assisted them in survival. Although their lifestyles were different, both civilizations became successful in their own ways. Finally, their similar belief was a very helpful guidance when their rulers governed. Without these factors, the two civilizations might not have been
Egypt and Mesopotamia were two of the world’s earliest city-based civilizations, creating the basis for Middle Eastern and Western history. Both Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilizations existed on the banks of major rivers. While Egyptian civilization thrived along the Nile, Mesopotamia settled between the Tigris and the Euphrates. Although they shared this characteristic, it was also the cause of many of their differences in political systems, religions, and social stability.
Egypt officially the Arab Republic associated with Egypt, is a transcontinental nation spanning the northeast portion of Africa and also southwest corner associated with Asia. It would be the world's only contiguous Eurafrasian nation. Most of Egypt's territory lies inside Nile Valley. Egypt is a Mediterranean country. Egypt has one of several longest histories associated with any modern area, arising in the particular tenth millennium BC as one of the world's first nation states. Ancient Egypt experienced lots of the earliest developments associated with writing, agriculture, urbanization, organized religion plus central government in history. Egypt is the predominantly Sunni Muslim area with Islam given that their states hope. The percentage
The main differences between Sumerian and Egyptian geography is the flooding of the rivers and invasions they suffered. Sumer was a Mesopotamia, a land between two rivers. The two rivers were the Tigris and Euphrates River. Egypt had only one river, the Nile River. It was usual to rivers flood; the Tigris and Euphrates had very unpredictable flooding. Different from these rivers the Nile was very much predictable. Flooding in Sumer caused a lot of death, so people would start building their houses further from the rivers and they would also build irrigation ditches. However, in Egypt the river wasn’t a bad thing. Sumer suffered many invasions; to prevent this they made armies and built walls around the cities. Egypt suffered any invasions because of its location,
One reason why I think Egypt was more unified, was the gift of the Nile. In my personal opinion people are products of their environment. The Nile, was one element that made living for a large population possible. The laid back atmosphere led the people to come together to create simple, but efficient ways of fertilizing the ground; furthermore, the fertile rich area allowed prosperity in crops and gave everyone piece of mind that they were not going to starve. (text, 73) On the other hand, Mesopotamia’s two rivers the Tigris and Euphrates, required people to create ways of irrigation to make the land more fertile for crops. (text, 59) The overall view of Mesopotamia’s greed arose from the possibility of loosing crops due to the floods. (text, 59) In other words, the land did not provide a great guara...
Egypt has one of the longest histories of any nation in the world. Written history of Egypt dates back to about 5,000 years, the commencement of civilization. While there is divergence in relation to Early Egyptian times, it is said that Egypt came to be around 3200 B.C., during the reign of a king by the name of Menes and unified the northern and southern cities of Egypt into one government. In 1675 B.C., Egypt was invaded by the Hyksos, people from the east, bringing along the very first of chariots and horses ever to come across Egyptian soil. Approximately 175 years later in 1500 B.C., the Egyptians had gotten rid of the Hyksos and driven them out. In 1375 B.C., Amenhotep IV had become the king of Egypt. During his reign he eliminated the worship of Egyptian gods and initiated the idea of only worshipping one god. But after his death, his ideas were retired and old ways were reestablished. Egyptian supremacy then started to decline around 1000 B.C. Between 1000 B.C. and 332 B.C., Egypt was ruled by many such as the Libyans, Assyrians, Ethiopians, and Persians. In 640, Muslims conquered Egypt and founded the city of Cairo in 969 and deemed it as the capital of Egypt. For many centuries Egypt was ruled by Muslim caliphs. A prominent ruler of this period was Saladin, who battled the Christian Crusaders at the conclusion of the twelfth century. In 1798 Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Egypt but was then forced to withdraw in 1801 Turkish and British armed forces. In 1805 Mohamed Ali began ruling Egypt till 1848 and great changed the country in terms of modernization and its military. During Mohamed’s conquest, he borrowed a lot of money from the French and British, which later resulted in Egypt’s coloniza...
Before the beginning of history, people from across the land gradually developed numerous cultures, each unique in some ways while the same time having features in common. Mesopotamia and Egypt are important to the history of the world because of religious, social, political and economic development. Mesopotamia was the first civilization, which was around 3000 B.C., and all other countries evolved from it. Mesopotamia emerged from the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. The soil was rich and agriculture was plentiful. The Semitic nomads occupied the land around Akkad. The Sumerians established the city-states. Villages became urban centers. Because of the formation of the city-states everything flourished. However, Mesopotamian agriculture lacked stones; therefore mud brick became their major building block. Their diet consisted of fish from the rivers. The rivers were flooded frequently destroyed the cities. Mesopotamians made their living from crops and pottery.
to 2650 B.C., changed his name to the more commonly known Zoser. It was Zoser
The unification of Ancient Egypt became the major foundation for which the way Egyptian and African history is taught in this day and time. The combination of the two dynamic kingdoms of Upper and Lower Egypt played a significant role in shaping Egypt’s impact on the early civilization of mankind. Before the unification can be explored, we must further understand the differences of the two kingdoms. This will allow us to better grasp the concept of how the two advanced kingdoms complemented one another during their unification. The geographical qualities/relationship with the Nile River, trade routes, symbols, and religious beliefs will be fully analyzed in order to compare and contrast the two kingdoms. King Narmer’s (Menes) role in the unification
Egypt has been around more than 7000 years. U.S has been around for 200-300 years. In addition, Egypt has two thirds archaeology of the world. U.S has no archaeology. Also, because Egypt has been around for many years, Egypt conquest by many countries such as France, England, Turkey and many other. In addation, we learned many languages and they used Egypt food and money to help their countries, but U.S had never conquest under any other countries. In addtion, U.S is powerful with young
Nubia demonstrates that securing and maintaining a position of power and influence in comparison to other civilizations is an important part of ensuring that the culture of one’s society is maintained. It served as an example of how great leaders in government can help a civilization to thrive, and how unorganized civilizations naturally fall apart and are easily absorbed into the societies of others. Nubia influenced and sustained the Egyptian civilization, which had an astounding effect on the ancient and modern world, through trade and religious influences. Some ancient scholars and historians have even recorded statements saying that Nubia was the original Egypt. Although there are many differences between Nubian structures of government
When analyzing the fall of both empires, one must take into consideration that it did not just happen over night. In the case of the Egyptian empire, the reign of Ramses II was the final chapter of glory. Following his death, Egypt slowly but surely entered their declining stages beginning with the war against the “Sea Peoples.” The invaders, also known as the Peleset by Egyptians, were on a war path going along the eastern Mediterranean Sea (Flow of History). The Peleset came across both Syria and Palestine before coming to Egypt, where one of the first naval battles recorded in history was fought and ultimately won in Egypt's favor. Eventually, the Peleset settled down in Palestine and became the Philistines. Although Egypt had won the war, they gained very little out of it. Most of the results of the war were negative and Egypt's strength plummeted in the following decades (Flow of History).
Ancient Egypt is considered to be one of the most significant eras in history, due to its lengthy existence and its overwhelming contributions to the development of western civilization. You could say that Egypt provided the building blocks for Greek and Roman culture, and through them, influenced all of Western tradition. Today Egyptian imagery, concepts, and perspectives are found everywhere; you will find them in architectural forms, on money, and in our day to day lives. We are able to distinguish various elements of its culture that played a key role in its development, such as agriculture, architecture, religion, and government to name a few. Egypt 's impact on later cultures was and still is immense.
First of all, where is Nubia? Nubia is located near the Nile river, by modern day Egypt and modern day Sudan. Nubia is a fairly big civilization. Nubia doesn’t have the best farming conditions because of their dry landscape. Although they have a dry landscape, they also have the Nile river where the Nubians get their water from. Every once and awhile the river will flood, and when it does it provides rich soil for gardening. This is how Nubians are able to live where they do.