Analyzing Comey's Essay Against Honeymoons

497 Words1 Page

In the essay “Against Honeymoons,” “Sexual paranoia,” and, “Family Tradition” Comey, Kipnis, and Nikolidakis all have one thing in common. Base off what each essay had to say, it is clear to the reader that there are different types of relationships in the world. Some may be worse than other and may all have a different outcome. I relate all three essay through relationships. They all have to deal with some type of relationship and commitment. In “Against Honeymoons,” Comey writes about the outcomes of Honeymoons. In “Sexual paranoia,” Kipnis writes about how back then in his past day it was okay for professors to date their former students. In “Family Tradition” Nikolidakis writes about how she grew up and had to deal with her abusive father. All these essay have some type of relationship that is being bonded, whether family or student. …show more content…

In order to go to a honeymoon there has to be some type of relationship involved. Back then they use to go visit family member that could not attend the wedding and that is a family bond and relationship right there. Now only thing expected to do is go out and make love, they do not worry about anyone else but themselves and what they are going to do. Maybe Comey is trying to show the readers how family and relationship to anyone is starting to get taken for granted.
In “Sexual Paranoia,” Kipnis writes about relationship in a way just like the other two. He talks about how in the past it was okay for a professor to date their forma student. That may not have been the big focus on the essay, but right away I saw that that related to relationships. Kipnis may have been trying to tell the readers how much the world has changed. Now, a man cannot compliment a girl or it could be considered harassment. The relationship between the professor and student makes readers think and wonder what if that was still okay

Open Document