Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
War on drugs (1971 to today)
The war on drugs in the united states
The war on drugs in the united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
War on drugs is the biggest political hoax in the history of the United States. In “Chasing the Scream”, Johann Hari elegantly outlined the arguments, which illustrate that the drugs use originates mostly from social causes. Hari briefly explained how the war on drugs came to be and how it is perpetuated in the contemporary society. Therefore, to illustrate that addiction to drugs is closely tied to social causes Johann Hari presented multiple examples. For the purpose of the following essay, I will focus on Chino Hardin’s life experiences and how the war on drugs came to be and the repercussions it had on the users. As a young man (I will refer to Chino as a male since that is his preference) Chino has faced a life of hardships. Likewise, from the moment of his …show more content…
Likewise, the story of his conception has had a significant impact on him as an individual. Knowing that he is, as he described, a “product of rape” (Hari 2013:82) is psychologically and emotionally straining. However, Chino grew up in the neighborhood, where rape of drug users by police officers was a common occurrence because “who’s going to believe a drug addict?” (Hari 2013: 68). Similarly, from a young age, Chino was involved in selling drugs because that was the way for him to make money and to survive in his neighborhood. He was first incarcerated at the age of thirteen for violent shit street because, as Chino described, dealing drugs put him in the situations where he had to stand his ground, and anger was the main source of retaliation (Hari 2013). Consequently, coming in and out of the broken prison system only perpetuated him to do more violence. Likewise, Chino described prison as a university where you learn how to deal and steal, resulting in many people leave prison with more knowledge about dealing drugs, than before they entered. Therefore, there is no
The book Chasing Lincoln’s Killer is about the world famous story of assassinating President Abraham Lincoln. This book takes the reader into the lives and minds of the four main conspirators responsible for the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and the attempted assassination of the Vice President, Andrew Johnson , and the Secretary of State, William H. Seaward. Not only will the reader learn about the details of the planned assassinations but the background of all conspirators involved, each one of their motives for committing the crimes, and all the differences between the actual killings and what was supposed to happen if everything went according to plan. In this gripping novel the writer, James Swanson, takes the reader through a key point in American history in order to learn the truth of what must have happened while chasing Lincoln’s killer.
The Singing Tree In the year 1914, one of the most terrible wars in history would begin; as innocent people laughed and spoke amongst each other as though they were all family, death was creeping over the horizon. Kate Seredy’s The Singing Tree tells the eventful story of a small and cordial farm that takes in the weak, dismal, and bitter then afterwards converts them into wonderful, determined people during a war-stricken time. The book takes us back to the time period of the horrific World War I, showing us the effects it had on the public while the children show the heroic traits of bravery, kindness, and charity.
In the book High Price, highly credible author and neuroscientist, Dr. Carl Hart explains the misconceptions that everyone normally has about drugs and their users. He uses his own life experiences coming from a troubled neighborhood in Florida. The book consists of Hart’s life growing up with domestic violence in his household and the chance he had to come out and excel academically. He talks about the war on drugs and how within this war on drugs we were actually fighting the war with the wrong thing.
" With violence affecting so many lives, one can understand the desire driven by fear to lock away young male offenders. But considering their impoverished, danger-filled lives, I wonder whether the threat of being locked up for decades can really deter them from crime" (305). Hopkins is definitely not our stereotypical prisoner. Most generally, our view of prisoners is not that of someone who has this profound use of wording and this broad sense of knowledge.
“Dr. Guthrie sheds light on the embarrassment that was early psychology and its extraordinary dedication to racism and, with his work, changed that discipline forever,” states William Grier’s forward for Robert Guthrie’s own Even the Rat Was White: A Historical View of Psychology (Grier, p. xi). After attending Florida A & M University in 1948 for his bachelor’s degree, Guthrie joined the military to fulfill draft requirements before returning to finish his degree (O’Connor, 2001. He went on to earn his Masters degree at the University of Kentucky followed by his doctorate in psychology at the U.S. International University in 1970 (O’Connor, 2001. He was the first African-American professor at San Diego Mesa College and one of the founding members of the Association of Black
In Pa Chin's Family, he portrays a traditional Confucian family battling to keep their traditions and their way of life in tact, amidst the deep upheaval and civil disorder gripping China. Pa Chin clearly portrays a family of which the Venerable Master Kao rules supreme at the expense of his family. The Kao family runs into several set backs such as suicide, death, depression, unhappy marriages, family conflict, and lack of respect for elders that undoubtedly lead to the unraveling of the Kao family. One significant reason the Kao family fails to maintain its integrity and way of life is because of the clash between Confusion traditionalism and Chinese cultural modernization. One of the main driving forces in disruption in Kao family tradition would have to be the rebellious youth, Chueh-min, Chueh-hui, and Chin in particular.
Authors who write creatively find themselves giving purpose for each word they place onto the page. Just as there is a purpose for each word, there is a purpose for each character, each plot twist, and each challenge faced. Lewis Nordan, author of the controversial novel, Wolf Whistle, creates a story about a story. His book is based on the well known murder of Emmett Till, along with the trial, but is not limited to the two events alone. Nordan bases the majority of the novel around the long list of major and minor characters. His purpose for centering the plot around more than just those involved in the murder and trial is to show how racism and violence create the atmosphere of the town. He also shows how those living in the Arrow Catcher
“Just Say No!” A statement that takes us deep into yet another decade in the history of the United States which was excited by controversies, social issues, and drug abuse. The topic of this statement is fueled by the growing abuse of cocaine in the mid 1980s. I shall discuss the effects of the crack cocaine epidemic of the mid 1980s from a cultural and social stand point because on that decade this country moved to the rhythms and the pace of this uncanny drug. Cocaine took its told on American society by in the 1980s; it ravaged with every social group, race, class, etc. It reigned over the United States without any prejudices. Crack cocaine was the way into urban society, because of its affordability in contrast to the powdered form. In society the minorities were the ones most affected by the growing excess of crime and drug abuse, especially African Americans; so the question was “Why was nearly everybody convicted in California federal court of crack cocaine trafficking black?” (Webb: Day 3). The growing hysteria brought forth many questions which might seem to have concrete answers, but the fact of the matter is they are all but conspiracy in the end, even though it does not take away the ambiguity and doubt. I will take on only a few topics from the vast array of events and effects this period in time had tended to. Where and who this epidemic seemed to affect more notably, and perhaps how the drugs came about such territories and people. What actions this countries authority took to restore moral sanity, and how it affected people gender wise.
In 1971 on June 17, President Richard Nixon delivered a special message to the Congress on drug abuse prevention and control. During the presentation, Nixon made it clear that the United States was at war with this idea of drug abuse. What baffled Americans then, and still baffles Americans today, is that we are at war with our own nation with drugs; it is not some foreign affair like the media tends to focus on with Mexico. Nixon stated that at the time of his speech, what was implemented to control drug abuse was not working…“The problem has assumed the dimensions of a national emergency. I intend to take every step necessary to deal with this emergency, including asking the Congress for an amendment to my 1972 budget to provide an additional $155 million to carry out these steps. This will provide a total of $371 million for programs to control drug abuse in America.”(Wolleey and Peters) Since the publicizing of the term “War on Drugs” in 1971, it has been used by many political candidates in elections over the years. In the movie, it was stated, “ every war begins with propaganda …[and] the war on drugs has never been actually on drugs… [Additionally] drug laws are shaped less by scientific facts, but more by political [reasoning].” (Jarecki) The movie, The House I Live In, directly relates to certain themes and terminology that were discussed in Martin and Nakayama’s Intercultural Communication in Contexts book, that have been used in class. Through the analyzing and comparing of The House I Live In and Intercultural Communication in Contexts an individual can begin to localize the ideals behind this everlasting war on drugs; some ideals focus on terms from the text like ethnocentrism, diversity training, and culture while ...
Our society is focused on spending and being a part of the latest trends. They teach that you can get rich quick by the use of violence. There is no growth or patience. Many people believe success should be handed to them without practice or work. This thinking is disastrous in the long run. He mentioned drug abuse and how it stems from society’s view of a good life. The so called good life is a series of climactic events (32). Quick fixes touch everything in our lives. Even the medical fields have fallen prey to this method (33). Since the pharmaceutical companies have taken over the medical field, doctors are no longer correcting ailments. Instead, they prescribe medicine to mask the symptoms. This new wave of thinking has put the country in debt and has created an even bigger gap between the rich and poor
The reason with the old ways do not work, Alexander say, is because “self-destructive drug users are responding in a tragic, but understandable way” (226). It is not their drug- problem that caused the dislocation, but the dislocation that cause the drug problem. He uses the term dislocation to describe the lack of integration with “family, community, society and spiritual values” (226). Alexander goes on to explain that history proves that inability to achieve health opportunities can take on the form of violence, and damaging drug use. Therefore, the “drug problem” (226) is not the problem. The problem is more the “pattern of response to prolong dislocation” (226). Alexander supports this by explaining the reason for the dislocation as being globalized by a society that is market driven which can only be established by the displacement of tradition, economy, and relationships. This has been seen in history before in England during the 19TH century, when “a brutal, export-oriented manufacturing system” was accompanied by work...
The article ‘The Likely Cause of Addiction Has Been Discovered, and It Is Not What You Think’ by Johann Hari shares an interesting perspective on the matter of addiction to drugs. It seeks to change the view that we have always had on addiction by fronting a different theory based on the findings of the author. The essay begins with a brief introduction of the timeline when drugs were banned, the war on drugs and how information on addiction has been unveiled to us. According to the author, addiction is an ethical shortcoming that is brought about by extreme decadent behavior that is almost a fixation that affects a captured mind. Several experiments are shared and the results that turn out in a bid to try and demystify what the author perceives as wrong views on addiction. As it appears, addicted people have a profound need to bond and shape associations. It's the means by which they get their fulfillment. If we cannot associate with each other, we will interface with anything we come across. From the findings and suggestions in the article, there is a huge surge of optimism that
June-May fulfills her mother’s name and life goal, her long-cherished wish. She finally meets her twin sisters and in an essence fulfills and reunites her mother with her daughter through her. For when they are all together they are one; they are their mother. It is here that June-May fulfills the family portion of her Chinese culture of family. In addition, she fully embraces herself as Chinese. She realizes that family is made out of love and that family is the key to being Chinese. “And now I also see what part of me is Chinese. It is so obvious. It is my family. It is in our blood.” (Tan 159). Finally, her mother’s life burden is lifted and June-May’s doubts of being Chinese are set aside or as she says “After all these years, it can finally be let go,” (Tan 159).
The term “War on Drugs” is one that carries a lot of weight, but what does this initiative really mean to the U.S society? Has it been an asset to the community or hindered and stunted growth? What are the material and human costs associated, and how does the United States compare to other countries when tackling drug policy? My artifact/literature essay will answer above questions surrounding the “War on Drugs” initiative created by former President Nixon. My artifact a documentary titled “Breaking the Taboo” offers more insight into how U.S. government officials feel about the initiative and U.S. drug policy by including exclusive interviews from previous U.S president Bill Clinton. For further support, this documentary also shares world opinions about the “War on Drugs” by incorporating statements from other countries’ leaders such as Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso and leaders of Colombia, Switzerland, Norway and Mexico. The purpose of this essay will be to explore deeper into my artifact by examining the artifact itself, the rhetor, and the context, the intended audience, and how the documentary touched society once released.
The abuse of substances such as alcohol and other harmful drugs (perhaps even a vicious combination composed of a number of the many possible constituents) is an aspect of life that arises simply from the manifestation of human nature itself—an incredibly profound and complex calamity which stems from this vague, yet familiar, source. It is a sword with many edges and a lust for its victims, and if taken to the extents of excess, will function as an inescapable common denominator for the division of an addict’s life and priorities. There is a certain notion, often espoused by former drug abusers, “that you can get a lot higher without drugs than you can with them.” However, throughout history there has existed a countess number of people, groups, and cultures who have employed drugs and alcohol as a means of “fuel”/self-propulsion, in similar magnitudes to what it takes an average American family to run a car for a year, and without which would have left nothing near as great of a scar on the facet of history’s withered skin. Hunter Thompson once noted, when attempting to get a handle on the meaning of the infamous Hell’s Angels mystique, that it is a fine line between survival and disaster—a fair definition of luck as well: