Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of songs about love
English iv getting acquainted with shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of songs about love
Analysis of Willy Russell’s Blood Brothers
Tell me it’s not true
Say it’s just a story
These words echoed in my head as I entered the Phoenix Theatre. I had
had past experience with “Blood Brothers” by singing the heartbreaking
ballad “Tell Me It’s Not True” in a past show. Therefore I anticipated
that the performance I was about to watch was going to be a roller
coaster of emotions, with bitter consequences.
I expected a first class show with strong, slick performances from the
cast and fantastic musical numbers. This expectation of “Blood
Brothers” was partly due to it being in the reputable West End of
London and had been running at the Phoenix Theatre since 1991. This
made me think that a musical that could still have large audiences
coming to see it in the highly competitive London Theatre scene, must
have something exceptional.
I also has background knowledge about “Blood Brothers” from reading
the script in parts in class. However, some parts of the play were
still patchy to me, so I was looking forward to having the entire
story acted out from start to finish. It was interesting for me as
well because I was familiar with other plays Willy Russell had
written. Having seen Shirley Valentine and read “A Grand Day Out” I
enjoyed his of simple, uncluttered style of writing.
“Blood Brothers” is set in Liverpool 1962. Its story stems from an
impoverished single mother of six called Mrs Johnstone who, by
finding that she is pregnant with twins, is persuaded to give up one
of her unborn children to her employer, Mrs Lyons. The story unfolds
by portraying how the two brothers grow up so differently without ever
knowing they have a twin.
“Of one womb born, on the self same day How one was kept and one given
away?”
The story deepens when the twins become friends when they are seven
but both realise that they have the same birthday and therefore are
both “nearly eight”. They become best friends and declare one another
to be their “Blood Brother”. From then on the story follows their
persistence to remain friends and the obstacles each come up against.
Sadly though, their forbidden friendship finally leads to one
another’s tragic death; never knowing the truth that they were
brothers.
Never knowing they shared one name Till the day they died
I never really absorbed the absurdity of the storyline because the
script was so subtle in its telling of the story, and the performance
of the cast didn’t over dramatise the events unfolding. If they had,
it would have made the story have an unwanted comical element as it
Bad blood is a book that was written James H. Jones who is an associate professor of History. The book narrates on how the government through the department of Public Health service (PHS) authorized and financed a program that did not protect human values and rights. The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment which was conducted between 1932 and 1972 where four hundred illiterate and semi-illiterate black sharecroppers in Alabama recently diagnosed with syphilis were sampled for an experiment that was funded by the U.S Health Service to prove that the effect of untreated syphilis are different in blacks as opposed to whites. The blacks in Macon County, Alabama were turned into laboratory animals without their knowledge and the purpose of the experiment
The similar controversial natures of Fury’s Kissing Doesn’t Kill and Manuel Ramos Otero’s “Nobility of Blood” suggest that perhaps their intended audiences may have shared characteristics as well. Because Kissing Doesn’t Kill is a piece of poster art, it was displayed out in the public, instead of a museum or convention like usual pieces of art. The poster was plastered in large sizes to the sides of public transportation buses, billboards, and even mass mailings. People of all kinds of backgrounds came across the artwork, whether they wanted to or not. However, since the point of activist artwork like this is to create social change, the effect of this artwork on its viewers is the main focus. To people who agreed with the statements on the
Motherhood found in the Trinity. Her representative approach of the all-encompassing unconditional love of a mother who nurtures, depicts Christ as our Mother ascending to the placement of Second hood within the Trinity while giving voice to the duality of God. Her choices of metaphors are simplistic explanations providing the
...rd. Thus putting Legree in Anger, he orders his overseers to beat him. When Tom is close to death, he forgives them. A bit too late, Shelby had finally arrived at Legree’s plantation after years of searching for his slave Tom. Shelby arrives with money to buy Tom’s freedom, but is too late. He can only watch as Tom dies as a scapegoat. As George was leaving the plantation, the two women tried to make a break for freedom, only to hitch a ride with him after they had explained their story. On a boat to freedom, Shelby and the girls meet Harris’s sister and had travel with her, where Cassy realizes that Eliza is her daughter. They decide to travel to France when Harris’s sister had claimed to be rich, from there they decided to move to Africa where many former African slaves return too. George had returned back to his farm, releasing all of the slaves in honor of Tom.
It is indisputable that Nicholas II had a substantial influence on the demise of the dynasty. He had an ardent devotion to his family, he was kind with only benevolent intentions towards his wife and children. It was this devotion that ultimately shifted Nicholas’s priorities, putting his role as a father and husband above his role as a Tsar.
Czar Nicholas’ poor leadership forced him to abdicate and caused the Bolshevik takeover. One of the reasons I say that is because of the way he handled “Bloody Sunday”. “Bloody Sunday” was when troops killed over a thousand people in a peaceful worker assembly. After “Bloody Sunday”, workers all over Russia went on strike, and peasants caused uprisings that were suppressed by Nicholas II’s troops causing tensions to increase. Another reason was his disastrous involvement in World War I. In the beginning of the war, Russia’s armies did not do well. To fix this, Nicholas became the commander. Now under his command, their continued failure reflected the Czar himself, further decreasing his popularity. Lastly, civil unrest grew as food riots, chronic food shortages, and labor strikes continued to proceed. This eventually erupted into open revolt, and Czar Nicholas had no choice but to abdicate. Soon after, the new government was overthrown by the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin.
The reign of Nicholas II catalysed the downfall of Tsardom. His lack of concern for civil liberties and political sternness directly lead to the revolutions. However, it was not just the weak leading of Tsar Nicholas II but rather the whole system of autocracy that was to blame for Russia’s misfortune, with its ideology fundamentally primitive and oppressive towards the greater population. The Russian society was formed around a hierarchy that was inefficient and degenerate to those below. This would lead to economic and social problems for the people of Russia, as well as a lack of progression and eventually, downfall.
It was Tzar Nicholas 2 political naivete and extreme obstinance that led to the downfall of the Russia
The government and reform; the actual character of Nicholas II hindered his time in office, for example his outlooks on situations meant he did not trust a lot of his advisors, he was also seen to have been very lazy with respects to making decisions, other observations included him being, weak, timid and lacked guts. This all adds up to a very weak leader that is vulnerable to opposition, due to his tunnel vision and un-ability to see the main needs of the country. The duma was another challenge to the tsar; after the 1905 revolution the tsar had set up an elected body called the duma, this was a way of showing the public that he could be open minded in that delegating decisions to other people, looking back in hindsight this would also be seen as a challenge to the tsar as he never gave the duma any real power, and were easily dissolved, this meant that people were further angered and he was receiving opposition from all sides, it did however hold off opposition for a small period of time in order for the tsar to retain his power. Other individuals had an influence to the challenges facing the tsar, Nicholas had brought some new people in to try and conquer some problems, these included Rasputin who he had originally appointed to become saviour of family, he managed to influence the tsar in many of his decisions, this inevitably caused there to be conflict as the he was relying on Rasputin to relay details of the state of the country, these were not accurate which meant that tsar could not act upon opposition. Other people did help the tsar for example stolypin and his reforms.
Nicholas was considered a selfish ruler with no love for his very own people. Nicholas was forced to give up his throne by a strike that broke out in Petrograd on March 1917(Kindersley). After Nicholas getting forced out of his throne a party called The Mensheviks formed a govern-ment made up of revolutionary’s but failed. The Bolsheviks came right after seeking to enforce Marxism and gain power. The Czar Family were arrested and all killed after a year,
‘The care of each man’s soul, and of the things of heaven… is left entirely to every man’s self’
The relentless support of abortion is always contradicting the moral and good teachings of the Church. Through passed laws, pro-choice supporters have made it possible for many women to have abortions. In some countries, including the United States, there does not have to be a reason for a woman to have an abortion early in the pregnancy. The Supreme Court in the United States ruled that the fetus’s ability to live was between about twenty four weeks to twenty-six weeks (Glendon 22). These laws show that supporters of abortion do not believe that life begins at conception. This is contrary to the teachings of the Church. “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you” (Jeremiah 1:5). God knew us before we were conceived. He made us accord...
Hamlet’s obsession with taking revenge destroys the relationships in his life. His furiousness with his mother’s marriage causes him to lose respect for her and wish for no more marriages in Denmark (III. i. 144-152). Hamlet’s loss of respect for women affects his relationship with his girlfriend, Ophelia. He slowly begins to drive her away. Hamlet becomes impetuous and consequently kills Ophelia’s father, which permanently destroys their relationship. Another instance of obsession to revenge is Laertes. He becomes so bent upon avenging his family, that he does not think clearly. Claudius deceives Laertes by persuading him into killing Hamlet so that he remains out of harm’s way. However, their obsession to revenge becomes the foundation of their
The assassination of the Romanovs will forever be one of the darkest parts of Russia’s history. Nicholas II was known by all as a kind and extremely well mannered man who, though too weak willed to rule a country, did not deserve such a gruesome death. As for his wife and children, it is truly disgusting that they were murdered for no fault other than being married/born into the Romanov line. Russia lost a large part of their culture the day the Romanovs died; the family that had ruled for over three centuries was ended, leaving no heirs. In an act of national repent, a memorial service was held for the Tsar and his family in 1998 in St. Petersburg. The Russian Orthodox Church recognizes Nicholas and his family as holy martyrs and they are buried in the beautiful Peter and Paul Cathedral.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin has been explained as being a history of harmful acts towards Blacks in America for a period of a hundred and thirty years (Stowe, “Nineteenth”). 51).The book Uncle Tom’s Cabin was one of History’s favorite books (Stowe, “Nineteenth” 1). It talks about how Tom would do anything for the white man (Stowe, Uncle 1). The southerners did not give Harriet Beecher Stowe and credit for writing the book (Piacentino 1).