Analysis of The Weakest Link and the Wheel of Fortune
This essay will be exploring the conventions of two different quiz
shows, The Weakest Link and the Wheel of Fortune. Quiz shows are types
of game show where you answer questions or you take part in some sort
of competition to win either money or prizes. This essay will compare
the two shows looking at similarities and differences and will take
into account the various conventions of quiz shows; rules, host, set,
lighting, music, competitors, audience etc .The host for the show the
weakest link, is Ann Robinson. Both shows have a wide appeal and both
have had prime time viewing slots in the pre watershed early evening
time .The wheel of fortune is an older show than the weakest link
(1990) and is no longer made. It now seems very dated and is only
shown on satellite television during the day. The weakest link is
still produced even though its popularity is not as great anymore. It
now has an early evening slot on BBC 2.
Both the hosts play important but contrasting roles in the shows but
they have completely different personalities. Ann Robinson hosts in
the Weakest Link and isn't the nicest of presenters. She is very mean,
confrontational and intimidating. She faces the contestants with a
very stern face and she never smiles or laughs which makes the
contestants very nervous and adds to the tension of the show. Her
dress is always very black but formal this sets the scene for the
show, making it dim all the way through. This is completely different
from the Wheel of Fortune's host, Nicky Campbell. He is very friendly
and polite with all of the contestants and likes to chat to them about
their lives, their families etc to make them feel calm and relaxed. He
is also very tactile and stands close to the contestants in a
non-confrontational way. He dresses more casually in light coloured
relaxed open necked shirts These features help to make the contestants
feel very relaxed because all they need to think about is the game now
The failing television networks have found a number of elements in reality shows which can save them money. These elements have combined to improve rating, while also improving the amount of money brought into the networks. The networks have had pressure from stockholders to improve the return on their investments, or possible begin to lose their money. So the networks have discovered ways to save money with reality’ shows one being they haven’t had to pay actors. All the main characters of this shows are contests and only one will be ~paid” at the end. In addition to not paying actors, they have also been able to cut back greatly on the number of writers used to write scripts. The reality shows have been in a way been “pre-tested” in other nations. The U.S. networks know that the shows can be successful because of the success they have had in Europe. These facts have all come together ...
Younger generations and the more vulnerable in society can be influenced in avoiding peer pressure, but for the individuals filled with wisdom, the shows can reflect based on American modern society. Everybody Loves Raymond and Full House are great shows who faces similar life obstacles a typical person living in the US has today. As a result, most modern family comedy sit-coms are reflecting our society’s generations and the more vulnerable. Based on the success of early family sit coms, American’s adapted to a fast pace lifestyle with the help of modern
The basic idea was similar with some difference, like the presence of two contestants for competing for each other and the no limit on their winnings. Barry and Enright leased the show to Pharmacueticals, Inc. and they used it as a platform for advertising their products, the first show aired on October 12, 1956. The quiz show 21 did not match the ratings of Questions, however, it competed for another successful and popular show. The author highlights one of the 21 contestants who became a symbol of the nation of the profitability, Charles Van Doren. Moreover, the author briefs about his intellectual family chain. Van Doren defeated the impoverished champion, Herbert Stempel, after three times of tough tie match on December 5, 1956. Van Doren’s victory in the quiz show brought him greater rewards than his ancestors. The author then provides detail about the fame and popularity Van Doren received, thousands of people from around the world thanked him through the letters he received. Little services which he had to pay, from his $4,400 salary annually as an English instructor in Columbia, were donated complimentary by the shop keepers. He received numerous job offers from several different colleges, he was given the title of Doctor without his Ph.D. On the other hand, rumors arose about the fixing of the quiz show. By the end of 1956, many articles published mentioning about the control exercise performed by the sponsors, eliminating the unpopular one and saving the popular
The setting in the stories The Lottery and The Rocking-Horse Winner create an atmosphere where the readers can be easily drawn in by the contrasting features of each short story. This short essay will tell of very important contrasting aspects of settings in that while both stories are different, both hold the same aspects.
The holocaust is known for the great number of deaths; including the six million Jews. Ida fink is a writer that captures this time period in her works. In “The Key Game” she appeals to pathos because of imagery used, connections to your own family, and dialog used by both the father and mother. Through her fiction stories, she tells tales that relate to what could have been and probably what was. Ida Fink is known for telling her stories in a journalist like tone with very little color. In her stories, she does not like to tell you how to feel she instead leaves that up to the reader. Fink does place some hints of emotion just by writing the story alone. The interpretation of her works is left up to the reader. As you read through her stories some will find more emotion, some will find more logic, and some may see more ethics. At the moment, we will be looking more on the side of emotions within this story.
In comparing and contrasting the short stories “Everyday Use” written by Alice Walker and “The Lottery” written by Shirley Jackson, tradition is carried on throughout the generations. Symbols are often used in these short stories to convey these messages of tradition and heritage. Rebellious characters are also found in both of the stories, trying to alter traditions to meet their own personal expectations. However, in contrast “The Lottery” is a much more barbaric story that does not reveal the cruelty until the end of the story. The story involves an entire village of families following a tradition. “Everyday Use” is not as tragic, it deals with a conflict within a single family unit.
Andersen, Kia. "Kia Papaya's Blog." : Thematic Comparison between The Hunger Games and The Lottery. Blogspot.com, Mar.-Apr. 2012. Web. 01 Apr. 2014.
While analyzing the speech, I notice how he isn’t shaky from nervousness or his voice’s pitch getting higher which makes him confident, is already prepared of what he wants to talk about, and therefore does not cause any distractions towards the audience. His voice tone is at his natural state as I assume as it calm, not quick to rush words out, and engages the audience by not bringing
People need money to live, and enough to buy the basic goods one needs to survive, but everybody wants more money. More money means an easier life. The more money one has, the more money one wants, as is shown in the story, "The Rocking Horse Winner" by D. H. Lawrence.
Game Theory, originally derived from the subject of Mathematics, aims to provide a way to understand strategic social interactions; such as in the case of the Cuban Missile Crisis. It can be understood as the study and explanation of strategically, mutually-dependent actions and decisions (strategies), made by what are assumed to be ‘rational’ decision-makers (players) in competitive conditions that involve both conflictual and cooperative options (games); where the objective of each player is to achieve the most desirable outcome from a set of potential outcomes (payoffs) (Carlson & Dacey 2013; Myerson 1991; Prisner 2014; Turocy 2001). Despite being a mathematical theory, its application in international relations has been prominent
Thomas J. Stanley, Ph.D. and William D. Danko, Ph.D. wrote The Millionaire Next Door, which is a highly informative book about what it takes to become wealthy. Some of the information I knew, such as the obvious fact that you need money to be a millionaire, but some information, such as millionaires not owning big luxury items, surprised me. People become wealthy by saving money, not by living in a huge house or driving an expensive car. Most households generate a lot of money, but, because people love buying things, they live from paycheck to paycheck. Stanley and Danko say, “Building wealth requires discipline, sacrifice, and hard work” (5). There are not too many millionaires because people are not willing to change their lifestyles to accumulate
Within the first season of House of Cards, Frank Underwood has to make a series of decisions which he uses to strategically move him forward on his path back to the white house from the senate. There are four key strategic interactions that allow Underwood to fully be in control of his own destiny as he pursues breaking into the white house these are, helping pass an educational bill, working with Zoe Barnes, working with Peter Russo, and agreeing to vet possible Vice Presidential candidates. As Underwood’s strategy goes on it is clear that each step he takes will move him closer and closer to the white house and will eventually land him a seat as the Vice President of the United States. Throughout the first season of the show, Underwood uses strategic thinking, framing, and commitment devices to negotiate efficiently with others and change their perceptions to allow him to gain political power in the most efficient manner possible. While Underwood uses these tools in his strategies, it is clear he also uses a great deal of misdirection in order to get others to collude with him in his actions to gain political clout.
In the excerpt of Sharpshooter Blues, Hydro is saved by luck when the store he works in is being robbed. While in the store, Hydro was lucky to not be shot while the store was being robbed. Like Hydro, almost everyone experiences some kind of luck in the everyday life whether it is a small or large amount of luck. In my life, I experience luck ranging from guessing on my accounting tests or having a great bounce on my drive while playing golf, but luck is not always good. Often, luck is not on my side especially on a day at the golf course when my golf balls always seem to take a bad bounce into the water. I have had many experiences on the golf course and while hunting that are extremely lucky. One moment in particular stands out to me the
Winfrey used almost every communication style throughout her career, but there is one that I want to go in-depth on, which is assertive communication. Oprah Winfrey is so successful because she expresses how she feels without demanding an answer. Celebrities and other guest are so comfortable speaking with her because she’s so down to earth and she really listens to what you have to say. Oprah knows how uncover what someone is going through without coming off too strong, and that’s what people want. Assertive communication is how you get the job done, and Oprah is phenomenal at using this particular communication style. An example of her using this style brings back to the interview with Michael Jackson. There was so much that everyone wanted to ask Michael but he felt comfortable speaking with Oprah because she didn’t come off too strong or that she wanted his information for personal gain(whether that was the case or not). She asked Michael questions that the world wanted to know, but she also paid attention and cared about what came out of his mouth. Mrs. Winfrey’s assertive communication method is impeccable. This style encouraged and led others to believe that they could follow in her footsteps and become a substantial interviewer/media personnel like