Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of women in masculinity
The role of women in masculinity
The role of women in masculinity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of women in masculinity
In her essay “A Woman’s Beauty: Put Down or Power Source?” Susan Sontag masterfully with just few strokes undoes the signification of the mythology of the feminine. She ponders the opposite pair of concepts of beautifulness and handsomest in a deconstructionist fashion. She describes the violent coexistent in which both concepts concur. However, after effectively have exposed the way these oppositions function and understanding the distortion of the myth of the feminine, Sontag fails in giving a “real” solution. Erroneously, she concludes that the only way to destroy this myth is by women getting a critical distance from the concept of beauty. Ignoring that the universe of women is not constituted just by those women who have clambered up to leading positions –western, white, educated women-, she fells in a hasty generalization. With Socratic irony –the title as pretension of ignorance- and the keen sense of the mythologist, Sontag begins her crusade against the myth of the feminine. With two historical references she fulfils her objective on deciphering the formation of the myth. The first occurred in the Greece of Socrates with the split between the inside and the outside; and the second, maybe the most important influence in the meaning’s change, occurred with the influence of Christianity. Further in her essay, Sontag, with irate fit, develops her analytics accusing an entire society to know that “the way women are taught to be involved with beauty encourages narcissism, reinforces dependence and immaturity; she stress that “it is ‘everybody’, a whole society, that has identified being feminine with caring about how ones look.” (118-19). However ideal, her judgment overgeneralizes the subject. Because not everybody knows t... ... middle of paper ... ...concept of beauty. Ignoring that the universe of women is not constituted just by those women who have clambered up to leading positions –western, white, educated women- she fells in a hasty generalization. Neither black, Hispanic, nor the 99% of poor women wear makeup to conquer nobody else than their own fear to the ugliness of everyday life. They need to wear the mask of beauty to forget the dirt in their fingernails. A play of mask which does not allow playing with words (concepts), just to use them. From that feminine existence, it seems like there is not a way out through critical distances, through the invention of neologism. Maybe the only way of getting out is shutting down the walls of language. Works Cited Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang, 2013. Sontag, Susan. "A Woman's Beauty: Put Down or Power Source?" Vogue (1975): 118-119.
In the essay “What Meets the Eye”, Daniel Akst explains scientific facts about the beauty of men and women matters to people. He argues that attractive individuals receive attention, great social status, marries, and gets paid more on a job. One can disagree with Akst’s argument because anyone with the skills and knowledge, despite the appearance, can gain a decent relationship and can get paid well. Akst looks at beauty as if it can lead individuals to an amazing and successful life, but he is wrong. Nancy Mairs’ and Alice Walker’s views on beauty are explained internally and through self-confidence. Both women’s and Akst’s arguments on beauty share some similarities and differences in many ways, and an
The concept of beauty is a subject society speaks on through many channels. Social media plays a tremendous role in how society measures beauty and how to achieve these impossible standards. People from all walks of life have become obsessed with the idea of beauty and achieving the highest level it. In many cases, those who do not meet societal views of what is “beautiful” can become very resentful to these predisposed notions of beauty. David Akst in his writing “What Meets the Eye”, is bitter toward women and their ongoing obsession with beauty.
First, Connie and her mother focused on outward beauty rather than inward beauty, which can never be tarnished. Connie’s mother was jealous of her daughter’s beauty, because she knew she could no longer attain the beauty that she once possessed. She often scolded her daughter for admiring her own beauty in order to make herself feel more secure inside. Connie did not try in the least bit to make her mother’s struggle any easier, but instead gawked at her own beauty directly in front of her mother, and often compared her own beauty to others.
Not long ago, a woman’s success was measured by the success of her husband and her domestic prowess. Today, a woman is presumed successful if she can emulate the standards of beauty portrayed in the media. Unfortunately, this subliminally enforced standard is unattainable to some women, regardless of the quality of their character. Let’s examine how western women went from being pioneering superheroes, to people who measure their worth against airbrushed photographs of impossibly beautiful women.
know beauty in any form”(86). We are so conditioned to see female beauty as what men
Wolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth. How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women. New York: William Morrow, 1991.
Sontag would still be concerned today. Sports has become a major part of society, and a new “sport” has been “created” for men, “pick up women.” Women are looked at as items by a myriad of men, where the craving to “get them” has not declined at all. One could think why men are constantly chasing women as a “sport.” The reason for this is that women allow for this to occur. Ms. Sontag’s worry that women welcome this upon themselves would still be correct. Ms. Sontag said, that women in her lifetime “should allow their faces to show the lives they have lived,” but her words might not have been completely understood by the women back then. By looking at a woman, one could possibly see what that woman is like. Today, some women perform horrible acts in front of cameras for money because their face “allows” it. These women have taken Ms. Sontag’s words out of
Her chief arguing points and evidence relate to the constriction of female sexuality in comparison to male sexuality; women’s economic and political roles; women’s access to power, agency, and land; the cultural roles of women in shaping their society; and, finally, contemporary ideology about women. For her, the change in privacy and public life in the Renaissance escalated the modern division of the sexes, thus firmly making the woman into a beautiful
Women have made great advancements in improving their rights and roles within society and are now less likely to be viewed as inferior by males. Nevertheless, they are still facing many challenges including being perceived as objects and being expected to dress and behave a certain way. In his essay “Looking at Women,” Scott Russell Sanders analyzes how men often perceive women as objects because of their indecent wardrobe and their willingness to put their bodies on display. In her essay “Why Women Smile,” Amy Cunningham explains the value of a smile and how it does not always reflect how a woman is truly feeling on the inside. Both essays spend much time looking at women and how they are under the constant scrutiny from those around them. What the essays of Sanders and Cunningham illustrate is that, while trying to shake old stereotypes, women find their identities constructed from their external appearance. The problem is and remains that women are complicit in the shallow construction of female identity that trades depth for surface because they have bought into the idea that a woman must trade on her external appearance to succeed in her public life.
In "A Woman's Beauty: Put-down or Power Source," Susan Sontag portrays how a woman's beauty has been degraded while being called beautiful and how that conceives their true identity as it seems to portray innocence and honesty while hiding the ugliness of the truth. Over the years, women have being classified as the gentler sex and regarded as the fairer gender. Sontag uses narrative structure to express the conventional attitude, which defines beauty as a concept applied today only to women and their outward appearance. She accomplishes this by using the technique of contrast to distinguish the beauty between men and women and establishing a variation in her essay, by using effective language.
Susan Sontag’s book Regarding the Pain of Others analyzes the ins and outs of the nature and ethics of violent war images. While one would not even have to bend the spine of this book to capture its essence, with its blunt title and frank cover illustration, some readers might turn the last page feeling puzzled by a few interpretations. While Sontag clearly establishes her belief that it is imperative that the general public view violent images and be informed about events their privilege would otherwise shelter them from, she hardly begins to consider the opinions of those who matter most-veterans. From mentions of their participation in staged photographs to talk of patriotic organizations denouncing anti-war propaganda, she is brief and
Opening/thesis: “The Birthmark” by Nathaniel Hawthorne and “Eye of the Beholder” by Rod Serling are short stories that introduce two young, beautiful women who, despite their beauty, are castigated by others for their uniqueness. Hawthorne crafts allegory using symbolism and third person omniscient storytelling, featuring characters who desire nothing less but perfection among the common man. Serling, however, writes of a parallel world where the one thing unaccepted by society is individuality. Despite differences in plot and setting, both authors poke fun at modern perceptions of beauty and elitism, suggesting our obsession with determining worth based on physical appearance will result in the conflict and segregation of peoples.
Throughout this essay it will be discussed how female representations affects society, what has changed, if has changed during the years. Representations of women were a crucial subject of discussion especially in the concepts of the gaze that often refers to women as objects of the active gaze. The gaze establishes relationships of power, representing different codes such as dominance and subjugation, difference and otherness (Sturken and Cartwright 2009: 111).
16.)Utt, Jamie. "Navigating The Difference Between The Appreciation of Beauty and Sexual Objectification." Everyday Feminism 18 Apr. 2013: n. pag. Web. 19 Apr. 2014. .
I would like to begin with the fact that women have always been known to dedicate their time to beauty. Those who are devoted to their appearance most often believe that beauty brings power, popularity, and success. Women believe this, because they grow up reading magazines that picture beautiful women in successful environments; not to mention they are popular models and world famous individuals. Beautiful women are no longer just a priority for most advertising, but we have become a walking target for the working class employers. It is documented that better-looking attorneys earn more than others after five years of practice, which was an effect that grew with experience (Biddle, 172). We cannot overlook the fact that it is always the most popular and most beautiful girl who becomes homecoming-queen or prom-queen. While these are possible positive effects of the "beauty myth," the negative results of female devotion to beauty undercut this value. These effects are that it costs a lot of money, it costs a lot of time, and in the long run, it costs a lot of pain.