The NCAA makes around a billion dollars each year through college sports and their athletes. All college athletes work very hard to help their teams win games and sometimes sustain many injuries. Although college athletes are not paid money for playing the sports that they love to play they are still given scholarships which can be worth approximately $150,000. As revenue is gained by colleges through their sports none of the money being made is given to the athletes who make these sports happen and games be played. Even though college athletes are not being paid to play some people believe they should be paid due to how much money they make for their college and other people believe they should not be paid due to having players become less …show more content…
motivated in playing the games they love to play and not being motivated in going to classes. One of the main reasons why college athletes should be paid is the revenue that they bring into the college. All colleges make an enormous amount of money off of their sports and they don’t give any of the money to the athletes that make these sports happen. The NCAA pulls out nearly $1 billion in revenue each year (Patterson). Also as of 2017 there were more than two dozen schools that generated upwards of $100 million in annual revenue. That is way more than the college actually needs while they should be giving some of this money to their athletes as they make a ton of money just from sports and sporting events. March Madness, a basketball tournament that takes place throughout march make the most money for the NCAA and their colleges. There is a $1 billion deal between NCAA and CBS without any of the athletes given a cut of money (Patterson). A main reason why athletes should be paid is that hey bring in a substantial amount of revenue for their colleges. Another main reason college athletes should be paid money is that they work extremely hard and sometimes receive injuries due to trying so hard to win for their teams. All Athletes put in lots of hard work minto their sports and in helping their teams. In basketball players can receive injuries through trying so hard and basketball is the most important sport of any college. here have been instances of players in college football becoming paralyzed through playing in games (Patterson). The overall injury rate in NCAA football is 8.1 injuries per 1,000 athlete exposures (games and practices combined). There were more than 41,000 injuries and 25 million athlete exposures from 2004 to 2009 (Article 10). A main reason why college athletes should be paid money is they work very hard and sometimes become injured. A reason why college athletes should not be paid is that if they were making money for sports they would have less motivation in both their sports and school. If college athletes were paid they would less motivated in attending their classes (Lennons). Also paying college athletes could detract from their passion and have less motivation in playing the sports that they are there to play. College athletes wouldn't care about school if they were making money as they would not have to worry about getting a degree for a future job. Most of a colleges athletes do not play the sports they play on order to make a living so paying them could also cause them to not try as hard as they usually do. A major reason was college athletes should not be paid is that it will cause them to lose motivation in school and in their sports. Another reason why college athletes should not be paid is that they are already given full scholarships that many believe cover the value that the athlete is worth. Although college athletes are not given any money from their colleges for playing in sports they are usually given full scholarships in a form of being paid money. Today’s college athletes enjoy more benefits far beyond what they receive while they are in school (Delaney and Williams). As scholarships are worth $150,000 players are still worth up to an extra $20,000 as a division one college athlete is worth $170,000 per year (Lemmons). College athletes sometimes gain less money than they should, however many strongly agree that a scholarship is more than enough provided for them by their schools. If a student athlete was paid money from sports they would still owe $23,800 in federal tax (Tylt). One last reason explaining why college athletes should be paid is that they will be able to provide support both for themselves and their families and making money teaches the athletes lessons to help them in their lives.
If athletes were paid they would be able to afford a good meal and would be able to provide support for their families. Many athletes blamed poor investments, trusting unethical financial advisors, and lavish spending habits as their reason for having money troubles therefore being paid would assist them in life. College Athletes usually do not have a good amount a money therefore they would be helped by gaining money. Making money from the sports that they play teaches college athletes how to handle their money very wisely (Washington). Gaining money would also help college athletes to afford nice clothes and many other things such as tickets to events to have fun and possibly a small apartment to live in during breaks. Due to being able to support their families college athletes would not have to leave school early and would be able to pursue an education increasing their colleges graduation rates. Being paid would help college athletes support their families and learn lessons they will be able to use later in their
lives. Although some believe that college athletes should not be paid for playing the sports that they love to play a majority of people believe that they should be paid for the sports that they take part in. One reason why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes bring in a very large amount of money for their colleges through sports. Another reason college athletes should be paid is that they work extremely hard and play extremely hard for their teams to win sometimes resulting in major injuries. One last reason why college athletes should make money from the sports they take part in is that they would be able to provide support for their families and learn lessons that will help them later in their lives. College athletes as a whole should all be paid money for participating in the sports they play.
Critics feel that the term amateurism is only a term used in collegiate sports to show the distinguish the difference between professional and collegiate so that they don’t have to pay college athletes. College athletes are just as talented and just as exposed as professional athletes. The argument is for there to be a share in the profits for wage compensation amongst players is know as pay-for-play. College athletics is a corporate enterprise that is worth millions of dollars in revenue. Pay-for-play is an assumption that colleges and universities receive huge revenues from marketing their collegiate sports programs and that the profits from these revenues are not shared with players who perform in the arena. Which some feel that they should.
The proposal of payment toNCAA student-athletes has begun major conversations and arguments nationwide with people expressing their take on it. “This tension has been going on for years. It has gotten greater now because the magnitude of dollars has gotten really large” (NCAA). I am a student athlete at Nicholls State University and at first thought, I thought it would be a good idea to be able to be paid as a student-athlete.After much research however; I have come to many conclusions why the payment of athletes should not take place at the collegiate level.The payment of athletes is only for athletes at the professional level. They are experts at what they do whether it is Major League Baseball, Pro Basketball, Professional Football, or any other professional sport and they work for that franchise or company as an employee. The payment of NCAA college athletes will deteriorate the value of school to athletes, create contract disputes at both the college and professional level, kill recruiting of athletes, cause chaos over the payment of one sport versus another, and it will alter the principles set by the NCAA’s founder Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. Under Roosevelt and NCAA, athletes were put under the term of a “student-athlete” as an amateur. All student athletes who sign the NCAA papers to play college athletics agree to compete as an amateur athlete. The definition of an amateur is a person who “engages in a sport, study, or other activity for pleasure rather than for financial benefit or professional reasons” (Dictonary.com).
College athletes should not be paid it will ruin college sports forever. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid by the school because of all of the hard work they put in however they shouldn’t be paid because there is no fair way to pay every college athlete. There are many reasons that college athletes shouldn’t be paid one of the main reasons is that colleges don’t have enough money, the second reason is that they already get money in the form of scholarships, and there is no fair way to pay each college athlete.
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
First lets explore the history behind the paying of college athletes. Over the past 50 years the NCAA has been in control of all Div.1, 2 and 3 athletic programs. The NCAA is an organization that delegates and regulates what things college athletes can and can’t do. These regulations are put in place under the label of ‘protecting amateurism’ in college sports. This allots
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote is regarding a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact that college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid to play for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income they bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Nowadays, we've seen many universities’ competitions on the television as a leisure performance but we've never concerned whether they receive their pay. In Mike Benedykciuk's article "The Blue Line: College Athletes Should be Paid," he argues that student athletes should receive the wage though they are not professional. Like any good writer, he employs special word choices, statistics and rhetorical devices to plead with the audience to take his side. In this article, he demonstrates many such devices, which will be explained further as follows.
... being paid. Many people prefer watching college sports over professional sports based on the idea that money isn’t involved in college sports. They are competing and giving everything they have for the love of their teammates, the love of their school, and above all, their love for the game. Paying athletes would ruin this standard of intercollegiate athletics. For all these reasons, college athletes should not be paid beyond their full ride scholarships.
College athletes juggle busy academic and practice schedules all throughout their stressful weeks, so why shouldn't they be compensated for their time dedicated to sports? NCAA rules strictly prohibits players from being paid for all the hard work they do to protect “amateurism”, but are you really an amateur putting in over 40 hours a week between practice and other activities? Although students earn a college scholarship, that doesn’t cover living expenses, and access to a degree at the end of their career, players should be paid because schools, coaching staffs and major corporations are profiting off their free labor.
Athletes everywhere complain and gripe about how little money they have. What they don’t realize is, it’s not just them. Most college students do not have a sufficient amount of money that they can buy whatever they want. It is outrageous that athletes believe they are entitled to accommodations because they play sports. To play a sport at the collegiate level is a privilege (Top 10 Reasons College Athletes Should Not Be Paid). Students that participate in athletics should not receive any payment because they are receiving tons of benefits, free tuition, and this would extend the talent gap.
Colleges make a plethora of money off of the sports teams and the players do not see any of that money at all but if they do then their performance would be poor on the field and off the field as well. According to Fred Bowen, “only football and men’s basketball are money-making college sports. Most others, such as field hockey, wrestling and swimming, do not attract big crowds or make big bucks.” (Should college athletes get paid?). Also the sports team that give out the most money for athletes to come and play for them, are football and men’s basketball. “Critics of paying college athletes note that only a small number of them compete in sports or on teams that actually generate revenue. They argue that if players were paid, a handful of exceptional athletes would receive large salaries while most players would receive a pittance, and would probably no longer be offered valuable athletic scholarships” (Paying College Athletes). It is not a surprise to anyone that the main athletes that do want to be paid is football and basketball players. They want to be paid because they bring in all of the money for the school and the...
It is reported that the NCAA makes $6 Billion annually. This is all from TV deals, advertisement, merchandise, and sponsorships. All this money because of the players and they don’t see any of it. How would you like to go work for a company make that company a million dollars and you not receive a dime of it? It just doesn’t sound right. Especially when you take into the fact that these players are putting their bodies at risk for their school. A college football player for example, his body takes so much punishment on the football field and injuries absolutely happen and he isn’t getting paid to put his body on the line. What happens to these kids’ scholarships if they suffer a career ending injury? If they were receiving some sort of compensation they can help pay their way forward to having an education if they can’t play a sport again because of an injury. These same athletes are also getting stuck with the medical bills when they get hurt. For example at the University of Maine athletes are responsible for the first $10,000 in deductibles (Emmert, Mark 2014). How is this fair they aren’t even receiving any money to pay for this
College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!
The college sports industry produces around 11 billion dollars in annual revenues. Sounds like there’s enough money to pay college students, right? Wrong. In my opinion, college athletes should not be paid for playing sports in college- it’s unfair, unnecessary, and there’s just no good justification. Why? Well, there are several reasons I believe this, and why you should too.
Student athletes are the main reason why college sports exist. Even though it is a highly profitable area, the NCAA claims that they cannot afford to pay athletes that are involved in competitive college athletics. There are many reasons why the college athletes should get paid. One huge and controversial reason is, what if the athlete gets injured and cannot live a normal life. This has been in-question many times during debates on the athletic department of many colleges. Imagine yourself as an injured college