Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare claude monet and
Compare claude monet and
Another impressionistic compared to monet's
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare claude monet and
Color and composition are important elements to art. Without understanding the basic information of these elements, you tend to just look at a piece of art and not fully understand what the artist is trying to covey. The Garden at Sainte-Adresse was painted by Monet in 1857. It is oil on canvas and is 38 5/8 x 51 1/18 inches. Monet was on vacation with his family, while painting this and even had them pose for the painting. The Autumn Effect at Argenteuil was painted by Monet in 1873. It is oil on canvas and is 21 5/8 x 29 3/8 inches. Monet painted this piece while out on his studio boat, a small boat that had a cover over it so he could paint outside in any weather. Even though, Garden at Sainte-Adresse and Autumn Effect at Argenteuil, …show more content…
In Garden at Sainte-Adresse the use of reds, yellows, and oranges in the flowers and the flag, to the blues and greens in the water and grass, makes all the colors “pop” in this piece. The brush strokes have a more defined outline and that makes the painting crisp and gives it more of a smooth texture. Whereas, in Autumn Effect at Argenteuil, he still uses complementary colors, the orange trees to the blue water and touches of greens, the colors don’t seem as vibrant, due to his different brush stroke technique. There are no defined outlines, in this piece, almost as if it is just blotches of color. They are almost muted in comparison to Garden at Sainte-Adresse. By using these types of brush strokes it give the work more texture and makes the leaves on the trees more realistic. In both pieces he uses “cool” colors to give us a calming and relaxing feeling, but in Autumn Effect at Argenteuil, he also gives us warmth by using a lot of reds and oranges. By using both “cool” and “warm” colors we get more of a warm and relaxing feel in Autumn Effect at Argenteuil than in Garden at Sainte-Adresse. There is also, a difference in the use of intermediate colors. He uses more intermediate colors in Autumn Effect at Argenteuil, whereas, in Garden at Sainte-Adresse, he uses more primary colors. In Autumn Effect at Argenteuil, he uses of more blue-green and yellow-orange …show more content…
He uses unity, balance, emphasis and subordination, and rhythm to design each piece. He has created a unified piece in, Autumn Effect at Argenteuil the use of vertical lines, the height of the trees and the stream. He also adds a little variety by painting the town in the horizon. In Garden at Sainte-Adresse, he uses the same technique, but only opposite. He has unity by painting the patio, sea, and sky horizontally, but adds some variety by painting the flag poles and flowers vertically and by painting one boat, in the forefront and the fence being higher on one side. Both piece have a balance to them. In Autumn Effect at Argenteuil, the forms above the horizon mirror the forms below the horizon, in the reflection of the water. It is not a perfect balance, but it makes the piece more calming to look at. There are three horizontal bands of the painting, Garden at Sainte-Adresse; the patio, sea, clouds, and sky and with the vertical lines of the flag poles and flowers, it gives the piece a nice balance. According to Getlein, “Emphasis and subordination are complementary concepts” (Getlein, 2012, 127). In Autumn Effect at Argenteuil, the emphasis is on the stream and trees, but the subordination is the town on the horizon. The emphasis in Garden at Sainte-Adresse is the people, patio, and flowers. The subordination is the boats on the horizon and the sky. “Through, repetition, any of the visual elements can
The historical painting I chose for my final, is an illustration of Bret Harte’s novel, Her Letter, His Response, and Her Last Letter, creatively illustrated by Arthur Ignatius Keller in 1905. The historical painting I chose for the comparison of Arthur Keller’s painting is another painting done by Arthur I Keller; illustrated for 54-40 or Fight by Emerson Hough, in 1909. Arthur I Keller is a very natural, elegant style painter, with an eye for natural beauty. Keller’s many paintings express intricate detail, and genuine quality. Although I picked two water color paintings out of Arthur Keller’s many collections of paintings, he also uses charcoal, acrylics, oils, and pastels to create other works of art. In both paintings I chose, Arthur Keller uses water color and gouache to paint people. Arthur’s first painting I mentioned, illustrating “Her Letter” is a more detailed painting. Keller uses water color to create a graceful look to his painting; his delicate balance of color, keeps the viewer’s eyes wandering around the painting. The focal point in the painting does not catch the viewer’s eyes because of heavy, dark colors, but because of the proportion differences of the people he implies. The painting gives off a very old fashioned feel, in a tasteful way. Arthur Keller’s second painting, illustrating “54-40 or Fight” has a completely different color theme, and gives off more of a mysterious, dark feel to it. The painting is detailed, but in a more simple way, and there is less negative space. As to where Keller’s “Her Letter” painting had a lot of open areas on the canvas, this painting, displays two people in a small enclosed dark room. The focal point is more dramatic, and a lot more obvious because instead of using sizing,...
They might not be very prominent, but they exist the painting and serve as the base for creation. For starters, the window pane contains lines that highlight its simple design. Simplicity remains as the core of this work. Moreover, sill is roughly represented by a thick brown line underneath the window as a boundary in a quietly brilliant fashion. The work has a wonderful color allocation to express the mood. The color is limited within the muted palette color range. Grey—the intermediate color of black and white, is the dominate color for both exterior view and the interior part, as a matter of fact, the observer notices that nearly all colors are mixed instead of natural this work. The cloudy sky corresponds to the grey color of the wall, yet the brightness is not influenced. However, this consistency has successfully created a cold, grave and silent environment for a crowded place such as New York. The whole environment of this painting seems to be surrounded by the negative and depressive
An artwork will consist of different elements that artists bring together to create different forms of art from paintings, sculptures, movies and more. These elements make up what a viewer sees and to help them understand. In the painting Twilight in the Wilderness created by Frederic Edwin Church in 1860 on page 106, a landscape depicting a sun setting behind rows of mountains is seen. In this painting, Church used specific elements to draw the viewer’s attention directly to the middle of the painting that consisted of the sun. Church primarily uses contrast to attract attention, but it is the different aspects of contrast that he uses that makes the painting come together. In Twilight in the Wilderness, Church uses color, rhythm, and focal
Besides bright or dim colors, and fine or rough brush strokes, artists use centralized composition to convey their interpretations in "The Acrobat's Family with a Monkey," "Amercian Gothic," "The Water-Seller," and "The Third of May,1808.”
There is a lot of repetition of the vertical lines of the forest in the background of the painting, these vertical lines draw the eye up into the clouds and the sky. These repeated vertical lines contrast harshly with a horizontal line that divides the canvas almost exactly in half. The background, upper portion of the canvas, is quite static and flat, whereas the foreground and middle ground of the painting have quite a lot of depth. This static effect is made up for in the immaculate amount of d...
There is, however, a slight opposition to this intense realism. It can be seen in Wood’s representation of foliage. The trees that appear in the upper left corner look like large green lollipops peeking over the roof of the house. The viewer knows that trees do not naturally look like that. Wood has depicted them as stylized and modern, similar to the trees seen is Seurat’s Sunday Afternoon on the island of La Grand Jatte. After viewing other works by Wood, it is clear that he has adopted this representation for the trees in many of his paintings.
We can see a clear representation of the impressionist that tended to completely avoid historical or allegorical subjects. In this painting, Monet’s painted very rapidly and used bold brushwork in order to capture the light and the color; include relatively small, thin, yet visible brush strokes. An insistence on what Monet called “a spontaneous work rather than a calculated one” – this in particular accounts for the sketchy and seemingly unfinished quality of the Impressionist paintings. In the texture, he played with the shadow and light and created variation in tone, he employs patches of depth and surface. The light in the painting come from back to the windmill, it is a light shines softly behind the houses and the windmill. He was shown each brushstroke in the painting. Balance is achieved through an asymmetrical placement of the houses and the most important the
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
From the piece of artwork “Rain at the Auvers”. I can see roofs of houses that are tucked into a valley, trees hiding the town, black birds, clouds upon the horizon, hills, vegetation, a dark stormy sky and rain.
He used rich naturalistic color to create gently, winding forms and silhouettes creating a picturesque scene on the left, and local color creates a hazy unifying blanket of light in the scene on the right and delivers a beautiful, peaceful mood. His harmoniously balanced compositions evoke the tranquil, undisturbed celebration of sublime nature. Van Gogh used color to express feelings and spirituality, and this coloristic composition creates a joyful, yet peaceful mood. The omnipresent strokes of yellow flowing from the sun provides the feeling of continuous energy and warmth. Van Gogh’s vibrant colors in the painting range from cool blues and greens to singed reds and bright yellows, a hue that he used to great effect. There is an inherent variety of colors in the dense green foliage. In the shade, the bark and leaves appear to have bluish-grey
Impressionism is very pretty and complicated. It was from 1860 to 1910. Monet is the perfect Impressionist. Impressionism had its basic tenants. Their subject matter was the middle upper class, the city, and leisurely activities. They painted on en plein air which means they painted outdoors. They painted in snow, rain, storm, just in order to record directly the effects of light and atmosphere. They painted with strokes and touches of pure color by using a great deal of white and rarely black. They recorded the shifting play of light on the surface of objects and the effect light has on the eye without concern for the physicality of the object being painted. They were influenced by Japanese art and photography. One of Monet’s works is titled Water Lilies. The medium of this work is oil on canvas. Monet is an impressionist. He puts up pure color just describe the water. He said, when you go out paint, the impression of the scene not the exact scene.
This painting consists of three parts, with curving lines distinctly separating each of the parts. The foreground details a brick house with a thatch roof and a person walking along a path, the mid-ground depicts houses further away and the undulating greenery, and the background highlights the break between earth and sky with the tree line. The main objects in the Houses at Auvers are blocky houses, with a path cutting through the landscape and a person on the path. This...
Not only the painting was detailed, but also the colors enhances everything that is going on. By looking at the painting I was able to identify what was going on easily, which I thought was impressive. My second motive for wanting to choose The Swing by Renoir was because of how these two paintings are somewhat the same yet they have a totally different meanings. I was amazed by how two similar paintings could have two different meanings. For example, in both paintings we can clearly see the sunlight and in both paintings there are two men, one lady, one child, and couple of people in the background yet the meaning of both paintings are 100 percent different. My third and final motive was when looking at the paintings, I was able to understand that the painting of Fragonard was drawn in a rich society where you can see the swing is made with thick rope, and a luxurious red seat, and even the forest, the statue, and the clothes relates to rich society. However, in Renoir’s painting we can clearly see the total opposite, the figures in the painting seem like they are from an average society, and that the swing is made out of thin rope, and wood seat, the clothes, and the atmosphere represents an average
The composition concentrates mainly on the foreground .It has three main points of interest, the small rowing boats, the artificial island and the floating barge .It also has a stretch of trees and foliage in the background painted in a much lighter fashion. Monet?s painting has a very different composition from Renoir?s painting of Grenouillere, which was done at the same time; Renoir?s painting is focussed much more on the artificial island and the people on it. Monet uses a combination of thick bold brushstrokes and small short soft brushstrokes; this creates a nice varied look and helps give a good impression of perspective. The tone is also very varied as it is Very light in some areas, but it is also quite dark in others, such as the shades on the barge. The use of dark shades in the foreground makes the boat look so realistic and quite 3D. Although the middle ground is flatter this helps add to the perspective. The water ho...
...f the shadows is sprinkled with the orange of the ground, and the blue-violet of the mountains is both mixed with and adjacent to the yellow of the sky. The brushstrokes that carry this out are inspired by the Impressionists, but are more abundant and blunter than those an Impressionist would use.