Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: J
“The Battle of the Huertgen Forest,” Charles B. MacDonald (2014) This Battle of the Huertgen Forest is a varied account referencing one of the World War II (WWII) Battles fought in Germany. This battle attests to being one of the bloodiest battles of the war in Germany, a war of attrition. This battle convened from September 1944 – December 1944, culminating in a German counteroffensive that won the final day at Huertgen. Some of the key points brought out in the accounts of this battle were: the number of losses on both the American and German fronts, the terrain needing covered or acquired, key German and American leaders and tactical/strategic advantages, disadvantages. The J. B. Lippincott Company, of Philadelphia and New York, originally published the “Battle of Huertgen Forest” in 1963. This re-account references two opposing forces, America and German, in a bloody battle over the Huertgen Forest. The Huertgen …show more content…
Forest is a piece of real estate that lay across a path the “First Army had taken to reach the Rhine River,” the objective, for American troops, was to control this piece of land considered crucial to combatant commanders. The Huertgen forest, located south of Aachen, was a stretch of heavily wooded forest covering approx. 50 sq. ml. I found this book to be awe-inspiring, taking into account the time frame for this battle as well as the resources available, and was amazed at the determination and grit displayed by these Soldiers. At the onset of this battle the American troop count was approximately 120,000, this count did not include the augments/replacements during the battle. This count included 6 American Infantry Divisions and 1 Armored Division that actually engaged in battle within Huertgen Forest. While the German troop count tallied 80,000 consisting of 6 German divisions to include 1 Panzer Division and augments from 2 other divisions. At the conclusion of this battle the casualties numbered 33,000 (9,000 non-battle injuries) for American troops and approximate 28,000 for German troops. The distinction between battle and no-battle injuries for the German troops is undetermined due the loss of records. The terrain during this battle was treacherous at best. The forest itself was a major obstacle to attempt to traverse on foot let alone trying to cut across these sectors with wheeled vehicles or tanks. The obstacles included: deep muddy terrain, narrow paths, mines (land and bouncing betties), pillboxes, firebreaks and trees. The trees within the forest were the most dangerous of them all. Even though the Americans had greater numbers than the Germans, once in the forest, numbers counted for nothing essentially once the Americans decided to make their way through the forest this leveled the playing field. The significant power and numbers displayed by the American troop was diluted by Germans knowledge of the terrain and the strategic use of the trees in the forest. While the Americans were in the forest the German troops lobbed artillery into the forest, when the Artillery struck the trees, the trees would splinter launching projectiles on to the forest floor, there was no escape and the foxholes provided no cover. Metal and wood fragmented projectiles mauling the bodies of American troops, the most one could do was to huddle at the base of a tree or lie beneath one of the decimated bodies lying on the forest floor. American tanks didn’t fair much better. There were multiple accounts of tanks: getting stuck in the mud, throwing a track, being damaged by mines and being stuck or immobilized on narrow paths and therefore blocking other tanks and being attacked by German troops. The tanks, at times, seemed to be more of an impediment than help. Key leaders for during the battle were: (US) MG J.
Lawton Collins, LTG Courtney H. Hodges, (German) General Walter Model and General Erich Brandenberger. This battle on both fronts was encumbered by a litany of problems not limited to logistical problems, low morale, and relief for cause disguised as R&R leave as well as lackluster intelligence. The most significant intelligence debacles were not realizing the importance of the Roer River Dams and the city of Schmidt. As the reading indicates, who ever controls Schmidt controls the dams but neither side knew what to do with the dams, either to seize and control or to destroy them. Eventually the Americans commanders decide to capture Schmidt to have control of the high ground as well as major crossings along the Roer. Although after taking Schmidt the Germans successfully fought to regain the ground and Schmidt would not be conceded again. A second attack on Schmidt cost the American troops: 167 killed, 431 missing, 232 captured, 719 wounded and 544 hospitalized (non-combat
injuries). The Battle of the Huertgen Forest was a good read, very informative and helps the reader by framing battles that occurred during WWII. I was a bit surprised at the number of Soldiers that both refused to fight and/or the commanders that didn’t want to put their Soldier in harms way, commanders who later were relieved of their command. The frustrating aspect of the book was the failure of combatant commanders to recognize the importance of certain objectives, while Soldiers were dying, holding objectives that had no real tactical advantage. The Battle of the Huertgen Forest is good historical read for anyone interested in battles during the WWII era, it also makes military member appreciate the importance of good intelligence gathering as well as logistical support.
In the summer of 1940, World War II had been in progress for nearly a year. Adolf Hitler was victorious and planning an invasion of England to seal Europe’s fate. Everyone in the United States of America knew it. The Germans were too powerful. Hitler's Luftwaffe had too many planes, too many pilots and too many bombs and since Hitler was Europe's problem, the United States claimed to be a neutral country (Neutrality Act of 1939). Seven Americans, however, did not remain neutral and that’s what this book is about. They joined Britain's Royal Air Force to help save Britain in its darkest hour to fight off the skilled pilots of Germany's Luftwaffe in the blue skies over England, the English Channel, and North Europe. By October 1940, they had helped England succeed in one of the greatest air battles in the history of aviation, the Battle of Britain. This book helps to show the impact of the few Americans who joined the Battle of Britain to fight off an evil that the United States didn’t acknowledge at the time. The name of Kershaw’s book was inspired from the quote, “Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to sow few,” which was said by British Officer and Prime Minister Winston Churchill.
In the summer of 1944, General George S. Patton and his 3rd Army successfully broke through heavy German Forces resistance from the Normandy invasion. German forces were in total disarray by the end of August 1944. Patton pleaded with his boss, General Omar Bradley, that if 3rd U.S. Army could be allocated as little as 400,000 gallons of fuel, he could be inside Germany in two days. Time was crucial before the inevitable reaction by the Germans to shore up their defense, preventing Patton from advancing. General Bradley refused Patton's request for more fuel; Unfortunately, General Patton advanced to Germany. Morale ran high throughout Patton’s Army, and there was no sign of heavy resistance before the German border. Consequently, by early September, the 3rd U.S Army had ground to a virtual halt along the flooded Moselle River. In places, Patton's tanks and vehicles ran out of fuel on the battlefield and their swift momentum outran their supply lines (Fugate, 1999). Lack of logistics allowed the German forces to take advantage of Patton’s Army and initiate one of the largest tank battles of World War II, the Battle of Arracourt.
Lyons, Michael J. World War II - A Short History. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education,
"World War II in Europe." 10 June 2013. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. 18 March 2014 .
The Battle of the Wilderness was a very unusual battle because it was fought in the woods. The terrain and the trees wouldn’t allow for the smoke to clear and it was dark anyway because of the trees. The men described it as eerie. Both sides fired blindly because of the smoke. Artillery was abandoned because they could not transport it through the woods. So those soldiers became...
Borneman, Walter. The French and Indian War: Deciding the Fate of North America. New York: Harper Perennial, 2006.
Kelley, Roger E. "America’s World War II Home Front Heritage." Cr.nps.gov. United States, n.d. Web.
Anderson, F., and R.S Stephenson. The War That Made America. Penguin Group USA, 2005. (accessed December 5th , 2013).
Keegan chooses the three well documented campaigns of Agincourt in 1415, Waterloo in 1815, and Somme in 1916 to answer the question of his thesis: To find out how men who are faced with the threat of single-missile and multiple-missile weapons control their fears, fix their wounds, and face their death. In his words he is seeking “to catch a glimpse of the face of battle.”
Resnick p. 15. However, these events infuriated Hitler who refused to believe that the Germans had been defeated fairly on the battlefield.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Works Cited Horne, Alistair. A.S.A. & Co. To Lose a Battle: France, 1940. New York: Penguin, 1990. Jackson, Julian.
Considered by most to be the greatest naval fleet battle during World War I, the Battle of Jutland was the largest and last full-blown conflict between massive fleets consisting of battle cruisers, dreadnoughts, and destroyers. Despite the fact that Jutland changed nothing strategically within the war, it is still known as being one of the most significant battles in naval history. But this battle was also one that ended with many questions and controversies that have been written about and discussed throughout the years following, even to present day.
The battle of Aachen was the first battle that the Allied forces broke the Siegfried Line around the border 1945, of Germany. World War II lasted from 1939-1945; the battle of Aachen was in October of 1944, which is very late in the war. Both the U.S. and Germany had thousands of men killed on the battle field. Since so many troops lost in this one battle over a city, the Americans nicknamed the battle “bloody Aachen”. The battle of Aachen was the first successful offensive action that the Allies had in Germany.
Military Forum, For discussion of the armed forces, military history, weapons and related topics, The Third Battle of Kharkov.
Zink, Harold. (1957) The United States in Germany, 1944-1955 [online]. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand [cited 12th September 2011]. Available from: