Analysis Of W. E. B. Dubois In The Souls Of Black Folk

1133 Words3 Pages

W.E.B. DuBois in the Souls of Black Folk, published in 1903, is one of the most classic pieces of literature in American history. This book describes the “veil” between whites and blacks within society. He constructs the idea of a dual personality, where an African American has two identities as two unconnected individuals, in order to show the fallacy of these opinions. It was derived of four different essays. First, the readers see what is it like to live in the skin of a black person. Second essay speaks on the topic of color line. These both cement the rest of his essays. In the third essay, he describes Booker T. Washington’s ride in the United States. His fourth essay, “The Meaning of Progress,” he describes what it was like to be a teacher …show more content…

He no longer understands the languages spoken by his ancestors. He has forsworn their religion and forgotten their mores” (366). He speaks on behalf of negros, explaining how there is equality to eventually flourish if allowed. A negros value has always been directly related to hard labor, which co-exists with pay.
Family life is different for a negro in return. Families suffer due to economic standing. He says, “In America, family… does not exist” (685) A negro is bought and sold among white folk and has no chance of having a ligament family life. A slave is not considered a person, so from the womb they are nothing (property), cannot be married, cannot have a ligament name. All slaves are equal at birth and have no social status in society.
DuBois had explained that the average life for blacks in America was a hardship. DuBois had a different take in the fight for equality and the struggle for the abolishment of racism. Some people that wanted black to be submissive and others strived for a "separate black nation." DuBois only wanted fight and passion from blacks to find equality. Through his writings …show more content…

Even if he knew that it was wrong I don’t think he took into consideration how bad it was. He later honed the term mores, which means this is the proper way to behave within a culture or society. He did not believe in slavery as being a good “more” and was an abolitionist. As he was finishing the second volume of Democracy in America, he was elected to the Chamber of Deputies. Tocqueville fought for the rights of many black slaves within the United States.
I would also say that he isolated slaves in his own manner. "Despotism... sees in the separation among men the surest guarantee of its continuance, and it usually makes every effort to keep them separate" A quote from Tocqueville in his book. The best way to encourage slavery to end would have been a way that DuBois took initiative to retaliate and fight for the freedom. He also said bows to the tastes of his oppressors, adopts their opinions, and aspires, by imitating them, to become indistinguishable from them” (368). I would say that Tocqueville took a less hands on approach. Tocqueville states, "as soon as a man begins to treat of public affairs in public, he begins to perceive that he is not so independent of his fellow men…" When people act out or protest, this usually means that they will be dependent on each other, and are doing it for the good of the entire

Open Document