Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of vygotsky's sociocultural theory
Cultural influence on identity
Strengths and weaknesses of vygotsky's sociocultural theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Learning Theory Given the comprehensive nature of sociocultural theory, its educational implications for assessment, curriculum, and instruction are numerous. When considering theory to practice with regards to the sociocultural theory, the notion of zones of proximal development (ZPD) must be recognized. ZPD is a teaching tool that aids students to progress educationally beyond what he or she could do by themselves. ZPD also has a prominent place in the goals of educational assessment. When teachers create assessments they should identify what abilities the student needs to master the objective of the lesson and then create an assessment that captures the mastery level of the student. One method of assessing a The set of systems and the individual’s interactions between and within these systems nurture or stifle an individual’s development. Bronfenbrenner’s perspective on child development transformed how researchers study human development. The transformation was evident in when researchers examine naturally occurring and designed experiments in order to determine the influences of contexts on child development. As the result of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological learning theory of human development, the environments including family to economic and political structures are part of the individual’s life journey (citation). Bronfenbrenner’s ecological approach to human development helped to unite the disciplines that have allowed emergent of key elements in the larger social structure that are vital in understanding the development of human nature Vygotsky’s theory makes assumptions about how children learn, but he emphasized the social context of learning more than Piaget 's cognitive constructivist theory. Piaget’s theory is used as the foundation for learning models in which the teacher has a limited role. Whereas, Vygotsky 's sociocultural theory both teachers and experienced peers play important roles in learning. Cognitive constructivism and Vygotsky 's sociocultural theory have common aspects between the two theories or an overlap. However, Vygotsky 's theory incorporates a more active and involved teacher role. Vygotsky in his theory advises that culture gives the child the cognitive tools needed for development. The tools determine the pattern and rate of development of which the parents and teachers are conduits for the tools of the culture.
This reading reminded me about how Vygotsky’s theory is mostly based on the interactions and influences help children to learn. I really do believe this theory is very accurate, because students can learn from each other. If a teacher is having trouble explaining a complex topic to a student, another student can explain it in more relatable way. Also, I was fascinated when I read about what cultural tools, were and how they related to Vygotsky’s beliefs. Learning about what cultural tools were, helped me to broaden my understanding of how crucial cultural tools are to student’s learning process. Also, the chapter did a great job of elaborating on how these tools can help to advance and grow in the understanding of student’s thinking process. Another aspect of this reading that interested me was the elaboration on private speech and the Zone of Proximal Development. Each of the definitions displayed help me to advance my own thinking on what it was and how it is used in regards to the education of students. The description of what private speech and how it is basically the inner narration of their thinking process helped me to understand how this aspect can help with students learning. Also, the Zone of Proximal Development helped me to make a connection to both what is and how it relates to private speech as well. The Zone of proximal development plays a crucial role in the
Urie Bronfenbrenner (1917-2005) was born in Russia in 1917 and moved to America at a very young age. He became a psychologist in 1938 and received a doctorate in Developmental Psychology in 1942. In 1948 he accepted a position in Human development, Family studies and Psychology at Cornell University where he remained for the rest of his professional career. Bronfenbrenner spent most of his professional life in a department that contains three different fields. He was not satisfied with what he believed was a fragmented approach to the study of human development, each one with its separate level of analysis (child, society, family, culture, economics and so forth) (Danner, 2009) In response, he developed an ecological system model, listed in his 1979 book The Ecology of Human Development, in which Bronfenbrenner (1979, p.3) states ‘The ecological environment is con...
Sociocultural theory was introduced by the psychologist Lev Vygotsky, a contemporary of Sigmund Freud and B.F. Skinner. Vygotsky believed that parents, caregivers and the culture at large were responsible for a child's cognitive development, especially in regards to the development of higher order functions. From this perspective, when children are participating in an activity with a peer, caregiver or parent, their actions are based upon the environment in which they learned to navigate social relationships. As children age, their personalities and capacities are further developed by their interactions in a particular society, determined by cultural and historical events. A sociocultural perspective would be utilized in a situation in which
Nature versus nurture is an argument in psychology over whether a person’s innate qualities and behaviors are caused from their environment or if they’re born with it. Vygotsky places more emphasis on the social factors that contribute to cognitive development, in other words he is in favor of the nurture argument. He believes that everyone learns from their culture, environment, and social interactions. He talks about a few of his theories like the zone of proximal development, and a more knowledgeable other. He also expresses his thoughts on developmental tools and the importance of language to cognitive development. All of these factors together support his idea that children’s behavior is learned.
She is able to do very well in math but has trouble in reading due to English being her second language. It is possible that the student grasp math, by being taught from her culture, or family. The zone of proximal development allows her to learn from things independently, which the teacher tries to do during her lessons, to allow children read and understand a story individually. Student A can also accomplish learning by interacting with the teacher, which helps her learn and sound out
He deeply” believed” that “community” played “a central role in the process of “making meaning” (McLeod, 2014). Vygotsky, had "argued on Piaget’s notion that a “child’s development must precede” his or her learning”, and he also argued that “learning is a necessary and universal aspect in the process
Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky are two very well-known theorists who emphasized the development of cognition in their theories. In Piaget’s Cognitive Developmental theory, he claimed that children go through a series of stages, which he used to describe human development. In Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory of Learning, he believed culture and social interaction played a role in cognitive development. Although Piaget and Vygotsky both focused their theories on cognitive development they take different stances a series of developmental issues. This paper will look at the similarities and differences between these theorist’s views on critical developmental issues, such as view of human nature, mechanisms of development, and their
Lev Semenovich Vygotsky is a sociocultural theorist that believed cognitive development occurs within ones environment and social interactions. People are a product of their environment and will likely retain information and acquire similar ideas to those that are around them. Vygotsky had multiple ideas supporting his theory, such as cultural tools, psychological tools, language, scaffolding, and the zone of proximal development.
Bronfenbrenner’s approach was to study children in their natural environments to explore how a child experiences and interprets their world within a complex system of relationships (Berk, 2009, p. 26). His theory regards the environment of a child; taking into account the practices within that environment and how they might influence development and of the child’s individual connections to show the way in which external forces and the child interrelate to influence their development (Paquette and Ryan, n.d.). It is important to recognise how the interaction of the systems with bidirectional (adults affect children’s behaviour but children’s behaviour can also affect adults’ behaviour [Berk, 2009]) influences within and between the systems can strengthen or interrupt healthy child development as each system contains roles, norms, values, beliefs and rules that can effectively shape their development.
The similarities in the theories, including the development perspective and dialectical approach, are very complex and focus upon the fundamentals of each theory. The differences in each theory make them very unique, including the autonomous and heteronomous approaches for each respective theory. The four cognitive stages of Piaget’s theory, including sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operations, and formal operations, provide a clear, effective progression of an individual’s development path from infancy to adulthood. This is very unique to Piaget’s theory and is utilized immensely in academic studies of psychology. The fundamental aspects of Vygotsky’s theory, including cultural and historical factors contributing to the individual’s development is also very unique and is regularly utilized in academic studies. Without the research that each theorist conducted and presented, the psychology studies that we know today would not be the same. The work of both respective theorists will continue to be utilized in academia and in psychology for many years to
Human development issues have remained critical in understanding how and why people behave the way they do. Several human development theories exist to explain human development from birth through to death. Some of these have focused on the psychological aspects of human development while others on the cognitive aspect (Piaget, 1971; Lerner, 2001; Swick and Williams, 2006). Other human development theories have also focused on the social and environmental aspects (Bronfenbrenner & Bronfenbrenner, 2009; Swick, 2004). This current essay examines one of the major social theories relating to child development. The theory to be examined is the Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory of human development. The essay will further examine the applicability of the Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory to my personal development, growing up as a child between the ages of 4 years and 12 years. In the first instance, the essay will focus on explaining the – Bronfenbrenner’s theory including the four types of systems described by the theory. Subsequently, the essay will examine how these systems apply to my life in relation to the social systems in which I grew in South Sudan in Africa. It will be seen that the Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory
Lev Vygotsky developed his theory of learning in the 1920’s but it was not until the late 1960’s that his ideas about learning became popular and were used to contribute to “Constructivism” as a method of teaching. (Krause [et al.] 2010 p. p81).
Sivan (1986) explains cognitive activity as the process of the individual having a motive, which gives direction and a goal at the end of the interaction or conversation. The difference between the social constructivist theory and Piaget is their view on cognitive development and the amount of people that are involved in the process. Piaget perspective is based on an individual and their experiences and Vygotsky took it further and thought that it should be constructed with someone other than one person. Cognitive activity is a complex process, which develops and becomes more dynamic based on the person and their maturity level that you are completing the activity with. Sivan’s (1986) idea of cultural knowledge, tools, and signs is based on the idea of culture and the environment that the students are in. A tool of social constructivist theory would be language and speech between different students based on experiences, and living environment. Sivan (1986) states the “development of people’s psychological and cognitive processes is involved in, created by, defined by, and limited by the opportunities that culture provides”. When students are exposed to different cultures and different experiences students have the tendency to become more interested and engaged in the content. Students are gaining knowledge based on the culture interactions and conversations with other students or adults. The world has become a consistent and steadily changing world but many students do not leave the city where they were born to know of any change that is being made. A student’s cultural knowledge at a young age is based on parent or guardian’s attitude or idea behind culture. I have many students that are told they can’t play with a certain student because of what culture they are a part of. This is
The theories of Vygotsky, Gardner, and Gagne present vary different models of learning. Vygotsky and Gardner see culture as an important factor in how a child learns, and see growth and development and individual thing. Gagne, however, focuses on a formal model of instruction, with the method used depending upon the content being taught. All three theories have a role to play in educational technology.
developed many theories in cognitive development during his lifetime, which later became known as the Social Development Theory. He believed that social factors and interactions with the community played a vital role in cognitive development. One principal that Vygotsky developed into his theory was the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). The concept behind ZPD is that there are developmental differences in a child who can achieve independently and a child can achieve with the guidance and support from a skilled helper. The Zone of Proximal Development is the concept that there are certain skills that are too difficult for a child to accomplish by his/herself, but with the task or skill can be mastered with the guidance from a knowledgeable person. Vygotsky saw the ZPD as the zone where children are most sensitive to instruction and guidance should be given. This would allow the individual child to develop skills that they can eventually use on their own, thus developing cognitive function (Doolittle, 1995).