Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Movie analysis of a western
How to analyse western films
Movie analysis of a western
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Movie analysis of a western
The 1962 Western film “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance” centers around Ranse Stoddard and his struggle with morality and justice. The film opens with Stoddard and his wife Hallie returning to Shinbone, a small town in the west, for Tom Doniphon’s funeral. In a flashback that spans most of the film, Stoddard recounts how Doniphon, a relatively unknown man, became so important to him, a famous, well respected senator. 25 years ago, Stoddard was beaten up and left by the road by Liberty Valance, leader of a notorious gang. Doniphon found Stoddard and brought him back to Shinbone, explaining that Stoddard’s position as a lawyer meant nothing if he couldn’t handle a gun. Throughout the film, Stoddard struggled with this Western lifestyle, and …show more content…
Immediately after being viciously beaten up by Valance and the rest of his gang, Stoddard, with blood and bruises littering his face, demands to know the name of the man who beat him up. He plans on finding Valance and arresting him, and even after Doniphon offers him his handgun, he mutters, “Gun? I don’t want a gun. I don’t want a gun,” then hotly continues, “I don’t want to kill him!” Here, the thought of physically fighting the man who beat him up shocks him. He believes hurting Valance is beneath him, that Doniphon is horrible for even implying that Stoddard would kill Valance. He doesn’t even want to carry a gun to defend himself, something he repeats for emphasis. In this scene, Stoddard is sitting down on the bed, woozy and bloody, evidence of his defeat. But his words, which are shown throughout the film to be his weapon of choice, describe different scene. Stoddard is angry, ready to jump up, find Valance, and arrest him. He wants Valance to pay, but in a different way, one that is unheard of in Shinbone. Furthermore, he is shocked that everyone knows about Valance and his abuse, yet does nothing about it. This is Stoddard’s first realization that the town he came upon isn’t like the East, where he’s from. When he stands up and starts shouting he is a lawyer and no one is above the law, he falls down, with Doniphon having to …show more content…
The first student talks about the United States being a republic, that the people can choose who holds power by voting for representatives. Not only does this embody what Stoddard is trying to teach the town, where many people don’t care about voting and getting the best representative, but it also foreshadows Stoddard’s future, as he’ll be chosen as a delegate for the statehood convention and he’ll go on to become a United States senator. When Stoddard talks about the newspaper that details the cattleman vs statehood conflict, he shows the type of town that Shinbone will become, one where the powerful ranchers don’t own large areas of land and the people can vote for their rights. The return of Doniphon shatters the moment when he reveals that Valance and his men have been hiring gunmen for the ranchers, and have already killed some people. When it’s revealed that Stoddard has been practicing shooting a gun to prepare for a standoff with Valance, the line between Doniphon and Stoddard isn’t as clear. No longer is Stoddard the straight-laced pilgrim who advocates for doing everything by the law. Although he’s still trying to bring some change to Shinbone, making it more of a self-governing town, part of him sees that Doniphon is right, that sometimes the law can’t fix
The book Chasing Lincoln’s Killer is about the world famous story of assassinating President Abraham Lincoln. This book takes the reader into the lives and minds of the four main conspirators responsible for the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and the attempted assassination of the Vice President, Andrew Johnson , and the Secretary of State, William H. Seaward. Not only will the reader learn about the details of the planned assassinations but the background of all conspirators involved, each one of their motives for committing the crimes, and all the differences between the actual killings and what was supposed to happen if everything went according to plan. In this gripping novel the writer, James Swanson, takes the reader through a key point in American history in order to learn the truth of what must have happened while chasing Lincoln’s killer.
For instance, Dally did not have much to live for. No family that loved him except for Johnny, just a couple of Old’ friends. He already has a police record, because of how is is so disobedient to the laws. The only fun in Dallys life was picking up girls and finding some new ways to break the law. He never cared for anyone but Johnny, and once Johnny had died that was the end. Dallas did not know how else to handle himself. When Darry got the phone call Ponyboys thoughts scattered then came to a conclusion, “But I knew that was what he wanted, even as the lot echoed with the cracks of the shots, even as I begged silently please, not him… not him and Johnny both - I knew he would be dead, because Dally Winston wanted to be dead and he always got what he wanted”(154). Like Pony said, Dally always got what he wanted and he definitely did. Once Johnny died he did not care about anything in life. Conversely, Johnny had a lot to live for. He is only sixteen years old and he has a lot ahead of him. Johnny was very law abiding he tried hard not to get into any trouble or break any laws. Now that he has made that mistake with Bob he thinks he has ruined his whole life. He has not, there is much more ahead of him. Johnny had died a hero by saving all those kids at the burning church. He finally understands, “Listen, I don’t mind dying now. It's worth it, It’s worth saving those kids. Their lives are
The Alamo portrays the historical battle between Santa Anna controlling the Mexican Army and the Texan Defenders who are defending The Alamo, a mission located in San Antonio, Texas. The film is heavily concentrated on the year 1836, specifically the months February and March, and the year 1835. The film stars Dennis Quaid as Sam Houston, Billy Bob Thornton as David Crockett, Jason Patric as Jim Bowie, and Patrick Wilson as William Travis. The Alamo is a historically accurate movie that involves history, war, and immense amounts of drama.
In the past few years, advertisement has changed significantly, and with it bringing many changes to our current society. Susan Bordo, a modern feminist philosopher, discussed in her article “Beauty (Re)discovers the Male Body” how current society has changed starting with Calvin Klein’s advertising campaign that showed men wearing nothing but underwear. Bordo argues how men are becoming the subject of the gaze, just as women were for centuries. This argument of the gaze is especially pronounced in John McTiernan’s film The Thomas Crown Affair, which focuses on two main characters, a man named Thomas Crown, who is a billionaire Manhattan financier, and a woman named Catherine Banning, and insurance investigator who is investigating Crown’s robbery of the 100-million-dollar painting, the “San Giorgio Maggiore Soleil Couchant”. The film addresses Bordo’s modern feminine and masculine gaze to target a wide range of adult audience.
It was incredibly difficult to not to pick one of my favorite films for this project, such as A Clockwork Orange, One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, and Jaws. However, I went out of my comfort zone and picked a genre of film I’ve never become familiar with- Western. The 1974 film Blazing Saddles was a hilarious frontier/Wild West twist about road worker named Bart, played by Cleavon Little, becoming part of character Hedley Lamarr’s (Harvey Korman) evil plan to out-run the small town of Rock Ridge by appointing an African American sheriff to the massly single-minded small town of racist’s. With the plan to destroy the town to make way for a new railroad, Lamarr is convinced that they town would be so appalled that they wouldn’t stand having an
An early scene in George Roy Hill’s film Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969) shows illustrious bandit Butch Cassidy walking into a bank and observing a series of security upgrades (e.g. an alarm system, a safe, and several different locks). As Butch Cassidy exits the establishment, he asks the security guard, “What happened to the old bank?” The guard responds, “People kept robbing it.” Butch remarks, “Small price to pay for beauty.” Although Butch Cassidy’s disappointed assertion may have been rooted in disappointment for the loss of a heist rather than the loss of architectural merit, it leads one to question: To what extent are cultural attributes lost at the expense of new technology? I will consider this question as I examine the ways in which Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid highlights the
Citizen Kane, Orson Welles’ cinematic classic, is a film that centers on a group of reporter’s investigation into the meaning of Charles Foster Kane’s last uttered word, “Rosebud.” Citizen Kane ' brings into light many social problems between countries, relationships, and also between competing newspaper companies. It brings into light how a newspaper should react and also brings the corruption of politics. War was breaking out in Europe and throughout the entire film Kane states there will be no war. He ignores the fact people are being killed, tortured, and rounded up like livestock.
Moreover, the film Mildred Pierce follows the struggles of a hard-working mother, Mildred Pierce, as she divorces her husband and supports herself and her spoiled daughter, Veda, by starting a successful restaurant business chain. In different ways, the film challenges the notions of masculinity and femininity as gender roles are reversed with different characters but identify this, you have to look at the films ideology. Ideology is a system of ideas that structure and make sense of society. If you look at 1940s America, post World War 2, the society at the time adhered to a very hegemonic patriarchy in which men were the ones with power, the ones providing for the family; where as the women of the time were seen subordinate and were more
The manner in which Torvald talks down to his wife and the apparent. unopposed acceptance of this by his wife, is evidence that, at least. Initially, power firmly rests in the grip of Nora’s husband. Nora’s language is full of indefinite, qualitative statements, demonstrated. especially when talking about Torvald's salary, however, when Torvald speaks.
‘Our interest in the parallels between the adaptation inter-texts is further enhanced by consideration of their marked differences in textual form,’
The movie I decided to analyze for this course was American History X (1998), which stars Edward Norton. Though this movie isn’t widely known, it is one of the more interesting movies I have seen. It’s probably one of the best films that depict the Neo Nazi plague on American culture. The film takes place from the mid to late 1990’s during the Internet boom, and touches on subjects from affirmative action to Rodney King. One of the highlights of this movie that really relates to one of the key aspects of this course is the deterrence of capital punishment. Edward Norton’s portrayal as the grief stricken older brother who turns to racist ideologies and violence to cope with his fathers death, completely disregards the consequences of his actions as he brutally murders someone in front of his family for trying to steal his car. The unstable mentality that he developed after his father’s death really goes hand-to-hand specifically with Isaac Ehrlich’s study of capital punishment and deterrence. Although this movie is entirely fictional, a lot of the central themes (racism, crime punishment, gang pervasiveness, and one’s own vulnerability) are accurate representations of the very problems that essentially afflict us as a society.
Based on a true story, the movie ‘Lone Survivor’ features four Navy SEALs that set out on a mission to Afghanistan with orders to capture and kill Taliban leader Ahmad Shah. The Navy SEALS are detected by villagers and the mission was compromised. Ultimately, the mission had been discovered and the men found themselves surrounded by dozens of Taliban soldiers. One of the Navy SEAL soldiers managed to dispatch to base and retrieve assistance but the Taliban shoot down the helicopter. During battle, three of the Navy SEAL soldiers were killed leaving one still alive.
Tom Stoppard is able to make clear statements about the society that has influenced him to create Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. He essentially takes elements of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and transforms them to make a judgement on society. By shifting the focus of his play to common man, he is able to convey values that are relevant to the 1960s. He develops characters that allow audiences to gain a new perspective on Shakespeare’s play and acquire a more informed perception of themselves. Stoppard makes a statement about 1960s society’s lack of direction and pleads viewers to take an active role in improving their own situation.
For this assignment, I decided to do my film review on To Kill a Mockingbird (Mulligan, R., & Pakula, A. (Directors). (1962). To Kill a Mockingbird[Motion picture on VHS]. United States of America.) I have a personal connection to this film because it is one of my most beloved novels by Harper Lee. I have never watched the film so it was a nice experience to see the characters I have loved for years come to life just before my eyes. The film particularly focuses on a white family living in the South of the United States in the 1930s. The two siblings, Jem and Scout Finch, undergo major changes while experiencing evil and injustice in their small town of Maycomb. Jem and Scout’s father is named Atticus and he is a well-respected man in the town as well as being a lawyer.
...eople inside before running out and killing one woman nearby. After a police chase, Stawicki shot himself (“We could see this coming”). If Stawicki had gotten help before he would have been better off and maybe this shooting could have been avoided. Many examples show that the government could put in safety nets and could avoid many of these killings.