Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Regional free trade agreements
The north atlantic free trade agreement
The north atlantic free trade agreement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Regional free trade agreements
The Softwood Lumber Dispute “In August 1987, after fifteen months of negotiations Canada and the U.S concluded another round of talks, and finally agreed on a free trade agreement. It was then Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and President Ronald Reagan who had launched the trade initiative at their convivial 1985 and their main focus was lowering trade and tariff barriers. This was cast as a path to increased prosperity for both nations. This is also known as the Ottawa summit. However the negotiating was not easy. Substantive differences did not prove amenable to quick resolution. The Canadian Prime Minister was however in for a disappointment as he had placed a considerable amount of stakes on this deal and hated to see it finished off. The Canadian negotiators were in for a difficult deal that was how to move the bargain forward without losing their side off the deal. By September, the Canadian government was preparing a strategy for resolving the talks-one way or another. Failing that, the Canadian cabinet would have to determine how and when to acknowledge the breakdown in the negotiations. This case is designed to encourage discussion of both the Canadian and US negotiating postures and of how each nation's assessment of the other helped to define its negotiating stance. Another case, US-Canada Free Trade Negotiations I (C16-87-785.0), involves US preparations for the negotiations, with specific focus on obtaining congressional approval for the talks” (http://www.ksgcase.harvard.edu/case.htm?PID=862) “Canadian officials had given quite a palpable response to the imposition of duty, which was around 19.3 percent, countervailing tax on imports of Canadian softwood lumber with much tub-thumping and hand wringing. Many traders a... ... middle of paper ... ...an business world at odds with the free trade agreement that was drafted in 1987, with the aim of encouraging better trading through pulling back the different trade barriers that are used in international trade. The softwood lumber dispute is however straining relations between Canada and the Unites states. It has put the 1987 agreement into the background and dashed any hopes of better trading relations between the two countries. Canada is a major supplier of softwood and the united state is a major market, which it is at risk of losing. Therefore the achievement of Canadian objectives remains elusive at best. Bibliography US-Canada Free Trade Negotiations (II): The Canadian Dilemma, http://www.ksgcase.harvard.edu/case.htm?PID=862 Keith Jones, (7 September 2001) “Lumber dispute strains Canada-US relations, http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/sep2001/lumb-s07.shtml
Canada and the United States are the largest trade partners in the world. It is the result of the geographical position of two countries and the free trade between two countries. It should be a great thing for the economies of both countries, but since the North American Free Trade Agreement was signed, American businesses almost took over the Canadian economy. When the American companies started to make more business in Canada, it brought more jobs and money to the country in the short-term. But as a long-term effect Canadians became even more depended on the U.S. as the American companies started dominating Canadian companies in Canada. Also, today Canadian manufacturers have little protection from the government when ch...
The article goes over the affects this deal has on some local Canadian industries. For example, the author explained that this deal will possibly increase the amount of imported foreign car parts and maybe even dairy products, which could mean a better selection as well as lower prices for consumers but also hurt some workers who operate locally in these businesses. Currently the absence of foreign products in the Canadian dairy market means that there is less selection for a higher price, but this also means that local farming communities can have stable incomes and can be
Introduction “We are all treaty people” Campaign. The year 1907 marked the beginning of treaty making in Canada. The British Crown claims to negotiate treaties in pursuance of peaceful relations between Aboriginal peoples and non-Aboriginals (Canada, p. 3, 2011). Treaties started as agreements for peace and military purposes but later transformed into land entitlements (Egan, 2012, p. 400).
Further with "pieces of paper", the negotiation of the Halibut Treaty between Canada and the United States of America was also instrumental in establishing Canada's
Roberts, Russell. (2006). The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
A complex collection of more than 1800 separate islands forms the Canadian Archipelago and Canada’s Arctic territory. 1 Within recent history the arctic has gained popular attention from governments both domestically and internationally. The rise in global climate temperatures accounts for longer, ice free Arctic summers, higher levels of resource exploration and development, and less challenges to access in the Arctic. Canadian sovereignty over Arctic lands and islands is undisputed with the single exception of Hans Island, a 1.3 square kilometer island claimed by Denmark.2 Currently what is disputed is the Canadian assertion of sovereignty over the Northwest Passage waterway. The passage which would facilitate international shipping through the sovereign Canadian archipelago island system, links the Atlantic Ocean with the Pacific Ocean. Its widest and deepest course would take the Northwest passage from “Lancaster Sound through Barrow Straight into Viscount Melville Sound an onwards through M’Clure Straight and into the Beaufort Sea.”3 Historically Arctic ice made this route impossible to cross, but rising temperatures are changing that. The government of Canada believes that the Northwest Passage is situated within internal Canadian waterers, thereby falling under Canadian sovereign jurisdiction, subject to Canadian domestic laws. With the possibility of the passage becoming a international shipping rout, many countries including the United States do not agree with this claim. They suggest the Northwest passage should be an international straight subject to the International Law and the doctrine of transit passage.4
MEMO RE CLARKSON LUMBER TO: John Doe President, Northrup National Bank FROM: George Dodge Loans Officer, Northrup National Bank Clarkson Lumber Company is owned and operated by the hardworking, 49-year-old Mr. Clarkson. It has low operating expenses, a small staff, and strong management. The overall impression is one of a conservative, efficient operation. Clarkson himself leads a frugal lifestyle with little personal debt. Clarkson Lumber is a company experiencing rapid growth but with a constant cash flow crisis.
The meeting of minds between Chile and the United States has brought about a long awaited union pertaining to free trade. Chile responded enthusiastically when presented with the opportunity to become a part of 1994's North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) but because of the issue of presidential fast-track trade negotiation authority, the merger did not come to fruition. Now, nearly a decade later -- after negotiations began in the year 2000 -- Chile and America have come to their own agreement with regard to free trade, one that is both historic and comprehensive in nature.
Trade was important to the Maritimes. Up to 1846 Britain had provided the British North American colonies with a market for their goods, but then began a policy of free trade. Because there were no tariffs placed on any country the colonies lost a sure market for their goods. Many colonists were concerned that some might consider union with the United States and the British North American colonies was brisk with large amounts of lumber and grain being imported by the U.S. When the Americans ended the Reciprocity Treaty in 1865, many Maritimers became uneasy about the economic future. It became apparent that in order to develop thriving trade; new economic links would have to be developed. 3
With the opposing sides at almost equal size, it is important to come to a final decision. Before possible violence breaks out within the province. Bibliography Doran, Charles F. “Will Canada Unravel?” in Foreign Affairs. Sept-Oct 1996 v75 n5 pg97.
from this trade agreement is a significant risk, it is slightly offset as there is still a likelihood that the U.S. government would negotiate a new bilateral trading relationship with Canada directly. In fact, prior to NAFTA, there was already a free trade agreement between the two countries known as the Canada – United States Free Trade Agreement (FTA) which was signed in 1988 (“The World Factbook: Canada,” 2017). The trading relationship between the two countries is simply significant and it is inconceivable that an adequate replacement, which would address the concerns and flaws of NAFTA, would not be found. Furthermore, President Trump has stated that some of his concerns with NAFTA include the migration of U.S. jobs and factories to Mexico, meaning that the trading relationship with Mexico is of a bigger concern and a renegotiation of NAFTA would affect the U.S. – Mexico relationship more than it would affect the U.S. – Canada
Butler Lumber Company is looking for more cash due to a fast-paced lumber market and a shortage of funding. Their regular bank, Suburban National Bank, is not willing to expand their exiting loan to an amount greater than $250,000 without securing the loan with real property. Another loan is being offered by a second bank, Northrup National Bank, for $465,000, with the understanding that the previous loan would be rolled into the second. The interest on the new loan would be prime + 2%.
After the failed International Trade Organization, Rodrik discusses the Bretton Woods Agreement, the transition from the General Agreement on Tariffs and T...
The constant battle between Canada and US and the tariffs that were put on the Canadian lumber had negative consequences on the economy and employment. If the US never put trade barriers in the first place, it would very beneficial for both economies. In this case, from the US perspective, the price of the lumber would go down (since it doesn’t include the tariff); the US consumers/firms would enjoy the lower price. By having decreasing the lower input cost, American firms would expand their production and enjoy higher profits. On the other hand, Canadian producers would focus on producing more lumber; by having no constraints on the current account, this will allow the Canadian lumber industry to increase production and enjoy
Fletcher, I. (2011). Crumbling of Free Trade – And Why it’s a Good Thing. Retrieved from