Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relations between China and the USA
Army Ethics and Values
The relationship between us and China
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relations between China and the USA
The Commanding Officer’s Moral Dilemma
United States Military Officers from all services are trained in military tactics, standards, and values. One of the most important lesson they are taught is the health and welfare of their troops. Commanding Officers (COs) hold the lives of thousands of service men and women in their hands, and their decisions directly affect the safety and well-being of subordinates. The moral dilemma to risk the lives of many to save a few, or its opposite, to save the lives of many by sacrificing the lives of a few, is one of the toughest situations for a CO to be in, and one of the toughest decisions to make. The CO has to look at the big picture and the long-term effects of his decisions, and in this scenario the
…show more content…
Reports confirm seven Americans work on the rig, which borders the Chinese-Vietnamese maritime boundary. An American engineer has told the CO of the LCS that the resupply ship was attacked by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and has sunk. The engineer believes there are survivors in the water, the rig is also under PLA attack, and he is pleading for rescue. The PLA Navy ship has contacted the CO of the LCS and has made it clear that this is a police action dealing with illegal activities, and the American ship should stay outside a 10 mile radius from the oil rig. The moral dilemma for the CO is saving the seven Americans but risking the lives of his sailors and/or losing the ship, or sacrificing the seven Americans to comply with Chinese demands. Not only does the CO have a moral dilemma, but he also has maritime rules and regulations to follow and the foundations of Navy …show more content…
By doing what he feels is morally right and his duty, the CO is trying to save lives on the oil rig. There are many repercussions in taking this action including putting the crew and ship in danger, and starting an international incident with China. The Chinese could take this as aggressive actions and call in air support or declare an act of war against the US. The CO didn’t get authorization to conduct the rescue from his command. The ship could be damaged, the crew killed, and the CO could be relieved from duty and court martialed. This choice of action has very serious negative fallout; from losing the ship, death of sailors, and an international incident that could negatively impact the relationship between the US and
LM01, Ethical Leadership. (2012). Maxwell Gunter AFB. Thomas N. Barnes Center for Enlisted Education (AETC)
In A Tactical Ethic, Moral Conduct in the Insurgent Battlespace, author Dick Couch addresses what he believes to be an underlying problem, most typical of small units, of wanton ethical and moral behavior partly stemming from the negative “ethical climate and moral culture” of today’s America (Couch, D., 2010, p. 15). In chapter one, he reveals what A Tactical Ethic will hope to accomplish; that is identify the current ethics of today’s military warriors, highlight what is lacking, and make suggestions about what can be done to make better the ethical behavior of those on the battlefield and in garrison. He touches on some historic anecdotes to highlight the need for high ethics amongst today’s military warriors as well as briefly mentions
The circumstance of immoral orders is understandable, but a soldier should still meet his or her given instructions. The keys to a soldier's system are the policy letters and army regulations that dictate every given bit of information on the army and its moral history. Within each article and sub-article, the information is pertinent to the success of a soldier and shares the history as well. This can provide lessons to those who instruct other soldiers.
The gulf Oil spill was bad; the company’s public relations strategy made matters worse. Their game plan was to stonewall the media, deny any responsibility and hope the issue would solve itself. Needless to say, that plan did not work—and they did not have a “Plan B.”
After the Bhopal Disaster, Union Carbide made an ethical decision through their legal strategy to secure the best outcome for themselves and to keep their company from going bankrupt multiple times over. Union Carbide used the corruption of the Indian court system to their advantage to minimize the amount they would pay in damages to the victims. Their strategy wouldn’t be considered moral to the victims of this chemical explosion if the trial were kept in the American court system. What is ethical isn’t always considered moral to all the parties involved. With a company facing bankruptcy and losing everything they had, the only ethical decision was to use the court systems to their advantage. By doing so, they made the ethical decision strictly
As our forefathers before us stated, ‘‘No one is more professional than I. I am a Noncommissioned Officer, a leader of soldiers. As a Noncommissioned Officer, I realize that I am a member of a time honored corps, which is known as “The Backbone of the Army (“The NCO Creed writing by SFC Earle Brigham and Jimmie Jakes Sr”). These words to Noncommissioned Officer should inspire us to the fullest with pride, honor, and integrity. The NCO creed should mean much more than just words whenever we attend a NCO’s school. For most of us this is what our creed has become because we learn to narrate or recite. The military from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard has an overabundance of NCOs who fall under their pay grade of E-5, E-6 and etc. Yet somehow there still not enough leaders. I believe that the largest problem afflicting the military today is our lack of competent leaders, ineffective leader development, and how we influence our subordinates under us who are becoming leaders.
In our military, leaders are always faced with risk, regardless if it is a training exercise or combat operations. The army has several processes to mitigate risks and commanders must put these safety procedures in place to decrease risk. According ADP 5-0, commanders have to accept prudent risk and exploit opportunities to complete missions. In Iraq and Afghanistan, leaders accepted prudent risks and placed soldiers in harm’s way to complete critical missions. The army defines prudent risk as a deliberate exposure to potential injury or loss and the commander judges the outcome in terms of mission accomplishment as worth the cost. Commanders must be able to recognize and visualize changes in the operational environment. The changes
At the four year mark of the Deep Water Horizon accident in the Gulf of Mexico, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows British Petroleum (BP) to drill for oil in the gulf once again. Many consumer advocate groups, chiefly Public Citizens, have voiced concerns over this decision. The lack of corporate accountability and oversight makes this decision seem unethical to these advocates groups. However, the company agrees to follow the agency’s ethic and safety procedure given the new leases. Yet, a series of accidents on its infrastructure makes reform seem doubtful for the company.
On April 20, 2010 the Deepwater Horizon oilrig exploded off the coast of Louisiana. The explosion was so powerful that it sent a fireball into the sky that was visible from as far as thirty-five miles away. Eleven workers were killed and seventeen injured in what became the largest offshore oil spill in United States history. Approximately 4.9 million barrels of oil was spilled out of the Macondo Prospect well and into the environmentally sensitive Gulf of Mexico. The disaster of the Deepwater Horizon can be relevantly compared to the Three Mile Island nuclear plant partial core meltdown, the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger or the Chernobyl nuclear plant explosion. All of these disasters were not the result of one mistake or one malfunctioning piece of equipment, but rather a lack of ethical decision-making or responsibility by the regulators and administrators charged with preventing such catastrophes from occurring. The post-event investigations of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill found that the United States government agency that was responsible for overseeing and regulating the oil industry was permeated with an ethical disregard for the regulations and professional standards that it was tasked with achieving. In the book “The Responsible Administrator”, author Terry L. Cooper explains how these abuses of power and a culture of unethical conduct can flourish and more importantly, how such unethical behavior can be prevented. Cooper endorses a dynamic “design approach” to ethics for public administrators to implement in both analyzing ethical dilemmas and when making ethical decisions.
On march 24, 1989, the Exxon Valdez hit a reef called Bligh Reef, severely damaging the ship, and rupturing eight out of the eleven holds. The third mate increased the damage of the ship by trying to break free of the reef, but this only did more damage to the ship causing more oil to spill out than before. This was the cause of human error, and if not for the carelessness of the captain, and the inexperience of the third mate, the ship would have never hit the reef. The captain should have stayed at the helm until he got the ship back into the correct shipping lane. Exxon’s oil spill changed how Prince William Sound operates today, and has made shipping safer for the environment.
“I was ordered to go in there and destroy the enemy...That was my job on that day. That was the mission I was given. I did not sit down and think in terms of men, women and children” (William Calley 1970). Lieutenant William Calley was explaining to his audience as he testified at Court-Martial in defense of his actions during the war. Calley explains that its not an easy duty, and that they must do what was ordered each day without questioning why they were going to go destroy the enemy. In the short story, Ambush, by Tim O’Brien, the lieutenant has to make a huge decision on weather or not he should throw a grenade and take a life or allow the enemy to kill him and his war buddy. When trying to not overthink the situation and proceeding through
The most effective commanders through their leadership build cohesive teams. Mutual trust, shared understanding, and accepting prudent risk serve as just a few principles for mission command. Mutual trust is the foundation of any successful professional relationship that a commander shares with his staff and subordinates. The shared understanding of an operational environment functions, as the basis for the commander to effectively accomplish the mission. While my advice for the commander on what prudent risks to take may create more opportunities rather than accepting defeat. Incorporating the principles of mission command by building cohesive teams through mutual trust, fostering an environment of shared understanding, and accepting prudent risk will make me an effective adviser to the commander, aid the staff during the operations process, and provide an example for Soldiers to emulate.
So, the individual in the scenario is an officer who has taken an oath to fairly, equally, and impartially enforce the law in their particular jurisdiction. Moreover, they work at a department where at least one officer was unprofessional and unethical in that he or she used excessive force when it was not necessary (Pollock, 2017). Consequently, the officers in the same division as the unethical officer state that they do agree with the excessive force, yet only one officer told the truth about the officer in questions actions. In fact, the division's personnel are angry at the officer who testified against the unethical officer; furthermore, they are harassing the moral officer and destroying their property. Thus, when you observe several officers destroying said moral officer’s property, and admitting to the illegal act when asked if you know anything about said incidents there is a decision to make.
D- The patient arrived on time for her scheduled appointment with this writer. According to the patient, she is stable on her current dose and continues to see her mental health provider. The patient continues to test negative for all illicit drugs. The patient asked about the status of her take home bottle group referral as this writer informed the patient that her referral is pending by the facilitator. The patient discussed a recent altercation with her mother whereas her mother wet her with water and hit her because she, referring to the mother, was upset with her boyfriend for being on the computer. The patient believes her mother has bipolar and addressed it with her to which according to the patient, her mother agreed. This writer discussed with the patient about her safety. The patient reports that since her last encounter with this writer everything was good. Her mother is not moving forward with the eviction. The patient then says that she is safe and will continue to keep her distance from her mother; however, this writer addressed with the patient as to how she will handle her mother if she's provoke her and invade her space. The patient response was, " I am just going to walk away rather than argue with her."
The taking of an innocent life is seemingly always wrong, but what if it’s to help save the lives of many? This classic ethical dilemma was brought to life when four American soldiers on a secret mission to locate a high ranking member of the Taliban were accidentally discovered by three locals, one of who was a fourteen-year-old boy. By releasing them, the soldiers ran the risk of the locals being Taliban sympathizers, who would alert them to the soldiers unknown presence. However, this decision was not that black and white, because it was also possible the goatherds would not tell anyone what they saw, and then would have been brutally murdered for no reason. Petty Officer Marcus Luttrell struggled greatly with this decision, as the soldier in him screamed to kill them, but the man inside him told him to let them go as they are innocent and not deserving of death. By applying the three different