Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of suffering
An essay concerning suffering
An essay concerning suffering
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The concept of suffering
In the article, “ Blessed Are the Meat Eaters: Christian Anti Vegetarianism and the Missionary Encounter with Chinese Buddhism” the author discusses the relationship between anti vegetarianism and Chinese Buddhism. Anti vegetarianism is defined as being against meat products. The major confluence between Christian missionary and Chinese Buddhism is the issue of meat eating and dietary practice. The author inputs accounts from two missionaries who are both from Christianity and Buddhist point of view. Ricci was an Italian Jesuit missionary who taught Chinese empire the beliefs of Christianity. Ricci was unpleased with how Buddhists avoided eating meat; therefore, he came up with six points to his argument of transmigration. His points summarizes …show more content…
In addition, Ricci argued that meat eating is beneficial for animal species. In opposition, a Christian Anti Vegetarian, Timothy Kung reviews why Chinese Buddhists are against meat eating. In terms of Buddhism, being vegetarianism is a dietary practice and eating meat is avoided because the animals are most likely a past ancestor. Buddhists often criticize Christians for “loving people” and not expressing enough love for animals. Buddhists consider animals as some kind of “Buddha nature”(Reinders, 2004, 529). Animals are every masculine objects just like how the Chinese would describe animals and man a “yang” code instead of “yin”. In today’s global society, this controversial topic between vegetarianism and meat eating is a never ending topic. Everyone has their own way of why meat eating is a pro or con …show more content…
Huber explains the problem of suffering which is caused by self hatred. Her solution to suffering is understood through the process of Buddha’s Four Noble Truth. She first identifies the issue of the “American Problem” (Gold, 2015, 2). As many Americans suffer through psychological emotions such as depression, fear, anxiety, and hopelessness, people are driven through a moment of despair. Buddha’s first noble truth: the truth of suffering. “Life is suffering” (Gold, 2015, 3). A simple Chinese phrase meaning to experience the bitterness before tasting the sweet. For example; going through a harder obstacle first will make other tasks easier in future. The second noble truth: the causes of suffering. This defines suffering as “ a source of dissatisfaction”(Gold, 2015, 3). Everyone knows the feeling of disappointment when we don’t receive what we want. This makes a person create a habit of wanting more. This process of suffering is a never ending cycle because the desire of satisfaction will quickly fade away and continues with another dissatisfaction. The third noble truth is the cessation of suffering which means to renunciate the dissatisfaction of suffering. In order to solve the cause of suffering, Huber says “one must accept the world as it is. Non acceptance is always suffering and acceptance is always freedom” (Gold, 2015,
Jonathan Safran Foer wrote “Eating Animals” for his son; although, when he started writing it was not meant to be a book (Foer). More specifically to decide whether he would raise his son as a vegetarian or meat eater and to decide what stories to tell his son (Foer). The book was meant to answer his question of what meat is and how we get it s well as many other questions. Since the book is a quest for knowledge about the meat we eat, the audience for this book is anyone that consumes food. This is book is filled with research that allows the audience to question if we wish to continue to eat meat or not and provide answers as to why. Throughout the book Foer uses healthy doses of logos and pathos to effectively cause his readers to question if they will eat meat at their next meal and meals that follow. Foer ends his book with a call to action that states “Consistency is not required, but engagement with the problem is.” when dealing with the problem of factory farming (Foer).
of suffering is most beneficial. However, answering this question about suffering becomes increasingly more difficult with the
arises from our own wrongheadedness — our cherishing of self — we have the cure for it within.” (Iyer 1) This quote is explaining how Buddhism looks at suffering in that it is necessary with life and that within oneself comes the cure, or realization about suffering. Then Iyer goes on to tell his stories where suffering is looked at in thi...
Olson, Kirby. "Gregory Corso's Post-Vegetarian Ethical Dilemma.(Gregory Corso)(Essay)." Journal Of Comparative Literature And Aesthetics 1-2 (2004): 53. Academic OneFile. Web. 4 Dec. 2013.
The cause and responses of the spread of Buddhism in China is similar to and reflect that of Christianity’s spread throughout western Europe. The universality aspect of both of these religions makes it possible to draw the comparison between the two. Buddhism and Christianity shared a positive response concerning the recognition of its unifying effects to create a more orderly society. Regarding Buddhism, this is seen in document 5, and regarding Christianity, this is seen in the way it became the unifying force in the Roman
For many Christians, faith has little to do with what's in the fridge. Lunch with Christ would raise issues far more problematic than choice of food. However, I propose that if the above-mentioned foods came from modern factory farms, Christ would not eat or drink them. I will argue that Christians are obligated to be morally concerned about animals, and that this obligation brings Christians into moral conflict with modern factory farms. Furthermore, I will argue that Catholic Social Teaching (hereafter "CST") should emphasize a theocentric basis for such obligation and conflict.
to state suffering as the entirety of the first noble truth, is not enough because the expression of
There are many differences between Christianity and Buddhism, for instance: Christianity believes in that all things are created by God, while Buddhism denies the existence of the Creator ; Christianity holds that salvation will be obtained by faith, while Buddhism advocates to be free from world by wisdom . But fundamentally speaking , both Christianity and Buddhism (this paper mainly refers to Chinese Buddhism ) are philosophies to life. They answer the questions of where persons come from and go to , and inquire the nature of life. They demand people to do goodness and remove evils in actual life, so as to make life more meaningful. Both of there theoretical bases are ...
Suffering is an individual's basic affective experience of pain or distress, often as a result of one’s physical, emotional or spiritual circumstance (Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 2006). Suffering can be classified as physical; for example pain caused by a dislocated knee, emotional; for example one’s grief over the death of a loved one, or spiritual; which is described as the state of being separated from the blissful nature of your divine self (soul). To suffer physically or emotionally is often unavoidable; however it can be argued that spiritual liberation...
Vegetarians are uncomfortable with how humans treat animals. Animals are cruelly butchered to meet the high demand and taste for meat in the market. Furthermore, meat-consumers argue that meat based foods are cheaper than plant based foods. According to Christians, man was given the power to dominate over all creatures in the world. Therefore, man has the right to use animals for food (Singer and Mason, 2007). However, it is unjustified for man to treat animals as he wishes because he has the power to rule over animals. This owes to the reality that it is unclear whether man has the right to slaughter animals (haphazardly), but it is clear that humans have a duty to take care of animals. In objection, killing animals is equal to killing fellow humans because both humans and animals have a right to life. Instead of brutally slaying animals, people should consume their products, which...
Realizing the necessity of refraining from meat is especially difficult because people consume it for a long time, and in addition, there is a certain attitude to the meat as to the product that is useful, nourishing and even prestigious. On the other hand, the constant consumption of meat has made the vast majority of people completely emotionless towards it. However, there must be some real and strong reasons for refusal to consume meat and as I noticed they were always completely different. So, even though vegetarianism has evolved drastically over time, some of its current forms have come back full circle to resemble that of its roots, when vegetarianism was an ethical-philosophical choice, not merely a matter of personal health. As believed, vegetarianism was originally founded in ancient India and was generally formed on ethical and moral issues.
Rachels, J. (2013). The Moral Argument for Vegetarianism. In L. Vaughn, Contemporary Moral Arguments - Readings in Ethical Issues Second Edition (pp. 617-622). New York: Oxford University Press.
Suffering can be defined as an experience of discomfort suffered by a person during his life. The New York Times published an article entitled what suffering does, by David Brooks (2014). In this article, Brooks explains how suffering plays an important role in our pursuit of happiness. He explains firstly that happiness is found through experiences and then, suffering can also be a motivation in our pursuit of happiness. In other words, suffering is a fearful but necessary gift to acquire happiness. This paper is related to motivation and emotion, two keys words to the pursuit of happiness (King, 2010).
For several years the issue of eating meat has been a great concern to all types of people all over the world. In many different societies controversy has began to arise over the morality of eating meat from animals. A lot of the reasons for not eating meat have to deal with religious affiliations, personal health, animal rights, and concern about the environment. Vegetarians have a greater way of expressing meats negative effects on the human body whereas meat eaters have close to no evidence of meat eating being a positive effect on the human body. Being a vegetarian is more beneficial for human beings because of health reasons, environmental issues, and animal rights.
“I always knew that becoming a vegetarian would help prevent cruelty to animals but I was not aware of the environmental consequences of a meat-eating diet.” writes Lillie Ogden, a writer for the popular recipe magazine, Vegetarian Times. The first part of her statement, about “cruelty to animals” is a familiar argument, and generally the one that surrounds the case for adopting a vegetarian or vegan lifestyle. However, this exhausted argument is ineffective in actually changing anyone’s eating habits. You can show me as many videos of suffering farm animals as you want, but that argument isn’t going to change the fact that at the end of the day I’m still going to enjoy a juicy, medium-rare steak. The reason being isn’t that I’m not a empathetic person or that I