Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Skinner behavior analysis theory summary
Skinner theory of behavior modification
Skinner philosophy of behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Skinner behavior analysis theory summary
Explain Yourself! #5: Skinner’s Behaviorist Theory
I’m constantly speeding when I drive. On my way to work, school, church, movies, or grandma’s house, I always seem to drive over the speed limit. Interestingly though, I also tend to slow down at the sight of a police car near me. Skinner would find this to be a valuable trait to study, considering the fact that this behavior distinguishes me from others. In this essay, I will allow Skinner to analyze me by utilizing his operant conditioning theory. Perhaps, Skinner might interpret my imprudent driving as a behavior that is ultimately modified to the environment. That is, this behavior is undisputedly connected to an environmental event. In order to provide the reader with the best understanding
…show more content…
A response is an observable reaction someone has towards something. A responses may vary from a simple behavior to a more complex behavior. For instance, a simple response would be a flinch, while a more complex response would be swerving a vehicle car out of danger. In contrast to Pavlov, Skinner believes that all responses can’t always be trained to become automatic by association of a stimulus, as Pavlov’s classical conditioning theory suggests. In fact, Skinner believes that all responses are not automatically evoked by the environment. Instead, people and animals are biologically wired to do things naturally. For instance, babies are able to grasp things since birth and this sort of behavior, like others, is naturally embedded in us. For that reason, the primary cause of behavior is in us, and we usually operate on our …show more content…
Reinforcement is something that comes after a response and it usually increases the probability of it happening again. Though, reinforcers themselves can vary from person to person and everyone can respond differently to a reinforcements. A relevant reinforcement to consider would be a negative punishment. This type of reinforcement involves taking a pleasurable stimulus away to decrease a particular behavior; for example, getting a speeding ticket for speeding. However, we must take into account that punishment reinforcers only change behavior temporary, as oppose reward reinforcers that are more pleasurable. Ultimately, finding a reinforcement that works best for you may take trial-and-error and what might reinforce my behavior might not reinforce yours.
Skinner would likely say that my behavior is reinforced by negative punishment. And perhaps that is why I’m likely to slow down when seeing a police car, before actually receiving a speeding ticket. For example, I’ve never actually been given a speeding ticket, but I have actually been stopped by a police officer before for speeding. And even though he didn’t give me a speeding ticket at that moment, he did tell me to drive slower or else I would get $100 speeding ticket next time. As a broke college student, this was the perfect reinforce to temporarily stop me from speeding in sight of police
B.F. Skinner, a behaviorist, claims that people tend to repeat responses that lead to positive outcomes. He goes further to say that they tend not to repeat responses that are followed by a negative or neutral response. If Skinner were looking at the case of Lionel Tate, he would say that Tate must hav...
Skinner, B.F. A Brief Survey of Operant Behavior. Cambridge, MA: B. F. Skinner Foundation. 1938
F. Skinner focuses on behaviorism which primarily deals with what can be observed and measured. B.F. Skinner believes through operant conditioning you can create desired (or undesired) behaviors in anyone. Operant conditioning is changing behavior through the use of reinforcement after the desired action is given; a behavior that is rewarded positively is more likely to continue and a behavior that is rewarded negatively would likely stop occurring (Santrock,2014). In addition to reinforcement, Skinner also talks about punishment. Reinforcement increases the probability an action or behavior will be repeated, while punishment is intended to decrease a behavior (McLeod, 2015). When Laurie was younger, she thought she was being sent to school every day to socialize with her friends and that learning was a secondary, unintentional happenstance. In third grade, compared to the other students in her class, she was falling short in reading and math. She couldn’t pay attention and often disrupted the class by talking with the people around her. Laurie’s third grade teacher got fed up with her behavior, so she placed Laurie’s desk next to her own in front of the class and then slapped Laurie’s desk with the ruler every time she caught her not paying attention. After a couple months, Laurie no longer required a slap on the desk to pay attention. According to Skinner, this behavior modification is punishment, not reinforcement, as the teacher was trying to decrease Laurie’s preference for daydreaming. However, as a result of not daydreaming, Laurie’s grades improved. Her parent’s began to reward her with $3 for every A she earned, using positive reinforcement to get Laurie to continue performing well. Due to operant conditioning, Laurie passed third grade and remained a top student the rest of her life, graduating from college with honors. If you ask Laurie to
Joey 's program will be based in Applied Behavior Analysis which was first introduced in 1913, when John Watson started a movement towards behaviorism with his article “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It” (Miltenberger, 2012). Based on Pavlov 's observations of classical conditioning, Watson suggested that human behavior could also be explained by the same means and that the process of classical conditioning was proper subject matter for psychology. He believed all human behavior were responses to external stimuli and environmental events (Miltenberger, 2012). B. F. Skinner took Watson 's theory of classical conditioning further to include operant conditioning. The highlight of Skinner 's theory is identifying what a behavior achieves through observing the behavior. It is only after the function of behavior is identified that we can alter the consequences to increase the probability of the desired behavior 's occurrence (Miltenberger, 2012). In operant conditioning behavior is changed through the manipulation of contingencies or the use of reinforcement or punishment after the desired or undesired response occurs (Miltenberger, 2012). Skinner was able to prove through his
According to Gewirtz and Peláez-Nogueras (1992), “B. F. Skinner contributed a great deal to advancing an understanding of basic psychological processes and to the applications of science-based interventions to problems of individual and social importance.” He contributed to “human and nonhuman behavior, including human behavioral development, and to various segments of the life span, including human infancy” (p. 1411). One of Skinner's greatest scientific discoveries was “single reinforcement” which became sufficient for “operant conditioning, the role of extinction in the discovery of intermittent schedules, the development of the method of shaping by successive approximation, and Skinner's break with and rejection of stimulus-response psychology” (Iversen, 1992, p. 1318).
At Harvard, B.F. Skinner looked for a more objective and restrained way to study behavior. Most of his theories were based on self-observation, which influenced him to become a enthusiast for behaviorism. Much of his “self-observed” theories stemmed from Thorndike’s Puzzle Box, a direct antecedent to Skinner’s Box. He developed an “operant conditioning apparatus” to do this, which is also known as the Skinner box. The Skinner box also had a device that recorded each response provided by the animal as well as the unique schedule of reinforcement that the animal was assigned. The design of Skinner boxes can vary ...
Skinners studies included the study of pigeons that helped develop the idea of operant conditioning and shaping of behavior. His study entailed making goals for pigeons, if the goal for the pigeon is to turn to the left, a reward is given for any movement to the left, the rewards are supposed to encourage the left turn. Skinner believed complicated tasks could be broken down in this way and taught until mastered. The main belief of Skinner is everything we do is because of punishment and reward (B.F. Skinner).
Eppley, George. "Confessing to Road Rage." Human Development 26.3 (2005): 48. Acedemic Search Complete. Muntz Lib., Tyler, TX. 25 Mar. 2009.
B.F. Skinner was considered the father of behavioral approach to psychology and a noticeable spokesperson for behaviorism. According to Corey (2013), he advocated radical behaviorism. In other words it placed a primary importance on the effects of environment on behavior. Skinner was a determinist; he did not consider that humans had free choices. He recognized the existence of feeling and thoughts, but disagreed about them causing humans action. In its place, he underlined the cause-and-effect links between objective, observable environmental conditions and behavior. Skinner claimed that more than enough attention had been given to the internal states of mind and motives, which cannot be observed and changed directly and not enough focus
There are processes and systems in place to ensure that any piece of legislation, no matter how large or small, gets hundreds, if not thousands of eyes on it before it is even introduced to a voting body. Therefore, it is important to note that while each person may have their own set of cognitive biases, paternalistic policies that are created by governing bodies allow for collaboration and different perspectives. Many of the biases Conly listed in her article are more applicable to one’s individual, private actions. When one is speeding and appealing to their optimism bias that they will not get into a car accident, that is an individual choice that no other individual influences. There is no other perspective to challenge the views of the speeder.
Goddard, M. J. (2012). ON CERTAIN SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MAINSTREAM PSYCHOLOGY AND THE WRITINGS OF B. F. SKINNER. The Psychological Record, 62(3), 563-575. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1030424426?accountid=458
Like some other psychologist, B.F. Skinner has criticized cognitive psychology in reviewed articles, providing examples and reasoning’s to justify his belief that cognitive psychology
B.F. Skinner was born on March 20, 1904 in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, a small town where he spent his childhood. He was the first-born son of a lawyer father and homemaker mother who raised him and his younger brother. As a young boy, Skinner enjoyed building and used his imaginative mind to invent many different devices. He spent his college years at Hamilton College in New York to pursue a Bachelor’s degree in writing. Following his graduation in 1926, Skinner explored writings of Pavlov, Russell, and Watson, three influential men in the field of behavioral psychology. After two years as a failed writer, Skinner applied to Harvard University to earn his Ph.D. in psychology.
In my reaction paper I will discuss B.F. Skinners theory operant conditioning and the ways he tested it out on animals, how it relates to humans, and how I can relate operant conditioning to my own personal life.
B.F. Skinner is a major contributor to the Behavioral Theory of personality, a theory that states that our learning is shaped by positive and negative reinforcement, punishment, modeling, and observation. An individual acts in a certain way, a.k.a. gives a response, and then something happens after the response. In order for an action to be repeated in the future, what happens after the response either encourages the response by offering a reward that brings pleasure or allows an escape from a negative situation. The former is known as positive reinforcement, the latter known as negative reinforcement (Sincero, 2012). A teenager who received money for getting an “A” is being positively reinforced, while an individual who skips a class presentation is being negatively reinforced by escaping from the intense fear and anxiety that would have occurred during the presentation.