Analysis Of Richard Hofstadter's 'Paranoid Style In American Politics'

555 Words2 Pages

The Paranoid Style in American Politics written by Richard Hofstadter, was first published in 1964. During the seminal text, Hofstadter applies clinical terminology to discuss the ‘paranoid style’, talking about how he views conspiracy theories as dangerous/negative and his fear of mass society/ populist politics. These psychological and historical explanations explains that conspiracy theories are in fact real, however The Paranoid Style is not the belief in conspiracies, but the style by which they are presented, openly admitting that the term ‘Paranoid Style’ is not ‘limited to American Experiences’ but with Hofstadter being an ‘Americanist’, he mainly focuses on the American Culture and how conspiracy theories applies to this nation as …show more content…

Hofstadter has found a way of identifying conspiracy theories in both an intellectual and popular understanding, however the concept of ‘paranoid style’ is still downgraded from this idea of what is ‘normal’ in American political culture, to a fringe phenomenon. Although, as previously stated Hofstadter does not believe that the ‘paranoid style’ purely focuses on just American culture, he proceeds to give examples of this by talking about the Bavarian Illuminati and the Anti-Catholic movement by the Protestants as a way of showing that it is not just the American culture that identifies conspiracy theories, as well as the ‘paranoid style’ effecting the minds of just the American nation. This supports the point that Michael Rogin has made when he states that conspiracy theories are a ‘symbolist approach to

Open Document