Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical media essay
For many, it is commonplace to criticize media’s methodology in one way or another. In fact, it may be necessary to keep major news companies honest and partial about the information they provide to millions. This is especially so in a climate where, for example, a police and civilian shooting may incite riots and outrage across large cities. Should incorrect information be published, there may be substantial consequences in response to something false. Rebecca Solnit argues in her piece, When Media Is the Disaster, that the media’s tendency to treat property as more valuable than human life depicts victims of natural disasters as criminals, rather than survivors. It’s first important to consider her audience. Rebecca is an activist writing …show more content…
for “Guernica, an award-winning, bimonthly online magazine of ideas, art, poetry, and fiction” (Solnit 237). As such, she is likely trying to inspire others to think like her and work to create change as she suggests in her work. A common tactic to try to persuade and inspire others is to use their emotions in a compelling manner. The use of pathos is a prominent and effective element in her writing.
In the very beginning of the text, she employs powerful descriptors such as “ruthless,” “selfish,” and “indifferent” (Solnit 237) which set the tone for the entirety of the article. Words such as these, scattered throughout, slowly shape the reader’s opinion in the intended direction. That is, it guides them toward having a negative sentiment toward the actions of media. To further this point from a different angle, she puts the reader in the hypothetical situation that they are the disaster victim. Approaching the ethics of taking food from stores in that position, she questions “If you grab that stuff are you a criminal? . . . Or are you a rescuer?” (Solnit 239). In a life or death setting it seems obvious that ensuring essentials are provided to all, through whatever means, ought to come before the likely insignificant losses incurred by local businesses. Allowing the reader to come to this decision, despite the answer seeming obvious in retrospect, helps solidify their opinion while in the process of coming to the desired conclusion by the …show more content…
author. In any argument, however, it is very important to not exclusively convey emotion or opinion. Without any defense for the statements being made, it is easy for readers to dismiss the writing as simply an opinion piece instead of substantiated claim. To combat this, Rebecca cites professionals in the field, such as a historian and disaster sociologist (Solnit 240). Their defenses help further her argument and credibility, especially in her discussion about the origin of the term “looting.” Additionally, they add another necessary element to her writing that was otherwise lacking; factual evidence to back her claims. Her claims are something else that must be considered, in and of themselves.
Her writing covers the topic of disaster victims and media portrayal of survival tactics following such events. She provides an excellent argument for her beliefs and is very convincing in her discussions about being more empathetic towards those in desperate situations. She even backs the media’s opinion of calling certain people “looters” in the cases that they are looking only for personal gain, despite it being unlikely in such a situation (Solnit 240). All these are justified and build into a strong writing. However, it is her brash claims such as “We need to banish the word ‘looting’ from the English language” (Solnit 240) that greatly detract from the effectiveness of her work. An overhaul of media portrayal or perhaps reshaping public opinion about disaster response would be reasonable. Suggesting a ban on a word, because it is used incorrectly, opposes guaranteed rights in our nation and could incite a new argument completely on its own. In short, it is a statement that could have been better left out of the
writing. In summary, Rebecca’s writing was a well-composed, effectively convincing piece comprised primarily of strong emotional arguments. These passionate statements are supplemented by the inclusion of defenses from professionals specialized in the field, which greatly benefits her credibility. Some statements detract from her persuasiveness but are mostly insignificant to the article overall.
In his editorial "Words Triumph Over Images," Curtis Wilkie blames today’s media for being “reckless” and “a mutant reality show”. He believes that television and radio are “unfiltered”, which causes the quality of journalism for newspapers to be unmatched. Yet, it is unfair to label all media that is not print as lesser because the quality of any media relies on the viewers and the individual journalists, and in drastic situations like a hurricane, reporters may have many road blocks. Any of these aspects can affect the quality of journalism, which invalidates Curtis Wilkie’s claim.
In “Building the Third Wave” Laurie Ouellette addresses her stance on feminism by passing the audience a question as to “why so many young women have shunned feminism”. Ouellette states her response of feminism by giving reasons as to why young women are not supporting feminism. Ouellette states that one reason is because they do not have role models to reach out to young people. Another aspect of the feminism movement that struggled involved a lack of support from the economically disadvantaged and women of color due to the silence of the upper middle class white females. Also, Ouellette mentions that women do not like hearing about the past because they feel as if have been lied to in regards to feminism. Ouellette concludes the article by explaining that it is responsibility of generations past to fight to get more young women into the feminism movement.
Wang’s studies have shown that news industries are now tabloidizing news because it elicits the attention of their viewers. Now the only thing considered as “entertainment” in the news is “crimes, accidents, and disasters”. Wangs writes “News that bleeds seem to still lead the primary broadcasts” (Wang 722). People nowaday only tune in when a disaster has occurred and anything other that is not “interesting”. Unfortunately, people would rather watch Isis in action then heard about Obama releasing innocent victims from prison. The reporter in “Gray Noise” proves Wang’s words true when he records on his lens about a mother who had just lost her
In “Reporting the News” by George C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, and Robert L. Lineberry, the main idea is how the media determines what to air, where to get said stories that will air, how the media presents the news, and the medias effect on the general public. “Reporting The News” is a very strong and detailed article. The authors’ purpose is to inform the readers of what goes on in the news media. This can be inferred by the authors’ tone. The authors’ overall tone is critical of the topics that are covered. The tone can be determined by the authors’ strong use of transitions, specific examples, and phrases or words that indicate analysis. To summarize, first, the authors’ indicate that the media chooses its stories that will air
Her description is full of emotional words and phrases which enable the reader to feel indignant about the case’s verdict-Nelson is convicted of vehicular homicide following the death of her son. Malchik emphasizes that “[T]he driver who had two previous hit-and-run convictions pleaded guilty,” but the mother who lost her son is forced to be jailed for a longer time. This part of description shapes a poor image of a mother who in order to feed her tired and hungry children, has no choice but to jaywalk. The author explains to the reader that Nelson chooses to jaywalk not because she is crazy, but because of her mother’s identity as well as lack of safer road for them. The purpose of the author is touching readers to sympathize with the mother, assuaging the mother’s guilt, and proving that walking should be human beings’ freedom and liberty. Adding to this idea are words and phrases such as, “instinctive,” “injustice,” “the narrowest,” “lost right,” “Orwellian fashion,” “more treacherous,” “laziness,” and “scorn” (Malchik). All of these emotional words are awkward for Americans. As the author indicates, “[T]he ability to walk is a struggle, a fight, a risk”, which can help to arouse readers’ awareness of protecting their lost opportunities and rights. Apart from these, at the end of the article, Malchik uses several imperative sentences like: “Open your door; go for a walk; feel the spring”, to strengthen the tone. It is also an effective way to attract readers and create strong emotional
She uses a string full of rhetorical questions throughout her article, as well, to make us contemplate whether people do deeds out of compassion, fear, or something else. She uses rhetorical questions such as “Was it fear or compassion that motivated that gift?”(6), “...what compels this woman to feed this man? Pity? Care? Compassion? Or does she simply want to rid her shop of his troublesome presence?”(9), and “Could it be that the homeless, like those ancients, are reminding us of our common humanity?”(14). These questions make the audience think and contemplate why these people did these acts of kindness. Ascher includes some of these rhetorical questions at the end of both of the narratives to force the readers to quickly analyze the situation and decide what the motivation was. As a result, I can conclude that one woman did it out of fear while the other did it out of compassion; therefore, this proves that people are not born compassionate, but they develop the quality later on in life. This is more effective instead of just expressing how she personally feels about each
According to the text “ there were relatively few stories or images focusing on aging, poverty, isolation, crime and fear, and the ethno racial, or gender distribution of mortality, morbidity, and access to care.” They went to the extreme by looking for more information and pictures with people in body bags to put on their front page. People use the media as their information source to guide them on what is going on in their countries and around the world. What is portrayed in the media is often taken as true even if it actually is not completely accurate. Throughout the text it was clear to see that there is pressure when it comes to the media. News reporter often think about what they are going to present to the public because it has to be brain washing and appealing, but they also want to keep their connections to sources such as public officials. This means what they end up reporting is effected by what public officials will approve of, to make them look
She chooses her words wisely, as any good writer should. The overall tone of her piece is slightly negative, especially when describing the administration. She uses accusatory terms throughout, most especially in her second paragraph, describing how the letter portrayed safe spaces and trigger warnings as “narrow-minded, oversensitive, and opposed to dialogue” (Downes 1). Her paper is fraught with negative words, especially when referring to those who do not understand or might oppose trigger warnings or safe spaces because they believe they are “coddling” the younger generations. On the other hand, she uses more gentle, positive language when defining what trigger warnings and safe spaces are and how helpful they can be for many people—or at least less negative in comparison to her language in other paragraphs.
They frequently kill stories they dislike and in other ways inject their own preferences.” (p. 61). Michael informs the reader how it is rare to see media portray attention to those who are poor and who are undergoing financial instability. In Mass Media: For the Many, by the Few, the author, Michael Parenti, persuades the reader by providing a variety of facts to support his claim. This article is persuasive because it has valid resources to convince that the media is mostly ran by higher corporations. After reading his writing, I was able to see that the media does not illustrate every side to every story. There is much more to nation/world issues than just rich politics, and private
The article “When The Media Is The Disaster,” by Rebecca Solnit discusses the accounts that took place with the media and the victims during the Haitian earthquake. People were trapped alive struggling to survive. Many of these victims became so desperate for food and water they began to steal. The mass media interpreted their actions as stealing, characterizing them as “looters”. Solnit does not agree with the media labeling victims as “looters” because victims are being portrayed as something they are not.
The media takes a biased approach on the news that they cover, giving their audience an incomplete view of what had actually happened in a story. Most people believe that they are not “being propagandized or being in some way manipulated” into thinking a certain way or hearing certain “truths” told by their favorite media outlets (Greenwald 827). In reality, everyone is susceptible to suggestion as emphasized in the article “Limiting Democracy: The American Media’s World View, and Ours.” The
Media platforms like television and radio primarily spread propaganda created by the government. Citizens spend a lot of time watching television or listening to the radio and it’s a big part of their life. Almost everyone in the city owns a television or radio and believes things they see and hear from them. Montag escapes the police, but the T.V. chase is still playing out because they don’t want people to know that they let a fugitive get away. They found an innocent man on the street, labeled him as Montag, then killed him on the broadcast. “‘They’re faking. You threw them off at the river. They can’t admit it. They know they can hold their audience only so long. The show’s got to have a snap ending, quick!’... ‘The innocent man stood bewildered’… ‘The victim was seized by Hound and camera in a great spidering, clenching grip’” -Granger (Bradsbury 142). Media propaganda is so powerful today because everyone is susceptible to it. The press (newspapers, magazines, and T.V.) uses their tactics to shape people’s opinions. According to Johnnie Manzaria, the press is important because the most current news and info is spread through them everyday. People can believe anything the media says, because they have a popular opinion or reputation. Even if they spread propaganda, some people will inevitably believe it because “the news said so”, and is a very influential resource ("Media's Use of Propaganda to Persuade
However, despite being regarded as unnecessary rumors by a section of the American society and government, many media people and houses reported harrowing incidents of murder, rape, carjacking and assaults. There were also media reports about a significant number of urban legends who sprouted at the height of the commotion brought about by Hurricane Katrina – systematic children rapists and a 7-year-old’s throat being slit. However, media reports aside, these contentions remain just that. Nevertheless, although a significant count of th...
If an individual is familiar with their surrounding “they are more likely to help” (Altruism and Helping Behavior. Print). In the essay, the authors state “the scene of the crime, the streets, in middle class society “represents all the vulgar and perilous in life” (Milgram, Stanley, and Paul Hollander. Paralyzed Witnesses: The Murder They Heard. Print.). In society, the streets, especially at night, represents the dangerous and negative sides of society due to the crimes and chaos that occur on the streets (gangs, drive-by shootings, robberies, murders, large crowds walking, etc.). The crimes and dangers of the streets cause many people to fear being on the streets alone which leads to external conflicts. When the murder was occurring, the witnesses’ attitudes of the streets prevented them from calling the police due to the fear of the streets and since the witnesses were middle-class, they believed that Genovese was poor, a criminal, or someone who has nothing else to do and was expecting for the=is to eventually
As mentioned previously, audiences expect photojournalists to accurately depict the truth (Bruining 2017; Lamble 2016; Taylor 2000). Since they hold significant influence over viewership, photojournalists should therefore take some moral responsibility when their inaccurate reporting leads their audience to misconceive the world. One notorious instance where photojournalists violated audience trust was in the ‘Children Overboard’ affair of 2001, where tabloid and broadsheet newspapers circulated photographs of a child in the sea and claimed that asylum seekers were throwing their children overboard to coerce entry into Australia (Bruining 2017; Macken- Horarik 2003; Phillips 2006). These images were taken from a high angle and cropped to only show three adults and a child in water. What the pictures did not reveal, however, was that a large boat had sank, leaving the passengers stranded (Macken- Horarik 2003; Maclellan 2002). Unfortunately, the cropped images dominated the news cycle, with publications such as the Daily Telegraph proclaiming them as “Proof that boat people threw children overboard” (Macken- Horarik 2003, p. 293). These claims largely went unchallenged due to the public’s assumption that news photography is factual and objective (Bruining 2017; Macken- Horarik 2003). Thus, the power of photojournalism was abused to mislead