Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The case of torture
How was torture between 1450 and 1750
Middle ages torture methods essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The case of torture
The following essay concerns the book Rack, Rope, and Red-Hot Pincers, by Geoffrey Abbott. Included in the essay, is a brief synopsis of the book, followed by a detailed analysis. Rack, Rope, and Red-Hot Pincers gives a brief history of torture, beginning in the early Middle Ages. The subject of torture is quite fascinating– a meticulously intricate art, yet reaping gruesome and blood-curdling results. Thus, Rack, Rope, and Red-Hot Pincers, seemed like the perfect choice for this book report. Geoffrey Abbott, a retired Yeoman Warder of the Tower of London, conveys his own intrigue in the art of torture in Rack, Rope, and Red-Hot Pincers, telling of the horrific consequences faced by criminals in medieval, and even modern, times. …show more content…
As stated in the introduction, Rack, Rope, and Red-Hot Pincers discusses torture through the ages, covering a period stretching from about 1076 to 1964. In the book, Abbott gives gruesome details about some of the most infamous torture devices, such as the rack and Skeffington’s Gyves, yet also touching on some of the lesser-known methods of torture, such as the thumbscrews and the cucking stool. Indeed, sometimes the instruments of torture appeared so wicked in design that simply imagining them in action would be enough to obtain the desired information or confession from the victim. Others proved more resistant, requiring that the instruments of torture be put to use. Human anatomy did not make the task particularly difficult – humans are usually quite susceptible to pain, as pointed out by Abbott in the introduction. “Human flesh, soft and sensitive? Well, let’s apply heat to it, cut it, pierce it with needles and spikes, lash it with whips. Limbs were only meant to bend one way? Then let’s see how far we can bend them the other way. Shoulder blades, hip and leg joints can only operate when moving smoothly in their sockets? Right, let’s dislocate them, then” (2). Throughout Rack, Rope, and Red-Hot Pincers, Abbott emphasizes the horrors of torture and the ways in which wrongdoers were often unjustly punished in the name of the king, queen, church, or God.
Beyond that, he explains the wide scope of torture, in which anything could be used – time, pain, imagination, deprivation, starvation, humiliation, etc. – to reap the desired results. Abbott speaks of torture almost commendingly, especially when he describes the ways in which torturers would exploit every facet of human nature to break their victims. This is demonstrated perfectly in the following quote: “It says much for man’s inventive spirit that he is not restricted to the more stereotypes methods of persuasion and punishment, but can let his fertile imagination conjure up more ingenious deices, all based on the same premise, that of causing pain or death. With men like these around, torture and execution may be abhorrent and detestable, but never boring or routine” (Abbot 179). However, the undeniable underlying theme of the book is the utter horror of torture: being boiled alive in scalding hot water, being forced down unto the gridiron to be grilled by the fires beneath, or being caught in the embrace of the Virgin Mary herself, with spikes to pierce the skin throughout the …show more content…
hug. The book is written in a familiar tone, which makes it all the more enjoyable.
Abbott’s writing style is relaxed and informative, and pulls the reader in within the first few sentences. Yet, throughout the book, Abbott’s dark sense of humor comes in here and there, as in his introduction of two of the most fiendish devices in the history of torture. “Allow me to present two very forceful ladies, one the daughter of John Holland, Duke of Exeter, Earl of Huntingdon, and the other the daughter of Sir Leonard Skeffington, Kt. So captivating were they, that once they had you in their grasp, you would not be able to tear yourself away from them. And they are certainly not the sort of girls who would take ‘no’ for an answer. Actually they were not the type of females you would wish to meet on a dark night or even on a sunny afternoon. To be more precise, the two ladies in question are more shudderingly known as ‘The Rack’ and ‘Skeffington’s Gyves’” (39). The style of Abbott’s writing is in perfect concordance with the content of the book – grim humor for a grim topic. Illustrations given halfway through the book were quite helpful in understanding the material – the mechanics of the finger pillory were a bit difficult to understand, but the drawing helped to clarify things a bit. No biased feelings are apparent in the book – Abbott’s main goal appears to be informing the audience, not pushing his own agendas. Abbott speaks of torture with a mixture of respect and horror, but
keeps the content factual. Rack, Rope, and Red-Hot Pincers was very enjoyable, and is definitely now a favorite history book. It was interesting, engaging, and thought-provoking. It most interesting reading about the Pendulum, a device used during the Spanish Inquisition. As described by Abbot, “this sanity-destroying device consisted of a large pendulum suspended high the roof of the torture chamber the bob being replaced by a crescent-shaped blade about twelve inches from horn to horn, and honed razor sharp” (76). In this torture, the victim would be tied down directly beneath the blade of the Pendulum, and forced to watch the mesmerizing movement of the blade as it moved gradually lower and lower with each swing. Usage of the Pendulum usually reaped a quick confession. In other cases, if the victim proved more resistant, he or she either “went out of their minds or died the most hideous death imaginable” (76). The Pendulum is so much different from the other torture devices of the age. Rather than actually inflicting pain, the Pendulum simply relied on time to wear down the victim, as realization of the impending doom sunk in. Rack, Rope, and Red-Hot Pincers was far more interesting than anticipated. Geoffrey Abbott’s style was engaging, informative, and, at times, darkly humorous. Puns throughout the book, especially in chapter titles, such as “Pressed to Reply,” were rather amusing. Thus, not only did it teach a great deal regarding the nature of torture and its instruments throughout the Middle Ages and into modern times, but also made the learning experience quite pleasant. This book is definitely worthy of being recommended to a friend.
Early in the poem “Marginalia,” Collins explores the emotions of readers and annotators and claims “the notes are ferocious, [including] skirmishes against the author raging along the borders of every page” (Lines 1-3). By describing the annotations as “ferocious” and “raging,” it is more easily conveyed that the annotations are predatory towards the author in defense of one’s own frustration in seeking a nonexistent underlying message. Similarly, in “Introduction to Poetry,” Collins is faced with the challenge of persuading readers, “but all they want to do is tie the poem to a chair with rope and torture a confession out of it.” (Lines 12-14). By choosing the word “torture,” Collins is enforcing that the annotations are aggressive and readers retain that anger and violence which is forcing literature to give up a meaning that it is not willing to give up or supposed to give up. The word choice clearly portrays the emotions being felt by readers and how they use their annotations to support the need for an extensive interpretation of the reading.
Throughout the ages, death penalty has always been a controversial topic and triggered numerous insightful discussion. In Kroll’s Unquiet Death of Robert Harris, the writer employs pathos as an appeal throughout the whole article in order to convince the audiences that death penalty is “something indescribably ugly” and “nakedly barbaric”. While Mencken makes use of ethos and logos and builds his arguments in a more constructive and effective way to prove that death penalty is necessary and should exist in the social system.
Bales and Soodalter use this to their advantage very effectively by using a multitude of personal stories from people who went through slavery. They tug at your heart strings by starting with Maria, who was 12 years old when she was taken into slavery for seven months by Sandra Bearden. During that time she was reportedly “ . . . dragged into hell. Sandra Bearden used violence to squeeze work and obedience from the child.” (722). Bales and Soodalter begin by giving you an emotional connection with Maria by telling a short story of her life growing up with her two loving parents, and small details of their house and living conditions. After the backstory is established, it goes straight into the accounts of beatings and torture endured by Maria, to quote “ . . . Sandra would blast pepper spray into Maria’s eyes. A broom was broken over the girl’s back, and a few days later, a bottle against her head . . . Bearden tortured the twelve year old by jamming a garden tool up her vagina.” (722-723). The inclusion of the tortures paints an image of how horrible slavery is, and evokes a sense of dread, despair, and helplessness for Maria. Bales and Soodalter not only state the tortures but they follow the text immediately by stating “That was Maria’s workday; her “time off” was worse.”
Until there is a credible way to determine whether or not torture is in fact effective, I pass judgment that the practice should be discontinued. The question as to if the torture policy is a human rights violation or if it holds crucial necessity, is not answered in the essay. Applebaum explores the reality that torture possesses negative implications on the inflictor. After presented with the compelling stance and evidence, Applebaum raises the interesting question as to why so much of society believes that torture is successful. I agree that the torture policy is wrong, a point emphasized by Applebaum, contrary to the popular attitude surrounding the topic.
Through vivid yet subtle symbols, the author weaves a complex web with which to showcase the narrator's oppressive upbringing. Two literary
Torture is a loaded word. It conjures images in a readers' mind of any number of horrors, physical and mental. Many writers rely on this reaction and use pathos in their articles to illicit a strong response in their audience. Pathos is an emotional appeal used to gain sympathy and trust from the audience and works for people of all intellectual levels. It often casts the author or characters in a story as an Everyman, easy to identify, and therefore see eye to eye, with. In my opinion, the more an author is able to create a personal connection to torture, the stronger their argument becomes. Strong emotions create a more appealing argument for an everyday audience.
After the characters had been “released” from their entrapment, they were dreading the thought of being trapped again. The character’s feeling of entrapment undoubtedly added to the feeling of urgency, panic, and dread in the tone and mood of the novel.
Douglas described these events in great detail, from the slave masters’ tying their hands together and being hanged, stripping them naked, leaving half their body exposed, but most disturbingly Douglass witnessed and describe the cries and blood dripping to the floor. Revealing the gruesome details from women abused is
Shining a light on the cruel treatment of slave masters and their overseers. It would seem as though he wanted to ease the readers into the violent topic while at the same time painting a vivid picture.
Torture is the process of inflicting pain upon other people in order to force them to say something against their own will. The word “torture” comes from the Latin word “torquere,” which means to twist. Torture can not only be psychologically but mentally painful. Before the Enlightenment, it was perfectly legal to torture individuals but nowadays, it is illegal to torture anyone under any circumstances. In this essay, I will demonstrate why torture should never acceptable, not matter the condition.
Finally, through symbolism the novels truly come alive. The symbolism present gives the reader a clear depiction of the cruelty that is to befall both men. It is truly tragic how close these horrific stories are, a sad testament to dark chapters in time honored establishments, American economy and Christian missionaries. If these are the consequences of such highly thought of establishments, is there anyway to stop oppression from overcoming the world? It tends to make one think.
The author’s purpose is to also allow the audience to understand the way the guards and superintendent felt towards the prisoners. We see this when the superintendent is upset because the execution is running late, and says, “For God’s sake hurry up, Francis.” And “The man ought to have been dead by this time.” This allows the reader to see the disrespect the authority has towards the prisoners.
Torture is the intentional infliction of extreme physical suffering on some non-consenting, defenseless person. Torture in any form is used to punish, coerce, or afford sadistic pleasure.
He persuades the audience by using verbal irony and statistics. When he first mentions prison, he uses verbal irony towards the subject to express his true attitude towards imprisonment by saying that locking people in cages is more humane than punishing them physically (197). This statement is ironic because he actually believes that imprisonment is a worse punishment than corporal punishment but says that it is more humane to ridicule the opposing argument. This irony serves its purpose of telling the audience that prison is
criminals to be tortured to death by burning them alive”(SOURCE 1). Some of the things