Analysis Of Philip Roth's Book 'Conversion Of The Jews'

1023 Words3 Pages

“The Quest for the Truth” In his short story, “Conversion of the Jews,” Philip Roth illustrates a conflict between faith and reason through a young boy’s endeavors to find the truth. A thirteen-year old Jewish boy, Ozzie, habitually questions Rabbi Binder, since Ozzie’s logical reasoning frequently disagrees with Rabbi Binder’s religious faith. Consequently, Ozzie often finds himself in trouble. One day, he claims that Rabbi Binder “[doesn’t] know anything about God” and runs to the roof, refusing Rabbi Binder and the firemen’s orders to come down. Instead, before jumping down onto the firemen’s yellow net, Ozzie forces the Rabbi, the custodian, his mother, and his classmates to say that they believe in Jesus. Through Ozzie’s refusal …show more content…

Eventually, unsatisfied with Rabbi Binder’s limited answers, Ozzie becomes impatient with Rabbi Binder’s lack of knowledge and reasoning. He accuses Rabbi Binder that he “[doesn’t] know anything about God!” Shocked, Rabbi Binder angrily retorts, “Apologize, Oscar, apologize,” which may allude to James Joyce’s “A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man,” in which he states “Dante said/ O, if not, the eagles will come and pull out his eyes/ Apologize/Pull out his eyes/ Pull out his eyes/ Apologize.” Instead of obeying, Ozzie calls Rabbi Binder a “bastard” and runs to the top of the roof. Ozzie even attracts the attention of Yakov Blotnik, a usually unassuming custodian, who calls the fire department. Yakov Blotnik represents those who want to preserve the face of their religion; he calls the fire department because he believes the situation could evolve into a problem “no-good-for-the-Jews.” On the roof, Ozzie “fit[s] together the world beneath him,” attempting to decide what holds truth, including the questionable truth of his self-identity. He asks himself the Sphinx’s riddle, “‘Is it me? It has to be me – but is

Open Document