Analysis Of Night By Eliezer Wiesel

814 Words2 Pages

The Holocaust took place during World War II, when Adolf Hitler became the dictator of Germany in 1933. Would your identity change, if you were put through an epidemic. In the first section of the book, Eliezer Wiesel is a twelve year old boy who studies Judaism, but he wants to study Kabbalah, Wiesel described himself as faithful religious man. However, throughout Night, the evolution of Wiesel’s religious beliefs, symbolizes the struggle of the Holocaust. In the first section of Night, Elie Wiesel is a twelve year old boy who studies the Talmud and is a devoted Jew. "By day I studied Talmud and by night I would run to the synagogue to weep over the destruction of the Temple"(3). During the first chapters of the book, Wiesel is faced …show more content…

The Jews are being transported to other camps because the Americans are coming. Juliek is a violinist, and he played his violin for the last time in Gleiwitz. “He was playing his life... How could I forget this concert given before the audience of the dead and dying? (95). Wiesel explained how Juliek was playing his hope and his future. Not to mention that they no longer cared for each other lives that they would fight over crumbs of bread. “Men were hurling themselves against each other, trampling, tearing at and mauling each other. Beast of pray unleashed, animal hate in their eyes"(101). Wiesel refers to the Jewish men as animals, because this is what has become of them over a piece of bread. Before the Holocaust, all Jewish men treated each other like family. “The old man mumbled something, groaned, and died. Nobody cared. His son searched him, took the crust of bread, and began to devour it. He didn 't get far. Two men had been watching him. They jumped on him... There were two dead bodies next to me, the father and the son"(102). This is what the Jewish people had become, trying to survive for a piece of bread. Also the Americans finally show up to get all the Jews, the remaining Jews did not care about revenge, but only of the bread, he also explained " and even when were no longer hungry, not one of us thought of revenge"(115). “From the depths of the mirror, a corpse

Open Document