Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
My papa's waltz” analysis
My papa's waltz” analysis
Alcoholism introduction research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: My papa's waltz” analysis
Reminiscing On Fond Memories: An Analysis of “My Papa’s Waltz”
Theodore Roethke first published his poem, “My Papa’s Waltz”, in a magazine in 1942. Over the years, this poem has sparked many debates between people of all ages and statuses. There are two common interpretations of this poem: one being that it is a story of an abusive alcoholic father and the other, that it is a fond memory of the speaker’s childhood. George Hillocks, Jr. states, in his book, Reading, Natural Learning, and the Interpretation of Literature, “Theodore Roethke’s "My Papa's Waltz" is a straightforward, simple statement of the speaker's reminiscences of his childhood romps with his father. . . .” (Hillocks) A small group of critics agree that this is a fond memory;
…show more content…
(R. Line 13) The phrase “beat time” has a very musical connotation. The word “beat” is often taken to mean physical abuse when in fact, in this situation, the wording makes more sense in association with a beat of a song. As it is said the father was beating the time on the boy’s head, which in no way conveys physical abuse, but simply keeping the time or beat by tapping on the boys head to the song. (McKenna) The use of the phrase “beat time” could be construed as some sort of physical abuse such as hitting the child on the head. However, this term is commonly used in musical circles as a reference to keeping time with music by using the movements of one’s hands or feet to stay on the beat or keep time with the music. So to say “You beat time on my head” could simply mean keeping time with the music, whether actual music or imagined. (R. Line 13) The author does not tell us if music was playing, but the music could easily be playing in the father’s head as he danced with his son. And the father could have easily been gently tapping or lightly patting his son’s head as a means of keeping time. His father tapped on his head keeping time with the song by using his hands that are hardened from working with dirt in the green houses all day. The indication is that his father is a hardworking man who uses his hands extensively in his work, and those hands have become hardened and calloused over time. Even still, he enjoys the opportunity …show more content…
Line 15-16) “[…] this image of swirling movement and musical accompaniment […]”, in this context seems to indicate a more playful attitude. (Zbikowski) An alternate word choice could have been the word dragged if the intent was to convey that the father was being abusive in his actions. Had the father been abusing his son in some alcoholic rage, it does not seem reasonable that his son would be clinging to his shirt at all, much less “still clinging”. The more likely scenario if this is about abuse is that the son would be attempting to disengage from him and try to not near him. The language here suggests that the son had been having a wonderful time with his father and simply did not want to let go so that the wonderful moment of closeness could be extended for as long as
The most notable qualities of Theodore Roethke’s “My Papa’s Waltz” are the tone and language of the poem which convey the nostalgia adult author feels thinking about the time spent with his father. In the title narrator’s father is affectionately referred to as “Papa” making the impression that the main character and his father are close. The use of possessive pronoun “my” contributes to the overall impression that the father holds special place in the narrator’s heart. As word “waltz” in the title implies the poem gives account of the festive occasion in which the narrator’s father takes part.
In the poem “My Papa’s Waltz” by Theodore Roethke, the speaker is reflecting on a childhood experience involving his father. Some people assume that this poem is about a happy relationship between a father and son while other people assume that this poem emphasizes hidden messages of parental abuse. In my
"We romped until the pans / Slid from the kitchen shelf" (5-6). In numerous poems different readers vista a variety of ways to interpret what poems actually mean. This is very much true in Theodore Roethke's poem "My Papa's Waltz." The quote mentioned has caused many misconceptions about what the poem; "My Papa's Waltz" actually refers to. The two superior interpretations of critics are that Roethke's poem describes abuse or a dance. The abuse seems much more apparent in "My Papa's Waltz" because of the language that Roethke uses. The dance is interpreted because the boy is innocent and knows nothing else therefore the abuse seems normal. The drunkenness of his Papa, the mother's ignorance, and the way the child describes his abuse are very clear interpretations of mistreatment in Theodore Roethke's poem "My Papa's Waltz."
Today, people tend to believe that hitting a person is abuse. Although, many people can connect with ¨My Papaś Waltz¨ by Theodore Roethke, the intended audience is himself illustrating a past memory of his childhood. The controversy of the poem is whether itś a good or bad memory. While the subject of “My Papa’s Waltz” has spurred a passionate academic debate from professors, scholars, and students alike, the imagery, syntax, and diction of the poem clearly supports the interpretation that Theodore Roethke wrote “My Papa’s Waltz” to illustrate on a past memory of his drunk and abusive father.
The poem "My Papa's Waltz" uses imagery by especially appealing to the sense of touch. The sense of touch also helps the reader to better understand the abusive father theme. The third stanza concentrates on the actual act of abuse. The author, Roethke, describes the battle wounds on the father and son that are inflicted by the father. The father's hand "was battered on one knuckle" from hitting his son with a belt (10). This is apparent because the son's "right ear scraped...
The first line in the poem introduces the fact that the father has been drinking whiskey. Now, most of us know that people have different reactions to alcohol. Some people are funny and like to have a good time, others become pretty mean. Which category the father falls in is hotly debated, however, most agree that the father’s drinking is the catalyst for the events in the rest of the poem be it waltzing or beating. Then comes the line, “But I hung on like death.” This is an incredibly powerful simile. Death has a negative connotation and adds a darkness to the piece as well as creating some very strong and powerful imagery. Also in the vein of imagery, the description of the father’s hands as “battered on one knuckle,” and “palm caked hard by dirt,” are very descriptive. His hands’ knuckles could be battered (which is an intense word that usually indicates some type of violence) from hitting and abusing the boy, or, in tandem with his hands being caked with dirt, just shows that his father is a hard
The poem opens with a son talking about his father’s alcoholism, describing that the amount of whiskey his father drank “could make a small boy dizzy” (Roethke) with the effects of alcohol. The figurative dance with addiction is not easy for the boy, but he still “hung on like death” (Roethke), hoping for a brighter outcome. The father and son are in the kitchen, where the amount of the father’s drunken, physical abuse on the child causes pans to fall from kitchen shelves (Roethke). The boy’s mother, however, can only stand to the side and watch the events unfold with a “countenance [that] could not unfrown itself” (Roethke). The boy’s father grabs him by the wrist with a “battered...knuckle” (Roethke). With this interpretation in mind, the cause of the father’s rough hands becomes unclear. His hands could still be rough from a hard day of work, or perhaps his abusive nature has ended with injuries on his hands. The amount of alcohol consumed by the father causes him to stumble, or miss steps, according to the speaker. As the physical abuse continues, the child states he is “still clinging to [his father’s] shirt” (Roethke). This last line hints that, although the father is an abusive drunk, the child still loves his father and clings to this love with the hope that someday things will improve for his
Notably, the denotation “romping” can mean, “to play roughly and energetically” (Google), but it can also have a connotation that the boy is hurt or in pain. Furthermore, stanza two also mentions the “mother’s countenance/ could not unfrown itself” (7- 8) which is unusual in the description of playing. While the father and son are playing, the mother is standing aside frowning. Her unhappiness contrasts the playful description of the waltz, which gives the poem its sense of seriousness. In other words, it tells the reader that there is much more happening here than the father and son playing. The drunkenness of the father has caused him to become careless and rough with the boy. The mother is clearly unhappy about the situation, but only watches as the two continue their
The father moves from side to side like waltzing, but in reality, I believe this is for his drunken condition. The child and the mother are dealing with his father’s alcoholism, which looks that the mother doesn’t care anymore about her family. I can easily perceive the child’s and the mother’s feelings and their unhappiness if instead of spending a great time with him, they are experiencing somehow abandon of the persons who supposed to be the strongest in their family and giving the best sample to them. “Then Waltzed me off to bed” (line 15) and “Still clinging to your shirt” (line 16) these two phrases are highly critical view of the fact that the child still sticks to his father no matter how dangerous his father is the child loves his “papa”. In addition, at the end the child’s hope is that his father changes one day and be with them as a real father unknowing that this is a perpetuated situation and transcending anger for
The word ‘beat’ in itself carries the underlying tone of abuse and violence that goes beyond the typical meaning of keeping time to the dance. Looking into the line itself, this could mean that the boy had been suffering from this abuse for some time. The abuse made the days seem to stretch, and a day could feel like a week, and a week a month. The next line, “With a palm caked hard by dirt” (Roethke line 14) could have indicated that his father was a manual field worker, a job with long hours and little pay that could easily lead to things like frustration and depression which could be easily diverted to a scapegoat, in this case his son, with a bit of impaired judgement that is brought along with alchohol. Perhaps in his mind, his son was guilty of costing him money, living as a dependent in need of food and clothing. The father then “waltzed me off to bed/ still clinging to your shirt.”(Roethke line 15 / 16). Meaning that after the beating, the narrator followed the father and went to bed without any complaints; still dreaming of the days when his father was still kind and sober, ‘clinging’ onto the hope that they one day will
involved in this dance. He shows his caring feelings in the last line by using the words "still clinging". "Certainly, this small boy's family life has its frightening side, but the last line suggests the boy is still clinging to his father with persistent if also complicated love" (Kennedy and Gioia 668). Although their dance appears to be "comic", Roethke seems to possess "an odd and ambivalent closeness" to his apparently intoxicated father (Balakian 62).
...perpetrated on the small child (13). Tapped or stroked may have been a more tactile image designated in the place of the word “beat” if this was truly a frolicking moment between a father and son. The next line, “With a palm caked hard by dirt,” the speaker uses this syntax to sympathize with the father and excusing his actions based his working class upbringing (14). The last two lines of the poem, “Then waltzed me off to bed / Still clinging to your shirt,” as the action diminishes, the child is clearly grasping in terror, afraid to let go of his father for fear of reprisal (15, 16). The word “clinging” is a denotation of the speaker adhering to a memory of his past.
This poem has a kept form. Even at a glance, it has a set form. It consists of four quatrains, each line being an iambic tritameter. The poem is about a young boy waltzing with his father. One can assume that the speaker is a young boy, or perhaps the poet reminiscing his youth. The father dances around in a haphazard manner, knocking over pans in the kitchen. Upon first glance, the tone is humorous. The picture one immediately forms is rather comical with the boy clinging on for dear life as his chuckling father spins him round and round, making a mess in the kitchen while the mother looks on discontentedly. However, the line, "whiskey on your breath could make a small boy dizzy" suggests the father's drunkedness and "at every step you missed my right ear scraped buckle" suggests the dance was not an altogether joyful one. Lines such as "hung on like death", and "beat time on my head" are might even lead the reader to think the father is abusive of the boy.
It is obvious this is an evening ritual, one that is cherished. The boy is aware of his fathers’ waltzing abilities and he concedes that he is up for the challenge. The irony of the statement, “I hung on like death” (Roethke line 3) is a private one, yet deeply describes his yearning for one more waltz with his father who passed away when Theodore was only fifteen years
In the late nineteen forties, Theodore Roethke emerged with a poem that has been the source of much debate. "My Papa's Waltz," is an account of a relationship between son and father. Alas, many readers who are exposed to this piece fail to note the love present in the connection of the characters. In an attempt to illuminate the author's true intention several factors must be examined. After several examinations of Roethke's poem as well as learning of his childhood it is evident that this poem does not suggest an abusive environment, but is an appreciative account of the love and playfulness between the characters. Therefore, a successful interpretation of this poem will look beyond the four stanzas and study not only the history of the writing, but the life of the poet.