Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of sports in society
Merits and demerits of team sports
Merits and demerits of gambling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits of sports in society
In the Article “Lotteries Cheat, Corrupt the People” George Will presents the idea that lotteries are bad for the people, stating that legal gambling boost the productivity of illegal gambling, victimizing poor and minorities populations, and painful way of raising revenue. Will gives many reasons as to why he believes gambling is bad and backs his opinion with many facts on percentages of losers as well as quotes from Thomas Jefferson on the importance of hard work. Although Will presents many different facts I disagree with the general statement that “Lotteries Cheat, Corrupt the People” The reason a Lottery is good for the people starts with the mental aspect, some people can’t live without gambling much like those with a coffee addiction …show more content…
Gamblers don’t gamble just to gamble they gamble to stay in the game, the rush of pulling that handle and hearing the wheel spin or the lights flash in rapid secession is the real drive to gamble not because the money, entertainment or to socialize these people were simply born this way. These types of gamblers are much like a coffee addict or an adrenaline junkie that lives to jump out of planes or bungee jump from tall bridges, but you don’t see Will calling them losers with no self-control. Will thinks all people gamble entirely for the money but doesn’t see it for what it is nor will he understand because his mind does not work like theirs. Gambling has been around since the start of Earth it is not just now coming to the people, our government didn’t start gambling the people did our government only controls it and makes it safe. People from all parts of the world gamble from the USA to China and anywhere in between, gambling is not a thing of money or race it’s a thing of history and evolution. The People who gamble today are the same as people who gambled in the caveman days they gambled on who would start the fire as I gamble on who will win the super bowl nothing has changed or will change the people want what the people …show more content…
This includes all forms of income from high to low and all races from black to white. A more financially set adult will spend more money gambling then the “minority and poor populations” as Will explains them. If these so called poor populations have no money will they be the ones flying all the way to Vegas spending money on gas, food, hotel, and entertainment? I think not the ones gambling are those who make a good living and can afford to spend thousands of dollars in Las Vegas. One thing all people can agree there is not a person out there that would wish to be average their whole life, everyone wants to be able to retire knowing they have money to send their kids to college or to even buy luxury items. This hope of one day winning it big is the reason people get up each day only to work long and hard hours at work as well as at home. People don’t just quit their job because they lost the lottery they will work many more days to buy a ticket and hope to win only to try again and again. People need something they can look forward to work hard and achieve things never done before and the lottery provides this for them. You take this away and the hard-working people no longer have anything to look forward to, nothing stops them from going out and doing
In her first publication, “Against the Odds, and Against the Common Good”, Gloria Jiménez tries to convince the readers that the lottery business is urging people to gamble. The thesis is apparent in the first paragraph: “Still, when all is said and done about lotteries bringing a bit of excitement into the lives of many people and bringing a vast amount of money into the lives of a few, the states should not be in the business of urging people to gamble” (118). The author successfully presents valid arguments to support her opposition to state-run lotteries throughout the essay; whether the evidence will properly convince most readers the way she wants them to, is questionable. Although the valid arguments and evidence Jiménez provides is adequate for the essay, I believe only one argument really stands out to convince her readers the purpose of the essay.
The money the lottery provides is lower than many think.Some people say that they are because all state’s give some money to education.But that is only
Shirley Jackson wrote many books in her life, but she was well known by people for her story “The Lottery” (Hicks). “The Lottery” was published on June 28, 1948, in the New Yorker magazine (Schilb). The story sets in the morning of June 27th in a small town. The townspeople gather in the square to conduct their annual tradition, the Lottery. The winner of the lottery will stoned to death by the society. Although there is no main character in the story, the story develops within other important elements. There are some important elements of the story that develop the theme of the story: narrator and its point of view, symbolism, and main conflict. The story “The Lottery,” by Shirley Jackson, argues practicing a tradition without understanding the meaning of the practice is meaningless and dangerous.
The following two paragraphs are a summary of Gloria Jimenez's essay Against the Odds and Against the Common Good. States should neither allow nor encourage state-run lotteries. There are five major arguments that people use to defend lotteries. One is that most lotteries are run honestly, but if gambling is harmful to society it is irrelevant to argue if they are honest or not. The second is that lotteries create jobs, but there are only a small handful of jobs that would be eliminated if lotteries were put out of business. Another argument that would support keeping lotteries is that, other than gambling addicts, people freely choose to buy lottery tickets. This is true, however, there are misleading advertisements that may cause people to buy tickets under false pretenses.
“Why We Keep Playing the Lottery”, by freelance journalist Adam Piore takes a very in depth look as to what drives millions of Americans to continually play the lottery when their chances of winning are virtually non-existent. He believes that because the odds of winning the lottery are so small that Americans lose the ability to conceptualize how unlikely it is that they are going to win, and therefore the risk of playing has less to do with the outcome, and more to do with hope that they are feeling when they decide to play. It 's essentially, "a game where reason and logic are rendered obsolete, and hope and dreams are on sale." (Piore 700) He also states that many Americans would rather play the lottery thinking ,"boy, I could win $100 million" (705) as opposed to thinking about all of the money they could lose over time.
The Lottery gains through selling tickets a massive amount of utility (money/pleasure). Much more than one person who buys a lottery
An obsession exists in the world today based solely upon the use of scapegoats. According to the dictionary, a scapegoat consists of a person or group made to bear the blame for others or to suffer in their place. Some of the most influential scapegoats consist of Jesus Christ taking suffering for the sins of civilization, the Jewish population being punished for the problems in Germany, and more recently the U.S. citizens who perished in 9/11 being punished for the sins of America. Scapegoats have come in many forms over time and have been very destructive. The usage of scapegoats in our society, such as in Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery”, has proved to be damaging, and an end must be found in order to find peace.
Did you know that Merle and Patricia Butler from Red Bud, Illinois and three teachers from Baltimore Maryland won the biggest lottery in American history at $656 million dollars? That means every person acquired $218.6 million dollars each from the lottery (Carlyle). Unfortunately, the citizens of Shirley Jacksons’ fantasy short story “The Lottery” were not imbursed with money, but were stoned to death by their peers. “The Lottery” is a lottery of death in which the town uses to keep the population down (Voth). The story consist of many subjects to analyze which include: irony, imagery, and pathos.
"The Lottery" is "symbolic of any number of social ills that mankind blindly perpetrates" (Friedman 108). The story is very shocking, but the reality of mankind is even more shocking. Isn’t it funny that Jackson gives us a description of our nature, and not only do we not recognize it for what it is , but it shocks us.
In the article “The Lottocracy,” the author Alexander Guerrero makes some bold assessments toward the current system of electing representatives. Alexander Guerrero reflects on the general attitude people have toward voting, analyzes why people vote the way they do and how the system is flawed. It is easy to fall into a state of thinking that one vote does not make a difference when one considers that there is little difference between the candidates. Ethos, pathos, and logos are present throughout the article to persuade and convince the audience of how flawed the current system. Guerrero appeals to his reader’s sense of logic by using examples of statistical analysis that outlines the demographics of those who are currently serving in elected
State-run lotteries open up many opportunities for the poor and for students combined. Not only that, but they also help many government run resources like social services. If the state was not using the lottery to fund these projects, the state government would have to raise the state taxes in order to receive the money needed. The author points out that because these programs are so important to the government, they should not rely so heavily on the poor and addicted (to gambling) to fund these projects. Money earned from lottery tickets is used to pay for many student's scholarships. Despite what the author says, the states are taking great advantage over the lottery system that for the most part, benefits almost all of their citizens. The lottery has prevented already high taxes from being raised more. The article points out that the state legislatures have basically made the whole lottery ticket system into a "voluntary
Study Commission showed “ that low and moderate income lottery taxpayers spend more on the lottery than do middle income taxpayers” (Analysis 3,4). In addition, this study revealed that education levels do affect how much a person spends on the lottery. The biggest spenders were
Answer: the article mentions that the lottery is controlled by the State, meaning that a few people in charge makes a lot of money out of millions of people, and because gambling is a somewhat a form of "entertainment" and one individual might win and get a lot money (pleasure) from it, it supposedly outweighs the harm of these other million of individuals that gave their money away and lost. Nevertheless, in utilitarian monster logic, an experiment create by Robert Nozick, the intensified pleasure of one individual is more important than the small harm caused to others. The comic picture below by Peter Singer, paints a more vivid image of what the utilitarian monsters looks like:
Gambling is described as the betting of money or property on the result of an event or game that is mainly random with the desire to win more money or gain additional property. The industry or sector created by the activity of legal gambling is referred to as gaming. Since inception, gambling and gaming has continued to develop to an extent that it worth more than $335 billion across the globe. Most of the revenues obtained in this industry are generated by casinos and lotteries. In the past few years, gambling and gaming have attracted significant concern and controversy, especially with regards to the morality of the practice and whether its financial benefits outweigh the damage. While proponents of gambling
The gambling business does not care how much our debt is or how poor we are. All they care about is how much of our addiction to gambling at their casinos. They have strategies to wash our “awareness” when we are at the casino. They give us chips to separate our mind from our cash. For instance, if we place our $100 dollars bill down to bet, I am sure that we will not spend it as fast as with the chip marked “100” because our brains are detached from the real value of cash. Moreover, there is no watch and all of the windows in the casino are tinted, so we do not know whether it is morning or midnight outside or we cannot realize how long that we have been staying in the casino. In Las Vegas, all of the casinos are designed to keep us not to leave the area, they have everything that we want, from dining to shopping. They look like an indoor amusement park for adults which many kinds of gambling games. All for one purpose is nothing can distract us while we are gambling, and the more we addict to gambling, the more profit they earn. Furthermore, gambling business provides free bus rides for everyone to their gambling venues. However, free is not always good, so what is the purpose of those free rides? To increase the number of people who visit their gambling venues or to establish “The connection between greater access to gambling