Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature and the poet
Nature and the poet
The relationship between humans and nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The American perspective on nature is that we want control over nature, we take what we want from nature at the expense of ourselves and all other life within nature.
E and T- Poets see a tree as a beautiful gift to cherish, but the wood-cutter only sees it as a stick of timber (Emerson). Emerson acknowledges that some people appreciate nature, but most people would have forests cut down because we care more about what we can gain materially from the destruction of our planet than by what we can gain spiritually by loving nature as we do ourselves. The transcendentalists would rather everyone live in nature with the bare necessities, but they know that society would rather have electricity, housing, and other material goods than reaching enlightenment.
…show more content…
Into Thin Air- In May of 1996, Jon Krakauer was “straddling the top of the world… [he’d] been fantasizing about this moment” (Thin Air).
Every climber on that expedition, including Jon, knew that climbing Everest was potentially fatal, yet every one of them dreamed about being on top of the summit. Eight people died on May 11th 1996 when a storm came out of nowhere. The climbers put their desire to play king-of-the-world over their own safety, and many climbers suffered death as as result. Going into the most merciless of landscapes for fun when there is such a big risk shows that people gamble their lives for a few stories and a sense of accomplishment. Human beings are a part of nature just like any other animal, and we need to respect our lives and nature without being so self-absorbed that we put ourselves in death’s
way. Old Man- The old man apologizes to now the half-eaten by whispering “I shouldn’t have come out so far fish. Neither for you nor for me” (Hemingway 110). Though Santiago seems to normally only takes what he needs, such an experienced fisherman should’ve known better than to let a big fish drag him far away from the shore. With all of his wisdom, he would’ve known that a fish of that strength would be impossible to haul onto the boat, leaving it vulnerable to the sharks in the ocean. We can assume that his pride and desperation got in the way of clear thinking. His desire to kill the great fish and change his luck was too great, and he killed the fish with nothing to show for it. Many fisherman would’ve probably let the fish go after losing sight of land. However Santiago followed his pride to the open sea where he knew that hungry sharks lurked, letting his prize slip away, thus the fish died in vain. Poetry- In the poem Birches, Frost describes how he “was once a swinger of branches” in the sense that when he was a child he would climb to the top of trees and swing until his weight dragged him down and the top of the tree touched the ground. This would leave the trees bent and deformed, but the sight of bent trees made Frost feel a happy sense of nostalgia. Frost would swing on the trees despite the harm that this would cause to the trees. He put his own desire to have fun over his respect for the environment around him. Ted Talk- The speaker in the video An Inconvenient Truth refers to the greenhouse gases that we create by burning fossil fuels for electricity and energy. These gases build up our ozone, trapping infrared rays and heated up the atmosphere. Humans use increasingly bigger amounts of natural resources every year to satisfy their insatiable desires. Many people ignore the thought of global warming, but using so much energy is dangerous to every living thing on Earth, yet we continue to create greenhouse gases as more and more heat is trapped by the Ozone. We take resources and energy without giving a second thought about the consequences about how our actions affect the world.
Into Thin Air by Jon Krakauer, uses motivation to make the protagonist feel and behave a certain way. The author uses struggles to show the theme of perseverance.
The novel "Into Thin Air" by Jon Krakauer, he writes about an experience that changes his life when Outside magazine asks him to write an article about the commercialism of Mount Everest, he knew from that moment that he needed to climb the mountain. But of course his expedition does not go as expected. On May 10th Krakauer reaches the summit after a extremely stressful and treacherous trek up, but only to have to scale down the mountain with his team in one of the most dangerous seasons in the history of Everest. Many things went wrong when they came down the mountain and throughout this book, Jon attempts to evaluate what exactly happened and how things went wrong. He researches and figures out every person actions on that mountain. He has speculations about the failures of the expedition, and blames the catastrophe due to a series of little
Imagine feeling guilty for making it out alive on a journey. In the nonfiction novel, Into Thin Air, by Jon Krakauer, he documents his journey to the summits of Mount Everest and ultimately accuses himself of holding responsible for the disaster on the mountain. After realizing only one-fourth of the people that climbed to the summits on May 10, 1996, made it back down to base camp alive, Krakauer theorizes why that was so. He attributes most of the reason for the disaster to the erratic weather, along with hubris, who wanted the thought of leading a group to the mountain. Despite those reasons, there is no ultimate reason for the deaths documented in the book, but bottom line the climbers that died didn’t thoroughly comprehend the danger they were going to encounter as a consequence that contributed to the disaster.
While Peak and his group are climbing a steep icewall, one of the climber’s ice axe broke. Peak decides to climb down and help the fellow climber. This act could have killed Peak, yet he would risk his own life for a friend. “Got him! I shouted down to Zopa”(202). This quote reveals that Peak saved his fellow climbers life. Also, when Peak is less than 10 feet away from the summit of Everest he lets Sun-Jo reach the top. Even though Sun-Jo was having issues up the whole mountain and Peak saved his life. Peak and Sun-Jo are both 14. They both would be the youngest to make it to the Summit of Everest. Sun-Jo is poor and all Sun-Jo wants to do is go to school. Peak lets Sun-Jo reach the summit and get all the money and fame. “I don’t have a reason for being here. I’m heading back down the north side”(230). This quote shows Peak is letting Sun-Jo to the summit, and Peak just climbs down the mountain, not even reaching the summit after Sun-Jo. Too often in life, criminals do not change to kind people but, Peak’s actions show readers that 1 little thing can fix up someone's
Everest in 1996. This became the deadliest expedition to ever climb with 15 people losing their lives. Krakauer explains his intrinsic motivations to accept this challenge and many of the mistakes that helped lead to the disasters of that day. He includes himself, and explicitly blames himself for at least one person's death. The experience affects him profoundly, and in addition to telling the story, the book focuses on how Krakauer is forever changed as a result of what happened. All of the clients have difficulty adjusting to the altitude, tiring easily, losing weight and moving slowly. The climbers' experience in mountain climbing and at high altitudes varies some of them are quite qualified, others very inexperienced and highly reliant on the
Everest is an unbelievable mountain that has taken the lives of a number of the greatest climbers in history. It was my job to ensure that clients make it up that treacherous mountain safely. My name is Rob Hall. I was the main guide and cofounder of a climbing company called Adventure Consultants. My friend, Gary Ball, and I used to be professional climbers. Together we succeeded in climbing to the highest summit on each of the seven continents in seven months. This was our greatest achievement. After this, we decided to start our own company guiding clients up large mountains. In May 1992, we successfully led six clients to the summit of Everest. Unfortunately, Gary died of cerebral edema in October 1993 during an attempt on the world’s sixth-tallest mountain. He died in my arms and the next day I buried him in a crevasse. Despite the pain that his death had caused me, I continued guiding for our company and eventually led thirty-nine climbers to the summit of Everest.
Climbing makes for a difficult expedition, you need to give up the wrappers when you was ascending. You need to give up the heavy things, you need to give up your wrappers, and you need to give yourselves. Sometimes we need to give up our lives to climb the mount Everest. According to snow storm, the energy, the oxygen and the people who desired prove themselves the spring’s 96s expedition to mountain Everest was destined to be the most tragic.
In Emerson’s “Nature” nature is referred to as “plantations of god” meaning that nature is sacred. Also mentioned, is that “In the woods is perpetual youth”(#) conveying that nature keeps people young. Therefore, these excerpts show that nature is greatly valued by these transcendentalists. Transcendentalists would likely care significantly about the environment. In contrast, nowadays nature is often and afterthought. Natures’ resources are being depleted for human use, and the beauty of nature is also not as appreciated by modern people as it was by transcendentalists. The threat to nature in modern times contrasts to the great appreciation of nature held by authors like Emerson and
My initial reaction to the words “You’re next book you will be reading is Into Thin Air” was definitely not me jumping up and down in my seat out of joy. I’ll admit I was not looking forward to reading this book at all. I tried putting off reading it for as long as possible, but then realized that I should just try reading the first chapter. After reading the first chapter I was completely hooked and I couldn’t get enough of the book. Jon Krakauer does a phenomenal job at keeping the reader engaged with what is happening throughout the book. You get an astounding story of the struggles that come with climbing Mount Everest and a wonderful background of the mountain and its history.
A transcendentalist values the natural world compared to the obsession of the synthetic values of those before them. Among the well respected Transcendentalists are Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Washington Irving, and Henry David Thoreau. A common dream world consists of simplicity, admiration, and individualism, and there hasn’t been a clear line drawn regarding the connection between transcendentalism and utopian thinking. A future ‘utopia’ should be founded on transcendentalist philosophies in order to restore the value of nature and one's own individual spirit, due to the qualities shared by a 21st century ‘utopia’ and transcendental ideas.
Everest. “The falling ice hit twenty-five men, killing sixteen of them, all Nepalis. Three of the bodies were buried beneath the debris and were never recovered,” (Source 2). This tragedy had occurred all when mountaineering. This is not something rare either, according to Source 1 “Keep Everest Open”, “...Everest exacted a ratio of one death for every four successful summit attempts”. This sport is extremely dangerous if something goes wrong, which means that the chance of death is high. So why would anyone want to risk their life just to climb a
I was really confused by the thoughts of Emerson and the real meaning behind transcendentalism because of its complex beliefs. I felt that because of the belief of transcendentalism is so complex, it somewhat sounds vague. But, I do agree with Emerson and his ideas of how everyone takes everything around them for granted, not the material world, but of nature itself. I agree because in today's society there are many environmental issues that are harming nature itself and most of the issues are mainly caused by humans which I do agree still happen today as Emerson sees it, but his description of taking nature for granted was that people only focused on the objects in front of
We are first going to break down the importance of nature. Transcendentalists believed in a monistic universe, or one in which God is immanent in nature. The creation is an emanation of the creator; although a distinct entity, God is permanently and directly present in all things. This thought can be seen in Emerson’s “Nature” on line seven and thirty, “Within these plantations of God, a decorum and sanctity reign… / Nature always wears the colors of the spirit.” Here Emerson metaphorically compares nature to the “plantations of God” in which the spirit of God is always present.
In Source #1 it states, “the opponents assert that the unpredictability of avalanches, for which there seems to be no reliable scientific forecast, makes future disasters all to likely. Despite the evident risks, I believe that people should still be able to climb Mt. Everest,” (Source #1). Avalanches are plausible and are all likely therefore that should not truly determine the debate on the closing of Mt. Everest. Meanwhile Advocates insist in Source # 2, “that, for much of recorded history, we have celebrated humanity’s unfettered spirit of adventure―a questing drive that has often entailed great risks. Yet, by the same token, we have accepted limitations,” (Source #2). Advocates are instilling
Ralph Waldo Emerson(1803-1882), the leader of the Transcendentalism in New England, is the first American who wrote prose and poem on nature and the relationship between nature and man Emerson's philosophy of Transcendentalism concerning nature is that nature is only another side of God "the gigantic shadow of God cast our senses." Every law in nature has a counterpart in the intellect. There is a perfect parallel between the laws of nature and the laws of thought. Material elements simply represent an inferior plane: wherever you enumerate a physical law, I hear in it a moral rule. His poem The Rhodora is a typical instance to illustrate his above-mentioned ideas on nature. At the very beginning of the poem, the poet found the fresh rhodora in the woods, spreading its leafless blooms in a deep rock, to please the desert and the sluggish brook, while sea-winds pieced their solitudes in May. It is right because of the rhodora that the desert and the sluggish brook are no longer solitudes. Then the poem goes to develop by comparison between the plumes of the redbird and the rhodora . Although the bird is elegant and brilliant, the flower is much more beautiful than the bird. So the sages can not helping asking why this charm is wasted on the earth and sky. The poet answers beauty is its own cause for being just as eyes are made for seeing. There is no other reason but beauty itsel...