Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personal narrative about hunting
Personal narrative about hunting
Personal narrative about hunting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personal narrative about hunting
When thinking about the wild we often look to places like the woods and uncharted territory. These places are in fact wild, but we often overlook the wild we experience every day. Everyone has their own opinion about what the wild is to them. William Cronon says that the wild is not real, that is a human creation that is a mirror of what we believe the wild is, and that we can only define wild as a place that has been untouched by man. In the novel Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, we are told the story of a young man, Alex McCandless, who travels across the United States trying to find such a wild place, and once he found such a place he walked in and never walked out. But along the way we see how his travels can be considered wild. We learn how the people around us and the places we go can be …show more content…
wild in their own ways.
The wild can be anything from a new experience to a simple change in your daily routine. The wild can be experienced in your everyday life.
The wild can be seen in many different ways, but one general view is used by Krakauer. That view of the wild is described as a way for someone to separate themselves from the rest of society to be able to reconnect with who they want to be. Many people seek to find a wild place where they are able to reset their mind in a way. They go to a much simpler place without all the so-called “distractions” of today’s hustle and bustle society. People also think the wild is only a place that disconnects us from the world. That this disconnection is an unnecessary commodity. Cronon says, “If the core problem of wilderness is that it distances us too much from the very things it teaches us to value, then the question we must ask is what it can tell us about home, the place where we actually live” (Pg. 13). He believes that going
out into the woods is not the way to learn about yourself or your home because where you live is where the wild once was. He makes us think about whether or not the wild and the distance it gives the rest of the world is actually a problem. It also shows us that even though that wild place we all think about may not show us all the answers to our problems, but it can teach us how to handle these problems at home where we live day in and day out. In Krakauer’s Into the Wild, Krakauer uses the story of Alex McCandless to show us how wild can be found even when you are around other people. Alex goes off by himself on a spiritual journey and the first thing he did was burn all his money showing his first step in making that first leap of distance between him and his old self. By doing this we see his new identity that he would explore and expand on throughout his spiritual journey to find the person he wanted to be, not the person that society wanted him to be. We grow up being told by our parents and taught by our teachers that a wild is a place where animals live and where trees and plants grow freely. But what if the wild could be seen in the middle of downtown Seattle without even trying to look for it? There are millions of things that happen every day that we have no control over. There could be a fire that interrupts your daily commute to work, or it could be as simple as noticing something new that you haven’t seen before. Some people may ignore these things, but others see them as a daily wild experience. William Cronon has a theory that the wild is only what we make it out to be, “As we gaze into the mirror it holds up for us, we too easily imagine that what we behold is Nature when in fact we see the reflection of our own unexamined longings and desires” (Pg. 1). William compares the way we may see the wild to something that we might be searching for. He believes that the wild is different to all of us depending on who we are and what the wild means to us. A person with a closed mind will more often than not think of the wild and only assume that it solely a place where animals and plants roam free. For every one of those people there is someone like Alex McCandless whose open-mindedness allows him to take that mirror image of what the wild looks like and expand it. These people take their expanded mirror image and use it to open their eyes to the world around them. The people who choose to never expand their thoughts on what is wild tend to view the wild as a place where they want to someday go but never take the time to actually experience it. They do not realize that the experience they are searching for is right in front of them, all they have to do is look at the bigger picture. There are a few things many people in this world lack. They lack the knowledge of what it means to be generously kind when no one is watching. They focus on themselves more than they focus on the world around them and the things that are happening right before their eyes. Today all we think about is money and ourselves, we fail to stop and look around at the place we live and thrive. William Cronon tells us, “In reminding us of the world we did not make, wilderness can teach profound feelings of humility and respect as we confront our fellow beings and the earth itself” (Pg. 13). Cronon uses his strong and persuasive writing that gives us a view of the world that many people have not seen, and very few will take the time to do this. He amplifies the idea that we truly have changed as an entire race. We have little, if not any, respect for not only ourselves but the people and planet that we coexist with. We fail to see the amazing things that are standing right in front of us. Alex McCandless was one of the few people who opened his eyes and decided he wanted to go against the social normality that our parents, peers, and society push on us. He wanted out and that’s just what he did. Alex left, without out a word. He disappeared into the world to figure out who he wanted to be. He left his old self and began a new life. He set his mind to Alaska and headed out. Along the way, he meets strangers who ultimately become a kind of new family in a way. He treats everyone with the utmost respect he has, not taking more anything he didn’t need. He left his mark on people and inspired them to things that might seem scary but are worth the risk. He taught people to live in the moment and see how great the world is around them. Helping them to see how every step you take can change what happens next, which is in itself a wild experience. throughout Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild and William Cronon’s “The Trouble with Wilderness”, we read about how both authors have different views on the world and how we generally define the wild and what it means to us. But their different views mesh together when it comes to how each individual can view the wild, and also how they can change that view and how they define it. These two authors are writing about different ideas that seem far apart, but once you take the time to break down you see that they are not too far apart. From what they are saying you are able to see how one perspective might seem different from another but in retrospect, they aren’t so different after all. Both Krakauer and Cronon explore the thoughts of how wild experiences change people. The two of them write about how traveling into the wilderness is not always the best way to get all of life's answers, but the journey there can teach you a lot about yourself and who you are. The wild, in my opinion, is not just a physical place you can seek out to find. The wild is also a mental and an emotional state of mind. A wild perspective on life is not as hard to obtain as you might think. You have to be willing to let your mind take the thought of, “What is Wild?” and let it run. The everyday wild that we experience can be simple or complex. You just have to be willing to let go of your preexisting thoughts of what wild is, and enjoy the world around you.
Many individuals decide to live their life in solitary; though, only a few choose to live in the wild. The book, Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer vividly paints the adventurous trek Chris McCandless went on. From the friends he made, to the hardships he went through, McCandless is portrayed as a friendly, sociable person despite the fact that he was a vagabond. Other than McCandless, there are even more individuals that have taken the risks to live in the wilderness such as, Jon Krakauer and Everett Ruess. All three of them had both similarities and differences between their own qualities as a person and their journey.
Have you ever felt like you didn’t belong somewhere and just wanted to get away? Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer is about a guy named Christopher who called himself Alex, and he just wanted to get away from his life and live how he wanted. Christopher McCandless stands out because he shows his emotions thoroughly and goes through with what he thinks. McCandless can be described as a thrill seeker, arrogant, and courageous.
This book Into The Wild is about how a young man wants to get away from the world. He does escape from society, but ends up dying in the process. The author, Jon Krakauer, does a great job of describing Chris McCandless and his faults. Chris is an intelligent college graduate. He went on a two-year road trip and ended up in Alaska. He didn't have any contact with his parents in all of that time. Krakauer does a great job of interviewing everyone who had anything to do with McCandless from his parents, when he grew up, to the people who found his body in Alaska.
the idea of the wild and its importance and necessity of human interaction with the wild.
Ultimate freedom is an odyssey everyone, at least once in their lifetime, tries to conquer. Chris McCandless did everything in his power to try and capture that freedom he was searching for. He ultimately gave up his own life during that quest. Did he find what he was searching for? We may never know. Very many people have diverse opinions on this character. Chris McCandless was not selfish. He was a young, well-educated boy. His parents handed him everything on a silver platter; he wanted to prove not only to himself but to everyone else he could do things on his own. His possessions did not define who he was as a person. He thought towards everyone else he was just another brick in the wall, a pretty rich boy, and that did not “fly” with him. He had to prove his worth.
Thesis- In Jon Krakauer's nonfiction novel, Into the Wild, the wilderness is a natural home to seekers, a place free of the harm of a modern society, where a seeker can explore the lands and experience life by their own rules.
Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer tells of a young man named Chris McCandless who 1deserted his college degree and all his worldly possessions in favor of a primitive transient life in the wilderness. Krakauer first told the story of Chris in an article in Outside Magazine, but went on to write a thorough book, which encompasses his life in the hopes to explain what caused him to venture off alone into the wild. McCandless’ story soon became a national phenomenon, and had many people questioning why a “young man from a well-to-do East Coast family [would] hitchhike to Alaska” (Krakauer i). Chris comes from an affluent household and has parents that strived to create a desirable life for him and his sister. As Chris grows up, he becomes more and more disturbed by society’s ideals and the control they have on everyday life. He made a point of spiting his parents and the lifestyle they lived. This sense of unhappiness continues to build until after Chris has graduated college and decided to leave everything behind for the Alaskan wilderness. Knowing very little about how to survive in the wild, Chris ventures off on his adventure in a state of naïveté. It is obvious that he possessed monumental potential that was wasted on romanticized ideals and a lack of wisdom. Christopher McCandless is a unique and talented young man, but his selfish and ultimately complacent attitude towards life and his successes led to his demise.
In John Krakauer’s novel Into The Wild, the reader follows the life of a young man who, upon learning of his father’s infidelity and bigamy, seems to go off the deep end, isolating himself by traveling into the wild country of Alaska, unprepared for survival, where he died of starvation at 67 pounds.
Jon Krakauer, fascinated by a young man in April 1992 who hitchhiked to Alaska and lived alone in the wild for four months before his decomposed body was discovered, writes the story of Christopher McCandless, in his national bestseller: Into the Wild. McCandless was always a unique and intelligent boy who saw the world differently. Into the Wild explores all aspects of McCandless’s life in order to better understand the reason why a smart, social boy, from an upper class family would put himself in extraordinary peril by living off the land in the Alaskan Bush. McCandless represents the true tragic hero that Aristotle defined. Krakauer depicts McCandless as a tragic hero by detailing his unique and perhaps flawed views on society, his final demise in the Alaskan Bush, and his recognition of the truth, to reveal that pure happiness requires sharing it with others.
The wild is a place to push yourself to the limit and take a look at who you truly are inside. “Wilderness areas have value as symbols of unselfishness” (Nash). Roderick Nash’s philosophy states that the wilderness gives people an opportunity to learn humility but they fight this because they do not have a true desire to be humble. Human-kind wants to give out the illusion that they are nature lovers when in reality, they are far from it. “When we go to designated wilderness we are, as the 1964 act says, "visitors" in someone else's home” (Nash). People do not like what they cannot control and nature is uncontrollable. Ecocentrism, the belief that nature is the most important element of life, is not widely accepted. The novel Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer depicts a young boy who goes on an exploration to teach himself the true concept of humility. Chris McCandless, the protagonist, does not place confidence in the universal ideology that human beings are the most significant species on the planet, anthropocentrism.
“Into The Wild” by John Krakauer is a non-fiction biographical novel which is based on the life of a young man, Christopher McCandless. Many readers view Christopher’s journey as an escape from his family and his old life. The setting of a book often has a significant impact on the story itself. The various settings in the book contribute to the main characters’ actions and to the theme as a whole. This can be proven by examining the impact the setting has on the theme of young manhood, the theme of survival and the theme of independent happiness.
Into the Wild, a novel written by Jon Krakauer, as well as a film directed by Sean Penn, talks about Chris McCandless, a young individual who sets out on a journey throughout the Western United States, isolating himself from society, and more importantly, his family. During his travels, he meets a lot of different people, that in a way, change his ways about how he sees the world. There are many characteristics to describe McCandless, such as “nave”, “adventurous”, and “independent”. In the book, Krakauer described McCandless as “intelligent”, using parts in his book that show McCandless being “intelligent”. While Krakauer thinks of McCandless as being “intelligent”, Penn thinks of McCandless as a more “saint” type of person.
In today’s world, we live in a society where we are subjected to follow rules, which are placed upon us by the society. Many people are faced with the dilemma of whether or not to follow the ideals of other people, or pursue their ideals and go against the prevailing conventions. In “Selections from Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer, the author talks about a man named McCandless who went into the Alaskan wilderness in order to find his true self. His journey was also to escape from the societal norms of society. A person who goes into the wilderness believes that they can live their life with brute simplicity. This gives them little to no time with the complicated problems of modern society. Likewise, in “Waiting for a Jew” by Jonathan Boyarin, the author talks about one’s aspiration to find their identity and purpose in the community. He conveys that religious places, like shul, allow an individual to develop a cross- cultural self. The desires and expectations placed upon us by the society shape our strategies of personal identity; therefore, instilling fears that cause us to identify in opposition to our prevailing conventions.
In Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer explores the human fascination with the purpose of life and nature. Krakauer documents the life and death of Chris McCandless, a young man that embarked on an Odyssey in the Alaskan wilderness. Like many people, McCandless believed that he could give his life meaning by pursuing a relationship with nature. He also believed that rejecting human relationships, abandoning his materialistic ways, and purchasing a book about wildlife would strengthen his relationship with nature. However, after spending several months enduring the extreme conditions of the Alaskan wilderness, McCandless’ beliefs begin to work against him. He then accepts that he needs humans, cannot escape materialism, and can never fully understand how nature functions. Most importantly, he realizes that human relationships are more valuable than infinite solitude. McCandless’ gradual change of heart demonstrates that exploring the wilderness is a transformative experience. Krakauer uses the life and death of Chris McCandless to convey that humans need to explore nature in order to discover the meaning of life.
Chris McCandless and Buck serve as examples of the archetype of the wild through their experiences of leaving where they feel most comfortable and answering the call of the wild. They show that each experience is inimitable because the wild is unique to every individual. For Buck, the wild is a place outside of civilization and his dependence on man, where the external threats of nature exist and he must prove himself as a true animal with instincts for survival. In McCandless' case, the place outside of civilization is actually an escape from his fears because the wild for him is in relationships, where the threat of intimacy exists and he must learn to trust others for happiness. This is because for each of us, the wild is what we fear, a place outside of our comfort zone and, as McCandless' experience shows, not necessarily a physical place. To render to the call of the wild we must leave everything that makes us feel protected, and we must make ourselves completely vulnerable to the wild. McCandless and Buck show that in order to successfully respond to the call of the wild we must relinquish control and drop our guards, until ultimately the fear subsides and we find peace with ourselves as well as with our environments.