Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of chris mccandless
Analysis of chris mccandless
Analysis of chris mccandless
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of chris mccandless
The book, Into the Wild, written by Jon Krakauer, is a non-fiction narrative of Chris McCandless’s short but incredibly inspirational life. After graduating from university, Chris gave up his privileged life and took his adventure into the wild in full swing. By living off the land, Chris had pursued a grand odyssey of freedom throughout the American west, Alaska, and Mexico in search of peace, self-discovery, and solitude in almost two years. Tragically, his life ended during his final journey to the Alaskan wildness. To Chris’s tale of derring-do, People’s reactions varied. Some opined their criticism of Chris’s reckless act, some placed Chris’s adventurous lifestyle under close scrutiny, and others praised him as being inspirational …show more content…
and aspirational. Despite the hubbub over Chris’s demise, Krakauer held his own strong personal conviction that “He wasn’t a nutcase, he wasn’t a sociopath, he wasn’t an outcast. --McCandless was something else—although precisely what is hard to say. A pilgrim, perhaps” (85). After reading the book thoroughly, even with all due respect to Krakauer, I am still awfully reluctant to accept the notion that Chris was a pilgrim in his nature. Frankly speaking, Chris’s personal expedition to Alaska appeared to go on a pilgrimage; however, there are also considerable footprints, anecdotes, and the revelation of his inner thoughts left behind by Chris to flatly contradict or compromise what constitute a true pilgrimage. First and foremost, the topic of a defined sacred place was never brought up by Chris in his conservation with others, nor mentioned in his private journals.
People, who consider Chris as a pilgrim, might readily point out that Alaska was Chris’s holy site because it was the place he had been dreaming about going for a long time. That claim is not totally baseless and unwarranted. Alaska is not just the place that Chris’s mind had hooked on, but also “Alaska has long been a magnet for dreamers and misfits, people who think the unsullied enormity of the Last Frontier will patch all the holes in their lives” (4). But, for Chris, Alaska was not such a primary location that he wanted to search for spiritual faith or religious beliefs, but a practical ground he could try out his ability and venture of living off the land, “He wanted to prove to himself that he could make it on his own, without anybody else’s help”(159). For instance, as soon as Chris arrived Alaska, the first thing he did was not going to any church or religious services, but to the University of Alaska campus in Fairbank to grab a copy of the field guide to the region’s edible plants before setting out for the wildness. Furthermore, except for declaring that “The Great Holiness of FOOD, the Vital Heat” (168) in his journal, Chris also expressed, “Disaster…Rained in. River look impossible. Lonely, scared” (170). How could Chris himself feel lonely and scared in his holy place? The very basic and fundamental definition of a pilgrimage is that it is a religious practice in which a pilgrim goes on a journey to a sacred place. If there was no holy place involved, then a pilgrimage did not
happen. Additionally, Chris’s quest for adventurous living in the wildness actually seemed more like a ramble than a purposed journey. At the beginning, there was the implication that what motivated Chris to pack and run away was his sour relationship with his “disrespectful” parents, according to his complaint to his sister, Carine, “Since they won’t ever take me seriously, for a few months after graduation I’m going to let them think they are right, I’m going to let them think that I’m ‘coming around to see their side of things’ and that our relationship is stabilizing. And then, once the time is right, with one abrupt, swift action I’m going to completely knock them out of my life. I’m going to divorce them as my parents once and for all and never speak to either of those idiots again as long as I live. I’ll be through with them once and for all, forever” (64). And then, during the last two years of his life, Chris really lived like a lone vagabond, hitchhiking around the West, sleeping at wherever allowed, taking employment sporadically, and even canoeing all way down to Mexico. Only personal freedom, solitude, the wildness thrilled Chris the most, as in his letter to Wayne Westerberge to elaborate his tramping lifestyle, “As for me, I’ve decided that I’m going to live this life for some time to come. The freedom and simple beauty of it is just too good to pass up” (33). Conspicuously, the thought of a pilgrimage was not the thing that crossed his mind. Actually, even the site of the old bus beside the Sushana River Chris chose to settle down for his Alaska adventure was not the last stop of his tramping journey he initially planned, “I might walk all the way to the Bering Sea” (164), as he told Jim Gallien. For a pilgrim, every step, not randomly picked, taken along the journey to the holy land has special meaning, and each step advanced makes it closer to the final destination. Yet, by mapping out Chris’s adventurous journey physically or connecting the dots of his vagabond route mentally, there was no such clear pattern or a single excursion pointed toward a particular direction or final location that Chris was on the way consistently and persistently. He just roamed the wild on impulse. Undeniably, Chris is a person who lived a life with some righteous ideologies and high morals, and especially he had been profoundly influenced by Tolstoy’s asceticism. Essentially, asceticism centers on the doctrine that an individual should live a frugal, abstinent, and austere life in pursuit of spiritual or religious goals. Since Chris transformed himself into a died-hard follower of asceticism in college, he had faithfully followed the exact principles of asceticism wherever he went and whatever he did. In his daily life, “Chris was very much of the school that you should own nothing except what you can carry on” (32), as his mother observed. Regarding money, although Chris displayed the unusual talent of making money and being an entrepreneur in his early years, he never hesitated to divest himself of any money, either through donation to charity or burning them into ashes, because owning money had become a symbol of sinful self-indulgence and material pleasure to the eye of an ascetic Chris. Also, most likely in name of asceticism, Chris felt an enormous amount of animosity toward his father as Walt’s bigamy secret was brought to light, “he’d been a bigamist at one time—and that kind of went against Alex’s grain”(159). Undoubtedly, that explained the reason why the relationship between Chris and his folks was so unpleasant and hostile. Then, even his parents’ offer to buy him a new car as a graduation gift was considered by Chris as a malicious deed of “They will think they have bought my respect” (21). In a strict sense of asceticism, the trek that led Chris to the Alaska’s wildness was actually a massive undertaking of his ascetical exercise, eking out a remarkably frugal living in the wildness in search of self-discovery. Therefore, the undertaking was by no mean a part of an envisioned pilgrimage, which emphasizes on a journey to a sacred destination. Important to know, nowadays there has been an insidious trend or fashion in which many people use the word of pilgrimage so liberally to define their numerous endeavors, such as cultural pilgrimage and spiritual pilgrimage. Traveling is the epitome of the cultural pilgrimage, and a mind meditation exemplifies a case of the spiritual pilgrimage. And roughly, Chris’s personal saga could also be classified into the category of cultural or spiritual pilgrim or the combination of both. Whether such liberal use of the definition of pilgrimage in our daily life is appropriate or not is hard to say; nevertheless, such excessive application of the word of pilgrimage not just overly inflates the concept of a pilgrimage, but also substantially dilutes its religious significance. We’d better just leave the word of pilgrimage alone in the religious dictionary. Understandably, Krakauer, with a similar life experience as Chris’s in their younger years, might have the intent, subtle but sincere, of trying to ennoble Chris in a way of respecting such a brave and dedicated young man who died so young, as well as endorsing his own legendary life . There’s no argument here: Chris was a good man with virtuous consciousness and noble characters; but, simply by the definition, he was not a pilgrim in this set of circumstances. Maybe next time, I should call myself a pilgrim when I go back to visit my hometown in China? Perhaps, not.
Many individuals decide to live their life in solitary; though, only a few choose to live in the wild. The book, Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer vividly paints the adventurous trek Chris McCandless went on. From the friends he made, to the hardships he went through, McCandless is portrayed as a friendly, sociable person despite the fact that he was a vagabond. Other than McCandless, there are even more individuals that have taken the risks to live in the wilderness such as, Jon Krakauer and Everett Ruess. All three of them had both similarities and differences between their own qualities as a person and their journey.
“I have had a happy life and thank the Lord. Goodbye and may God bless all!”(199), these were the last words of Chris McCandless in a picture with him smiling and waving good-bye. Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer is an extension of an article first published in Outside magazine. In the book, Krakauer further explains the journey of Chris McCandless, while providing his own insight to provide the reader a better understanding of the McCandless reasoning. McCandless lived a nomadic life after he graduated from college, traveling from South Dakota to Mexico. However, his two year journey proved fatal when he took a trip to Alaska, his greatest undertaking. Among his remains several books were discovered, including a copy of Walden by Henry D. Thoreau
The epigraphs presented by Krakauer before each chapter of the memoir Into the Wild dive deep into the life of Chris McCandless before and after his journey into the Alaskan wilderness. They compare him to famous “coming of age characters” and specific ideas written by some of his favorite philosophers. These give the reader a stronger sense of who Chris was and why he made the decision to ultimately walk alone into the wild.
Throughout Into the Wild, Krakauer portrays Christopher McCandless as an infallibly eager young man hoping to distance himself from the society he so obviously loathes, to "live off the land," entirely independent of a world which has "conditioned [itself] to a life of security." Chris, contrarily to this depiction, is disparagingly viewed by some as a "reckless idiot" who lacked the sense he needed to survive in the Alaskan wilderness. This derogatory assessment of Chris's mindset is representative of the society he hopes to escape and contains all the ignorance that causes him to feel this way. Nevertheless, he is misjudged by these critics, allowing Krakauer to hold the more accurate interpretation of Chris's character, his goals, and his accomplishments.
In 1992, Christopher McCandless set off on an odyssey into the backcountry of Alaska, an adventure that had proved fatal. After McCandless's corpse was found, Jon Krakauer wrote an article on the story of Chris McCandless, which was released in the January 1993 issue of Outside magazine. The article had received a negative response; several readers criticized McCandless for being foolish and ill-prepared, and showed no sympathy or remorse for his death. McCandless has been referred to as a nut, a kook, and a fool. However, McCandless was not a nonsensical man. In 1996, Jon Krakauer's novel, Into the Wild, was published. The novel uncovers more detail of McCandless's story. Into the Wild rebuts the idea of McCandless being someone who is foolish, and speaks of the many occasions where McCandless has demonstrated great perseverance and determination. The novel also proves the intelligence of McCandless, and brings insight into McCandless's psyche. The following examples will illustrate how McCandless was not a fool, but someone to admire.
This book Into The Wild is about how a young man wants to get away from the world. He does escape from society, but ends up dying in the process. The author, Jon Krakauer, does a great job of describing Chris McCandless and his faults. Chris is an intelligent college graduate. He went on a two-year road trip and ended up in Alaska. He didn't have any contact with his parents in all of that time. Krakauer does a great job of interviewing everyone who had anything to do with McCandless from his parents, when he grew up, to the people who found his body in Alaska.
Ultimate freedom is an odyssey everyone, at least once in their lifetime, tries to conquer. Chris McCandless did everything in his power to try and capture that freedom he was searching for. He ultimately gave up his own life during that quest. Did he find what he was searching for? We may never know. Very many people have diverse opinions on this character. Chris McCandless was not selfish. He was a young, well-educated boy. His parents handed him everything on a silver platter; he wanted to prove not only to himself but to everyone else he could do things on his own. His possessions did not define who he was as a person. He thought towards everyone else he was just another brick in the wall, a pretty rich boy, and that did not “fly” with him. He had to prove his worth.
Living in the wilderness is difficult, but understanding the meaning of such lifestyle is even more difficult. One of the Christopher’s admirable qualities was that he was well aware of what he was doing. He knew about the difficulties and dangers that he would face into the wilderness, and was mentally prepared for that. Author Jon Krakauer says that “McCandless was green, and he overestimated his resilience, but he was sufficiently skilled to last for sixteen weeks on little more than his wits and ten pounds of rice. And he was fully aware when he entered the bush that he had given himself a perilously slim margin for error. He knew precisely what was at stake” (182). McCandless was an educated youth, who loved nature and dreamed of living in the Alaskan wilderness. Although he ignored to take many necessary things with him on this
Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer tells of a young man named Chris McCandless who 1deserted his college degree and all his worldly possessions in favor of a primitive transient life in the wilderness. Krakauer first told the story of Chris in an article in Outside Magazine, but went on to write a thorough book, which encompasses his life in the hopes to explain what caused him to venture off alone into the wild. McCandless’ story soon became a national phenomenon, and had many people questioning why a “young man from a well-to-do East Coast family [would] hitchhike to Alaska” (Krakauer i). Chris comes from an affluent household and has parents that strived to create a desirable life for him and his sister. As Chris grows up, he becomes more and more disturbed by society’s ideals and the control they have on everyday life. He made a point of spiting his parents and the lifestyle they lived. This sense of unhappiness continues to build until after Chris has graduated college and decided to leave everything behind for the Alaskan wilderness. Knowing very little about how to survive in the wild, Chris ventures off on his adventure in a state of naïveté. It is obvious that he possessed monumental potential that was wasted on romanticized ideals and a lack of wisdom. Christopher McCandless is a unique and talented young man, but his selfish and ultimately complacent attitude towards life and his successes led to his demise.
Jon Krakauer, fascinated by a young man in April 1992 who hitchhiked to Alaska and lived alone in the wild for four months before his decomposed body was discovered, writes the story of Christopher McCandless, in his national bestseller: Into the Wild. McCandless was always a unique and intelligent boy who saw the world differently. Into the Wild explores all aspects of McCandless’s life in order to better understand the reason why a smart, social boy, from an upper class family would put himself in extraordinary peril by living off the land in the Alaskan Bush. McCandless represents the true tragic hero that Aristotle defined. Krakauer depicts McCandless as a tragic hero by detailing his unique and perhaps flawed views on society, his final demise in the Alaskan Bush, and his recognition of the truth, to reveal that pure happiness requires sharing it with others.
Chris McCandless, the main character of “Into the wild” was angered by his father’s infidelity and bigamy. As a result, Chris McCandless wanted to separate himself from his family and he begins a spiritual adventure to search for his identity. Chris McCandless isolates himself physically and emotionally to find freedom and peace by adventuring into the wild. Therefore, McCandless escapes from Emory University and immediately flees his dull and predictable life, heading west without a word to his family. Although, McCandless journey ends in a tragic ending, he fulfilled his ambition by pursuing his ambition and inner peace. In conclusion, McCandless journey was both a search for inner peace and transition to maturity.
In the novel, A Hero’s Journey, Joseph Campbell, an American mythologist, writer, and lecturer, states that “every decision made by a young person is life decisive. What seems to be a small problem is really a large one. So everything that is done early in life is functionally related to a life trajectory” (Campbell). In mythic criticism, the critic sees mythic archetypes and imagery connecting and contrasting it with other similar works. Certain patterns emerge, such as a traditional hero on a journey towards self actualization. Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer portrays this hero’s journey. The protagonist of the novel, Chris McCandless, hitchhikes to Alaska and walks alone into the wilderness, north of Mt. McKinley. He had given $25,000 in savings to charity, abandoned his car and most of his possessions, burned all the cash in his wallet, and invented a new life for himself. He thought that the reality of the modern world was corrupt and uncompassionate, so he went on this journey in order to find a life of solitude and innocence that could only be expressed through his encounters with the wild. During this ambitious journey to find the true meaning of life, Chris McCandless exhibits a pattern like the type explained above. In Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, Chris McCandless follows this mythic pattern, seeking to be the traditional hero who spurns civilization, yet he discovers that modern heroes cannot escape their reality.
“Into The Wild” by John Krakauer is a non-fiction biographical novel which is based on the life of a young man, Christopher McCandless. Many readers view Christopher’s journey as an escape from his family and his old life. The setting of a book often has a significant impact on the story itself. The various settings in the book contribute to the main characters’ actions and to the theme as a whole. This can be proven by examining the impact the setting has on the theme of young manhood, the theme of survival and the theme of independent happiness.
In today’s world, we live in a society where we are subjected to follow rules, which are placed upon us by the society. Many people are faced with the dilemma of whether or not to follow the ideals of other people, or pursue their ideals and go against the prevailing conventions. In “Selections from Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer, the author talks about a man named McCandless who went into the Alaskan wilderness in order to find his true self. His journey was also to escape from the societal norms of society. A person who goes into the wilderness believes that they can live their life with brute simplicity. This gives them little to no time with the complicated problems of modern society. Likewise, in “Waiting for a Jew” by Jonathan Boyarin, the author talks about one’s aspiration to find their identity and purpose in the community. He conveys that religious places, like shul, allow an individual to develop a cross- cultural self. The desires and expectations placed upon us by the society shape our strategies of personal identity; therefore, instilling fears that cause us to identify in opposition to our prevailing conventions.
In Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer explores the human fascination with the purpose of life and nature. Krakauer documents the life and death of Chris McCandless, a young man that embarked on an Odyssey in the Alaskan wilderness. Like many people, McCandless believed that he could give his life meaning by pursuing a relationship with nature. He also believed that rejecting human relationships, abandoning his materialistic ways, and purchasing a book about wildlife would strengthen his relationship with nature. However, after spending several months enduring the extreme conditions of the Alaskan wilderness, McCandless’ beliefs begin to work against him. He then accepts that he needs humans, cannot escape materialism, and can never fully understand how nature functions. Most importantly, he realizes that human relationships are more valuable than infinite solitude. McCandless’ gradual change of heart demonstrates that exploring the wilderness is a transformative experience. Krakauer uses the life and death of Chris McCandless to convey that humans need to explore nature in order to discover the meaning of life.