Analysis Of I Am Not Batman

1091 Words3 Pages

Dealing with a grieving adolescent is hard, but as with most human beings, the loss is dealt with and the individual moves on. Susan Philips and Lisa Carver explored this grieving process and have stated that “The case that losing a parent can diminish both the nurturing that promotes healthy development” (Phillips and Carver). Marco Ramirez’s I Am Not Batman gives insight to a male figure who shows signs of withdrawal from society and from a healthy state of sanity. The first depiction of the main character, one whose name was retained from the audience, seemed to be of a meek young child who was visualization himself as a superhero. But, as the boy begins to specify a detailed episode of which he knew too much about to be a …show more content…

Ramirez’s use of the boy’s dialogue shows that the character is mentally incapable of handling his father’s passing. Dialogue gives the audience a clear view of what is happening in the story, but the majority of the time it withholds important facts of the story. In Ramirez’s I Am Not Batman, his character is exhibiting signs of insanity in his speaking. He continuously mixes the realistic life he had with a fantastical one. The speaker reveals, seemingly on a slip of the tongue, that he was formerly abused by a relative. “… nobody pulls out a belt and whips Batman for talking back—Or for not talking back—And nobody calls Batman simple—Or stupid—Or skinny…” (pgs 1091-1092). This abuse he encountered had an impact on his emotional stability already, and adding his father’s death at the end of the play completely ended any hope for sanity to remain. “The authors propose that CEA (Child Emotional Abuse) interferes with the childhood development of adaptive coping strategies. These skills may be especially compromised in heightened emotional contexts.” (The Impact of Emotional Abuse). Kathrin Bell and Lorrin Higgins conducted a study on emotional abuse and its impact on the sanity of a human

Open Document