Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thoreau’s understanding of nature and human life
Thoreau's essay
Henry David Thoreau and his ideas of nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thoreau’s understanding of nature and human life
Through the essay “Where I Lived and What I Lived for,” Henry David Thoreau expresses his interest of living life to its maximum capacity by simplifying its intricacy. Thoreau’s idea-“Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity! I say, let your affairs be as two or three, and not a hundred or a thousand; instead of a million count half a dozen, and keep your accounts on your thumb nail.”-can occur when individuals are independent and making their own choices, but dependents cannot always control their affairs, and they are as simplified as their elders allow them.
In Thoreau’s essay, he focuses his attention on simplifying individuals who have the power to make a change in their life. Independents can “instead of three meals a day, if it be necessary eat but one” (11). By eating one meal a day instead of three, individuals are able to simplify their life. However, children are not given permission to only eat one meal a day. Even if one meal per day is enough, parents would not let them. Children eat what their parents want them to eat, and they could not make that change until they are an adult. Also, Thoreau’s idea of the life individuals are living can sometimes seem like a bottomless pit. The life individuals are supposed to live
…show more content…
is like a “chopping sea” and consists of “clouds and storms and quicksand” (11). Life is as complicated as individuals make it, and most do not know how to simplify, the point Thoreau tries to make. Children do not have the same responsibilities as adults, so they do not have as many things to add to their life. Adults usually have a choice in how complicated their life is while children have to conform to their elders. Thoreau’s essay shows that life can be simplified, but he does not take into consideration that children do not have the choice of “simplicity.” From personal experiences and current events, I believe that there are many cases where individuals can simplify their life; however, dependents are not always as simplified as they can be because their elders make choices for them. For example, I am going to college in two years because my parents want me to get a good education. I do not have a choice in this matter because I need my parents to support me so I must obey them. I am conforming to them, and I do not have the power to simplify my life and not go to college. On the other hand, my parents have the ability to make their own choices because they are independent. They can choose their job, where they live, and how much money they spend. My parents can simplify their life by choosing a well-paying job and living in an area where the cost of living is not very high. Therefore, my parents can live simplistic while I live with elders who choose the kind of work I do and the place I live. Independent individuals have the ability to reduce the number of their affairs as stated in Thoreau’s essay, but dependents, such as children, cannot have the “Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity!” that their elders have.
Thoreau gives many examples in his essay that individuals have complicated lives that need fewer meals or affairs. A complicated life can be resolved with simplicity but not for children. Also, I do not have a choice whether or not I go to college, but my parents have many options that lead to a simplistic life. I agree with Thoreau that simplicity is possible, and it should be sought after, but children or young adults cannot make their life simplistic, so the essay does not provide enough clarity into the world of
simplicity.
In his essay, “The Evolution of Simplicity,” American conservative political and cultural commentator David Brooks examines the modern obsession with the simplification of life. His essay hints at man’s tendency to overcomplicate various aspects of day-to-day activities and failure to appreciate life for its true beauty. Brooks warns that this over complication of the nation can leave us swamped with stress and spread to thin, spending too much of our energy and focus on unimportant and virtually irrelevant facets of our existence.
Thoreau conveys many points in his writing and a large recurring one is the state of society. As stated before, he believed that people are too focused on physical gain and modernization which leads them into desperation. He adds on to this belief later in the book asking that above all else whether it be money or fame he be given honesty (Thoreau 246). To Thoreau, the truth is more important than anything measurable in status. Thoreau believes that a minimalist lifestyle is a good lifestyle, similar to Mccandless. He speaks of how it is good that he can put all of his belonging in one pile in his yard because it removes the clutter from his life (Thoreau 85). He also says that his best quality in life is to want very little, because it keeps himself true to himself and keeps him from distraction. Thoreau also believes that every man should be one in himself not oppressed by the government. He says that everyone should be able to be themselves whether is is in accord with the government or not (Thoreau 240). He is essentially saying that the government should not be a part of people's life decisions only to maintain the
“Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity!” once stated by Thoreau. Henry David Thoreau was a simple man with a simple life. He yearned for simplicity. He was a very wise man as well. In his piece of writing “ Where I Lived and What I Lived For” Thoreau explains a life of simplicity separated from the complexity of society. In “Where I Live and What I lived For” Thoreau most effectively appeals to pathos through the use of allusion, similes, and imagery.
Henry Thoreau uses specific rhetorical strategies in Walden to emanate his attitude towards life. With the use of many strategies Thoreau shows that life should be centered around Nature. People live their lives not ever taking a second glance of what Nature does and has done for humanity and Thoreau is trying to prove his point. Humanity owes Nature everything for without it humans would be nothing.
We often focus on the unimportant and minor details of life. Rather than just going on about life peacefully, we tend to complicate things for ourselves by never being satisfied. Throughout the story, Thoreau uses rhetorical questions as a literary device. He questions the actions of those who surround him by asking, “Why should we knock under and go with the stream?” This is similar to asking, “Why make things harder for yourself when you can just go with the flow?” He asks, “Why should we live with such a hurry and waste of life?” This question is straightforward, simply meaning; we often tend to rush life without completely living it. Instead, we should rather pace ourselves and enjoy every present moment before it’s gone.
After viewing both concepts of an ideal society and comparing them to the current sociological debate, it’s clear that present day society emphasizes the need for individual action, instead of integrated and far-reaching reform. Thus, the Thoreauvian idea of individual reform encompasses modern society, unlike the integrated, comprehensive social actions as More describes.
To conclude, Thoreau believed that people should be ruled by conscience and that people should fight against injustice through non-violence according to “Civil Disobedience.” Besides, he believed that we should simplify our lives and take some time to learn our essence in the nature. Moreover, he deemed that tradition and money were unimportant as he demonstrated in his book, Walden. I suggested that people should learn from Thoreau to live deliberately and spend more time to go to the nature instead of watching television, playing computer games, and among other things, such that we could discover who we were and be endeavored to build foundations on our dreams.
Thoreau distinguishes what he wishes his life was; he compares what he wants out of life to what he currently has. He says “I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear; nor did I wish to practice resignation, unless it was quite necessary.” He makes note of how dear and important life is, and how he wishes to live in a way which he hadn’t been before, by making the most out of the life he has left.
When it comes to civil rights, there are two pieces of literature commonly discussed. One of these pieces is Henry David Thoreau’s persuasive lecture On the Duty of Civil Disobedience. In this work, Thoreau discusses how one must combat the government with disobedience of unjust laws and positive friction to create change. The second piece is the commonly known article Letter From a Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr. This letter covers the ways in which peaceful protest and standing up against injustice can lead to positive results. Both pieces conveyed a similar message of standing up for what is right. The strongest rhetorical methods which Thoreau uses are allusions, logos, ethos and rhetorical questions. However, King’s use of
An American Author, Transcendentalist and tax resister, Henry David Thoreau was born in Concord Massachusetts, and lived there most of his life. He was opposed to many of the things that went on in our society and debated many issues in his life. Two of these major issues are , the Mexican American War and the implement of Slavery in our society. This was the reason for many of his writings include “Slavery in Massachusetts” and “Civil Disobedience” where he wrote about his principles and views against the U.S government and their involvement in the Mexican American War and the evil of Slavery. Thoreau opposed to these because they promote unjust government practices which he was strongly against.
Henry David Thoreau was bon on July 12, 1817 in Concord, Massachusetts, on his grandmother’s farm. Thoreau was of French-Huguenot and Scottish-Quaker decent. Thoreau was interested in writing at an early age. At the age of ten he wrote his first essay “The seasons”. He attended Concord Academy until 1833 when he was accepted to Harvard University but with his pending financial situation he was forced to attend Cambridge in August of 1833. In September of 1833 with the help of his family he was able to attend Harvard University. He graduated college in August of 1837.
Thoreau accentuates the benefits of self-reliance throughout his stay at Walden Pond. Thoreau writes, “I lived alone, in the woods, a mile from any neighbor, in a house which I have built myself, on the shore of Walden Pond, in Concord, Massachusetts, and earned my living by the labor of my hands only” (7). He puts an emphasis on the personal pronouns to exaggerate how he supported himself. Thoreau uses his stay at Walden Pond as a justification that relying on oneself is most efficient, rather than depending on others. His experience at Walden Pond displays the practicality of self-reliance. Thoreau writes, “For more than five years I maintained myself thus solely by the labor of my hands, and I found that, by working about six weeks in a year, I could meet all the expenses of living” (58), to prove the productivity of relying on oneself.
Henry David Thoreau implies that simplicity and nature are valuable to a person’s happiness in “Why I Went to the Woods”. An overall theme used in his work was the connection to one’s spiritual self. Thoreau believed that by being secluded in nature and away from society would allow one to connect with their inner self. Wordsworth and Thoreau imply the same idea that the simple pleasures in life are easily overlooked or ignored. Seeing the true beauty of nature allows oneself to rejuvenate their mentality and desires. When one allows, they can become closer to their spiritual selves. One of William Wordsworth’s popular pieces, “Tintern Abbey”, discusses the beauty and tranquility of nature. Wordsworth believed that when people
Henry David Thoreau was a renowned American essayist, poet, and philosopher. He was a simple man who built his life around basic truths (Manzari 1). Ralph Waldo Emerson deeply impacted Thoreau’s viewpoints and philosophies, specifically by introducing him to the Transcendentalists movement. There seems to be no single ideology or set of ideas that entirely characterized Thoreau’s thoughts, but principles encompassing Transcendentalism come closest (Harding and Meyer 122). Spending time in nature and in solitude gave Thoreau an entirely new perspective on life. In fact, his doctrines regarding nature and the impact of the individual on society have transformed realms of political, social and literary history. Politically and socially, Thoreau’s