Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women's rights movements throughout history
Gender equality and society
Gender equality and society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The struggle for equality for women is a long road. For some countries the road has been successful, others have not been, and some have just started. In Canada women have been through an extensive battle for equality. In Lorna R. Marsden’s “Canadian women and the struggle for equality” Marsden outlines the on going struggle for equality for Canadian women. Starting as early as the founding of the country and leading into today’s society, many of the actions women took in order to push for equality are similar to the tactics used by today’s interest groups. The actions they took have become staples such as the use of interest groups to provide one central voice for advocating. In the road to equality it is beneficial for the use of a social …show more content…
network for individuals to use their powers of position to push for new ideas. In this paper I will argue Loma R Marsden’s “Canadian Women and the Struggle for Equality” outlines the struggles for equality for women, and their fight for equality has become an outline for other groups pushing for equality. Marsden in her book argues that many of the methods Canadian woman used to to secure equal rights demonstrated early sociological methods. In order to prove her argument Marsden outlines the women’s rights movement through a sociological approach, in order to analyze the different aspects of the movement. The book begins at confederation, when Canada established its independence as country separate from Britain. Confederation despite unifying Canada it left the equality of women in the passenger seat of importance of Canadian politics. Marsden believes women’s equality took the driving seat in Canada in April of 1985, “the equality rights sections embedded in the Canadian Constitution act of 1982 came into effect” . Marsden highlights the embodiment of the time gap from 1985 to 1867, as the entirety of the novel covers this time gap and the various movements that swayed the government to give women the rights they deserved. A woman’s life in Canada in 1860 would look like “a life of marriage and children unless she had a religious calling” whereas in the 1960’s her life would look like “been encouraged in high school to think of a career but not to the exclusion of marriage and children” . The novel looks to recap the history of the women’s rights movement and establish the different events and root causes these changes, that in turn led to a better future. The core of the book focuses on the aspects of the law changed by the female community through different organizations. Many of these organizations formed made strides in order to achieve equal equality for women by impacting different branches of Canadian life. Nurses an example, organizations like the VON (Victorian Order of Nurses) pushed for women to serve in war efforts. It is accepted that because of the contribution of nurses in World War I, that woman gained suffrage by instilling their own standards for their nursing practices. The Canadian women took charge and formed their own standards for their discipline in accordance that were higher then the British. The role that woman served was not unnoticed, and being noticed was exactly what interest groups needed. Men who were stuck at home, or fighting in the war were impressed with their actions “What these men- as a group- could not overcome was their deeply held view of a women’s place” and “women’s sphere” in society as supporters, helpmates, housewives, mothers, and wives of men” . World War I set forward the motion for the representation of equality for women, and thus pushed forward women’s suffrage. Despite women demonstrating what they were capable of doing some were not sold despite service to their country that women should be given a vote. Whilst women did receive suffrage in the end this showed that women’s efforts way from home were not sufficient enough for some. But it didn’t matter, the VON had done what it accomplished lead a dialogue that would have people question the role of women. The way the women’s rights movements in Canada changed the quality of life of woman, the labour movement looked to copy in order to improve quality of life for working class.
The women’s rights movement through the use of interest groups was able to sway public policy. The labour movement looked to imploy the same methods in order to sway public policy for better treatment of the working class. The labour movement employed the use of “workplace activism and collective, bargaining broadly based political advocacy, and party politics via support for the New Democratic Party” . Many of the same tactics originated in the women’s rights movement as communities came together to fight an injustice, and demonstrate their discontent to different branches of government. Interest groups became the weapon of choice for discontent communities by connecting together in order to have a larger voice in order to gain regional or national attention. Marsden highlights the importance of organizations as it leads to “common understandings of issues, the formation of powerful alliances, and a powerful voice for women who could not vote yet, hold public office or occupy, the public sphere” . Interest groups allowed for disadvantaged groups to hold some form of power, and voice. In the women’s rights movement in Canada these groups were able to educate women about the limitations of laws in Canada that led changes in provincial and federal laws. In the labour movement the same interest groups lead to the creation of unions that protected the rights of the working force. Interest groups are the footing of promotion of rights and these organizations would be the ones who spoke on the behalf of those who had no
voice. Interests groups were the medium in which the women of Canada were to have their voice heard. Lorna Marsden in her journal highlights the importance of many interests group and what impact they had on living conditions for women. Interest groups in the words of Mario Levesque looked to have their voices heard in large groups and attempt to influence public policy. The amplification of women’s voice was the purposeful intent of interest groups and hence the reasons why they are important. After confederation, there was an increasing demand for change one of the problems that women in organizations were confronted with was how to have a small community be heard by a provincial or federal government. Mario Levesque in his publication mapping a way forward addressed what he believed the best method to use in order to gain national attention. He believes the best method to be “collaborative methodology” this method included “draw upon the concepts of policy communities and network analysis to highlight the value of examining collaboration patterns around actors” . The same theory that Mario Levesque proposes is demonstrated in “Canadian Women and the Struggle for Equality”. In the late 19th century a collaborative effort in order to combine the thoughts of all organizations into one lump understanding of core issues. NCWC led the creation of an umbrella organization in order to focus on the primary issues of many organizations remains a key organization that “women use to advance their issues in Canada … it has continued over a century as Canadians have been torn by religious, political, and ethnic identities, provincial struggles, wars, strikes, and ideological divisions” . The creation of the NCWC would be important to Canada as by collecting women’s opinions and creating a central idea it allowed for the government to hear one clear voice rather than several. Groups like the NCWC were the earliest organizations that created a broader engagement process by “(1) identifying issues; (2) identifying potential engagement participants; (3) mapping collaboration linkages between interest groups identified in step 2 and identifying the roles played by each in collaborative projects; (4) analysing data for potential engagement partners and roles” . The creation of umbrella interest groups was the pinnacle in the way women changed Canada and to Mario Levesque the best way for political groups to gain influence. What could social movements offer that lobby and reform groups offer that it couldn’t? It has been made clear and simple that “none of the reformed legislation in the provinces or at the federal level was created without pressure from human rights and women’s rights groups. None of the legislative changes escaped the attention of women’s organizations” . Without Women’s right’s groups none of the desired changes would have occurred so what role does the social movement have in all this? Social movements unlike lobbyists movements are responsible in a university setting according to Robert Huish for having “a historic impact on the academy, the onus is ultimately on the faculty to push new ideas and innovations into the university” . New ideas must be taught to those not forced upon them. When something is pushed upon someone others might believe it to be unfair and to resent against it. In the case of the women’s right movement it was critical that equality was promoted, so that it would not be undermined. One of the most notable examples of promotion of equality changes was in the person’s case. The person’s case led by the famous five led the fight for women to sit in the Upper Chamber the Senate of Canada. Females were forbidden from being senators as they were not seen by laws as “qualified persons”. This case demonstrated the importance of social networks as another way to improve women’s quality of life by demonstrating how “women who were prominent through their work and leadership used their networks to change an important law” . The importance of the women in a predominant area of Canadian Politics’ led to women being able to hold seats in the senate and been considered able bodied persons. Activism is while great method is limited because there must be individuals willing to listen to the activists. In the case of the social networks there is already a seed in place that can grow and in this instance allow women to take a seat in the senate. In conclusion Canadian Women and the Struggle for equality outlines the course of history women have had to endure in order to receive equal treatment of men. From their use of interest groups to allow the government to have a unified voice to hear what women wanted changed. Social networks also as a method of internal reform as individuals used their positions in their respected positions in order to implement changes.
one of the few jobs open to women. She started her 'voyage' at age fifteen by
However, we cannot completely assume this article is going to persuade all women to progress beyond these issues by uniting and devoting themselves to these underlying conflicts. Some readers may fear the impossible of completing such a great task as this because this problem has continued to linger from the 70’s into now. Overall, Laurie has accomplished a great task in showing her dedication to women’s rights and their future by delivering the problems and also giving the readers insight on how to solve them. In detail, Laurie not only explains the issues she has seen, but also she explains her personal experiences so the readers can better relate to the message she is trying to
In Canada, women make up slightly more than half of the population. However, throughout Canadian history and modern day, women are needing to stand up for themselves and other women to bring about change. Canadian women are strong and have the power to work together and bring about change. Jennie Trout stood up for Canadian women that wanted to be in the medical field, women during WWI made a difference in their lives by entering the workplace and standing for their right to work, Nellie McClung was a leader for women’s suffrage, and The Famous Five campaigned and won The “Persons” Case allowing women to be considered persons under the Canadian Constitution. These women were instigators of change. Change for women only occurs when ambitious and courageous women stand up for a difference that they deserve.
In 1911, the Dower Act was finally passed in Alberta, which gave women the right to own one-third of their husband’s property.1 Emily Murphy's important decision to help amend the law in a way that it was beneficial to women showcases her determination to make sure women got their rights. Even though the law was not totally fair, it still shows that Emily Murphy took an initiative and helped women reach a step closer to their goal. Before Murphy took this essential action, many women were left homeless, since they had no right over their husband's property, and if she had not done so, many more women would fall victim.
provided that a wife must get a third of her husband's estate, even when he
Before World War I, equality for woman and men were very unfair. Woman weren’t even legally “persons”; they weren’t allowed to join parliament or the senate because they weren’t legally “persons”, therefore these jobs were occupied by men only. During World War I and World War II, many men had left for war, thus meaning there were many job openings that needed to be occupied as soon as possible, women then began to take on stereotypical male jobs which men thought women couldn’t do or couldn’t do as well. Women showed their capabilities and realized they shouldn’t be considered less than men. In retaliation of not being considered “persons”, women decided to take action. The famous five brought the persons case upon the supreme court of Canada in 1927, which was finally determined by Judicial Council of Britain's Privy Council in 1929. The “persons” case involved women not legally being “persons”. After the famous five won the case, women were legally considered “persons” then women began to join important jobs such as members of parliament and the senate. Along with becoming “persons”, women were beginning to get their right to vote in provinces slowly. In 1916, four provinces gave women the right to vote provincially and, finally, in 1940, the last province (Quebec) gave women the right to vote provincially. Later, in World War II, there was another change in
During America's early history, women were denied some of the rights to well-being by men. For example, married women couldn't own property and had no legal claim to any money that they might earn, and women hadn't the right to vote. They were expected to focus on housework and motherhood, and didn't have to join politics. On the contrary, they didn't have to be interested in them. Then, in order to ratify this amendment they were prompted to a long and hard fight; victory took decades of agitation and protest. Beginning in the 19th century, some generations of women's suffrage supporters lobbied to achieve what a lot of Americans needed: a radical change of the Constitution. The movement for women's rights began to organize after 1848 at the national level. In July of that year, reformers Elizabeth Cady Stanton(1815-1902) and Lucretia Mott (1793-1880), along with Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906) and other activists organized the first convention for women's rights at Seneca Falls, New York. More than 300 people, mostly women but also some men, attended it. Then, they raised public awar...
In the 20th century leadership of the suffrage movement passed to two organizations. The first was the National American Woman Suffrage Association. “The National American Women’s Suffrage Association lobbied congress, and state legislatures for const...
In England women were allowed to hold jobs such as teachers and shopkeepers but not given the right to vote even though they supported the government by paying taxes. This became a major stumbling point as even prisoners and those in mental institutions were allowed to vote. A push to include women in this right began with a peaceful movement that consisted of public talks and gatherings. The leader of this movement was Millicent Fawcett who believed that peaceful protest would gain more support and be more effective than using violence. Her followers became known as the Suffragists. Sentiment concerning women’s rights was strongly divided with only one small portion of those in government showing support through the efforts of the Labour Party. At that time the Party was so small that even its influence was minimal.
Morris, M. (2000). Some facts and dates in Canadian women’s history of the 20th century. Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women, 20(1). Retrieved from http://criaw-icref.ca/millenium.
The contentious little book titled Women, Power, Politics maintains politics to be devalued, acknowledging the fact that only few people do vote, and women are unable to achieve within the realm of Canadian politics. Sylvia Bashevkin, the author of the book argues that Canadians have a profound unease with women in positions of political authority, what she calls the "women plus power equals discomfort" equation. She evaluates a range of barriers faced by women who enter politics, including the media's biased role of representing the private lives of women in politics, and she wonders why citizens find politics is underrepresented in Canada compared to Belgium. In clear, accessible terms, Bashevkin explains her ideas on how to eliminate “low voters turn-out,” “devaluation of politics,” "gender schemas," and "media framing.” She outlines some compelling solutions to address the stalemate facing women in Canadian politics which are; contesting media portrayals, changing the rule of the game, improving legislative quotas, electoral reform, movement renewals, and so on. This response paper would addresses the reality of a political mainstream, actions which should be taken against the oppressive elements of reality, and the awareness it brings through economic, social, and political environment.
“Honey, you’re not a person, now get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich!” If a husband were to say these words to his wife today, he would likely receive a well-deserved smack to the face. It is not until recently that Canadian women have received their status as people and obtained equal rights as men. Women were excluded from an academic education and received a lesser pay than their male counter parts. With the many hardships women had to face, women were considered the “slave of slaves” (Women’s Rights). In the past century, women have fought for their rights, transitioning women from the point of being a piece of property to “holding twenty-five percent of senior positions in Canada” (More women in top senior positions: Report). The Married Women’s Property Act, World War I, The Person’s Case, and Canadian Human Rights Act have gained Canadian women their rights.
Most women in Canada before World War One (WWI) were treated poorly compared to the men. Women were dehumanized and were not looked as any worth or value. During WW1 women’s roles in Canada changes to a great extent. The war influence change in the work force and politics. Women had to take on jobs of the men who went to war to keep the established economic system running. In 1911 before the war 16.6% of the female population of 2,521,000 participated in the labour force. During the war in 1921 the participation rate increased from 418,486 female workers to 563,578. War changed their roles greatly as before women were housewives, they would raise the children and do household chores. Now during the war they were needed as men went overseas
A growing population of women’s activists can be attributed to the growing number of courses being offered and information available. Only a few decades ago this would not have been heard of. It is due to the increasing amount of awareness on the topic of women’s status as second class citizens that activism has increased. Through various media, we have learned of topics such as the “glass ceiling”, the working conditions of women in Third World countries, the current injustices against women being carried out in the First World, reproductive rights, as written about by Angle Davis, and other limitations imposed on women.
From the beginning of time, females have played a powerful role in the shaping of this world. They have stood by idly and watched as this country moved on without them, and yet they have demanded equal rights as the nation rolls along. Through the years the common belief has been that women could not perform as well as men in anything, but over the years that belief has been proven wrong time and time again. So as time marches on, women have clawed and fought their way up the ladder to gain much needed equal respect from the opposite sex. However, after many years of pain and suffering, the battle for equal rights has not yet been won. Since women have fought for a long time and proven their importance in society, they deserve the same rights as men.