Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays over the civil rights movement
Sociological imagination diligence
Essays over the civil rights movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays over the civil rights movement
In the movie Marshall, a lawyer by the name of Young Thurgood Marshall, is tasked with the challenge of being the only lawyers working for the NAACP. He teams up with Joseph Friedman, a lawyer who has never handled a criminal case before. With the odds stacked against them, Marshall and Friedman fight against racial inequalities and anti-Semitic views to defend the freedom of Joseph Spell, a black man accused of a crime he did not commit.
C. Wright Mills is the master that created the Sociological Imagination. Mills believed that the life of an individual is linked to historical context (1959). In fact, one cannot understand the life of an individual nor the history of the social world without understanding both as interrelated systems (Mills
…show more content…
Mills wants to know the essential components used to complete the society (Mills 1959). According to the movie, the dominant religion remains Christianity. For example, when Friedman was interviewing potential jury members he was taken aback by a comment that insulted his Jewish religion. Next, it appears as though the main social class is the middle, to upper middle class. The clothing that people wore was always clean, posh and pristine (Hudlin et al 2017). Most of the men were in suit and tie, or business casual. The women had their hair done, wore a nice dress with some heels. Also, the education level eludes to a higher social class because these individuals would have the means to pay for higher education. However, it seems to be that the men were the ones that were highly educated. For instance, the lawyers, reporters, police, and the judge were all men. Each of these occupations require some sort of post-secondary schooling. What was interesting was that the women, who appeared to have no secondary education, offered subtle tokens of wisdom that leave a rather large impact. For instance, a woman that Marshall encountered at a bar gave him the piece he was missing to solve his case. She said, “men will be men and women will be women” (Hudlin et al 2017). This was the key piece of advice that helped …show more content…
But that’s just it, a part of history that repeats itself in today’s society, particularly the justice system. This is one reason why this movie is important in this particular time in society. It highlights the African American stereotypes that are common biases corrupting the justice system. For instance, Marshall’s main mission in this movie is to defend those who are innocent but have been wrongfully convicted because their race. He is fighting against a system where Joseph is considered guilty until proven innocent. This is relevant to today’s society because the nature of African American men in American today is much the same, guilty until proven innocent. This is evident in the display of African American men in the media being pulled over by cops as if they are guilty of something. They of course have to prove their innocence in order for the police man to be satisfied. In a way, this movie counter-acts this stereotype by painting a different picture of African American men in court. Marshall is a highly educated African American lawyer who is partly responsible for proving the innocence of a black man against a white woman. A narrative that is uncommon in today’s
“[T]here is one way in this country in which all men are created equal- there is one human institution that makes a pauper the equal of a Rockefeller; the stupid man the equal of an Einstein, and the ignorant man the equal of any college president. That institution, gentlemen, is a court” (Lee 233). These are the words uttered by Atticus Finch, an important character in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. Atticus is a lawyer, and at this point in the novel, he is trying to defend Tom Robinson, a black man who was accused of raping a white woman. This reflects upon how society was in the 1930’s, when the color of your skin affected your chances of winning a trial. In fact, it is speculated that To Kill a Mockingbird is loosely based off of the trials of the Scottsboro Boys, a famous case from this time period. Most of the main characters associated with both trials share similar traits, experiences, and backgrounds.
Many African Americans have contributed to the development of criminal justice field by their legal endeavors. One of these individuals is Thurgood Marshall, who played a role in desegregation in American public schools and became the first African American attorney to win a Supreme Court case. His major contributions in this field were mainly through his civil right activism while at NAACP. In particular, Marshall’s successful intervention in defending the three men involved in the Brown Supreme Court decision made him one of the greatest African American
One's identity is a very valuable part of their life, it affects the Day to day treatment others give them which can lead to how the individual feels emotionally. Atticus, defending Tom Robinson, who is an african american man from the plaintiff of the case, Mayella Ewell, who is a caucasian woman, accusing that Tom raped her is supposivly a lob sided case. During the great depression, any court session that contained a person of color against a caucasian would always contain the “white” individual winning the case. The cause of the bias outcome comes from the lawyer of the african american does not try to defend or the jury goes against the person of color simply because their black, this shows the effect of racism to anyone’s identity in the courtroom for a case simply because of race. Atticus, deciding to take Tom Robinson’s case seriously sacrifices his identity as the noble man he is, to being called many names for this action, such as “nigger lover”. He is questioned by
The first social issue portrayed through the film is racial inequality. The audience witnesses the inequality in the film when justice is not properly served to the police officer who executed Oscar Grant. As shown through the film, the ind...
Marshall was also a member of the NAACP, a group that was and still is continuously involved in court cases where discriminatory issues are involved. The story jumps around a lot because it goes from talking about Marshall’s life, including his other works, feelings of where worked, his wife, life in Harlem, and the continuous harm offered by his line of work, and then jumps to the stories of other African-Americans, like Zora Neale Hurston, then to the beginning of the story of the Groveland Boys, Marshall, Groveland Boys, and then to Sheriff McCall. As written before though, these all do cater to story. It’s really only mentioned because some might not realize the purpose of the jumping around. Its purpose is to give insight to the character’s lives as they are mentioned and bring awareness to the other things that are happening around that time besides just the Groveland Boys. There was the case of an African- American servant John Spell, “‘He was supposed to have raped this [white] woman four times in one night,’ Marshall recalled” (King,
C. Wright Mills was the sociologist who came up with this term we call social imagination. Think about individuality and society for a second and what those words mean to you. Social imagination is showing connections personally and the larger forces of history, individually and the society. The book goes on to explain that we are using our social imagination just by opening the book and questioning it, or when we question college in general. Mills argued we needed to see the social world that was around us, critically. Mills wanted social imagination to perceive situations and circumstances in an expanded social context. The goal was to view how interactions and actions were influential or not towards others and their situations. Though
The author mentions that another beginning factor that assisted in forming Thurgood Marshall’s perspectives involve...
In his own words, Mills claimed “it is the capacity to shift from one. perspective to another.the capacity to range from the most impersonal. and remote transformations to the most intimate features of the human. self – and to see the relations between the two of them.” . Mills believed that being able to see the relationship between the ordinary lives of people and the wider social forces was the key to the sociological imagination of the.
In the early twentieth century, the United States was undergoing a dramatic social change. Slavery had been abolished decades before, but the southern states were still attempting to restrict social interaction among people of different races. In particular, blacks were subject to special Jim Crow laws which restricted their rights and attempted to keep the race inferior to whites. Even beyond these laws, however, blacks were feeling the pressure of prejudice. In the legal system, blacks were not judged by a group of their peers; rather, they were judged by a group of twelve white men. In serious court cases involving capital offenses, the outcome always proved to be a guilty verdict. In Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, the plot revolves around a Depression-era court case of a black man accused of raping a white woman. The defendant Tom Robinson is presumed guilty because of one thing alone: the color of his skin.
In To Kill A Mockingbird Lee tells the story of a Mr. Tom Robinson who is an African American who is being charged with rape against a white women. Atticus is the lawyer who must defend Robinson in court. In the Scottsboro case a central figure was a heroic judge who overturned a guilty verdict against the young men. The judge went against the public in trying to protect the rights of the African American men. In reading the novel you learn that Atticus arouses anger in the small community when he tries to defend Robinson.
Words can bring positive change to a community, be it a small town or the entire world - all it takes is two key components, delivery and content. This was certainly the case with Clarence Darrow’s 1926 concluding speech in defence of African American, Henry Sweet, accused of the murder of a white man. Darrow’s monumental eight-hour speech set a legal precedent when Sweet was acquitted of his murder charge. The speech, “Changed the status of Negros before the law and meant in respect to defending ones home and self in self defence, what applied to whites now, in practice and not just in word, apply to African Americans as well.” Clarence Darrow’s speech, along with Henry Sweet’s acquittal, is now considered huge milestone in the civil rights movement.
According to C. Wright Mills, what materializes a human beings life is interrelated with society. One cannot understand the life of a human being or the history of society without understanding both. He claims that people do not see the connection that exists between the patterns in their lives and the course of history. What is right to Mills is that people need a quality of mind to use information to evolve reason to create connections between what 's going on in the world and what is going on in their lives. Mills calls that social imagination. Mills states: "The Social imagination enables us to grasp the connection between history and biography” (1959, p. 3). The key to the social imagination is to see the relation between the ordinary lives of people and wider social forces.
For example, if a man were to lose his job at an education institution, he would blame himself because society makes him out to be lazy. If you look at why the man lost his job at a societal point, you may be able to see that the company was not making enough money and needed to make budget cuts. The company may not have had enough money because of the amount of money the government gave them decreased. The government makes budget cuts based on the past, they look at history and see where they lost their money in the past to avoid losing their money in the future. Mills (1959:05) states that “the idea that the individual can understand his own experience and gauge his own fate only by locating himself within his period, that he can know his own chances in life only by becoming aware of those of all individuals in his circumstances.” Mills quote is saying that an individual’s outcome can be affected by their awareness on their of the society they were raised in. If they focus on how society is affecting their everyday life, they would be able to have a successful outcome. The would have a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages within a society, which may vary based off of your sex, race, and social
The Sociological Imagination The human attitudes have always been a curiosity that captivated most of the great social theorists like Karl Marx, Engels and Durkheim. One of the most unhumble attitude of the humanity was Racism and stereotyping. The racial issue even in the 21st century continue to be a subject that still is present and significant even though we tend to say that racism and other forms of discrimination are prohibited by law and illegal still even in the US the country of all freedoms people face everyday racism, discrimination and humiliation The Sociological imagination, a concept brought by C. Wright Mills basically states that a person lives out a biography and lives it out with some historical sequence. That means that everyone lives his personal life and personal experience but at the same time he contributes to change the history or to affect the society and that creates the historical sequence.
... the Criminal Justice system. The author offers the reader a front row seat to the unfairness and unreliability of the CJ system. Grisham is not a fair writer himself and is biased in his writing throughout the entire novel. It is evident to the reader by the end of the novel that the prosecution in the case went to every extreme possible to put Fritz and Williamson in prison for a crime they did not commit. From the reader’s perspective, we knew from the beginning that Fritz and Williamson, no matter how much negative behavior they engaged in, were not the criminals and that there was a high likelihood of Gore being the offender. Nevertheless, Grisham takes us on a wild, nail-biting edge-of-your-seat ride through the Criminal Justice system in this book that leads us through an unfair trial and a slew of biased opinions, lies and deceptions and unjust procedures.