Analysis Of Bilingual Instructions By Harryette Mullen

845 Words2 Pages

After the lecture by Harryette Mullen, I had different interpretations of the poems “Bilingual Instructions,” “Elliptical,” and “Why You and I.” Mullen’s poetry truly caught my eye more than any other poets poetry in this short amount of time because she is rule breaking and different. Before the lecture, I read these two poems multiple times, which allowed me to come up with my own thoughts and ideas of what the poems meant but when Mullen spoke out about the true meaning of her poems I found that my thoughts and ideas were not exactly correct. When I first read “Bilingual Instructions,” I automatically knew that the poem was talking about people who are bilingual, but I could not figure out what the poem actually stood for, which made me …show more content…

This made her unsure of how the move to California was going to go. I never once thought about where this poem focused, but it made sense because Mexico is directly under California, which is where most of the Latinos come from. So while I was thinking that this poem was about racism, it was actually about politics. She continued on to explain that in Los Angeles all yard work is done by Latinos and the people of the city want the Latinos there, but then again don’t, and this is where the poem was being political. In the first four lines of “Bilingual Instructions” it says, “Californians say No to bilingual instruction in schools; Californians say No to bilingual instructions on ballots…” Mullen made it clear that the people of California want the Latinos there so they can eat their food and have their lawn mowed, but don’t want their children going to the schools. I found this poem to be very inspiring because it is completely true. This happens all over the United States, not just in …show more content…

I realized that the three dots between each unfinished sentence didn’t have meaning. I felt like this poem was very powerful and had a lot to do with religion, gender, nationality, and race. It seemed almost political and that the powerless is speaking back. After Mullen’s lecture, I learned that this poem was about something lacking or about something imperfect. She wanted this poem to be opened to everyone, which is why she said it could be about black people, white people, parents, or children. There is a lot of the us and them, and we and they language in the poem. Every time she said “they” in the poem, I was trying to figure out who she was speaking towards and why she felt they didn’t deserve a title or a label, but that was just Mullen’s language in “Elliptical.” The context was also always changing and switching sides. “Elliptical” was a deep and interesting

Open Document