Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The nature of csr
Nature of csr
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The nature of csr
Introduction For organisations of all types, the last three decades have been crucial in changing the manner in which organisations interact with each other, stakeholders, the government, and themselves. Most of these changes occurred because of the evolution of globalisation, increased cooperation between nations and regions, while, at the same time, increased stakeholder expectations, opened hundreds of new markets, and now requires that organisations operate on a new level (Munshi, S., et al., eds., 2004). Businesses have also undergone a change in its overall philosophy – not just moving toward entrepreneurial thought as a way to change their marketing paradigm, but through consumer and corporate expectations of business in a more ethical and sustainable manner (Smoder, J., et al., 2003). For many organisations, this has engendered a greater need for transparency and a more strategic and ethical approach to management. BP, formerly known as British Petroleum, is a germane example of this …show more content…
This approach assures that the organisation’s compliance with the spirit, ethics, and standards of the law is part of their plan, and integrated into strategy. The overall goal of CSR is both to provide ethical practices for all stakeholders and to function in a proactive manner so that governmental regulations do not force issues of compliance. Corporate Social Responsibility does this in a soft manner – by encouraging and promoting the community, transparency in public disclosure, and simply eliminating those issues that might harm society – even if legal. Companies must be profitable in order to stay alive – and they have a responsibility to their stakeholders to do just that. However, CSR holds that the organisation can both do what is ethical and correct and still make a profit (Munilla & Miles,
Many organizations have been destroyed or heavily damaged financially and took a hit in terms of reputation, for example, Enron. The word Ethics is derived from a Greek word called Ethos, meaning “The character or values particular to a specific person, people, culture or movement” (The American Heritage Dictionary, 2007, p. 295). Ethics has always played and will continue to play a huge role within the corporate world. Ethics is one of the important topics that are debated at lengths without reaching a conclusion, since there isn’t a right or wrong answer. It’s basically depends on how each individual perceives a particular situation. Over the past few years we have seen very poor unethical business practices by companies like Enron, which has affected many stakeholders. Poor unethical practices affect the society in many ways; employees lose their job, investors lose their money, and the country’s economy gets affected. This leads to people start losing confidence in the economy and the organizations that are being run by the so-called “educated” top executives that had one goal in their minds, personal gain. When Enron entered the scene in the mid-1980s, it was little more than a stodgy energy distribution system. Ten years later, it was a multi-billion dollar corporation, considered the poster child of the “new economy” for its willingness to use technology and the Internet in managing energy. Fifteen years later, the company is filing for bankruptcy on the heels of a massive financial collapse, likely the largest in corporate America’s history. As this paper is being written, the scope of Enron collapse is still being researched, poked and prodded. It will take years to determine what, exactly; the impact of the demise of this energy giant will be both on the industry and the
This is not the first time that BP is at fault. They have had criminal convictions in places such as Endicott Bay in Alaska, Texas City and Prudhoe Bay. Jeanne Pascal was a part of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and was assigned to watch over BP. Pascal was watching over companies such as BP that were facing debarment. Under her watch, BP was charged with four federal crimes. Over the past twelve years, Pascal’s seen BP patterns as misconducts. She attempted to warn the government about BP’s safety and environmental issues that would most likely lead to another disaster. While she was watching over BP, the company misinformed and misled her about things that resulted to the felonies that they have committed. Sensing that some things were not right about the company, she presented a case of their unsafe working environments.
Ciulla, J. B., Martin, C. W., & Solomon, R. C. (2007). Is "The Social Responsibility of Business... to Increase Its Profits"? Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory. Honest work: a business ethics reader (pp. 217-253). New York: Oxford University Press.
BP was founded in 1908 under the name Anglo-Persian Oil Company. They changed their name to British Petroleum in 1954 and merged with Amoco in 1998. (BP Public Website, 2010) “The Texas City Refinery is BP’s largest and most complex oil refinery... It was owned and operated by Amoco prior to the merger of BP and Amoco.” (Michael P. Broadribb, 2006) Throughout their history, there have been a number of accidents that have been caused by negligence and disregard of safety precautions. Unfortunately many lives have been cut short or seriously injured as a result. My research will focus on the 2005 Texas City Oil Refinery Explosion. I will attempt to look into the ethical implications that surrounded this disaster before and after the event and suggest what BP could have done to prevent the incident then and in the future.
What is the real kicker to this whole disaster is that it took BP many months to finally take responsibility for their actions as well as the other involved, Transocean and Halliburton (Times-Picayune). If I was a part of BP’s leadership over this project I would have swallowed the pill and let upper management know that these repairs are crucial to the well-being of the project and its future. Sure it would take major time and resources to fix the problems on the drilling rig, but it would have not resulted in the 2010 catastrophe. Also with the Halliburton case I would have waited for the rest of the centralizers before giving the “go-ahead”. Lastly, covering up mistakes by denying responsibility and/or lying about them really makes a person wonder if they have a shred of morality in them. This is both ethically and morally wrong to do especially as the magnitude of this dilemma is one of the greatest in US history. I think when all a company does is focus on turning a profit and keep shareholders happy it strays us away from the core values and mission. In the world we live in today, it is important to make sure that all aspects of a company are in check not only just the profit it generates. I think of it as a human being, if all you do eat and sit around all day you are bound to have health problems down the road but if you remain active and take care of yourself you will ultimately live longer. This is true with businesses, if a company only cares about the bottom line, you will see problems down the road whether that be high turnover or in this case, reputation and accountability. Coming from experience, dealing with regulations can be annoying and can be costly depending on the work you do, but having equipment failing on you will cost a company more
Gender Diversity has been considered a key issue in the Corporate Governance and the details about how the organizations have worked on improving the women’s representation in the Boardroom composition has also been discussed. Several examples have been given about the board room composition of various companies and the number of female professionals in it.
The term “ethical business” is seen, by many people, as an oxymoron. This is because a business’s main objective is to make as much money as possible. Making the most money possible, however, can often lead to unethical actions. Companies like Enron, WorldCom, and Satyam have been the posterchildren for how corporations’ greed lead to unethical practices. In recent times however, companies have been accused of being unethical based on, not how they manage their finances, but on how they treat the society that they operate in. People have started to realize that the damage companies have been doing to the world around them is more impactful and far worse than any financial fraud that these companies might be engaging in. Events like the BP oil
Winston A, 2010, Five Lessons from the BP Oil Spill, Harvard Business Review, accessed 1 April 2014,
In recent years, companies are becoming socially responsible and now stakeholders almost expect a company to have CSR policies. Therefore, in twentieth century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) became an important development in public life (Barnett, ND).Corporate social responsibility is defined as “the ways in which an organisation exceeds the minimum obligations to stakeholders specified through regulation and corporate governance” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). Stakeholders can be defined as “those individuals or groups who depend on the organisation to fulfil their own goals and on whom, in turn, the organisation depends” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). There are many purposes for this essay, the first purpose is to descried the key principles of corporate social responsibility and explain their importance for stakeholders. Secondly, is to show how far this company follows those principles in order to be accountable to at least three of its stakeholders. In this essay, three stakeholders, environment, customers and employees will be evaluated respectively and the key principles of the stakeholders will be examined.
In today's changing global environments many companies have joined the open trade policies, and existing foreign opportunities available to growing companies with positive views and socially responsible attitudes. It all sounds like a lot to cover in a short essay so I will introduce a company that has in its short, yet very successful existence transformed through all the levels and practices mentioned above. The company is called "The Body Shop", I hope you have heard of it for that would make our journey through it's development even more enjoyable. Management is described as the process of getting activities with and through other people. This philosophy has been so widely examined that there are literally millions of opinions and differing views on the subject.
Stuart Hart, in a business article, discusses the tough task for companies to make a sustainable global ec...
Covey & Brown (2001) “the role of business in society has progressed over the years, from being primarily concerned with profit for sharehold¬ers to a stakeholder and community approach with a focus on corporate social responsibility”
In today’s fast paced business world many managers face tough decisions when walking the thin line between what’s legal and what’s socially unacceptable. It is becoming more and more important for organisations to consider many more factors, especially ethically, other than maximising profits in order to be more competitive or even survive in today’s business arena. The first part of this essay will discuss managerial ethics[1] and the relevant concepts and theories that affect ethical decision making, such as the Utilitarian, Individualism, Moral rights approach theories, the social responsibility of organisations to stakeholders and their responses to social demands, with specific reference to a case study presenting an ethical dilemma[2], where Mobil halts product sales to a garage, forcing the garage owner to stop selling solvents to young people. The second section of this essay will focus on advice that should be given to any manager in a similar position to the garage owner with relevance to the organisational strategic management, the corporate objective and the evaluation of corporate social performance by measuring economic, legal, ethical and discretionary responsibilities. It will address whom to think of as stakeholders and why the different aspect could cost more than a manager or an organisation could have imagined.
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
CG and SR continue to evolve and are no longer viewed the same as years ago. Businesses are now required to take on a broader range of responsibilities to society and provide to human values that were previously seen as unrelated to a company’s operating success. (Dennis et all 1998). These concepts remain a challenge for international companies as they are increasingly pressed to respond to stakeholders’ requests for additional accountability, as the gap between society and businesses continues to...