In the excerpt, Jest and Earnest, Annie Dillard suggests that nature is beautiful because it is powerful and, sometimes, that power brings danger. She supports this claim by illustrating her personal experiences of animals in nature; then, questioning the reasons behind nature as it is; and, finally, making references to fire to explain nature’s extravagance. The author’s purpose is to encourage the audience to experience nature and reflect on those experiences to gain a deeper understanding of nature and the earth as a whole, while she does the same. In order to lead the audience to speculate what they know of nature, Dillard writes in a respectful and speculative tone.
Using her own sightings of nature, establishes nature as powerful in both its beauty and violence. She graphically relays the “monstrous and terrifying” encounter she witnesses between a frog and a giant water bug, in which the bug
…show more content…
injects the frog with toxins that liquefies its insides and drinks them out of the skin. The image this description creates emphasizes the power in the giant water bug ability to reduce the frog to not much more than skin. It models the violence found all in nature. Another episode she speaks of is a mockingbird that takes a dive off of a building and gracefully catches itself before it crashed into the ground. Instead of the image of violence her diction created in the last account, the words she uses in this story stress how beautiful this sight was. However, it is still a powerful image, as the bird’s ability is clearly highlighted. She also articulates how easily she could have missed this sight, proving that this beauty exists everywhere, even where we can’t see it. Finally, she describes the sharks that she has seen as “grace tangled in a rapture with violence.” Sharks are usually only thought of as dangerous and destructive creatures, but Dillard describes them in terms that highlights the strength they possess in a positive light. In this way, she is able to open the reader up to the idea that violence and beauty are not completely separate. There can beauty and violence in power and that power exists all around us in nature. In her use of rhetorical questions, Dillard is able to advance her own thinking while also encouraging the reader to speculate as well.
While thinking further on her run in with the giant water bug and the frog, she questions “the created universe” and God’s continued role in it. It is clear that she is not asking these questions for the reader to provide a definite answer, but, as people are naturally inclined to try and answer the questions they are asked, the reader will begin searching for one. The questions probe Dillard’s own thinking also, guiding her in sorting out her own beliefs towards these topics. Later, she inquires that if nature is not the product of intelligent design, then how is this beauty possible and what is really going on here. This question steers her and the reader towards the idea that nature must have been created, as there is not any other explanation that she can conceive. The beauty that is achieved would not make sense if it were not. Her choice to use questions helps her advance her thoughts while encourage her audience to
think. Fire is used by Dillard in order to wrap up her ideas about nature’s power and extravagance while also continuing to elaborate on the idea that people should witness nature. She begins by mentioning how “setting the prairies on fire” was a way to call people down to the water. This gesture is obviously extreme, as she points out, and she uses it as a way to segue into how nature itself is full of extravagant gestures. By using an example from history, she makes it seem as though this is always how it has been. She continues using fire as a metaphor for nature’s excessiveness by comparing nature to a show on fire. Shows and fire are both things that people tend to watch and focus their attention on. Comparing nature to this conveys the idea that nature is something that people should watch and pay attention to. As a way to conclude her thoughts, she says that “that which isn’t flint is tinder.” Every part of nature is extravagant, beautiful, violent, and powerful. Fire can be all of those things, so it is a great comparison for nature. She is effectively able to summarize that nature’s beauty, power, violence, and extravagance all exists with one another and that we should pay attention to it. In “Jest and Earnest”, Annie Dillard comes to the conclusion that beauty and violence exist together. She does this by encouraging her audience to experience nature and question what they have learned. Overall, her use of personal accounts of nature, rhetorical questions, and fire allows her to convey these points.
When I was sixteen, I performed on the stage of Carnegie Hall. This is a very special memory to me. New York will always be in my mind because of that experience. What makes a place live on in one’s mind? The essay, Untying the Knot, as well as other selections from this unit demonstrate how experiences can make certain places live on in our memory.
This idea is expressed prominently in John Foulcher’s For the Fire and Loch Ard Gorge. For the Fire entails a journey of someone collecting kindling as they witness a kookaburra kill a lizard, Foulcher represents his idea through the use of metaphor, “a kookaburra hacks with its axe-blade beak.” This metaphor represents the beak in weaponised form, as it is compared with a violent axe. This evokes a sense of threat and intimidation towards the kookaburra, which contrasts to societies general interpretation of the ‘laughing kookaburra,’ thereby challenging the reader's perceptions of beauty in the natural world. Also, this comparison of the kookaburra offers a second understanding for the readers to interpret of the kookaburra. Similarly, in Loch Ard Gorge, Foulcher uses strong visual imagery, “savage dark fish are tearing their prey apart, blood phrasing the water decked with light,” to communicate the violence of the ‘savage’ fish to readers in a visual, gruesome manner. Thereby evoking a feeling of disgust towards the situation, as a visual description of blood is shown and Foulcher uses provoking, gruesome adjectives to communicate the fish's brutality. Foulcher expresses these ideas to communicate the abilities of nature, and provide a necessary ‘reality check’ for the readers, to review the beauty they see nature and understand the barbarity at the heart of everything. Although ruthlessness and brutality that nature can show are unintentional and immoral, this harm is a large part of the cycle nature needs to survive and thrive, and these factors can counteract assumed beauty and
Berry explains how art honors nature by depicting it and using it as a starting
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
Perceptions of the natural world have fluctuated throughout humanity’s short time on this earth, going in and out of style as societies and technologies have grown and died. As is the the very nature of literature itself, literature and its authors have managed to capture these shifting views, expressed and illustrated by the art of written word. Naturally, the literature chosen for us to read based on this fluid theme of nature encompasses an array of perspectives. One of these views is that nature is sublime and above all else, a reflection of all that which is perfection. Another is that nature is cold, uncaring, and indifferent to the vanities of humanity.
In the world of science there are many discoveries. “A discovery is like falling in love and reaching the top of a mountain after a hard climb all in one, an ecstasy not induced by drugs but by the revelation of a face of nature … and that often turns out to be more subtle and wonderful than anyone had imagined.” (Ferdinand Puretz). Most people in the world we live in lack to notice and or appreciate the gift of sight in life. By not cherishing the gift of sight and using it properly, many discoveries are left unfound. In the writing piece, Seeing, Annie Dillard speaks of nature and the small things that we all are unconsciously blind to and not appreciative of. Seeing explores the idea of what it means to truly see things in this world. Annie Dillard’s main point is that we should view the world with less of a meddling eye, so that we are able to capture things that would otherwise go unnoticed. There’s a science to how we view things in nature. Dillard attempts to persuade her reader to adopt to her way of seeing, which is more artificial rather than natural.
“The power of imagination makes us infinite.” (John Muir). Both John Muir and William Wordsworth demonstrate this through their use of language as they describe nature scenes. John Muir studies nature and in his essay about locating the Calypso Borealis he uses scientific descriptions to grab his reader’s attention and to portray his excitement at finding the rare flower. William Wordsworth on the other hand shows his appreciation for the beauty of nature and its effect on a person’s emotions in the vivid visual descriptions that he gives of the daffodils in his poem ‘I wandered lonely as a cloud.’ Wordsworth with his appreciation of beauty and Muir through scientific descriptions provide an indication of the influence that nature has had on them as they capture their reader’s attention both emotionally and visually through their personal and unique use of tone, diction, syntax and vocabulary.
Authors’ Steven Crane and Jack London are known for their stories using naturalism, the struggle between man and nature. Naturalism is like realism, but it explores the forces of nature, heredity, and the environment on human beings, who are faced with the forces of nature. Both “The Open Boat” and “To Build a Fire” demonstrate how inferior and small humans’ really are to nature. Humans cannot control nature or determine its outcome. In both stories nature is the antagonist constantly challenging the humans’ ability to survive. I chose the topic over naturalistic elements because I enjoyed reading these stories. Both stories have a strong since of naturalism in it and both authors’ are known for naturalistic features existing in their writings. In this paper I will give you more of an insight to what naturalism is and what naturalistic elements are present in the two stories listed above.
In Emily Dickinson’s poem #336, the narrator feels a strong sense of despair and laments at having lost the physical ability to see in one eye. The narrator reflects upon the importance of sight in experiencing nature and finds a better appreciation for it now that she has lost her sight. By the end of the poem however, the narrator experiences transcendence, as she comes to the realization that through the act of imagination she is able to see far more than the limited view her eyes provided her with. Through the act of poetic writing, the narrator is able to capture the beauty of nature and engrave it into her soul. In Ralph Waldo Emerson’s excerpt from “Nature”, he alludes to the significance in sight when it comes to being able to merge the human soul with nature to create perfect unity, and as such he lays the groundwork for Dickinson’s ideas that are presented within her poem.
In the first stanza, the poet seems to be offering a conventional romanticized view of Nature:
Nature is often a focal point for many author’s works, whether it is expressed through lyrics, short stories, or poetry. Authors are given a cornucopia of pictures and descriptions of nature’s splendor that they can reproduce through words. It is because of this that more often than not a reader is faced with multiple approaches and descriptions to the way nature is portrayed. Some authors tend to look at nature from a deeper and personal observation as in William Wordsworth’s “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud”, while other authors tend to focus on a more religious beauty within nature as show in Gerard Manley Hopkins “Pied Beauty”, suggesting to the reader that while to each their own there is always a beauty to be found in nature and nature’s beauty can be uplifting for the human spirit both on a visual and spiritual level.
Through the ingenious works of poetry the role of nature has imprinted the 18th and 19th century with a mark of significance. The common terminology ‘nature’ has been reflected by our greatest poets in different meanings and understanding; Alexander Pope believed in reason and moderation, whereas Blake and Wordsworth embraced passion and imagination.
Ralph Waldo Emerson(1803-1882), the leader of the Transcendentalism in New England, is the first American who wrote prose and poem on nature and the relationship between nature and man Emerson's philosophy of Transcendentalism concerning nature is that nature is only another side of God "the gigantic shadow of God cast our senses." Every law in nature has a counterpart in the intellect. There is a perfect parallel between the laws of nature and the laws of thought. Material elements simply represent an inferior plane: wherever you enumerate a physical law, I hear in it a moral rule. His poem The Rhodora is a typical instance to illustrate his above-mentioned ideas on nature. At the very beginning of the poem, the poet found the fresh rhodora in the woods, spreading its leafless blooms in a deep rock, to please the desert and the sluggish brook, while sea-winds pieced their solitudes in May. It is right because of the rhodora that the desert and the sluggish brook are no longer solitudes. Then the poem goes to develop by comparison between the plumes of the redbird and the rhodora . Although the bird is elegant and brilliant, the flower is much more beautiful than the bird. So the sages can not helping asking why this charm is wasted on the earth and sky. The poet answers beauty is its own cause for being just as eyes are made for seeing. There is no other reason but beauty itsel...
Many poets are inspired by the impressive persona that exists in nature to influence their style of poetry. The awesome power of nature can bring about thought and provoke certain feelings the poet has towards the natural surroundings.
Nature as imagery is a largely spread idea in most of Frosts poems. However he is not telling us about nature or trying to explain nature to us, rather, he is using it as a source of narrative to metaphorically position something else. This, we can deduce,...