Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Greek philosophy's influence on western civilization
Greek philosophy's influence on western civilization
Introduction for alexander the great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Greek philosophy's influence on western civilization
I choose to do research on this bust because I already am familiar with Alexander’s life and his impact on global history. At first, when I saw the sculpture without reading the description, I had just assumed it was some Roman craftsman making a bust of Alexander’s likeness based upon previous artworks as his reference point. However, upon discovering that Alexander the Great was considered divine in antiquity, I understood only now began to realize just how deep Alexander 's cult and life would be the spark that will help create and define both the Roman and American Empire. Alexander 's bust had the familiar style of a young man with short fiery-hair and had no unique touch on behalf of the craftsman. I doubt there is any death mask or any real record of how Alexander …show more content…
While I think the craftsman did a good job, the only thing I dislike is that there are no eyes on the sculpture. There is a possibility the eyes had either been vandalized or just turned into dust as time passed. I believe that if the artist had added a pair of eyes, it could have further enforced the vibe that Alexander was more than divine than mortal as the cultists have believed. While Alexander the Great was human, this bust was created and used in Alexander’s cult that survived far beyond his lifetime. It wouldn’t even be farfetched to think he was a deity in the eyes of the Ancient Romans because of all of his accomplishments, which seem to only be something that can be rivaled by heroes in Greco-Roman mythology. During his lifetime, Alexander the Great would become King by the age of 20 and he would have opportunities that occur once in a millennia. [5]. One such opportunity he had was that he was personally trained by the Greek philosopher Aristotle. [5] Besides being the most well educated man in the West, he also had a lot of combat experience from fighting the Greek City-States alongside his father,
Have you heard of a man named Alexander the Great, the famous historical figure? There are many amazing stories about him explaining the courageous things he had accomplished. However, if you learn more about him and his accomplishments you will soon realized the real person Alexander was. Alexander the Great, ruler of his empire was in fact not great as his title states. The definition of great is a person who shows concern for others, has leadership and shows intelligence. Alexander didn’t show any of these characteristics therefore he doesn’t deserve the title of “great”.
In the countries who believed Alexander was the son of the devil or the devil himself, will say he is not ‘great’ but a demon who did evil. The countries who were on his side would say he was the greatest conqueror to live. He began as a Macedonian cavalry commander at eighteen, king of Macedonia at twenty, conqueror of Persia at twenty-six and explorer of India at thirty [Foner and Garraty]. The amount of large scale accomplishments he managed to finish in a span of six years is astonishing. Alexander’s tomb was the largest tourist attraction in the ancient world. The tomb was even visited by Julius Caesar, Pompey, Caligula, and Augustus. Alexander the Great’s accomplishments set a bar in which provided a standard that all other leaders would match their careers too. Many leaders after Alexander could not reach the standard left by him [Foner and
And just like the Greek the statue are both big and almost human size. A great example of this is the “Augustus of Primaporta, 1st century C.E. (Vatican Museums).” It truly shows the evolution of art sculpting. It is a full size very detailed sculpture of Augustus. It very detailed from his hair showing every curl and split to the small details in his armor that also depicts a story as well is shows the god of the sky looking down on him and the goddess of the earth looking up towards him as they watch the Parthians surrender to him and returning the standards shows the great power that Augustus has, and not just that but also the sculpture itself is a symbol for how Augustus wanted everyone to see him as, as god like. And it even has a little small cupid on the side which is also detailed which shows that Augusts is decedent from a
The Nefertiti bust portrait, from Ancient Egypt's 18th Dynasty, was created sometime between 1348 and 1336 B.C. and now resides in the Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Agyptisches Museum. (Stokstad, 120) It was found in the studio of its believed sculptor, Tuthmose, at the then-capital city, Akhetaten. Because bust portraits during this time were a rarity, scholars believe that Tuthmose may have created the bust simply as a model for future sculptures and paintings of Nefertiti. Though it is generally known from ancient depictions of sculptors at work that statues were sometimes created in parts and then assembled, it is believed that this bust was never intended to be part of a full-bodied statue. (Stokstad, 120)
The statue is made of marble, instead of the bronze statue. This statue is one of the earliest marble statues of a human figure carved in Attica. The statue is a kind of symbol; he does not in any way a likeness. This is my first expression when I saw the statue: the statue is showing me a simple, clear action that was used by Greek youth sculptures throughout this period. Looking at this statue, he expanded into 3D space, because he is standing straight and facing forward without any exaggerated movements, thus the post makes him look closed-off and a column his limbs are locked in space. Therefore, the standing posture, the decorations on his body, his hair and knee’s texture and how the Egyptians impact Greek art, is what makes me interested in it. A question that has always been in my mind is
the statue was made for and depicts a warrior by the name of Kroisos who died a hero in battle. He was buried in a city/town called Anavysos near the city of Athens. Kroisos is portrayed in a frontal facing stance toward the viewer with a very natural look, like the egyptian statue of king Menkaure. The body proportions and head shape are more realistic than other statues from ancient greece.The statue of kroisos is made of one solid piece of marble and was chiseled out. He is depicted nude with his arms hanging down alongside his hips and torso. His hands are clenched lightly and the thumbs are facing forward. It looks like he may have been holding something at one point as well. Kroisos has an almost emotionless facial expression with an archaic smile,wide eyes and good amount of detail in the
Having a bad day can seem daunting, perhaps causing feelings like nothing can go right regardless of what you do. This seems to be the case in “Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day.” No matter what Alexander does, the day just doesn’t get better. From breakfast all the way to bed time, Alexander is miserable. Many things that Alexander experiences are avoidable through a better outlook on life and proper parenting.
I chose this sculpture because I was intrigued by the position of the man and the centaur. I was able to witness that the centaur is trying to invade the personal space of the man. The sculpture showed me that there is a strong relationship between man and creature. The quality of the sculpture made me realize that animals play a big part of a human’s life and can be seen as threatening to humans. It was interesting to see that both the man and centaur were created to have almost of the same structures. This statue has a metallic brown and green, bronze tone and appeared undersized. It has a height of four and a half feet, and six inches. It has long, thin, legs with calf muscles, and bulging thighs. The sculpture evolved from Olympia, Greece. The man and centaur sculpture was created in 750 BCE during an orderly time period. The colors used for this sculpture, proved that it has a longer lasting mold for statues. On the left side of the sculpture, the man has a wrap on his head, that can symbolize, he is some form of a god. On the right side, the centaur has the same head piece as the man, but the body of a horse. It can be seen that the man and
Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...
This is a copy of the sculpture of Athena Parthenos, dressed in battle attire, that was originally created by Phidias during the period of 447-39 B.C. The statue of Athena Parthenos was to be constructed, not of bronze, but of gold and ivory. The face, arms, and feet of the statue were to be made of ivory and the clothing, of thickly plated gold. The statue was an enormous size that towered thirty-three feet tall. The costly nature of the materials out of which it was designed was intended to overwhelm the viewer, creating a sense of religious awe.
It was found in a shipwreck off Cape Artemision and refurbished to what it may have looked like during its time. (Artemision Zeus or Poseidon). Standing a little over 2 meters high, it is sculpted in the nude fashion whilst being posed in the ready position to pitch an object. The body was made in the idealized image of the Greek’s superior overseers. The eyes of the sculpture likely inlaid with glass but had gone missing as time passed. On the account of the sculpture being found undersea, it had gone through much degradation and was thought to be done in Early Classical Style in bronze and was presumably made around 460 B.C.E (Artemision Zeus or Poseidon). The model of the sculpture closely resembles that of either Zeus or Poseidon, which leaves much confusion and speculation of who the piece represents. Consequently, there have been arguments that the piece may not represent Poseidon, but instead Zeus. The theory came about during the time when the sculpture was first being studied; the right hand grasping an object that would have helped archaeologists to identify the god, but the piece is lost. Most Art Historians believed it to be Zeus for his weapon was a thunder bolt and would not obscure the face of the work (Artemision Zeus or Poseidon). Another possibility is that the sculpture was made of bronze, a form that only gods of high
The first matter to consider is what constitutes “greatness”. There are no set standards no checklist, to apply to a person, to determine it they are “great.” The simplest way that I could conceive to decide whether this title should apply to Alexander was to determine if he was, in some way, superior to the rulers that came before or after his reign. The most obvious place for me to start my consideration is with Alexander’s vast accomplishments as a conquerer.
The artist traveled to the US to work directly off of George Washington. He took measurements of his body and even took a “Life Mask” of his face. The original statue is carved from Carrara marble. It is done in a roman style depicting a standing life-sized Washington. In his right hand is a cane, his left
Equifinality proposes that multiple paths can lead to the same outcomes (Nassar, 2007). There were many strategies that Alexander could have chosen as the battle plan to defeat Darius and his massive troops. In this battle, communication created an effective and efficient strategy for the success that Alexander the Great’s army had against the Persians led by Darius. When you have a disadvantage to overcome, you must have communication as the top form of weaponry. Alexander was at a disadvantage in the size of his army by 4 to 1 (Nassar, 2007). However, he used the minimal number of resources to his advantage by making sure that he could execute the communicated plan more clearly and with precision. This was something that the larger army
This statue is the result of the sculptor, Richard Rahl, being kidnapped and forced into bondage in a land ruled by a despotic religious order. This order’s teachings insisted humanity was in a state of sin from birth, unworthy of the light and love of their Creator. This sin was greed. To labor for one’s own survival was to show hatred of your neighbor through greed thus leading to slavery in all but name. Art in this land was deemed vile if it showed humanity in any other light than decrepit and twisted, cringing from their Creator and its light.