Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A short history of nearly everything reflection essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Bryson, Bill. A short history of nearly everything. New York: Broadway Books, 2003.
II. Summary of the Main Ideas
1. Subject: Bill Bryson is writing about science and the discoveries we have made into knowing about the universe, and the earth's existence.
2. Occasion; Bryson had written A Short History of Nearly Everything, because, Bryson had felt that “[The science book] wasn’t exciting at all” (5), therefore he hadn't liked science verymuch. Until, one day he had wondered how did they know that we had layers to the earth when we have never traveled far enough down to know. That is when he had set out on a journey to expand his limited knowledge of the universe, and science.
3. Audience: Anyone with an earning to learn. It is most likely intended for people with a limited or, has no knowledge of the universe, and the earth's existence throughout time.
4. Purpose: The main purpose of the book is to educate, and inform. He helps to widen the knowledge of people who are not experts in the field of science, or whom did not feel that had absorbed enough information in school and are still seeking the knowledge.
5. Speaker: Bill Bryson is the narrator, and he writes in first person. This demonstrated when he give examples from his life and using sentence referring to himself. For example, “I am delighted that you could make it” (1).
III. Critical Analysis and Evaluation
1. Logos: Bill Bryson argues in A Short Story of Nearly Everything that as humans we are extremely lucky to be on Earth. Bryson has always had wanted to know more about science, but felt that textbooks had always made science seem like a boring endeavor, until he had saw a cross section of the ear, in which had sparked his interest in ...
... middle of paper ...
...tay involved in the book.
IV. Applications of Main Ideas:
“If this book had a lesson, it is that we are awfully lucky to be here...” (478). Bill Bryson’s writing might not be liked by many people, however, I found it to be enticing, and a wonderful read. Along with his mind-blowing facts, Bryson throws in humor to make the text even more engaging. A few facts were outdated, such as when Bryson is explaining the discovery of Pluto as a planet, when it is now classified as a dwarf planet. However, this just proves one of Bryson’s point, which is that sciences is always moving forward. Continually, I would recommend this book to people. It had opened my eyes to the wonders of the world, and the incredibly long and interesting journey to human existence. Furthermore, I would later gush about the facts for days, because I couldn’t quite believe what I had read.
While discussing the unknown frontier that scientists must endure, Barry describes a “wilderness region” that is unfamiliar and new. He continues to say that scientists venture “through the looking glass” into a new frontier. These devices help to create familiar ideas that the audience will understand in an unfamiliar situation. A simile used to compare research to a “crystal” by explaining that “probing” was to “ precipitate an order out of chaos,” much like a crystalline structure forms an ordered structure. Finally, Berry implements a metaphor in order to describe what follows a discovery. He describes “a flood of colleagues” that “ pave roads over the path laid.” This metaphor describes how science continuously changes, one discovery after another while ultimately communicating the patience and curiosity a scientist must have. The culmination of these figurative devices teach a new way of an audience that is unfamiliar with the author's theme.
This suggests that their focus on the rivalry took away from their focus on work. The author's method of developing this idea was to state examples of mistakes created by both men.Like I stated before, Cope made a mistake when he wroteand drew his new discovery,the Elasmosaurus, which publically humilated him." Marsh crowed about the blunder to anyone who would listen." The author also talks about Marsh's mistake in his discovery of the Brontosaurus;this mistake wasn't noticed until hundreds of years later. While the men had made mistakes they also made major discoveries. The text states that"Cope and Marsh discovered more than 130 dinosaur species." The text also states that "Their teams dug up so many bones that scientists are still learning new things about them." This shows that many scientists still gain information from the discoveries of Cope and Marsh. The author's use of these details show Cope and Marsh's great effects in the world of science.The way the author developed this part of the third central idea is by stating their positive
In conclusion, Jack Repcheck has really succeeded in his major purposes of writing this book. He has given a precise and in-depth human explanation of the events that led to the scientific revolution. He has explained thoroughly the political, human, and cultural factors that eventually paved the way for the revolution. The author has brought this scientific genius to life in a manner that has never been achieved in the past. He has revealed some of the little known weak character traits of Copernicus at the time of his major theories. Copernicus’s secret mistress and other scandals, together with his earlier intention to hide his work, are some of the little known facts about him that the author reveals in the book.
The narrator speaks as a second person and to me Sylvia is the narrator in the
Polkinghorne asserts that “scientists are motivated by the desire understand what is happening in the world.”(551, Polkinghorne). As a physicist himself, Polkinghorne understands the desire to understand the world, even shifting careers to become a priest to better his understanding. Science asks how things happen, and does not attempt to answer every question. Questions asking why go ignored, as if they are not necessary to fully understand the world and the life that lives here. Science alone
...e preceding reasons, all college students should read the book. The book will captivate the educated mind, and most importantly, will cause that mind to think and to question why things happen as they do.
Odenbaugh, Jay. "Bill McKibben on the End of Nature." Green Thoughts. Blogspot.com, 28 Sept. 2006. Web. 25 Apr. 2014.
...ttempts to relate many fields to his paper so that even if the reader didn’t know some of the scholars that were cited, the reader could glean the basic idea and then truly understand a section that interested you if you knew about the sources he was using.
In the beginning of each chapter, Krakauer includes one or two exerts from various authors of nature such as Thoreau, Tolstoy, or London. Once in a while he even includes postcards that Chris had sent to some of the people he met along his journey, which show what he was feeling throughout the trip. Some of t...
Why do precisely these objects which we behold make a world? Why has man just these species of animals for his neighbors; as if nothing but a mouse could have filled this crevice? — Walden (1)
Neither Grobstein nor I complain about Dickinson's lack of rigorous logic or scientific underpinnings in this poem. Instead, we accept it as a welcome springboard for our own imaginings about her concept. By contrast, many have criticized and resisted the sometimes-slippery logic and swift-handed science that Dennett uses to explain his neo-Darwinian theory, or explain away whatever challenges it. In the end, both writers/thinkers rely on historical narrative to persuade their readers: "Many scientific patterns are also historical patterns, and hence are revealed and explained in narratives—of sorts. Cosmology, geology, and biology are all historical sciences. The great biologist D'Arcy Thompson once said: 'Everything is the way it is because it got that way.' If he is right--if everything is the way it...
The main message of the novel is a warning. Shelly is trying to warn us about the effects science could have on society if it continues to progress at the rate it is. Despite the good things about science like medicine, it is changing the world as we now it, we can see this in global warming, but despite knowing we are damaging the environment, as a race we take no real action to prevent it.
The first three chapters of A Brief History of Time cover a variety of topics. In chapter one, Stephen Hawking tries to provide a single theory to describe the entire universe. Chapter two describes some of the ideas that scientists, mathematicians, philosophers, and physicians of the past had about gravity and theories of motion. The third chapter in the book talks about the work of many scientists of the past concerning whether the universe is expanding or not. In each chapter, Stephen Hawking describes several different things to solve the huge idea of the entire universe.
In general, there are two focus questions that lead the Popperian account of science: firstly, Popper asks how our (scientific) knowledge grows. Secondly, Popper faces an inductive problem, as he questions how science is able to discover universal laws through singular observations (Chalmers, 1999)