Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Early childhood education why is it important
Early childhood education why is it important
What is the importance of early childhood education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Early childhood education why is it important
Are the various millionaires from the world truly self-made men or is their success a result of a more complex outside source- the environment? In the book Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell analyzes how people achieve success. He stresses the belief that success is obtained by other factors beyond personal characteristics like IQ, work ethic, talent and ambition. To truly understand success, one must go deeper and look at the “hidden” reasons, such as birthdates, hours put in, cultural background and timing. Individuals credit their own success on their merit, but it’s decided on other factors outside their control.
Most people people expect the current United States President and chairmen of The Trump Organization, Donald Trump, to be a self-made
…show more content…
man. Trump made successful investments when he entered the real estate business after taking control of his father’s company, Elizabeth & Son Co.-later on named the Trump Organization. Donald Trump seemed to be unstoppable during the 1980s in his apartment housing investments, but when 1990 came, Trump’s Organization faced bankruptcy due to accumulated debt and the decline of New York’s economy. Trump met with several banks and convinced them to loan him millions of dollars to keep his business out of debt. Trump faced bankruptcy about for times before 1995, when investments he made began working out successfully. From here Trump expanded the company and created the reality TV show, The Apprentice. Trump also ventured into licensing deals, which involved businesses paying to use his name and logo. Trump’s fame and fortune also increased when he released several books, including The Art of the Deal and Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again. He believes his success is from his ability to accept fear, along with his positivity and experience, but is his success truly from his on invention? Trump’s success was not based on his own merit, but on environmental reasons. Malcolm Gladwell analyzes people who have put in the time to reach success and Trump is not one of these people.
In reality, Trump inherited The Trump Organization from his father and did not work elsewhere besides the company. He was raised well off and entitled to inherit money from his father. Due to the successful company his father built, Trump didn’t need to do much. Donald Trump, like the successful partner of Skadden, Arps., Joe Flom, owe their success to their environment. Joe Flom was poor as a child, raised by immigrant garment workers during the depression. Due to discrimination against Jews, when Jewish lawyers looked for jobs during “hiring season” they were rejected due to their antecedents and were pushed to smaller companies. Flom was given the work other firms did not want and mainly worked with proxy fights and litigation. Flom mastered his craft over the course of 10,000 hours and his experience was sought after during the 1970s and 1980s when litigation and hostile takeovers -what old-line law firms discarded- became a high demand skill to have. Flom’s success was already predetermined as a result of the generation he was born in was considerably smaller than the generation before or after it. Being the son of Jewish workers also affected Flom’s success. A lot of Eastern European Jews who immigrated to New York had previously had an occupational skill and had mastered and polished their trade. Many of these Jews established themselves in the rising garment industry and the children who had parents in this industry saw the development of success from hard work. This was an advantage equivalent to having wealthy parents - like Donald Trump. Flom’s success was shaped by the opportunities given to him from his cultural background, and
timing. The theme of wealth and parental involvement having a direct correlation with success is shown in the difference between Christopher Langan and Robert Oppenheimer. Chris Langan had an IQ of 195 but in the end he had little impact on the world. Robert Oppenheimer on the other hand is famous for assisting in the development of the nuclear bomb during the World War II and he-on account of those around him (parents and teachers)- was a genius. What made Chris Langan ineffective in society was the circumstances he had in childhood and the opportunities that passed him Chris Langan’s family was dirt poor, while Oppenheimer was the child of a successful artist and garment worker. The advantage had been predetermined by their births. Oppenheimer would grow up seeing the success of his parents through a series of obstacles and the use of negotiation. Chris Langan, on the other hand, was raised watching his stepfather, Jake Langan, have drinking sprees, disappear and lose jobs, which created a dysfunctional environment for Chris. Chris Langan grew up never learning the necessary skills needed to help him reach success, while Oppenheimer did learn them and utilized these skills cleverly. The social view of success is heavily individualistic, which is misconception because no one is self made. Everyone, whether they are naturally talented or just a hard worker, received help in some sort of way whether it be through teachers, mentors, family and friends. Success is not only achieved by special people, but by those who are willing who to sacrifice and work hard.
“People don't rise from nothing....It is only by asking where they are from that we can unravel the logic behind who succeeds and who doesn't”(Gladwell 18).
I found Gladwell’s first chapter of Outliers entitled “The Matthew Effect” to be both interesting, confusing, and perhaps somewhat lopsided. Based on Matthew 25:2, Gladwell simply explains, “It is those who are successful, in other words, who are most likely to be given to the kinds of special opportunities that lead to further success.” (Gladwell 2008, pg. 30) The Matthew Effect seems to extend special advantages and opportunities to some simply based on their date of birth.
Malcolm Gladwell, in the nonfiction book Outliers, claims that success stems from where you come from, and to find that you must look beyond the individual. Malcolm Gladwell develops and supports his claim by defining an outlier, then providing an example of how Stewart Wolf looked beyond the individual, and finally by giving the purpose of the book Outliers as a whole. Gladwell’s purpose is to explain the extenuating circumstances that allowed one group of people to become outliers in order to inform readers on how to be successful. The author writes in a serious and factual tone for the average person in society of both genders and all ethnicities who wants to become successful in life.
In Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell argues that there is no such thing as a self-made man, and that success is only the result of a person’s circumstances. However, throughout the novel Gladwell points out that your circumstances and opportunities only help you become successful if you are willing to take advantage of them and work hard. From a twelve year old living in the Bronx, to those who were born at just the right time to become millionaires, one thing is the same throughout; these people because successful because they seized the opportunities they were given. The advantages and opportunities that came from their circumstances would not be important if they had not grasped them. Every successful man is self made, because he has seized the
“A statistical observation that is markedly different in value from the others of the sample” (Gladwell 3) or in other words an outlier. In the novel Outliers: The Story of Success, author Malcolm Gladwell holds one of the many secrets to life, the secret to success. Gladwell takes one’s thoughts on an astonishing journey to reveal the keys to success, their patterns, and how to achieve it.
In “Outliers” Malcolm Gladwell organizes his argument for their being a rule for overall success by showing statistics of people who are defined as being successful such as Bill Gates, Billy Joy, and The Beatles. He also uses a Berlin music academy to help prove his rule. He presents an argument that Bill Gates and The Beatles and the violinist attending the music academy may have been born with innate talent but that is not the sole ...
There are many different definitions of success, and many depend on the person defining it. Success can be achieving your goal of running a mile or not failing a math test. It can be independence or not embarrassing yourself in public. To achieve these versions of success, you need to practice and put in effort. After all, Gladwell says if you work hard enough you can do anything and “Achievement is talent plus preparation.” (Gladwell 221). The above definitions of success are similar to my own. I define success as reaching my goals, not being in debt (money wise), and having independence. I also agree with Gladwell that wealth, power, and fame are indicators of success, however, I do not gauge my own success on power or fame. My definition of success has not changed because of the Outliers, but it has changed over time. As I age, my view of the world changes and so does my definition of success.
Once in a while, it really hits people that they don’t have to experience the world in the way they have been told to. Gladwell believes that cultural legacies are powerful forces. Cultural legacies are the customs of a family or a group of people, that is inherited through the generations. According to Malcolm Gladwell’s book, Outliers, Cultural legacies is something that’s been passed down for generations to generations. It depends on what type of legacies was passed that will affect a person. If a good legacy was passed down, someone can keep that legacy going by trying hard at keeping the legacies going. If a bad legacy was passed down; I believe that cultural legacies can be altered or changed, by good working habits, determination, and a positive mindset to succeed. Culture can affect either positively or negatively, but we have the power to turn our cultural
Malcolm Gladwell makes many debatable claims in his book “The Outliers”. One of these controversial topics is brought up in chapter three when he talks about a person’s IQ and how that relates to one’s success. Gladwell says, “The relationship between success and IQ works only up to a point. Once someone has reached an IQ of somewhere around 120, having additional IQ points doesn’t seem to translate into any measurable real-world advantage.”After reading “Outliers” I believe that this is the greatest controversial topic. I agree with Malcolm Gladwell because there are a high amount of people who are not incredibly smart that are very successful, success can be viewed differently by different people, and from my own experiences on the U-High
The most intriguing study in the book Outliers by Malcom Gladwell was, in my opinion, Rice Paddies and Math Tests (Part Two-Chapter Eight). The correlation and connections Gladwell makes between what makes the Asian rice farmers so successful, and how it translated into math was frankly, a very remarkable comparison that changed how I thought of mathematics and success in general. It made a connection between the math we learn in school, how we learn it, and how this can translate into life, especially life as a rice farmer. It was also very fascinating for Gladwell to show the significant differences between how kids in Asian countries learn math versus how kids in Western countries learn math. Conversely Gladwell further strengthened and
For generations, only certain people have achieved success - they are known as geniuses or outliers; however, they did not obtain it on high IQs and innate talents alone. In the book Outliers, author Malcolm Gladwell, #1 bestselling author of The Tipping Point and Blink, reveals the transparent secret of success behind every genius that made it big. Intertwined with that, Gladwell builds a convincing implication that the story behind the success of all geniuses is that they were born at the right place, at the right time and took advantage of it. To convey the importance of the outlier’s fortunate circumstances to his readers, he expresses a respective, colloquial tone when examining their lives.
In Malcolm Gladwell's book Outliers he writes about how success comes from a numerous factors from extra opportunities that can open doors to genetic advantages that can be the difference in edging out competition. An “outlier” that I am quite familiar is my uncle Travis Knight. He is an obvious outlier because he stands at 7 feet tall and played basketball at the University of Connecticut and he played in the National Basketball Association for 7 seasons. His professional career was a result of many of the topics Malcolm Gladwell discusses, Early advantages often result in increased coaching or placement in accelerated programs which means more experience and significantly more practice than those who do not have the same opportunities.
Have you ever wondered why some people act certain ways? Are some people born smart, mean, or ambitious or do they achieve their traits? Malcolm Gladwell explores this question in his book Outliers: The Story of Success. Through analysis of data, he reveals many of our actions are a result of the environment. Moreover, Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness and The Secret Sharer exemplify this theme. Brutal environments test his characters, revealing their evil side. The settings in the Heart of Darkness and The Secret Sharer personify man's inner evil, supporting Gladwell's thesis.
Donald Trump is not only one of the world’s richest men, but one of its most recognizable. Despite a privileged upbringing, he did not inherit anything, and went on to fame and fortune thanks to his business accomplishments and natural instincts.
In Chapter 8 and 9 of Outliers: The Story of Success, Gladwell exams some of the ways that Asian and American students learn math, arguing that some of the principles in the US education system should be reconsidered. I generally agree with Gladwell’s point of view. I believe in two ways, students ' principal spirit and the length of students’ studying, the US education system leaves much to be desired, though an overhaul is in progress.