Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Out of africa theory
Out of africa theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Out of africa theory
Introduction
Alu elements are a class of transposable genes found exclusively in the genomic sequences of primates. Averaging in lengths of approximately 300 base pairs, Alu elements are classified as being short interspersed elements, more commonly referred to by the acronym SINEs. These elements interject themselves into the DNA sequence by means of retroposition. Once established into the genome, Alu elements are considered to be stable, only rarely being subjected to deletion. Initial studies on the prevalence of Alu inserts within the modern human genome was calculated to be nearly 5% (Comas, Plaza, Calafell, Sajantila, & Bertranpetit, 2001), however, more recent research indicates that the actual percentage of various Alu elements account for nearly 11% of the DNA sequence (Deininger, 2011). Alu elements are of great importance to scientists, particularly to those who wish to study evolution, as well as, migrational patterns of early human populations.
One remarkable Alu element located at the PV92 locus on chromosome 16 was found to be specific to the Homo sapiens species. The fact that it is found exclusively in the human population provides significant support to the theory that the PV92 element established itself into the genome sometime after the human-primate split in the ancestral tree approximately 5-7 million years ago (Batzer, et al., 1994). The PV92 insert, along with all other elements belonging to the Alu family, do not code for outgoing products, instead they are considered to be a genetically silent insertions. Although different genotypes in individuals can be observed there is no effect on a person’s phenotype.
The PV92 insert is a dimorphic element, meaning that it has two allelic forms, it will either be ...
... middle of paper ...
...is results biotech methods I
Conclusion
The study of Alu elements, such as the one found on the PV92 locus are of extreme importance for numerous reasons. Alu inserts have played a significant role in advancing the study of human evolution. For example, the analysis of specific polymorphic inserts has led some researchers to postulate that the divergence between primates and Homo sapiens was initiated in Africa, giving rise to the “Out of Africa” theory (Batzer, et al. 1994). Contrarily, others believe that the deviation arose from multiple regions from occurring mutations. Additionally, Alu elements are also speculated to have played a significant role in accelerating speciation in vertebrates by acting as a source of new mutations (Bohne, Brunet, Galiana-Arnoux, Schultheis & Volff, 2008), but further research is needed to confirm or refute these hypotheses.
The PBS documentary “Nova – Cracking Your Genetic Code” tells about the genome sequencing technology: its current possibilities, advantages, disadvantages and future potential. The system became cheaper, faster and more available since the first human genome was fully sequenced in 2000. Modern companies use the technology to provide clients with the information about their genes and impacts they can have on owners’ health. Hospitals can provide more accurate diagnosis and personalized treatments with the aid of the genome sequencing. The video shows several examples of these benefits. But it mentions concerns about the quality of services, risks of exaggerated
Over the last few hundred years, more and more has been added to the world’s fossil collection, fossils from all over the world. New theories have been created and old theories have almost been proven about the evolution of man. For example, we have proof that different species of man existed with certain types of DNA sequences and instincts, some we may not have anymore, or some that other species did not have back then. Even though it is subjected to much debate, one of the most widely accepted theories however, is that Homo sapiens interbred with the slightly more primitive species of man, the Neanderthal.
Miller, Kenneth R. and Joseph S. Levine. “Chapter 12: DNA and RNA.” Biology. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc., 2002. Print.
Neves, A. M., & Serva, M. (2012). Extremely Rare Interbreeding Events Can Explain Neanderthal DNA in Living Humans. Plos ONE, 7(10), 1-10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047076
Australopithecus afarensis who existed 3.5 million years ago and a 4.4 million year old skeleton of an Ardipithecus ramidus are the closest science has come to discovering the human lineage. Shattered Ancestry an article written by Katherine Harmon discusses the remains of two hominids found within Ethiopia. These skeletal remains have created a huge controversy within the topic of evolution questioning many assumptions that have been made referencing the human lineage. The skeleton of the Australopithecus afarensis was named Lucy and was discovered in 1974. The evidence of her walking upright on her two feet essentially guaranteed her a spot in the human lineage line. Lucy was a chimplike ape that was said to walk upright making scientists believe the human ancestry was simple. The complete skeleton found in Ethiopia of an Ardipithecus ramidus named Ardi completely changed all assumptions made from scientists about the complexity of the human lineage. These remains have encouraged researches that the human line is not the only lineage to have evolved but the chimpanzee line has undergone drastic changes as well. There are many traits that researchers have always directly linked to the human lineage however since these discoveries occurred researchers are reconsidering. The recent discoveries that have shattered what has always suggested what linked a species to the human lineage have changed the certainty of whether it is possible to confidently identify the human’s last common ancestor. Majority of scientist had forgotten that there would have been many hominid species living together at one time. New theories have been suggested since scientists revealed that the foot of a hominid found called the Burtele site was found ju...
Myers, provider of source material for Edie Heydt's notes from "Human Origins," fall 1997, Alfred. Much of the material in the notes is paraphrased, and the original information sources are unknown.
In recent years, the Homo Neanderthalensis were viewed as “subhuman brutes”, but are now seen as a different species from our own (Balter 2001). The Neanderthals were a branch of the Homo genus that evolved in Eurasia at least 200,000 years ago (Fagan 2010). The first Neand...
Wonder of DNA. Design(er) Conference. Answers in Genesis, 10 Apr. 2014. Web. 17 Apr. 2014
The species A. afarensis is one of the better known australopithecines, with regards to the number of samples attributed to the species. From speculations about their close relatives, the gorilla and chimpanzee, A. afarensis’ probable social structure can be presumed. The species was named by Johanson and Taieb in 1973. This discovery of a skeleton lead to a heated debate over the validity of the species. The species eventually was accepted by most researchers as a new species of australopithecine and a likely candidate for a human ancestor.
From the ancient bones of the Neanderthals, scientists have been able to extract small amounts of DNA. The DNA comparisons to modern humans show no relationship, implying evolutionary separation (Kunzig, 159). Some anthropologists say the small sections of DNA found are not conclusive evidence, because modern humans show just as much variation in DNA. These people point out that individuals such as the “Portugal Kid” are hybrids of Neanderthals and modern humans, showing there was gene trading. One argument against this is that there is no skull from the ‘Portugal Kid” so it is hard to compare it to Neanderthals. Also, it is known that closely related species can breed and their offspring can be fertile, but they are still separate species (Kunzig, 161).
Scientists thought that interbreeding would be a logical assumption to the Neanderthal conundrum. Unfortunately, any evidence of DNA from Neanderthals mixed with human DNA is difficult to come by because their fossils are usually tarnished upon finding. That is until Svante Paabo, and his research team from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, came across the remains of twenty-four Neanderthals and forty early humans.* All of these fossils were nearly 40,000 years old and were from Germany, Russia, and Croatia. Nine of these fossils (four Neanderthal and five human)
No one knew how heredity (passing traits) worked until Gregor Mendel, an Austrian monk, crossbred pea plants in his monastery kitchen garden in 1865. In 1869, gene-hunters found rod-like shape in the nucleus of cells that turned red when dye was added. They named this “Chromosome”, from a Greek word, chroma for color. They also went deeper into the cell and discovered a wispy microscopic thread within the chromosomes, which they named DNA. There were several scientists who did not know about Mendel’s breakthrough at the time, but then in 1900, they rediscovered his experiment and old journal copies.
Science, US Department of Energy Office of. Human Genome Poject Information. 12 August 2009. 21 February 2010 .
The evidence for human evolution begins with the australopithecines. All the australopithecines were bipedal and therefore possible hominines. In details of their teeth, jaws, and brain size, however, they modify enough among themselves to be divided into five species: Australopithecus anamensis, A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. robustus, and A. boisei. Genus Homo are also divided in five different spices: Homo erectus, H. habilis, H. sapiens, and H. sapiens sapiens.