Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tolstoy philosophy of art
Tolstoy philosophy of art
Tolstoy philosophy of art
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tolstoy philosophy of art
In his paper ‘What is art?’ (1897), Tolstoy states that art is not the mere expression of beauty or emotion; it provides no pleasure nor is that its sole purpose. Art is not an opportunity for catharsis or an activity to occupy the minds of idle beings. Instead, "art is a human activity consisting in this, that one consciously, by means of certain external signs, hands on others feelings he has lived through and that other people are infected by these feelings also experience them" (Tolstoy). In essence, the concept of art is an artist’s depiction of morality based on experience. Tolstoy’s essay on art sparked quite the reaction from the public because it openly criticized some of the world’s most renowned artists and completely disputed common beliefs regarding art. In this essay Tolstoy’s definition is analyzed through an empirical lens in an attempt to expose the incongruity of Tolstoy’s definition of art A necessary condition is one that must be satisfied before the concept at hand is attained. Basically, the necessary condition(s) of x need to be fully satisfied in order for x to be attained. For example, to receive course credits at the University of Victoria, a student must write and pass the final examination. Even with the fulfillment of every other condition, the course cannot be passed without achieving a score of at least 5o% on the final exam. Similarly, a square cannot be obtained if it does not have four equal sides and two lines cannot be parallel if they eventually meet. According to Tolstoy, there is one necessary condition of art; it must facilitate the transfer of emotion, allowing a person to re-experience the feelings of the artisan during the creation of the art piece. According to Aristotle and Plato, ther... ... middle of paper ... ...ed to an objective criterion that fails to capture every art form. Several amendments to Tolstoy’s definition are subsequently necessary. It is my personal view that art can be more suitably defined as an expression of emotion; it is uniquely beautiful depending on the perceiver; it provides pleasure, entertainment, enlightenment, education, appeasement and a variety of other emotions to people, depending solely on a person's experiences and interactions with the art piece. However, it is important that the distinction between regular forms of art and exceptional forms is drawn. Exceptional art is globally recognized by majority of critics and regular art forms comprise of the five imitative arts. The concept of art is unique and provides each person with a differing experience. In the words of the artist Ad Reinhardt, "art is art. Everything is everything else."
Modris Eksteins presented a tour-de-force interpretation of the political, social and cultural climate of the early twentieth century. His sources were not merely the more traditional sources of the historian: political, military and economic accounts; rather, he drew from the rich, heady brew of art, music, dance, literature and philosophy as well. Eksteins examined ways in which life influenced, imitated, and even became art. Eksteins argues that life and art, as well as death, became so intermeshed as to be indistinguishable from one another.
For majority of people, cruising through a fine arts museum or gallery is nothing short of browsing through a textbook and failing to grasping knowledge of the content. A casual activity and check off ones list of to-dos, sometimes done just for the appearance it offers. Of that majority, one might look at a painting for a long while before connecting the uncommunicated dots from gallery label. But for the small remaining others, a trip to an art exhibition is a journey through emotions and feelings rendered by the artists of the particular works of art. Leo Tolstoy deems this to be the appropriate response to “true art” in his What is Art?, published in 1897. Tolstoy responds to the
To start, Tolstoy believes that are can either be universally good art or good for people with specific tastes. However, the very best works have the ability to be universally
Art has been around for as long as humanity has existed, and it is much more than just drawings or paintings. Art is what every a person makes of it. Art can be drawings, paintings, writings, or even dancing, but never is it contained to just one of those things. As we explore just two aspect of art it is important to realize that there is no right or wrong way to look at the art. Art comes in many different forms, in which they are all interpreted a little differently by different people. For me, when I read a poem I do not instantly know what the poet is trying to say and I don’t find it as interesting, but when I look at a painting so many more thoughts comes and I can’t help by imagine what that artist was thinking while he was painting.
For Leo Tolstoy, in order for something to be considered art, it must evoke some form of emotion that acts as a means of unification and communication for humanity. As long as the intent of the artist hopes to unify, it is a positive necessity for the human experience, “art begins when one person, with the object of joining another or others to himself in one and the same feeling, expresses that feeling by certain indications.” For Tolstoy’s theory, the idea of intent is paramount to the execution of art. If something is not made with the intent of evoking a pure emotion, then it is not art. Tolstoy believes that art is “a means of union among men, joining them together in the same feelings and indispensable for the life and progress toward well-beings of individuals and of humanity.” When m...
The child’s game had ended. After I nearly ran Kurtz over, we stood facing each other. He was unsteady on his feet, swaying like the trees that surrounded us. What stood before me was a ghost. Each layer of him had been carved away by the jungle, until nothing remained. Despite this, his strength still exceeded that of my own. With the tribal fires burning so close, one shout from him would unleash his natives on me. But in that same realization, I felt my own strength kindle inside me. I could just as easily muffle his command and overtake him. The scene flashed past my eyes as though I was remembering not imagining. The stick that lay two feet from me was beating down on the ghost, as my bloodied hand strangled his cries. My mind abruptly reeled backwards as I realized what unspeakable dark thoughts I had let in. Kurtz seemed to understand where my mind had wandered; it was as though the jungle’s wind has whispered my internal struggles to him. His face twisted into a smile. He seemed to gloat and enjoy standing by to watch my soul begin to destroy itself.
Introduction Upon my first encounter with Kandinsky's painting, my eyes and indeed my mind were overcome with a sense of puzzlement, as it seemed impossible to decipher what lay beneath his passionate use of colour and distorted forms. Kandinsky hoped by freeing colour from its representational restrictions, it, like music could conjure up a series of emotions in the soul of viewer, reinforced by corresponding forms. Throughout this essay, I will follow Kandinsky's quest for a pure, abstract art and attempt to determine whether his passionate belief in this spiritual art and his theories on its effects on the soul, can truly be felt and appreciated by the average viewer, who at first glance would most likely view Kandinsky's paintings as simply abstract. Kandinsky was indeed a visionary, an artist who through his theoretical ideas of creating a new pictorial language sought to revolutionize the art of the twentieth-century. Regarded as the founder of abstract painting, he broke free from arts traditional limitations and invented the first painting for paintings sake, whereby the dissolution of the object and subsequent promotion of colour and form became means of expression in their own right.
This paper will explore Vladimir Tatlin and Naum Gabo's differences in the role of the Avant-Garde artists and how their beliefs influence the kind of work they produce. A pioneer of Russian design, Vladimir Tatlin is a representative of Russian Realism. He left home when he was fifteen and served on the shipboard. When he became a painter, he often represented sailors in his pictures. Art and culture in Russia after Revolution was a tool for creating industrially aesthetic reality.
According to Webster’s Dictionary, art is “human expression of objects by painting, etc” (10). The words “human experience” adds meaning to art. Artists reveal their inner thoughts and feelings through their work. When we study a painting by Salvador Dali, the strange objects and the surrealist background portrays the eccentricity of the painter. Some ideas cannot be explained verbally. They can only be shown via a medium. We can get across what is in our minds or our hearts by a stroke of a brush, a drop of paint, a row of words, or something else. But to express ourselves, we do not need to limit what we call art.
...t. It is important that art be simultaneously accessible and enjoyable to the common man. According to Tolstoy, a work of art need not follow all of the guidelines that have been given in the past, such as Aristotle's teaching on the Unities, as long as it carries the principles of instruction and enjoyment. Tolstoy believes that the greatest of unities are the unity found in God and with one's neighbor. The purpose of art is to highlight and influence this unification.
During the ancient times in Greece, Plato was the first human to document and criticize the existence of art and artists. He mentioned that human art was always in a form of a representation of something else. In one of Plato’s famous works, he demonstrates the idea of art is like an “imitation of nature” (Blocker 3). In other words, the purpose of art was to represent nature and nothing else. Art was not created for the sake of its own self nor was it created to appreciate its own beauty by any means. Instead, art, usually in forms of writings, paintings, or sculptures, was created to only to represent nature, Gods, emperors, families, or other important individuals. Furthermore, Plato had a very critical view towards the existence art in our society because art makes us more emotional, and our emotions lead to many errors about life. He believed it is our rational thinking, not our emotions or senses, which helps us und...
It can be said that art influences society, does it in different ways and through different types and as a social phenomenon and be immersed in the society, generating different opinions within it, even on the same work, and that is what is precious: with the same work you can have different views and opinions in which stopping to reflect and to experience different emotions and feelings but, most importantly, calls us to think.
Aesthetics is the theoretical study of the arts and related types of behavior and experience. It is traditionally regarded as a branch of philosophy, concerned with the understanding of beauty and its manifestations in art and nature. However, in the latter 20th century there developed a tendency to treat it as an independent science, concerned with investigating the phenomena of art and its place in human life. Yet, what in a field with a hazy line in between being classified as a science or study of beliefs is considered data for determining what can be studied? It can simply be drawn to the only three things involved in the process of art : The creator, the person experiencing, and the art itself.
The beauty of a portrait, the adventure of a saga, the delicacy of a porcelain vase, the emotion of a symphony – all forms of art, all forms of expression. Art, as Oscar Wilde explains it, is the “most intense mode of individualism that the world has ever known” (Wilde, The Soul of a Man Under Socialism). Art allows one to express themselves through a thousand mediums, using all five senses. It allows words that are not meant to be spoken, to be expressed, and ideas not meant to be thought, imagined. Perhaps the most prevalent form of art in today's society is literature, as is the most direct form of art.
Art can be defined in many ways by an individual. One can say that any creative output by a person is considered art. Others contend that art must conform to a societal standard and the basis of the creation should be understood by most intellectual people. For example, some contend that computer-generated images, such as fractals, are not art due to the large role played by a computer. E.O. Wilson states “the exclusive role of the arts is to intensify aesthetic and emotional response. Works of art communicate feeling directly from mind to mind, with no intent to explain why the impact occurs” (218). A simple definition may be that art is the physical expression of the ideals formed by the mind.