Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Shakespeare's influence on Elizabethan era
Influences on Shakespeare's works
Power greed and ambition in julius caesar shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Shakespeare's influence on Elizabethan era
William Shakespeare finished and published the play Julius Caesar in 1623, which was 391 years ago. The events catalogued within date to 44 B.C., which was 2057 years ago. In that time, the legend of Caesar has ingrained itself in the minds and political machines of every people on Earth.
We need look no further than the name "Caesar" for the extent of the reach the concept of such a man has attained. In nearly every language on Earth, one word sounds similar, no matter how different the culture or the politics. The Russians had a Tsar from 1547 to 1918. The Germans had a Kaiser from 1871 to 1918. The Ottomans had a Qaisar from 1453 to 1922, and these words and titles all directly translate to Caesar.
In the Tragedy Julius Caesar, the character of Caesar only speaks 1135 words, which is 5.9% of the total words spoken in the play. The astute reader will notice that this is quite a small percentage considering the title character is the one that we are discussing. This is simply because Caesar is not a major character in his own play. He sets the events in motion, but other than that, his presence simply exists in the background as a powerful symbol through the duration of his life and death.
As a symbol, Caesar is multifaceted. To some he is a coward “Ye gods, it doth amaze me, A man of such a feeble temper should so get the start of the majestic world, and bear the palm alone.” (1.2.129). To others he is an ambitious rival “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things! O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome, Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.39). To a few, he is even a friend “He was my friend, faithful and just to me: But Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honourable man.” (3.2.91). However, to all he is a god...
... middle of paper ...
...s, the rabble is soon lost in their own mundane monotony. That was the problem with Caesar. In private, he was a meek and nervous man who was epileptic and hypoglycemic. Putting on a persona can only last so long. Soon enough, cracks in the façade start to creep through. In addition, in some cruel twist of fate, even if the masses have loved a showman his entire life, the second he dies, no one cares. Now, one should never use absolutes, but after the “Great Leader” Joseph Stalin of the USSR died, his right hand men quickly reversed all of his policies. So it was with Caesar. In the end, he himself became opium for the masses, and his death was merely the ending of another game.
Works Cited
Shakespeare, William, William Rosen, and Barbara Rosen. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar: With New Dramatic Criticism and an Updated Bibliography. New York: Penguin, 1987. Print.
During the Republic, the people of Rome had a major disinclination towards any sort of Royalty, which is why when Caesar attempted to lead undemocratically indefinitely, he disrupted one of the core stances that romans shared communally. Caesar over indulged in power when he retitled himself as ‘dictator in perpetuo’. “And as Caesar was coming down from Alba into the city they ventured to hail him as king. But at this the people were confounded, and Caesar, disturbed in mind, said that his name was not King, but Caesar, and seeing that his words produced an universal silence, he passed on with no very cheerful or contented looks…..But the most open and deadly hatred towards him was produced by his passion for the royal power.” Caesars egotism and self-importance made him uncherished by members of the senate. “Everybody knew that Caesar's ego would never allow him to play second fiddle to another senator, and it was equally well-known that another famous military leader, Pompey the Great, had similar ambitions. In January 49, more or less at...
Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.” Elements of Literature: Kylene Beers. Austin: Holt, 2009. 842-963. Print.
Julius Caesar, an important figure in Roman history, lived during the end of the Roman Republic. His actions would shape the world around him forever. He was an important figure because he grew the Roman Empire, he brought about the end of the Roman Republic, and was able to grow his status within his lifetime and become dictator for life. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC and died on March 15, 44 BC. Caesar was born into a patrician family.
Shakespeare, William. "The Death and Life of Julius Caesar." www.shakespeare.mit.edu. N.P., n.d. Web. 22 Feb 2016. ;.
Shortly before his death Caesar was given several warnings throughout ActsⅡand Ⅲ , however he still went to meet with the Senate due to the fact he thought he was needed. He had an alliance with his adopted sons and valued soldiers Octavius and Antony. The play is about the events that follow his death making him an important secondary character that also portrays a protagonist. Caesar faced many conflicts throughout his lifetime, some internal and some external. He fought a war against Pompey ,which lead to conspirators plotting his death, and he was troubled by the fact that his wife could not provide him with a child. He showcased this by publicly asking Antony to touch her as he passed her, hoping that this would bring healing to her barren womb. He also went through several character changes. When he returned from war, he returned believing that the people would be ecstatic to have him as an emperor. Nonetheless when the people of Rome did not respond the way he expected he knew he had to play on their emotions. He did this by refusing the crown three times and by offering to kill himself to prove his honesty and trustworthiness. This gave him the desired effect, so he returned to knowing that the crowd wanted him as a king. The driving force of the play was the unfortunate murder of Caesar or what happened afterwards. Throughout this play many of the characters go through many unique changes, although Julius Caesar experienced some very significant character changes. The theatrical work exhibits Julius Caesar’s actions, alliances, character developments, and internal and external conflicts which in turn showcase his various changes. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a brilliant piece of work that thoroughly covers the story of Julius Caesar, a protagonistic secondary character. Julius Caesar was the unofficial emperor of Rome. He was a war General and he fought
In 1599, when the play was first performed, Queen Elizabeth I had sat on the throne for nearly forty years, enlarging her power at the expense of the aristocracy and the House of Commons. As she was then sixty-six years old, her reign seemed likely to end soon, yet she lacked any heirs (as did Julius Caesar). Many feared that her death would plunge England into the kind of chaos that had plagued England during the fifteenth-century Wars of the Roses. In an age when censorship would have limited direct commentary on these worries, Shakespeare could nevertheless use the story of Caesar to comment on the political situation of his day.
(II.ii.10-11). Caesar basically says that because he is so great and powerful, he will never be defeated. He also talks in third person, which is quite arrogant of a leader to do. Whenever people feel too anxious for leadership they may let it all go to their head, another reason why he turned into a tyrant. People need to watch for tyrannical or corrupt politicians as they can get too power hungry and cannot be stopped.
Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. Elements of Literature. Ed. Edwina McMahon et al. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1997.
He pauses while speaking of Rome’s love for Caesar to give himself time to reflect on his own feelings of sorrow and loss for Caesar: “Bear with me;/ My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,/ And I must pause till it come back to me” (913). So overcome with grief, Antony cries during this moment, showing his immense distress to the crowd: “Poor soul, his eyes are red as fire with weeping” (914). Antony and Caesar become sympathetic figures to the crowd, which begins to fin reason in Antony’s sayings. They begin to mock the conspirators, calling them traitors, villains, and murderers. Antony tells them to form a ring around Caesar’s body to read his will: “Shall I descend? And will you give me leave?” (916). Antony descends from the pulpit into the crowd, showing the bond the crowd has formed with Antony. Influenced by Antony’s continuing speech, the crowds respect for Antony soars and opinions on Caesar’s death begin to change: “Methinks there is much reason in his sayings./ If thou consider rightly of the matter,/ Caesar has had great wrong” (913). The crowd considers Antony the noblest man in Rome and while he descends down to their “level”, their respect for him ascends. By Antony’s actions and gestures, the crowd has grown more respect for him with a growing hatred for the
Bloom, Harold. William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. Chelsea House Publisher; Connecticut, New York, & Pennsylvania. 1988, Pg. #33 - 36
Julius Caesar was written in 1599 in England by William Shakespeare. Shakespeare has born in 1564 and died in 1616. Nobody really knows when exactly he was born but for the records it is assumed that he was born in April, creating an interesting coincidence with his death. He is the greatest writer of his century and probably of the modern era. He influenced many contemporary writers and created a new point of view in the poetry. He wrote 37 plays and 154 sonnets. In his work Julius Caesar Shakespeare shows us the change of power in Rome and the problems that Rome had there. Power is the ability to act with force. Shakespeare makes visible the abuse of power and the struggle to gain power in the biggest empire at the time. Shakespeare also shows that the power itself is more than a name or position. It is something that the people exercise. There is not absolute power, every power has limitations. Besides the servants every character in some way has his power. Although the biggest argument in Julius Caesar is the change of power in the rulers of Rome, Shakespeare tries to show us many different kinds of power and the use of it. As we can see during the play, people with power use power just for their convenience.
Shakespeare, William, Barbara A. Mowat, and Paul Werstine. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. New York: Washington Square, 1992. Print.
Shakespeare shows Caesar to be, what you could say, a contradiction. The audience see how Caesar respects Antony's soldier-ship yet still fights him; they see how he clearly loves his sister, but uses her unscrupulously as a political device; and they are shown how he is very rational and dull, yet he surprisingly tells his soldiers, as well as some Egyptians about how he would parade the defeated Cleopatra. He wants to do this because he feels that 'her life in Rome would be eternal in our triumph.' This shows the reader how Caesar has strong emotional outcries, which contrasts his initial characteristics.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is an intimate portrayal of the famed assassination of Julius Caesar and the complex inner workings of the men who committed the crime. In one particularly revealing scene, two of the men closest to Caesar, one a conspirator in his murder and one his second-in command, give orations for the deceased. Despite being simple in appearance, these two speeches do much of the work in developing and exposing the two characters in question. Though both have a love for Caesar, Mark Antony's is mixed with a selfish desire for power, while Brutus' is pure in nature, brought to a screeching halt by his overpowering stoicism. These starkly-contrasted personalities influence the whole of the play, leading to its tragic-but-inevitable end.
It was the citizens’ positive reaction to Caesar during his triumphant return after his victory over the sons of Pompey that fueled the fear of Caesar’s becoming king. The citizens’ opposition to Pompey’s allies caused great disturbances in the streets because a short while ago, Pompey was their hero. Now Caesar, victorious, is the hero of the hour. Their response also influenced the idea that Caesar was becoming too ambitious. Thus, the citizens of Rome had a role in the fate of Julius Caesar.