Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mastering mediation
Mastering mediation
Conclusion on the meditation of Marcus Aurelius
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Perceiving Life Differently
Three Favorite Passages from Meditations
Marcus Aurelius’ literary work, Mediations, has been seen throughout history as one of the most important literary works. It is similar to a journal, written by Aurelius during his life, about his life. Aurelius was a man who was unlike other emperors. While most other emperors disgraced themselves, he was an exception. There was no particular reason why he acted this way, and no external forces caused him to act this way. He was a man who could get whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted, and yet he didn’t use his power for his own benefit. He was afraid of doing what was wrong, and intended to live a life where he wouldn’t feel guilty about anything. He never wanted the things he wrote to be published; however they have given advice to many people over the years. Aurelius lived a lonely life, because there was no one as his equal, and anyone who talked to him was looking for something. Throughout the passages in Meditations, Aurelius makes a lot of really good observations.
I really like the message Marcus sends in book two of Meditations. He is giving himself a reminder that although we will spend every day running into people who may be awful to deal with, we shouldn’t be annoyed or frustrated with them. Everyone has faults, and he wanted himself to
…show more content…
recognize that. Life doesn’t last forever, and you shouldn’t spend the time you have on earth criticizing others just because they sin differently than you do. Aurelius also talks about death, and how it isn’t going to hurt us. He knows that after life we have nothing to fear. Also, he wanted himself to focus on his mind, what he saw as the most important part of us. We should not be selfish, or afraid of the future. As long as you keep your mind calm and let life come as it comes, you can live a life of happiness. As long as you free your mind, you will be free. Book three of Aurelius’ Meditations gives an important lesson of attention to detail. He says to pay attention to the little things, like the texture of different foods, or the cracks in a loaf of bread. Noticing things like the expressions of wild animals. The details that we shouldn’t pay attention to; however, are things like the gossip that others have, or our own gossip. We should only talk about things that we would not be embarrassed or guilty if the person found out. We should speak with happiness and love, and there will be happiness given in return. Aurelius believes that there is nothing better than telling the truth, and being kind to others, whether they are in your presence or not. In book five of Meditations, Aurelius poses a question: why do we love ourselves the most, but take everyone else’s opinions into greater consideration than our own? He believes that this is a mistake, that we should not try to impress the ones around us, but instead leave the earth being humble. We should not spend our entire lives trying to show others how well we do in our everyday life, but instead live a life to bring the others around you joy, and in turn you will be joyful as well. Aurelius’ strategy of spreading happiness to gain happiness is very inspiring. Often times people forget that it is their life that matters, not what others think of them. This does not mean you can do whatever you want and act obnoxiously toward others, but instead leave a positive mark on the world. Everyone will eventually leave the earth, and it is your decision whether or not you decide to leave it with light, or with darkness. Overall, Marcus Aurelius has many good points throughout Meditations.
He intended to live a life of no regret, only spreading positivity to others and within himself. He lived a life of temptation greater than anyone around him could ever have even imagined. Even though he faced these temptations, and had all of the tools he needed to get whatever he wanted, he didn’t let these things control his life, and was able to lead a life without regret, never being remorseful for his actions. Although he did not want these writings to be published, the literature that he produced changed the lives of many, and gives many lessons to its
readers.
light to his society as they believed that what's done individually but not collectively cannot be
...wn by the fact that in one of the books found with his corpse a he had written: “Happiness only real when shared (186).” One could interpret this as remorse, as him realizing—unfortunately too late—that he had made a tremendous mistake. At least he was man enough to face up to it, rather than to allow himself to die in denial; this merely vouches for his noble ways, because no arrogant imbecile would be able to admit a fault, even to themselves. This says it all, really: “Personal perception of perfection is like that. You see only what you want to see. After a while you just see what you need to (Good, 23).”
He begins with a declaration that “It is a sin to write this. [because] men may not write unless the Council of Vocations bid them so” (Rand, 17). Equality 7-2521 writes that he was born with a curse: He is different than the other men in his society. He lamented that “the learning was too easy”.
He tried to portray the world through the terms of compassion and hope, but at the same time “he was profoundly disturbed by the brutality of totalitarianism and the savagery of war,”
"...had one single goal--to become empty, to become empty of thirst, desire, dreams, pleasure and sorrow--to let the Self die. No longer to be Self, to experience the peace of an emptied heart, to experience pure thought..."
In the end, he gave away about 90% of his own money to various causes. He also preached to others to do the same as in giving money for education and sciences.The problem, however, was that there was such a contrast between the rich and the poor. By this he was referring to the inequalities in rights, hereditary powers, and such things. He also felt we should have a continuum of forward progress, i.e.
Human nature to him was best when it was unspoiled by external forces because of his belief that human beings are inherently good. He asserted that a person not tainted by society, but rather ruled by their own emotions, would end up being unselfish, a concept he termed the noble savage. By allowing freedom of personal growth to occur, a person’s ultimate desire would be to live peacefully amongst each other (Hergenhahn & Henley, 2014).
Baird and Kaufmann, the editors of our text, explain in their outline of Descartes' epistemology that the method by which the thinker carried out his philosophical work involved first discovering and being sure of a certainty, and then, from that certainty, reasoning what else it meant one could be sure of. He would admit nothing without being absolutely satisfied on his own (i.e., without being told so by others) that it was incontrovertible truth. This system was unique, according to the editors, in part because Descartes was not afraid to face doubt. Despite the fact that it was precisely doubt of which he was endeavoring to rid himself, he nonetheless allowed it the full reign it deserved and demanded over his intellectual labors. "Although uncertainty and doubt were the enemies," say Baird and Kaufmann (p.16), "Descartes hit upon the idea of using doubt as a tool or as a weapon. . . . He would use doubt as an acid to pour over every 'truth' to see if there was anything that could not be dissolved . . . ." This test, they explain, resulted for Descartes in the conclusion that, if he doubted everything in the world there was to doubt, it was still then certain that he was doubting; further, that in order to doubt, he had to exist. His own existence, therefore, was the first truth he could admit to with certainty, and it became the basis for the remainder of his epistemology.
He was at one point motivated by many good things like as virtue and honor, so much so that he wanted a companion to share in his happy life. “When I first sought it [sympathy], it was the love of virtue, the feelings of happiness and affec...
chose not to write in this way because he wanted to give a view of...
Does God exist? Philosophers and individuals alike have searched to find the answer to this question. Some may believe in resurrection, others in Dante’s Inferno, however philosophy aims to answer such ethical questions using skepticism as an approach. The premise of The Meditations by René Descartes, questions whether the immortal soul is real and if there is a God. Descartes concludes that God does exist, justifying his reasoning with the fact that he thinks. If one thinks, one exists. This conclusion leads to a discussion between the mind existing separately from matter. If one exists, one is mind. Immanuel Kant argues that morality is based on reason. Individuals act from maxims which are the basis to one’s rationale. Reason is universal.
what others thought of him. His life symbolized what a lot of people have gone
...t worried about this reputation. He worried about great men and the minds and ideas that they could create. Despite the challenges he faced, he "would rather be in hell and converse with great minds than live in paradise with that dull rabble."
...s is related to his philosophy about doing the right thing and about a being a good person. But it goes beyond this. He spoke often about having true compassion. It isn’t enough to help those in need, but we must truly care about them, to take a good look and see how they got that way. He asked us to examine how we as a society can change the conditions that led them to be there in the first place. Doing this makes us better as people. I have found that it also makes me feel better. Never give up on your dreams. While his life was cut tragically short, he died in pursuit of his dream and in spite of everything he faced, he never gave up on it. He faced obstacles I could never imagine having to face, and still persisted. This reminds me that the small things in my life that often seem insurmountable, are just my excuses for not taking action and are not obstacles.
Marcus Aurelius was a famous philosopher in 121 through 180 C.E. He lived a hard life and even though he was surrounded by crowds he was considered a recluse. He was known for his kindness and mercy. The last years of his life were spent on a military campaign. It is said that these years were the hardest and loneliest. However, instead of becoming bitter and angry Aurelius wrote The Meditations. This was a diary or journal of his personal thoughts. He believed that by writing this it was his duty to his soul. The Meditations, is a popular piece of stoic literature. In this paper I will be describing how Aurelius used stoicism in book two of The Meditations and what I liked and did not like about what he said.