An Analysis Of George Kent's Poem 'To The Universe'

866 Words2 Pages

In a post-slavery, capitalist nation such as ours, there are two experiences: that of the in-crowd and that of the out. The in crowd has innate privilege of which they are ignorant. The out crowd experiences all manner of cruelty and hardship as they are denied entrance into the in crowd; they must, then, decide whether to fight for their rights or to leave. These are the thoughts that have been rattling around in my mind not only throughout this semester, but ever since I truly encountered the out crowd’s experience my freshman year, with the Ferguson riots. My high school education taught me to problem-solve by building a procedure and following it, but what happens when the procedure isn’t working? What happens when riots and demonstrations …show more content…

There is a kind of enviable surety and serenity in both sources. Aristotle speaks in quite a self-assured manner, which has the whispers naiveté about it, as though he has never encountered resistance to his ideas. Similarly, Kent’s painting bears the whimsy of a man who is rarely denied anything and who believes himself the ruler of all he surveys; the figure’s body is physically perfect and pure, bearing no indication of a struggle to get to the crest of whatever mountain he is standing on. It was easy. The first verse of my poem suggests a similar white man, who would rather sit atop his mountain, with a waterfall of magic, than deal with another person’s …show more content…

In Amarion’s eyes and posture, there is a reserved hope. His bravery to stand in front of an imposing line of white police officers suggests defiance, but also a hope that they will not harm him; however, it is clear in his eyes and his posture—hands clasped as if in prayer in front of him—that he is unsure. Additionally, the academic contributions of Orlando Patterson, particularly his statements regarding those “third parties not directly involved in the slave relation who stood by and accepted it” (8), which touches on the third party’s choice to not get involved. Thus, my second verse depicts that very choice as “man [destroying] his chance to turn a harrowing world to one of

Open Document