Amyloid-Beta Theory

1133 Words3 Pages

Although the early-onset AD related to specific genetic mutations seem to have a stronger relationship to the AβH, it only accounts for less then 5% of the cases (Knopman, 2014). The other cases, classified as late-onset AD, have not be fully understood only with the advent of the AβH, although both types of AD bear plaques and tangles, hallmarks of the disease. I. What is the real role of Aβ? One of the most refutable arguments against the amyloid-beta theory is that a considerate amount of elders, particularly above 70 years of age, have amyloid plaques with no cognitive decline (Corrada et al., 2012). It is estimated that about 1/3 of old age persons without in vivo diagnosis of AD or any other dementia, have brain histopathological features …show more content…

Braak & Braak established in 1998 that tangles are seen before plaques in the AD brain. Furthermore, this study observed a greater association between the amount of tangles and disease progression than when comparing the second with the quantity of plaques (Giannakopoulos et al., 2003). Besides these findings, plaques and tangles also seem to emerge from distinct areas within the brain. Tangles firstly appear in the limbic system, area that is extremely related to memory processing, and then spread to cortical regions (Pimpilikar, 2009). Differently, plaques are primarily found in the frontal cortex and then ranges the entire cortical region as disease progresses (Pimpilikar, 2009). Thus, their deposition seems to be temporally disconnected. This disruption between the presence of plaques and tangles is a caveat in the AβH, since the premises within the hypothesis are not able to explain the connection between the pathological hallmarks of the …show more content…

Since the immune response plays an important role in Aβ pathogenesis, the presence of anti- Aβ antibodies could prevent the formation of amyloid plaques (Dodart et al., 2002). A few clinical trials testing Aβ vaccination were discontinued because 6% of the subjects presented aseptic meningoencephalitis, which is a severe adverse effect (Orgogozo et al., 2013). In one study however, by Hock et al. in 2003, AD patients immunized twice presented a slower progression of cognitive decline when compared to non-immunized patients, within the year of

More about Amyloid-Beta Theory

Open Document